Тёмный

Shifting from Economic Neoliberalism to Economic Nationalism - Global Capitalism with Richard Wolff 

Democracy At Work
Подписаться 397 тыс.
Просмотров 16 тыс.
50% 1

The U.S. reached global dominance as an advocate of neoliberalism and globalization, a champion of free-trade and open markets. But as Prof Wolff argues we have now entered into a phase of rampant economic nationalism. Why? Because capitalists searching for profit, who once turned to the U.S., found greater gains elsewhere, including in China. Now, a desperate U.S. turns away from the policies that are now undercutting them, and pivots to government intervention to stop the bleeding.
“The government is literally brought in because it seems that the American leadership has given up on globalization.”
In the full lecture, Prof Wolff explains how this is one piece of understanding not just the military war in Ukraine, but the larger economic war between the U.S. and China. Watch the full lecture here...
Global Capitalism: The Second War In Ukraine [January 2023]: • Global Capitalism: The...
______________________________________________________________________________________
We make it a point to provide the show free of ads. Please consider supporting our work.
Join our Patreon community: / democracyatwork
Become a monthly donor via our website: www.democracyatwork.info/donate
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Join us for our next live event! The hosts of our podcast All Things Co-op will be ready and eager to answer your questions LIVE on Friday, January 27th from 1-2pm ET.
www.democracyatwork.info/ask_...
Learn more about other events from d@w: www.democracyatwork.info/events

Опубликовано:

 

21 янв 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 186   
@LightlyEarthy
@LightlyEarthy Год назад
Very clearly stated. I recall when I was working at a garden flag factory when the boss's son came in with a stop watch and timed how long our jobs took. They were simultaneously speaking with "our man in China" and then the small factory moved there.
@michaelkilcommons57
@michaelkilcommons57 Год назад
Anyone who still believes in the benefits of free market capitalism as I did in the early 1980's Reagan Revolution and does not understand that we had the wool pulled over our eye by a very sophisticated group of confidence men really is not paying attention or is out of touch with reality.
@elainegoad9777
@elainegoad9777 Год назад
Thank you Professor Wolff. I look to you to understand whats going on .
@dyrectory_com
@dyrectory_com Год назад
He definitely know to how explain using lay person language. Unlike Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, etc.
@tanujSE
@tanujSE Год назад
Wish Professor Richard Wolff good times with struggle
@1337Frederick
@1337Frederick Год назад
I appreciate the talk. The good professor is always thinking of our best interests. I would argue, though, that there is no slow down of neoliberalism, and in fact it is only being redirected. The outsourcing of labor to Mexico and places like India have picked up pace recently. Labor in Mexico is actually 70 percent cheaper than most nations. The subsidies are designed as a form of corporate welfare system that will keep the corporations afloat, until they can relocate to more favored foreign locations. I would also argue that the world has never before seen a transition from liberal markets until World War ensues. This is only a trick of the global elite, to fool us into placation until they get the hate ball rolling again full steam ahead.
@cheri238
@cheri238 Год назад
Excellent!!!! 💯
@marcionphilologos5367
@marcionphilologos5367 Год назад
NO, THE US AND GB OLIGARCHIC ELITES ARE CONFUSED BY THE FACT THAT NEO-LIBERALISM IS FAILING AND CHINESE SOCIALISM IS RISING. SO, THEY PUSHED TRUMP AND BIDEN TO START THE TRADE-WAR AND PROTECTIONISM OF AI WITH CHINA. BUT THE SOCIAL PROBLEMS OF THE US, LIKE CRIME/ DRUGS/ POVERTY/ INEQUALITY/ INDIVIDUALISM/ OUTDATE RELIGION/ UGLY INFRASTRUCTURE/ BAD PUBLIC TRANSPORT ETC. ARE NOT SOLVED AND FURTHER WILL ACCUMULATE. THEN WILL COME A REVOLUTION IN WHICH THE OUTDATED PATRIARCHAL AND FINANCIAL ELITES AND THE US MILITARY ARE DESTROYED. VICTORY TO SOCIO-CAPITALISM. (THE WORKERS, ENTREPENEURS, STATE OFFICIALS UNITED)
@ProleDaddy
@ProleDaddy Год назад
Sounds like fascism. I agree that the U.S. is quite fascist and much of the rest of G20 nations to a more or lesser extent.
@marcionphilologos5367
@marcionphilologos5367 Год назад
@@ProleDaddy ONE HAS TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF FASCISM FROM THE INTERBELLUM, AND FASCISM AS THE TERM USED FOR OLIGARCHIC ELITES, SUPPRESSING SOCIALISM OUT OF CONSERVATISM IN THE 60/70S. ONE HAS ALSO TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN NAZI IDEOLOGY, BASED ON PROTECTING PEOPLE AND CULTURE AGAINST MATERIALISM BY ALL MEANS, AND NAZI-PRACTICES, REFERRING TO CRUEL AND REPRESSIVE ACTS AGAINST ALIENS AND COMMUNIST. HISTORY IS DIALECTIC, AND IT IS STUPID TO DEFINE NAZISM AS EVIL. ALL SUFFERING BY PEOPLE IN HISTORY IS CAUSED BY THEIR OWN BEHAVIOUR AND KARMA. IF YOU LIVE BY THE SWORD YOU WILL DIE BY THE SWORD. IF YOU LIVE FOR ANARCHO COMMUNISM YOU WILL DIE BY RIGHT WING FORCES.
@jerronng6036
@jerronng6036 Год назад
In another words US govt n oligatds priced itself out of US middle n lower income US citizens to earn profits .
@nihleigleca6702
@nihleigleca6702 Год назад
Spot-on
@AO-ow6tt
@AO-ow6tt Год назад
How can the world respect a country that walked back from their own moral values and is hypocritically using double standards and selfishness in its relations with countries in the world?
@comradetrashpanda8777
@comradetrashpanda8777 Год назад
Thr US Empire never walked back it's moral values. It never had them to begin with
@beastmode8203
@beastmode8203 Год назад
@@comradetrashpanda8777 fuck the left.
@cheri238
@cheri238 Год назад
Exactly correct 💯
@800_k_7
@800_k_7 Год назад
Let face it, President Donald trump's was the first to declare a trade war with China before and after he took office. Declare that most of the third world country are ship hose and Mexico and Canada were taking advantage of the trade deal. Thus we all suspect that COVID was introduced by China to topple president Donald trump's. Let face it, the world and our civilization have chosen war, rather than peaceful coexisting. God have mercy 🙏
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
@@beastmode8203 The left is now a part of the right.
@TennesseeJed
@TennesseeJed Год назад
I wish it had ended, instead of starting, as I entered the wage slavery system in 1980. Oh well, another waisted two generations.
@Googlag
@Googlag Год назад
Now it will only be like this. Each generation will live worse than the previous one. After all, you don't know anything better than capitalism). Now eat with a full spoon.
@marywest6844
@marywest6844 Год назад
Interesting conversation.
@floro7687
@floro7687 Год назад
Well, US politics have basically been leaning towards corporatism for quite a few years now.
@bobbafett1849
@bobbafett1849 Год назад
Since the Gilded Age actually
@cheri238
@cheri238 Год назад
Since the beginning of the creation of this country, I don't know, I could be wrong. Any arguments of debate? Lol Read American and world histories, philosophy, religious divisions, science, and books starting centuries ago. 📚
@LongDefiant
@LongDefiant Год назад
East India Company was corporatism.
@sentientnatalie
@sentientnatalie Год назад
@@LongDefiant A reminder, corporatism is just capitalism.
@LongDefiant
@LongDefiant Год назад
@@sentientnatalie yes, that's why I mentioned the organization that's considered to signify the birth of capitalism.
@sandramaria-ml8ne
@sandramaria-ml8ne Год назад
Bravo!
@NotKnafo
@NotKnafo Год назад
government is good as long as its a proletarian dictatorship
@peterfu529
@peterfu529 Год назад
Awesome
@dyrectory_com
@dyrectory_com Год назад
I have shared this video... 💡
@paulyandle6081
@paulyandle6081 Год назад
Love the Gilet Jaune vest on the wall. Vivre les Francais.
@NoJusticeMTG
@NoJusticeMTG Год назад
"Proletariat! i hope you're ready for mouthwatering capitalism!" "i thought you said we were having socialism" "Oh no, I said 'socialism with chinese characteristics'. That's what i call capitalism."
@MrDXRamirez
@MrDXRamirez Год назад
Maybe this generation thinks it is modifying the old circumstances it inherited with a completely changed activity. But from the looks of it. Its really a generation continuing the traditional activity under completely changed circumstances.
@Nosirrbro
@Nosirrbro Год назад
I would say given how the american imposition of global neoliberalism is still incredibly impactful on the current economic and governmental systems of many many countries worldwide, such as in south america where it was violently imposed by direct regime change, while i agree we are seeing this shift i would say declaring the shift complete to be an exaggeration to the point of being incorrect. For similar reasons, i think claiming that the shift away from the US as the global neoliberal hegemon is complete is also incorrect. But i absolutely agree that the shifts in these directions are happening, and happening fast.
@michael511128
@michael511128 Год назад
Economic Nationalism seems to the attitude of some not many. In the beginning yes factories was a main feature but so were the Chinese markets. They needed all sorts of basic technologies and machines for oil, electricity, transportation, chemicals, steel, construction works, agriculture that US blue chip manufacturers could send. China had to play along with the US routine of borrowing from the World Bank to buy US machines to build the basic infrastructure for the US to move their there to exploit their cheap labour. After a decade the Chinese consumers market began and a billion people started by things like Gillette, Colgate and Coca Cola. Another decade past Chinese factories evolved from clothing and plastics to cars and homes appliances. From 2000 a unique government economic strategy started with housing market reform. Instead of renting from the government people began to buy and own their homes. Home prices generally went up 10 folds or more in 15-20 years, and cities grew several times in size and population. The other day an American RU-vidr in Shanghai showcased coffee shops and said there are over 1500 coffee shops in NYC, 3200 in London, and more than 7000 in Shanghai, 600 Starbucks. Yes Shanghai has 28 million people but still they have more coffee shops per capita. Of the 28 million about 10 million were locals who owned their homes since 2000 that had gone up more than 10 folds, not per person but per family though. Today the Greater Shanghai metropolitan including the adjacent cities hosts 50 million people. Average home prices are about one million US dollars for a standard 1200 square 3 bedroom apartment. Beijing has similar structure and prices, a bit higher. Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and many other cities have millions of millionaires. The rest of the country are divided into tiers similar to the US where the midwest is much cheaper than the coasts. China is still a developing country because 40% of its rural population have low household income of less than 10,000 dollars a year. But government support provides them with a cost environment as well, food, rent, health care and education are affordable for them. It only costs 200 US dollars to rent a good quality family apartment in a less developed city, breakfast costs a dollar and lunch 2 dollars. On the other hand, in 2021, Chinese bought about 3 times more Audi and Mercedes than Americans, 4 million electric vehicles, and surprisingly 820,000 not so good looking Buick. There are more than 3500 McDonald’s, 6000 Starbucks and 8500 Kentucky Fried Chicken in China, among a plethora of growing American chains. Haagen Dazs is ubiquitous in the supermarkets so are Mars, m&m, Lay’s, and Peppermint. Chinese wives wash their clothes as well as their hair with the same American soups so they pretty much smell the same all over. China is the biggest partner for Tesla, Apple, Walmart, and numerous American small and medium sized companies. The majority of Chinese don’t watch mainstream media in English. They are oblivious to what those American economic nationalists are talking about. It’s a really weird situation. Who in particular are the economic nationalists?
@Sapheiorus
@Sapheiorus Год назад
In exchange for the visibly amicable labor relationship that you experience in China, the American corporations MOVED all their factory work from the US. What I mean by this is that the jobs disappeared from our country and were reallocated to yours. Not part of this new arrangement is that the working class was not subsequently compensated with new, better, and more available opportunities for work. It was the opposite. Now there is only “service industry” work that doesn’t necessarily adhere to even a minimum wage when they may instead take tips (which they may not get much of), isn’t always available because all age ranges from 16 and up compete (employers would sooner hire the youngest because they’ll have the most energy and rebel the least), and, lacking unionization in a grand majority of cases, won’t even be better jobs. The working class of the US was ignored in this economic shift. Americans do not receive an education that helps them find better work without paying lots of money or taking on considerable debt to attend a university for a professional degree. They also have been programmed through historical education and media, especially neoliberal news, to see unions as against their interests, to see any socialistic elements as evil, and to focus instead of accepting and advocating for this capitalist arrangement fueling their adversity as a reflection of “good” individual and national character. Econonic nationalists among working people don’t blame the companies for replacing the jobs in our country to yours, but instead blame China for “taking” them according to media rhetoric that they absorbed unquestioningly. They cannot see the blame the companies have in the affair, nor the blame of the profit-making imperative of capitalism itself in motivating this shift. They blame you because life is getting worse in quality and less secure compared to what it once was. On the politicians’ sides, “economic nationalists” first played off of the anxieties of the working people by performing that blame towards China, even though they and their prime benefactors, the American corporations, do indeed economically benefit from interacting with you. The politicial manipulators of our country are still acting upon the capitalist interests of profit making by buffering these anti-nationalistic decisions to take work away from the people that they need to live prosperous lives to give it to China for massive profit with rhetoric that placates American confusion and fears by presenting an enemy to consolidate a form of “national solidarity” as a workforce (but it’s ultimately an ignorant one). This contradiction of rhetoric enables capitalism to tighten its grip on the way the American people think about economic relations and politics. They made you a scapegoat for capitalism’s problems; conveniently, your political brand as communists implicitly helps this since the country has already completely convinced a good number of the people that the ideology itself is evil incarnate: totalitarian (in a way capitalism supposedly is not), dictatorial (a feature of fascism that conveniently becomes reflected when a prominent leader in communism exists for a country’s leadership, not to mention staying in their position for life), militarized (as if communism should lay on its belly and welcome capitalist military assault), and full of brainwashing (the deliberate, programmatic steps you took to cultivate the national culture of communism looks like you militarily command people to play along and obey, whereas capitalism looks less heavy-handed in its approach to social programming because the ruling class has the control it needs already and is sneakier about it). They say: “China has become too strong in the market.” “China has evaporated the American labor market.” “China cannot be allowed to make digital technologies as good as ours or else they will gain advantages if a war breaks out.” “China’s leader is a megalomaniacal dictator who wants to rule for life like he’s an emperor. That’s what they have in store for the world if they have their way.” They deflect from the kinds of talk that explicitly centers the conversation on what America wants and focuses instead on our conflict with China. Our economic desires are left for us to fill in the blanks, for as undereducated as we are to do that. But people do at least know that they want accessible and good work, and the narrative that China took those manufacturing jobs is enough to start being nationalistic about it.
@RevolutionarySM
@RevolutionarySM 10 месяцев назад
Neoliberalism could triumph in the 1980's due to the collapse of Stalinism and the betrayal of European social-democracy. From 1945 until the 1980's, capitalism accepted government regulation and many social-democratic demands out of fear for the anti-capitalist propaganda that was spread by the USSR. Despite its undemocratic nature and degeneration, the Soviet-Union was seen by millions as ''something different'' then capitalism. This was strong after WW2 and world capitalism knew they were facing an ideological battle. So the ruling class of mainly Western Europe choose to accept some government regulation and ideas linked to reformist leftism. By 1980 however, the Soviet-Union was stagnating and the capitalist class started to see that social-democracy was willing to betray its socialist roots, see François Mitterrand in France. As the Soviet bloc collapsed, world capitalism was shocked by the fact that many Stalinists accepted their free market fundamentalism (Boris Yeltsin). China and Vietnam also had embraced capitalistic ideas in the 1980's. As the red flag was lowered on 25 December 1991 in Moscow, capitalism declared victory. Neoliberalism was championed as the only working system for humanity by all major ideologies. From liberalism to conservatism, social-democracy and even former Stalinists. Those who rejected neoliberalism were called ''outdated'', ''inferior'' and outright ''stupid'' by the capitalist media and major governments. By 2008, neoliberalism started to crack and even today it is clear that we need a alternative to capitalism as a whole. Not more government, no going back to regulation and more rules (Bernie Sanders) to limit capitalist greed. We need a democratic socialist plan for the economy based on the interests of the overwhelming majority of people and the planet.
@user-xq8qx6bg2j
@user-xq8qx6bg2j Год назад
❤❤great work Prof. Wolff❗️🌷🌷You ARE THE Patriot that tells it like it is🇺🇸🇺🇸👍
@anwaypradhan6591
@anwaypradhan6591 Год назад
Well free market capitalism has failed. Actually, the free trade and free market has brought many complications and complexities. There is more increase in class differences than before.
@bobbafett1849
@bobbafett1849 Год назад
Free Markets and Capitalism are mutually exclusive. Capitalists abhor free markets because they want CONTROL of markets. JD Rockafeller, godfather of capitalism said "Competition is sin" for a reason. He wanted to control the markets and therefore the economy. The world hasnt had truly free markets since humans were on the barter system.
@milesobrien2694
@milesobrien2694 Год назад
The _Free Market_ died when global corporatocracy captured most industrialized nations governments. Sanctions, tariffs and trade pacts are the antithesis of *_FREE_*
@user-vj4sn1hk3n
@user-vj4sn1hk3n 6 месяцев назад
Only way to maintain being nation as has been. Globalization without same fundamental system of social, politic, and economic has witness unbalancing trade to the point of ………
@DerekFullerWhoIsGovt
@DerekFullerWhoIsGovt Год назад
@EvolutionWendy
@EvolutionWendy Год назад
Professor Wolff needs to wake up to the ecological disaster gaining momentum. Local production is better for the environment.
@jazondelta4976
@jazondelta4976 Год назад
Nope, not at all.
@hillbillyfred-xz9kn
@hillbillyfred-xz9kn 9 месяцев назад
@@jazondelta4976 please make your case why not?
@realdanrusso
@realdanrusso Год назад
potentially closer to ordoliberalism than neoliberalism
@chuckleaf8027
@chuckleaf8027 Год назад
The Davos crowd wants a free-market??? Ha ha Ha...
@earlviney5212
@earlviney5212 Год назад
TAX THE RICH!!
@alexandertrang6549
@alexandertrang6549 Год назад
I'll just move back under the bridge.
@jonathonjubb6626
@jonathonjubb6626 Год назад
Disaster capitalism will still triumph! It's us that will suffer!!
@northstar1060
@northstar1060 Год назад
the difference between the US system and chinese system lies in the COMPETENCE of the GOVERNMENT LEADERS ....................Chinese leaders are far more competent and a lot less corrupt
@ildarShafigullin66
@ildarShafigullin66 Год назад
I do not agree with the fact that China developed faster than the USSR. China did not have to rebuild cities and rise from the ashes first after the October Revolution 1917, and then after the Great Patriotic War of 1941. And the USSR did it in ten years. And after 20 years he flew into space(In 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin went into space.).
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
He said the growth within the last 40 years, which is correct.
@ildarShafigullin66
@ildarShafigullin66 Год назад
@@kevinschmidt2210 The USSR has not existed for more than 30 years. Comparison in the last 40 years is bullshit.
@donklee3514
@donklee3514 Год назад
And less than 20 years later it was gone. USSR burned thru its economic might like a shooting star. Of course the US had more fuel, but now that party is over, too. You got to love Reaganomics! Said in a sarcastic tone. I think prof Wolff missed the most important aspect of neo-liberalism. The homeless problem that has resulted in every country that has openly embraced neo-liberalism also known as neo-conservatism/Reaganomics.
@ildarShafigullin66
@ildarShafigullin66 Год назад
@@donklee3514 The USSR didn't burn down. He was betrayed by the drunkard Yeltsin and Gorbachev. He was betrayed by the greed of the elite, who needed to legalize their stolen money. And the US has spent billions to do this. But in this world, everything comes back like a boomerang.
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
@@ildarShafigullin66 Wrong! Comparisons in the last 40 years are more legitimate than comparisons of the previous 40 years. Or do you prefer to be stuck in the Cold War era?
@sonjaponath4914
@sonjaponath4914 Год назад
more like the age of disorder. It's one catastrophe after another. Just constant upheaval
@Googlag
@Googlag Год назад
If the state interferes in business affairs .so you have either fascism or socialism.And if there is no smell of socialism. I congratulate you!🙂
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
There is no smell that detects socialism as the problem. However, fascism stinks to high heaven.
@Googlag
@Googlag Год назад
@@kevinschmidt2210 there is no smell of rest here. it does not mean a smell,lack of what is expected ..😁
@bangthingneng9433
@bangthingneng9433 Год назад
Professor - As you mentioned that China has grow much faster than the American Economic due to the new system adopted by Chinese goverment. Just as America with Democratic capitalist did wonder for America to become the greatest Economic of the world no other countries could matched but its has become a matured Economic. China - with it new system which i call COMMUCRACY ( a mixture of Communist administrative, socialist & capitalist ) that bring China to what is today. Still far to that of America in term of standard of living though one could see sky scrappers everywhere & fantastic infrastructures. Appearance could be deceiving. One thing for sure, China has got to embark on big gigantic infrastructures in order for wealth distribution to work effectively due to its large population. Small scale infrastructures development won't do much for poverty alleviation. The fact is Democracy or Communism, capitalist or socialist, they are all methodology to develop a country for the betterment of countrymen. Whichever is the best will be the choices. It is imperative that the system must serve the people & nothing else. Indeed , the actual fact is America was experiencing tremendous growth after WW2 . Its economic began to decline in the 60's & no sign of improvement in the 70's, 80's.... . It was due to this fact that , America begin to look elsewhere to support its Economic growth. Then they discovered China was the best place as its large virgin market would be feasibled for a new Economic frontier. With its cheap labour, lower costs, good incentives & low investment tax particularly had attracted the west as a way forward for their Economic developments. That is the best bargains and this the main reasons why America looks for China. True enough, with its cheap labour & goods together with the advantages of better Currency Exchange Rate ( during the early 80's, the Exchange Rate was 15 to 20 RMB to US $1) , ETC, America has got lots & lots of benefits from it. I recalled on America per capita Income in the 90' to 20's ( around that ) was around US40 thousand dollars. In the year 2020, it rose to US65 thousand dollars. Now, in 2023, it touches over US70 thousands Dollars. Sadly, China took 40 years to rises from scratch to achieve only US10 to US11 Thousand dollars per capita income today. Imagine, for America 70k & for China only 10k and that is sky and earth gap. The messages is clear that America does benefited from these trade with China. Would America trade with countries with currency strength equal to theirs , America would not gain in his per capita income. Nothing gain, clearly. So, what America has got today is Political Delusion & ignisfacious for his fellow citizens. I hope America would turn back into the right perpective through a thorough lucabrations rather then seeing what are beneficial to them as something disadvantages. Championing something which are obviously are unattainable & wastage by forgoing something lucrative certainly insensate & further deteriorate America & american livelihood. Bbc - Bang broadcast corp
@bobcornwell403
@bobcornwell403 Год назад
I think it's Fairer to say that the Chinese actually practice Capitalism "with Chinese characteristics." China is where it's at today because of the greed and foolhardiness of primarily US politicians and corporations. The Chinese merely took advantage of a good thing. I don't blame them. Now, it appears that they have learned much of our technology--and even improved on it. The question becomes: How well will they do when they're on their own?
@geraldmeehan8942
@geraldmeehan8942 Год назад
Demographics are definitely not on their side. Rapidly shrinking working class left to support rapidly growing elderly
@milesobrien2694
@milesobrien2694 Год назад
China is investing in its infrastructure in a purely socialist way. It has expanded its high speed rail system at an astounding amount. Its roads, and urban development also. This could not happen and _has not_ happened in any capitalist country. The state owns all the infrastructure without which the "private sector" cannot function.
@beastmode8203
@beastmode8203 Год назад
China is screwed.
@milesobrien2694
@milesobrien2694 Год назад
@@beastmode8203 The US is FU*KED
@beastmode8203
@beastmode8203 Год назад
@@milesobrien2694 then so is the world ☢️
@alanmcrae8594
@alanmcrae8594 Год назад
Implement any ideology that you want. Eventually, it will stop working and you'll need to change to something else for awhile. (Probably the opposite. Shouldn't be surprising - if you press only on the accelerator for too long you'll end up going too fast, and then you'll need to press only on the brakes for awhile.) Global capitalism is not a win/win proposition, which is how it was originally sold to us by economists & politicians. It produces both winners & losers. We just obsessively focused on the winners & the cheap goods, while ignoring the losers & the stagnant wages. Now the losers are ready for an armed rebellion, so the politicians are finally listening.
@Googlag
@Googlag Год назад
Every goofball just has to leave a comment. Even if he does not understand the topic under discussion.😉😛🤫
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
Your comment is off topic. Do you not understand what it is we are discussing?
@Googlag
@Googlag Год назад
@@kevinschmidt2210 Read my comment above. If you don't understand, read it as many times as it takes to understand.🙂
@martinrob6816
@martinrob6816 Год назад
Amazing video and thank you for breaking it down!! Despite the economic downturn, I'm so happy have been earning $ 60,000 returns from my $7,000 investment every 10days..
@Cryptofouffi
@Cryptofouffi Год назад
Wow! How's that possible please I'll appreciate your assistance on how to go about it.
@maryparticia626
@maryparticia626 Год назад
Extraordinary is the right word to describe Mrs Jessica Madilyn McMain, she's experience as a trader and her signals are so accurate. have profited over $60,000 from last month of working with her.
@Bruno-kf8kv
@Bruno-kf8kv Год назад
How do start trading with her, keep seeing her name pop up all over the place and I and my family are interested👍
@thejimm656
@thejimm656 Год назад
Really, I think I will start with 3k USD when I got home...
@rosiesummer3797
@rosiesummer3797 Год назад
This is the kind of information that We don't get from most RU-vidrs will get in Touch with her right now.
@blogintonblakley2708
@blogintonblakley2708 Год назад
Nationalism... You mean white nationalism, right?
@chuckleaf8027
@chuckleaf8027 Год назад
Of course he does.... it's a deft way of calling patriots and "America first" types racists..... (opposing Trump obviously..). It makes clear that he is as anti-American as you are Blakely. (Mr Not a Leftist..).who does nothing but argue against capitalism, makes all the same arguments leftists make, and defends the super leftist Wolff on almost everything and anything..(looks like a duck walks like one ) Of course you're not a leftist... you are such a super virtuous, moral genius, with such advanced ideas and understanding of the world you put normal commies in the dust, since you're big and can handle troubled teens, and have such overwhelming insight..who if empowered would surpass Diocletian in superior planning and guidance.. Thank Gawdd Almighty for the blessings you bestow on us Blakely... I admire you...
@blogintonblakley2708
@blogintonblakley2708 Год назад
@@chuckleaf8027 Geebus, Chuck, have I gotten under your skin or something? You and I both know the USA is a racist organization. Built on slavery and genocide. What... you think it changed because of MLK? Look at Biden for a start. You telling me he isn't a racist? Or Hillary? Or Trump? They are all on record pushing their racist ideology. Oh the other hand, if you manage to amass billions of dollars the racists in charge of the USA will be happy to do business with you. There's skin color, and then there is business... I think we both know which comes first in the USA. In the USA greed always trumps all other considerations. It's why the USA and capitalism are falling apart.
@blogintonblakley2708
@blogintonblakley2708 Год назад
@@chuckleaf8027 You are a patriot? Or are you talking about someone else?
@chuckleaf8027
@chuckleaf8027 Год назад
@@blogintonblakley2708 There you go again, making a typical leftist argument...but of course you're neither leftist or liberal!!!! Pffft... The US was built on slavery? yeah right, Sherman on his March stole everything in sight and torched the rest which destroyed any actual gains from slavery.. and 90 percent of the Indians died from disease, not from pale face.. And how in the hell do you think America has gained economically from racism??? Blacks, well normally it-s just the men working and they're only 7 percent of the population, so even if they were discriminated against, how would that have any real effect on the success of capitalism? The real problem with capitalism, is government meddling and interference, picking and choosing winners, ie taking care of special interests... corporatism... but you want more government power, but somehow think that will eliminate greed, but the politicians are men too, and them being greedy is far worse..since they have the force of government behind them... so go burn your copy of Kapital and read something valuable and true....like "Anthem"...maybe it'll disabuse you of your terrible collectivist notions...
@blogintonblakley2708
@blogintonblakley2708 Год назад
@@chuckleaf8027 I can see why people from the south would hate Sherman. He crushed the resistance. He did the same thing to the Plains Indians. That's how it came to happen that buffalo hunting became a thing. Sherman destroyed their food source. Of course none of that has anything to do with the USA being built on the fortunes created from King Cotton. Just because Sherman razed the most troublesome cities in the South, doesn't mean that all the fortunes built on slavery were destroyed. The Souths were... But the North was part of the slave economy as well. And all those northern ship builders and budding industrialists also build their fortunes on cotton and slavery. Racism isn't rational, Chuck, You don't gain from it. It's a kind of mental illness that makes people LESS effective. Same thing with greed. I've read Anthem and Ayn Rand's other books as well. Greedy, self interested and ruthless people appreciate them. I've read Marx/Engels as well. I just don't find the two sides all that different. I get that you do. {shrugs} It's funny how both sides seem to think they are fighting about something new. You aren't. You are fighting about the same thing people who use property are always arguing about. Who gets to own what. For like 12,000 years now. Like kids around a Monopoly game. It's sad what you all do to yourselves and your children. But it's all coming to an end now. The obvious results are on their way. It's not like you all weren't warned over and over again all down through history. And each time the civilization you all built, collapse as greed took over and consumed everything you built. This time looks to put paid to the whole shooting match.
@clarestucki5151
@clarestucki5151 Год назад
More Wolff enconmic nonsense. No such "shift" has occured, and none will in the future. It's a law of economics that every person, every region, every nation, should do the jobs for which they have what Adam Smith was describing, which is now referred to as a "comparative advantage". Countries with abundant natural resiurces should mine, refine, farm, etc, countries with large populations should specialize in labor intensive jobs, such as manufacturing. That is what produces the highest standard of living for everybody.
@earlviney5212
@earlviney5212 Год назад
TAX THE RICH !!
@clarestucki5151
@clarestucki5151 Год назад
@@earlviney5212 Right on! Make the highly productive support the unproductive, cause they can't support thmselves!!
@jgalt308
@jgalt308 Год назад
Poor Professor Wolff still can't figure out whether the government is the problem or capitalism is...although the confusion is rather strange since he is not talking about "alternative economic systems", but alternative government ones. Nor has he figured out what caused the shift, although it seems rather obvious that at the heart of successful nations, the ability to produce goods profitably is central to it, and whether he understands it or not, is due to actual capitalism, not his imagined misrepresentation of it. Is China really competitive or dominant? In terms of GPD, they have almost caught up, in terms of population, they need 400% more growth to achieve parity, and they are already approaching the limits to further growth, while being a top-down hierarchical authoritarian system, which is entirely removed from his democratic co-op version of capitalism and one cannot help but remark that this alternative system of government which he seems to be praising, arose from the ashes of Marxism to embrace capitalism in order to achieve it. So it would seem that his stated purpose of "We can do better than capitalism" is false, since it is capitalism that is foundational to success, and upon which everything else rests. That he never understood capitalism and still doesn't should be clear, and that it allowed him pursue a career in opposition to it is both ironic and the height of hubris.
@cheri238
@cheri238 Год назад
Here we go again, J Gault lol
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
Once again, the poorly programmed Ayn Rand AI bot flunks the Turing Test by posting reams of misinformation and illogical arguments, all of which are clearly off topic to the subject at hand. The spaghetti against the wall algorithm and using ChatGPT is not working.
@LongDefiant
@LongDefiant Год назад
Ayn Rand died on welfare
@helengarrett6378
@helengarrett6378 Год назад
Gault, You are a Nazi and Fascists love elitism and authoritarianism. Capitalists are more likely to be Fascists than Socialists. You won't face facts. You keep on spewing garbage. The Professor is devoted to Russia and China because there once was Socialism there and he will defend those countries on principle. I, on the other hand do not want a Capitalist system or a State Socialist system. A mixed Socialist and Capitalist system still perpetuates all the ills of Capitalism. Ups and downs, wide class divisions and Oligarchy are the result wherever Capitalism exists. It runs right over the ordinary working person and it controls government with bags of money. I want a cooperative society with workers owning the means of production and keeping profit for workers. You don't want that. You, Gault want to be a big guy in a tiny little group of violent extremists. You are really just a little guy who needs to be ignored. But it's so much fun to ridicule you so keep on writing incomprehensible screeds and keep on trying to convince decent folks you have something important to say. We know better!
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
@@LongDefiant True! Her whole story is dripping with irony, which the poorly programmed John Galt AI Bot can never understand.
@marcionphilologos5367
@marcionphilologos5367 Год назад
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HALLELUJAH, PRAISE THE LORD, THE LIGHT IS SHINING. GIVE UP ON MARXISM/ COOPERATISM AND EMBRACE NATIONAL SOCIALISM WITHOUT ETHNIC AND CULTURAL CONSERVATISM OR MILITARISM.
@anarchisttechsupport6644
@anarchisttechsupport6644 Год назад
. . . are you okay? Im not tracking with why this relates to the video. And im probably not alone in cringing at the all caps.
@anarchisttechsupport6644
@anarchisttechsupport6644 Год назад
Ah. A cringe Nazi. And from the all-caps? A boomer too. Bye.
@kevinschmidt2210
@kevinschmidt2210 Год назад
@@anarchisttechsupport6644 There is no way to determine the age of anyone who uses all caps. However, we now have determined by your own words that you are a low intelligence, ageist bigot.
@anarchisttechsupport6644
@anarchisttechsupport6644 Год назад
@@kevinschmidt2210 meh, boomer is a state of mind, not an age. But I respect that you read it that way, and will adjust my words in the future. But more importantly... Youre defending a Nazi. So. Thanks for letting me know to block you.
@helengarrett6378
@helengarrett6378 Год назад
What? Balderdash! Nonsense! National Socialism means Nazi elitism and death camps. It was a union between Capitalism and the military and political elites. It was repressive of women, promited violence, racism, decadence and cruelty and deserves to be destroyed root and branch. Nazis are not Socialists. You are raking through garbage for pearls. Ugh!
Далее
Телеграмм-Колян Карелия
00:14
Просмотров 153 тыс.
Economic Update: From The Old Socialisms To The New
29:40
The Big Lie - How to Enslave the World
12:03
Просмотров 1,8 млн
When Will Neoliberalism Collapse? w/ Gary Gerstle
48:48
Economic Update: The Phenomenon of China
30:41
Просмотров 326 тыс.
France's Stunning Election Results Explained
9:39
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Economic Update: What's Wrong with Capitalism?
29:25
Просмотров 45 тыс.