Seeing Cell Division Like Never Before 

Truly amazing

Same

Yeah same. But I am not surprised that RU-vid recommended me that.

Unlike the 10 year old vids… lol

Literally dude, this is the first video of the day for me.

Yup! Although, the first imaging of DNA was made by Rosalind Franklin in 1952. (Was stolen by two male collegues)

@@tvre0 what does that have to do with his comment lol

And yet I can’t still can’t play minecraft with shaders on… 😢

@@bolson42 we have been able to observe insanely small objects for a while

@@Tester-sh1mn use more than 4 gigs of ram

Is it possible for a consumer to own an EM microscope? I would like to study aging outside of academic institutions so I can be more creative and exploratory.

@@SogMoseeit would be EXTREMELY expensive, not to mention how you acquire the materials you would need to study. What exactly do you mean by exploratory study of aging?

@@SogMosee you need money or good networking

It’s crazy bc I was in AP Bio 8 years ago, and always wonder what advancements have been made and what new concepts you are learning that we didn’t!

I got my B.S. in Biology 40 years ago, back when we still thought illnesses were caused by demons or an imbalance of bodily humors, lol...I'm ECSTATIC about how the biological sciences have progressed in the ensuing decades. We usually only had idealized artist's rendition of a cell in our textbooks or a blurry look through a microscope...these new technologies are Star Trek...!

That’s incredible

@@bluedreamyellowblack4745 I took ap bio as a senior in 1990. We learned about the miasma theory of illnesses.

Same I'm taking a test on mitosis and cell division tmr as well!

Yeah ! 🙂

No it isnt

@@matttzzz2 Then why are you here?

It's not actually under a microscope you can't really see anything it's all part of the plan look into it

@@matttzzz2 don't watch the video then

Ah, consider old starpictures. Microscopes and telescopes progress almost equally. A single pixel can make a difference. One of the voyager crafts that was leaving waaaay the bloody hell out there caught a lucky shot at one of the oldest rocks we know about. Two frames, of one star being blotted out, or something bullspit like that, got us the data we needed to pull off a shot that boggles the mind with how tight the calculations needed to be, and how quickly they needed to be ready to get there in time. You know, one of those Two-Stone potatoes, but it's OOOOLD and still in pretty good shape cuz it's so far out there. I swear they're trying to one-up eachother now.

Most of the science imagery you see was captured in black and white and false-colored later.

will only take about 50 years lol

@中村奈々 why not? You don't like to learn?

@@burnburnfirefire learning is for nerds. I prefer fortnight 😎

@@matttzzz2 tf 😂

@@burnburnfirefire i hate having to learn anything biology related, everything is way too specific

relatable

but with this multiplication comes division so you're also breaking up something if you're using that analogy

@@timelyseeker I hear the stupid "it's a joke" comments from a distance.

@@timelyseeker basically his 1 single problem itself has another 100 problem as the root cause of the main problem..

lmao 😭💀

Incorrect

@@Dad-lu1oi what is incorrect about that? ATP does support our metabolism/life, mitochondria likely was engulfed bacteria that developed an endosymbiotic relationship with early eukaryotes (hence mitochondria having their own DNA distinct from nuclear DNA that allows it a level of self-autonomy not present in other organelles) although I suspect the interaction was less asking for consent and more bigger cell “eating” the smaller cell

@@cahan557 There is no definable endosymbiotic relationship that can subsequently write the obligate genetics instructions (code) in the correct place, timing and in the required amount that is then left on it's own for creation, let alone duplication of a double-membraned bacteria. The code responsible for duplication is currently beyond our comprehension despite simplistic thinking it's "likely" a big cell eating a small cell which then figured out the obligate relationship and wrote DNA segment code out to perfectly execute duplication. DNA code over huge expanses of time decreases in complexity by dropping genetic instructions, in other words, it degrades, not improves. DNA code, mitochondrial and nuclear, is so far beyond our comprehension to recreate, let alone create from scratch, despite advances in mapping and successes/failures in DNA manipulation. We can finally map the DNA sequences but it's anybody's guess what all the combinations do or affect. Science just isn't there yet, but we're working on it.

@@SpaceCadet4Jesus Still, you really can't discount how Republicans appropriated viral genes through horizontal gene transfer. How else would you explain their effect on the environment?

@@dangerfly Think Uncle Joe could use a viral gene pick-me-up? The Republicans might be happy to give it to him.

The belief in a Creator starts from here.

Maybe because a less than perfect split would result in cells that aren't viable, cells that wouldn't do their work correctly etc, so cells evolved and ended up with this type of perfected split which allows them to do their job properly? I'm so fed up with people trying to justify anything they don't understand or find "amazing" with some unproven creator crap. Seriously. Everything that seems 'perfect' today may just be the result of many failures in the very distant past. Cells are one of the oldest things on this planet, I honestly don't find it weird at all that they eventually perfected themselves and reached the current level, in which they form pretty advanced organisms. By believing in gods, people just undermine the incredible progress of these amazing, fascinating little things. Because it's easier to say that some other life form came up with this "design". It's definitely easier than trying to understand how cells work and how they could have ended up forming the organisms we see today. But that's just for lazy and/or dumb people

@@dipteeshukla7 Only if you are naive.

@@dipteeshukla7 Then, who is the creator of creator?

@@avigamer7285 Things which are created have a creator, God always existed.

I’m just liking and replying so the algorithm knows I like this stuff lmao

Maybe in case the algorithm is in a good mood.

This is the creation of our lord praise to him😍

@@apollo1573 smart. doing the same rn

Agree, but I wish they would stop sending me CRAP VERTICAL stuff. I have repeatedly asked them to send nothing on my feed that is CRAP VERTICAL, but I still keep getting the trash that I routinely downvote and skip without watching. Together we can stop this vertical stuff ruining RU-vid.

In about 20 years

@@arnavpoddar 😂

@@arnavpoddar Agreed bro.

More like text holograms

@@snowpea98 so much more annoying than tactile data. The endless uses of paper and how integral it is to the act of human invention is gonna slap you in the face really hard in 20 years Sculptors still sculpt in clay first before going to 3d model... cause things made strictly in 3d models are usually ugly as sin and even if they aren't then they still don't have the wow factor.

it depends on the bacteria and temperature. for example e coli takes 30 mins to reproduce

E coli divides every 18 to 20 minutes

@@alexschannel7514 the generation time is closer to 20 minutes in ideal conditions

@@juliee593 Jeebus Crust How horrifying

@@silverseth7 how so? Most strands of E. coli are harmless. You have them in your gut and they help you digest. And those ideal conditions for a 20 minute generation time only really happen in labs, when scientists are purposefully trying to make bacteria reproduce as fast as possible. I've done it as a 2nd year undergrad student. It's not really dangerous or scary.

I mean, we can see atoms in a pretty clear image for quite a while

Nah silly it’s the 21st century

Do you think they have regenerative medicine or substances that they’ve made?

Suffering and dying must always be a part of life though. It's only fair humans get it too. A world without diseases is far from the "heaven on earth" that most people think of. If no one got sick, there would be other problems. Humans are already in too high numbers, diseases serve a good purpose, that's just the objective truth.

You do know that anti-biotics also kill parts of you right? Good bacteria is part of you as well and that part dies when you take anti-biotics. Also chances are that better anti-biotics just result in evolution to an bacteria resistant to anti-biotic resistant anti-biotics... maybe one day we'll have perfect control over anti-biotics but for now it's just an arms race. Not to say we shouldn't develop these but this time we should absolutely require serious prescriptions to use them because god damn was the general public incredibly irresponsible with regular anti-biotics.

@@TheInfectous Between doctors over prescribing antibiotics to overuse in dairy and meat we created a worse problem than necessary.

By the time we find the cure for cancer, the bad bacteria resistant to antibiotics will be a bigger problem to deal with. With this breakthrough, there's hope that that worse-case scenario won't happen.

It takes a village :)

JESUS LOVES YOU PLS REPENT OF LUKEWARMNESS AND SIN AND EMBRACE CHRIST HE IS THE ONLY WAY TRUTH AND THE LIFE. YOUR MY OUR DAY OF JUDGEMENT MIGHT COME AT ANY MOMENT REPENT. ETERNITY IS FAR TO LONG TO GET IT WRONG.

Biology student here, thank you for maintaining our internet connections, we wouldn't get anything done without you

Also I'm glad we can have more diversity and allow women in these spaces, we can get a lot done and more research

Not sure where you're getting that impression. An article I found says "DNA replication of E. coli cells growing with doubling times of between 20 and 60 min takes about 40 min. After termination of DNA replication, the cell needs another 20 min to divide into two daughter cells."

@@darrentibbils9271 cells need 60 min to reproduce? 💀

i think you’re mistaken with the idea that cell division happens so quickly, it can take several minutes or even hours as darren says. nevertheless it’s fascinating that we can capture it in 3D :)

Cell division is not that fast, this is closer to real time than you might expect. DNA replication occurs a lot faster than we imagine it though.

What kind of uneducated stupid misinformation is this? An average bacteria divide about every 20 min. Unless your eye take 20 min to blink, it is not quicker than "a blink of an eye". Why are people liking your comment and why is your comment even existing in the first place when you clearly don't know what you're talking about? SO MUCH IDIOTS SMH

You can read their paper for free, it has a lot of details. The title is "Cell wall synthesis and remodelling dynamics determine division site architecture and cell shape in Escherichia coli", published in Nature Microbiology.

Ha bro sahi kaha Kya tum dropper ho?

Really? Didn't you play with soap bubbles when you were a kid and observe how they form and divide?

@@riproar11 did you observe their molecular structure back then?

"Cancer" is not a disease nor a single entity. It is a symptom of hundreds of diseases that will never be cured all at once.

@@mikemondano3624 it's just dna mutation so stfu

Learn to enjoy life in the present and don't hold your breath that the future is going to be some incredibly advanced place. Cars and furniture styles change. Modern architecture makes an area seem sterile. Before mobile devices and social media grew, one would observe that not much has really changed. Social media and mobile devices have done great damage to where I have observed someone have a tantrum because their Facebook post didn't receive enough likes.

@@riproar11 what is to say I can’t enjoy the present _and_ be excited for the future? The fact of the matter is that we’ve advanced so quickly over the past couple of decades and our advancement is getting faster and faster, so I’m excited to see what the future holds. Social media has its flaws, but overall, it’s been great for humanity and is very important.

@@xXmlgamingXx355 When I was a kid my parents bought me lots of books that discussed space travel and the future. At the time, the books made me not appreciate the present and even resent it. I remember many of the illustrations and now see them are being quite silly with the way they imagined the clothing people would wear and moving sidewalks. That's the last thing people would need in a world with rising obesity. 62 Million in China. Other than city skylines, automobile styling and medical techniques, everything else will look about the same in 2042. Sadly, there will be those who cannot appreciate their reality and will become addicts of virtual reality.

There is no real future for humans. They will soon be gone. But what happens after would be great to see.

You could specify for E. coli's outermost layer specifically (and avoid human cells) by biochemically targeting its NAM-NAG crosslinkages. These NAM-NAG crosslinkages are present only in the type of bacteria that E. coli is so adding specificity for that trait would allow you to avoid human cells during administration of your drug. Granted, targeting this crosslink would hit other friendly colonies of bacteria that inhabit the various other microbiomes in our body that share this crosslinkage trait, but we may just have to accept that as collateral damage in order to fight off a more deadly infection. 🤷‍♂

@@Waeweas so does it mean that the outer membrane of E. coli is the reason why our immune system could not detect and kill these bacteria?

@@Waeweas Microbiologist has entered the chat.

@@Cryptofearia i am the storm that is approaching

@@Waeweas you may avoid human cell but what about our gut microbiome ,,,, what a shame that most research centers still don't invest more in investigations of bacteriophage therapy

and also terrifying

That's some 10 to 20 times sped up footage

What do you mean in just seconds? It takes above 20 minutes. It's sped up.

@@Izanagioomikami Oh i thought it wasnt sped up

@@hyp3r764 Nope, sorry to disappoint. But 20 min is still fast compared to human cells that takes one day on average.

Not "that" complicated but indeed too complicated for kids.

I love you jesus

How is this a verified account

Imagine youself one of the Wright Brothers an hour before that first flight. What's it really like to fly, now medecine has flown in this respect. I'm sure this is a dummied down version of what all the boffins concluded but separate labs must verify things before spouting off on the new possibilities. Or else they can scare away funding. Not always easy predicting the future even when you see it for your very eyes.

Me neither 😂

Algorithm. But im happy I got this in my reccomended even whrn I only do follow dumb meme and reaction channels. I like biology a lot, got into it more when I took advenced biology for 3 years. But I study ee engineering 🤠

Martian Belle

cringe

Mars looks like a pretty good rock to me. Still gotta find out more about it though

millenial comment