Тёмный

Shikha Bhattacharjee & Dev Nathan | Reverse Subsidies in Global Monopsony Capitalism 

Isas Departmental
Подписаться 11 тыс.
Просмотров 250
50% 1

March 15, 2022
Panelist/Discussants: Shikha Silliman Bhattacharjee, UC Berkeley Law; Dev Nathan, Institute for Human Development, New Delhi
Moderator: Sanchita Banerjee Saxena, Executive Director, Institute for South Asia Studies; Director, Subir and Malini Chowdhury Center for Bangladesh Studies
A panel presentation on the soon to be released book, Reverse Subsidies in Global Monopsony Capitalism: Gender, Labour, and Environmental Injustice in Garment Value Chains.
This book provides a firm analytical base to discussions about injustice and the unequal distribution of gains from global production in the form of global monopsony capitalism. It utilizes the concept of reverse subsidies as the purchase of gendered labour and environmental services below their costs of production in garment value chains in India and other garment producing countries, such as Bangladesh and Cambodia. Environmental services, such as freshwater for garment manufacture and land for cotton production, are degraded by overuse and untreated waste disposal. The resulting higher profits from the low prices of garments are captured by global brands, using their monopsony position, with few buyers and myriad sellers, in the market. This book links the concept of reverse subsidies with those of injustice, inequality, and sustainability in global production.

Опубликовано:

 

8 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1   
@abdullahalnomansaied6441
@abdullahalnomansaied6441 2 года назад
Dear sir, Very important presentation for develop.
Далее
Climate change: is capitalism the problem?
13:35
Просмотров 31 тыс.
Армия США вошла в Зангезур
04:17
Просмотров 300 тыс.
"The Real Power of Google" (2018) | 60 Minutes Archive
13:23
Capitalism vs. Socialism: A Soho Forum Debate
1:38:45
DoubleSpeak, How to Lie without Lying
16:15
Просмотров 11 млн
$25,000 vs. $25,000,000
29:58
Просмотров 2,2 млн