Shocking Results! Stock Motor Turbo 2V Goes 10s and Made How Much Power? 

We ran 10.90s at 125mph with 350hp NA in a foxbody

@@Texas_Road_Warrior yeah a fox that probably weighs alot less

Not to take away from the driver, but Tq is what gets cars moving out of the hole fast. 480 foot pounds of tq is why the car went 10's.

Actually the SN95/New Edge Mustangs are based on an improved Fox platform they dubbed Fox2 if I recall correctly. So there shouldn't be must less weight in a first gen Fox body.

Def ect bro stop with 1st or 2nd gen fox lmaoo yea it’s on the fox platform but so are a lot of old ford cars smh the foxbody mustang is wayy lighter especially the coupe version

There have been 10 second 2vs with 360 whp it's all in the suspension. Look at the steeda 18 or 19 gt. It just has a converter, full suspension, full exhaust cai tb and e85. The motor is still not opened.

@@karlhopkins713 yea these weigh like 3200 theyre 600 lbs lighter than a new gt that is pretty significant some people dont realize how much weight effects this stuff...you would need closer to 500 in a 3800 lbs newer stang which is what most of em have when they go 10s. Steedas is doing low 10z with around 500 due to some weight savings plus the et killing 10r80 it has. I mean killing as in very good not killing as in bad lol. This car could go deeper into the 10s with more suspension peices and some more weight reduction mods. I like this build because it shows people you can go 10s without having 700 whp.

@@michaelharris748 With the seats out around 3250 but still these are great cars in every way

@@karlhopkins713 yea they may be just over 33 stock but its easy to yank 200+ out of em without going too crazy more if you get more serious

Is that in the 1/8 mile????

Bingo

That torque number is badass. I would expect that from a pushrod, but not this. Very impressive.

I don't understand how people think the 2v isn't worth the time or money the block can handle 1000hp the rods break at 600hp the crank at 700hp. For a cheap motor originally from a family car in the 90s I can't complain

@@WarriorOfEden3033 the 2v rods are good for maybe 450 and you’re on borrowed time. Now the Manley rods in the 4v are capable of 600 and pushed to quad digit numbers

@@themrgodfather77 you can get manly rods for the 2v & make 1400hp

People only wanna go with what is new and trendy its trendy to diss on 2vs and act like they cant do shit. Truth is for what they can be had for (the engines and the new edge cars themselves) theyre pretty stout. If you wanna make more power all u need is forged rods and pistons which costs under 1500 bucks total for parts and you can really go fast then and make some damn good power. You dont gotta coyote swap to have a mean ride and you dont gotta ls swap either....

That would be a good one to watch, the newer stangs have a lot of excessive weight which is just one more reason to give the classics more love.

Now that he has a gt500..

It's close actually the trap speed is very similar maybe slightly more it would be a good run with a stock 13 gt500 prob a drivers race this car would have the advantage from a dig obviously.

Yes it is for sure.

Amen...that is exactly right the younger generation is fixated on big dyno numbers and act like if it isnt pushing 700-800 whp it isnt worth a damn but that isnt the case at all. Too many people with big power dyno queens that cant put the power down for shit vs people with more tame setups that can boogie down a track like nobodys business. I love the reactions people act like its unreal to hit 10z with just over 400 whp but people have been doing this for years people are just fixated on big dyno numbers and nothing else these days

YzfR6 420 wheel is about close to 500

It’s not the HP. It’s the torque. Everyone always sleeps on torque

Idk why ppl keep sayin its impressive for a 2v. Its at 420 rwhp that is easy to get to on a stock motor 2v with forced induction. Yea 10s at that power to weight ratio is impressive regaurdless what power plant is making the power.

Impressed.

Yeah man go see Tony. Tony is awesome

@@MustangLifestyleTV Good to hear man, I’ll definitely be going to Tony to get tuned. I cant wait to get the car going!

I also have a 99 2v here in daytona

I’m actually rebuilding a Bullitt with a 3v on3 turbo kit 76mm. Going for a built block and an 82mm with the t56 now

T56 bolts right up?

@@ProxityProductions mine was a viper spec but basically yeah

built or stock internals??

On stock internals? I have a 2001 bullitt too. What brand turbo? Did you do it yourself?

Jeremy Bode stock crank, coyote rods and mahle forged pistons

@@98snakehorse wht generation coyote rods do you have

@@carlosvelasco4119 they are actually considered the "boss 302 rods" part# CR3Z6200B

He has slicks on bigs n littles he doesnt really have that good a suspension you can see that from the launch with some weight savings and better suspension its much deeper into the 10s.

@@michaelharris748 he has complete upr everything on that car and viking covers at all 4 corners. tht is def suspension doing work.

ivy pixley if he can get it to bite. He can probably do 10.7 maybe 10.6

It all depends how committed you are to going straight. This car is definitely committed based on the suspension

I have one on a 3v and not gonna lie you gonna have to buy alot of little parts that add up . Because on3 has some shitty parts. Hoses , clamps , fitting , oil relocation, boost controller, wastegate forsure , and some other little things . But it adds up

And prob a ball bearing turbo because the journal ones they send with the kit are crappy and mine after 5 months of moderate use it has shaft play .

Cris The Red so I should probably just save up and buy a better kit to start with?

Good for 500-600 whp

If your engine is stock good luck they blow after 450whp

Have one sitting in the garage ready for 1400 :)

Alexander Grimm that’s impressive almost 300k miles

Want to buy one? I have clean as hell with low miles and not touched yet

Jeremy Bode what you asking?

He just means the engine is at ambient temperature.

Yea it has alot to do with the turbo too its got loads of torque and way less hp because its a smallish not very efficient turbo but it works enough to get into the 10s obviously. Much less weight than newer mustangs helps. I love how it shows you can go 10s without having a million hp everyone is so fixated on big dyno numbers these days they act like 400 aint nothing but in the right car on the right setup it can do pretty damn good.

He does there is nothing done to the car other than the ones he listed

Factory sealed I believe.

Yes

Yes

@@MustangLifestyleTV What one did You use on your car

Upr

@@MustangLifestyleTV thanks for the information I will be turboing my car in the next few days. 🤙

no prob

3.27

There have been heads cams cars making 360 that have done 10.8

@@karlhopkins713 exactly...its called traction and power to weight ratio...plus im sure the da was really good

boostghost Yeah it’s not a dodge that weighs in 4300 plus driver lol

@@karlhopkins713 heads cam n/a cars?

auto is for people who can't drive

stock

Real funny my guy

I don’t even think the car will make it to 7700, I don’t even think the bama handhelds will let you! Lmao

It makes swiss cheese engine block

low fuel resolution was shown in the video

@@MustangLifestyleTV thanks, missed it the 1st time I watched.

Donald Erdbrink 300rwhp is possible with that setup not 400. That setup bumps up the compression to make more power.

@@joshc606 Just heads cams fbo you can see 350+whp

@@karlhopkins713 2 generous.. I had a 02 Saleen. Car only had 30k miles on it so barely broke in. Did heads, stage 3 cams and intake and only seen 320 on a happy dyno. 350+ is a stretch with just basic bolt on's. Not saying it cant be done, but its going to take some work.

@@_carnivore_joe1520 I should have said stage 3 heads and cams