Note: This is not the full testimony from U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle. The stream ended early to make way for Vice President Kamala Harris’s remarks at the White House NCAA event. Watch more of the testimony here: ru-vid.comQLgCBAC852s?feature=share
“Can you please confirm your name?” “I appreciate the question. We in the Secret Service take names very seriously “ “Can you tell us what you ate for breakfast?” “I’ll need to refer you to the FBIs ongoing investigation’
Even if it wasn’t intended. So many things had to happen for that to have been possible, and regular people recognized what was happening and still, nothing was done.
Very simply. You just ask someone to interview every person at the rally and you won't have all the information until that task is done and reports are written up.
Well all details I understand why does wouldn't have but she had next to no details, she's almost as ignorant on the issues as someone who's living under a rock and didn't know about July 13th attempt. Or at least the way she wants to be portrayed sure she knows more she's letting on, and if something was classified she could have simply said so, interesting to note she refused to answer questions she answered on live television.
@@uToop Conspiracy just means "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful." Why wouldn't we use a word that describes something accurately?
Who sincerely believes more govt could ever be the answer to anything? Be it MORE agencies created, MORE agents hired, MORE field offices built, MORE regulations put in place, paying MORE licensing fees (usually to get the govt’s blessing to happiness l), paying MORE fines (usually financial punishment for having the audacity to not to pay forementioned fees before doing something)… I can’t think of a scenario where MORE government is ever an answer
As someone who wants to be law enforcement this is the worst hearing I have ever seen from the director of any law enforcement agency! This is sad and unacceptable!
Once again, Raskin deflects from the issue of who is responsible for the failure to protect a political candidate, only to promote the disarmament of law abiding citizens, and to denying their 2nd amendment rights.
What good would a resignation do? She's possibly guilty of multiple crimes. Quitting her job is not the punishment you think it is. If she isn't guilty of any state or federal crimes, she is most certainly guilty of gross incompetence. She can and will be forcibly removed from her position, and that is far more damaging than a resignation. At any rate, prison time must be mandatory for the individual or individuals who signed off on that security detail. A new Army recruit could draw up a range card in 10 minutes, and every building or location of cover/concealment within 450 meters (absolute minimum) would be recorded on that range card. There is no possible excuse that any human could use for ignoring the only possible raised position in that entire area. I looked at it on Google Earth; it's one of the easiest places to defend, with just one group of buildings to cover. There weren't thousands of windows to cover, or dozens of rooftops.
the question is : who this secret service director is protecting by not answering the questions? Who asked her to keep the roof access free for the shooter? This will end such as epstein case, a fake suicide.
The FBI asked her...they wanted to look like heroes... secret service also....both agencies are fully corrupt there's nothing they won't do to make themselves look good ..both institutions are ran by sociopathic narcissists it's all about looking good...same with the NSA and CIA...a bunch of sociopathic men running it ..they killed JFK....google John Stockwell former CIA agent who confirmed the CIA killed Kennedy.... Honey the word on the street is people want these institutions gone so they gotta make themselves look like valor's and victors to keep their jobs, salaries and budget...100% inside job
She should absolutely know everything there should be no need for an investigation, she should ask people for what happened. It may not be factual but it would help this a lot more cause 90% of her answers were "I do not have that factual answer." Also she should know why there weren't any over watch. She should also know when they figured out there was a shooter because they knew the shooter was up there about 10 minutes from the first shot because from a different video it is heard that she says "Do not shoot as he is not a threat at this time" And obviously it was. The shooter on the roof behind trump (I believe the secret service) did not shoot but saw the shooter and was told not to shoot him by the SS Director. It was mainly her fault at this and no one else's. Also they have Billions of dollars and about 8000 Employes ONLY, they can't protect the former president and do their 1 JOB. They do mainly 1 thing which is to protect our leaders or former leaders and they failed that 1 job. They should also have way better guns if they have that much money, they should also be able to afford more snipers to help protect the president from different angles because they said the slope on the building was the biggest thing that stopped them but if they had a different angle on it they could then get the shot off and not worry about Donald Trump getting shot. This was one of the most avoidable assassination attempts there is no reason that this should have happened, if Trump died this would be a lot bigger and she would be fired within 1 day, they also would have listened to what she said on the Radio to the SS when she told them to not shoot she would be gone. She is the worst person we could have possibly put at SS Director, she was bullshitting the entire conference, we all know she has answers just doesn't want to tell the congress cause she knows she will be fired.
In my opinion people still can get any guns no matter if there there is a bill to past for guns.There are many people that sell gun weapons illegally money talks , money busy
It is brutally painful to watch these democrats take the 5 minutes that they have to ask the director of secret service about questions gun laws which she has absolutely nothing to do with. This is your opportunity to hold her accountable for actual specific major issues that took place on July 13.
Your DEI at work. How is someone guarding Doritos qualified to run the Secret Service? I am sure there are plenty candidates are way more qualified than her.
Who is the lady in the black hat behind Trump that ignores gunshots to record the attempt on trumps life, the second question that needs to be asked is why so many stock shorting took place the day before!
Yeah, we need to stop focusing on our 2nd amendment when it comes to focusing on taking away our 2nd amendment. Do your job. Id rather see our president in a glass box with ac on the stage than we lose our rights because of 1 out of 360,000,000 it is to easy for forign soldiers to take over houses if we lose our 2nd amendment. When foreign soldiers take over houses, it becomes very hard to win against them.
There you go with your gender politics... instead of choosing the best for the job you chose the political correct gender and promoted Kimberly to secret service director... Are you going to vote/choose Kamala also? please....lol
