Should We Have Gender Roles In Marriage? | Lila Rose Podcast 

Your husband does the hard work and you're a lazy american. Nothing you do is hard, most men can do what you do blindfolded. Basically you overwork your husband so you can stay home and relax. Lets face it and youre pushing that on society. Real women who care for their family will find a part time or something to take the load off of their husband and be able to provide for their kid their own way, because they are realistic. You guys just play fantasy and expect couple to live off a single income. Of course traditional role is fuffilling to you, " he doesnt have to do the dishes" as if thats a huge sacrifice 😂😂 Grow up, stop playing your sex lives in the open.

100% agree and we do all the same. Gender roles just work, it removes so much chaos.

@@ThisBraveHeart doesn't it though? I get so much pushback from everywhere that is refreshing to hear that there are others too. I mean I know there are its just nice hearing from others who do the same and actually embrace this lifestyle. I hope you and your family remain blessed

​@@LadyMcGinniseach gender having their gender roles is like each train having their own train tracks, zero chances for collision 💥

You ladies are dinosaurs

Yes it the stay-at-home wife was a construct

Agreed. Share all the responsibilities

Well said 🙏🏿

The reason that happened was because of feminism whereby the wages were slashed in half because double the amount of people started to work. Men and women working led to this issue, not the other was around.

@@FreedomEagle1776 so: if all men go and stay home taking care of the kids. The wage slashed would be solved. Right?

​@@FreedomEagle1776And one of the reasons the economy's of countries were able to grow and therefore allow the country to become competitive first world nations is feminism. I'd rather that than raising a family in a nation where there are few opportunities for them to thrive

@@viviana3666 men shouldn’t be home raising kids.

@@erinjaftha5731 economics over social responsibility is where we’ve gone wrong. The west was already a powerhouse before feminism. Feminism is cancer.

💯

Couldn't say it any better

@@vlo123veronica thanks

I genuinely appreciate this comment. Your analysis was multi-varied and insightful.

@@ricodee3188 you are welcome. There is a nice interview Andrew Schulz and Neal Brennan where Andrew lovingly talks about his parents and how his dad was the nurturer. He has the utmost regard for both of his parents

Ideal? Women like her are just being lazy american.

Boom but most don’t forecast the possibilities you just listed they are stuck in just having control.

Find a woman and make her catholic

​@@kevinfernandez9999 Why would any woman want to be catholic

That's an interesting thought, but I'd disagree. It took me a second to put my finger on why, but here are a few reasons: 1. Separating roles into providing and nurturing allows each spouse to have a role they head allowing each to have a healthy amount of autonomy and ownership. 2. It's good for kids to have an example of what hard work looks like in the outside of the home since they will likely enter the workforce at some point. 3. Kids need varying degrees of independence. If both parents are solely focused on nurturing, it's easier for them to helicopter parent and smother they're kids since they don't have anything "better" to do

@@aisherwasher6959 I would respond like this in that ideal scenario: 1: their role is to love and support the kids unconditionally. No need to separate this role since it should be equal. This is the real ownership that the children need to see and experience. And since they are financially free this is the real autonomy they are teaching to the kids. 2. It is better to show the kids what financial freedom looks like. Remember: hard work doesn't equate to financial independence. 3: They are teaching real independence to the kids. Not depending on the work system is another level of independence. Kids always copy parents. Kids need a lot of attention, they would never be annoyed because of the parents attention, kids have a lot of energy and questions, and that demands a lot of attention. Actually this is an important problem we have: a very dramatic lack of attention to kids.

Both parents staying home isn’t ideal also men don’t do well without “ work “ or providing in general

@@Kwildcat13 the man is providing a lot of care to the kids plus taking care of kids is a ton of work. So problem solved

NOPE! always trying to have your cake and eat it too.

Nope - Women are natural nurturers. They are better at nurturing children and they actually activate and bond differently to their mother than the father. THE ideal is Mother nurturer in the home, father at work to selflessly provide and sacrifice their time with children to enable the woman to perform her homemaker role.

​@@FreedomEagle1776 In mammals, including humans, the amygdala has been found to be involved in the processing of infant-related stimuli, such as recognizing and responding to infant cues, like their cries and facial expressions. This responsiveness is essential for forming a bond between the parent and the infant, as it helps ensure the infant's needs are met. Additionally, the amygdala has been implicated in the regulation of social attachment and bonding behaviors, which are critical for forming and maintaining social relationships. It is believed that the release of oxytocin, a hormone involved in social bonding, modulates amygdala function, leading to increased attention and emotional responsiveness to social stimuli. There are some differences in the way men's and women's amygdalas function in relation to parental care, but it's important to note that these differences are not absolute and can be influenced by individual and cultural factors. Research has shown that there are some gender differences in the brain's response to infant-related stimuli. For instance, some studies have found that women tend to show greater activation in the amygdala and other brain regions involved in empathy, emotion processing, and caregiving when exposed to infant cries compared to men. This suggests that women may be more biologically predisposed to respond to and bond with infants. However, other research has shown that men can exhibit similar levels of brain activation in response to infant cues as women, particularly if they have experience with caregiving or are exposed to situations that promote paternal care. For example, studies have found that fathers who are more involved in caregiving show increased activation in the amygdala and other brain regions associated with empathy and nurturing behavior.

Not the ideal. Where did I just hear about Lance what’s his name who paid a surrogate for him and his man partner to have a baby. Then he complained the baby showed him no affection or snuggling no matter what, but then would snuggle all over Lances mother when she visited. Babies know, they also have natural inclinations.

​@@youtubeKathyInteresting but still anecdotal. Studies have consistently shown that children raised by same-sex parents do not differ significantly in terms of emotional, cognitive, and social development compared to those raised by opposite-sex parents. The quality of parenting and the support network available to the child are more important factors in determining child well-being.

Likely won’t work in the long term.