Scynce LED Raging Kush Review and PAR Testing 

@@adamseider4078 this is not correct. You only need to connect to the light when sending a change command (dimming, spectrum tune, or loading an updated recipe). The internal memory stores the recipe or current setting forever, so unless you are changing settings there is never a need for a wifi or network connection.

any updates?

Tim Turk the best part of waking up is Folgers in you're cup.. 😁

These lights cant be measured properly with a par meter because the direction of the light is cast sideways not directly down. If you tilt the PAR meter sideways you get a better reading.

why u want IR? they heat up plants

@@PoulJulle-wb9iu a/c

No IR

@@casconie solid argument. add 1, subtract 1

@KUSH 6enius I will look for info on this, I have not heard anything about genetic potential effect

@Game Changer .. Bond was referring to how the 120 degree optics angle the light instead of sending it straight down. Thus Eric briefly showed this. Kind of. Eric lifted the meter ... unfortunately he didn't tilt it though to show how the meter would pick up the angled light. This would have picked up some very interesting and positive par numbers all would marvel at. ScynceLED has a video here on their RU-vid channel explaining this w/ regard to accurate par meter readings and a very informative demonstration. Check it out!

the Grower's Choice ROI-E680

Yes

SCYNCE

I went with the Slim 600h.. 10 year warranty. All lights in this range will need co2 to maximize 75+% power and ppfd distance.. So, Slim600h made more sence

RAGING KUSH.

Both lights give me a boner

I’m in same exact predickament

Did you decide yet?

@@S0URSH0ES I’m set on the optic led slim 650s for sure. Haven’t got it yet, but I’m definitely doing the slim

@@vadim666er just yesterday I ordered the Raging Kush 🤙

Yes

@@handofgod9386 yes is notnan answer to my question...lol

Matthew Bolton yes, yes.

Not when using artificial lighting. Outdoors uva and uvb make a difference because there’s so much of it. However, in a grow light, it’s not going to provide enough Uv to make a noticeable difference.

@KUSH 6enius Appreciate your response! Our commercial bids are extremely competitive vs other top shelf fixtures, and in fact consistently come in less than competitors who offer zero future-proofing (smart tech/water-sealed) or wireless spectrum tuning. It's true that our core business is not the home grower, but we feel we are the best value in the industry when you consider what you getting a 5yr warranty on. Thanks again

@KUSH 6enius HLG Saber 100 = LM301B bars with 660 nm reds in 4' bars IP66 Waterproof as well

@Soo KUSH'd Out Impressive lights most definitely. Being 100% submersible under water and still being able to operate won it over for me.

@@ScynceLED about to buy a few of these to test out myself

You have no chance at making this yourself lol scynce FTW

Blop Jones hps is about 4000 btu at 1000 watts. Which is about 1000 watts to cool, so hps uses close to double what you’re lighting with.

Growing stadium style, but with horizontal HPS, I have seen the largest yields from individual plants were from those plants that were at a 45-70 ish degree angle from the light source. Plants directly under the light source never grew or finished as well as those on a diagonal to the light. I believe it was from better light penetration/coverage to more area of the plant than from straight above. Stadium style with multiple vertical HPS had better yields than the same number of lights separated into individual Colosseum setups. I believe this was because of the overlapping light spreads. This (expensive) light appears to me to do both of the above. Only thing is, when messing with the spectrum power and ratios I think I'd need to invest in a Par meter as well so that if I changed the spectrum to say 60/40 red/blue or 80/20 etc I would know how high to position the lights to get the desired PPFD.

@@victorsupreme214 very valid point, but par meters dont work on their lights (they're inaccurate) They have a video about why.

@@SolventlessBakenVape Yup seen that video. I think what they were saying was to angle the receptor towards the direction of the light source ie. where the lenses are directing the majority of the light to. Suppose I could use the tried and true method of lowering it until the plants have a spazz then lifting it up 6 inches lol

Did they have it too far away or did they cram too many plants under the light??

@@antoniareitinger942 probably too far or the strain was just that crap strain..cause these lights are the cutting edge of cannabis light science!

@@richardforbes943 i want one so bad

yep it cheaper to buy weed than grow it

@Wojciech Kamiński soon we will have cheap imports from a lot of countries, the stuff from Israel, is good for your health

@@haroldvonhelms8304 lmfao. I calculate my electricity cost per gram of bud and it comes to between 21 and 22 cents a gram. Yes the upfront cost of lights can be expensive but you get your money back and then some after your 1st harvest. If this light is too rich for your blood the check out the panthrix by crecer ligting or the diy version of the 4 bar 600 watt chilled growcraft both or 700$ and free shipping to the lower 48 states.

how lmao

Some people can't afford Bugatti.

Also UL, FCC, RoHS, and CSA certified for those running commercial facilities and require insurance

Awwww, broke boi

@Fish Sandwich yet you spend your time here lol. wheres your 2gpw+ grow log

@Fish Sandwich Dude some people just grow for fun or medicine. Not everyone's a professional grower, although everyone wants the best for their garden so get your head out of your ass. I bet you've never even pulled 4,000lb in an outdoor season so shut it, we all start somewhere.