Sid Vicious - What Goldberg is Really Like in Real Life, Outside WWE 

Wazoo

He was much bigger than Hulk

They wanted to give him the belt he replied what you need is a heel didn't want it

He was much bigger than Hulk.

Yeah when I was a kid he seemed like a bigger version of Hogan that was just angrier and disturbed. Dude was scarier than most.

Lesner def gave me Sid vibes when I first saw him. Lesner was much better in the ring but Sid was significantly bigger than Brock.

Almost like they, along with hogan, were known to be willing to ruin careers on a regular basis just so they could keep their friends on the payroll, and stay on the top of the mountain.

who?

Spoken like a true clueless mark, lol.

@ShadowAngel1860 Yes you are

@@CurlyFromTheSwirly Hogan was still the biggest draw. In 1999 when Hogan was featured on a PPV it averaged 35% more sales, than those without Hogan. There's simply no denying, that Hogan still was the biggest draw WCW had, no matter what clueless marks like you think.

@ShadowAngel1860 , That doesn't change the fact that his popularity was declining, and he was more valuable to the company as a heel. (He was getting booed cause people were bored with him.) Also, several of those PPVs in 1999 still had Hollywood Hogan instead of Hukster. He entered Feb & March to defend the title against Flair. In April he was still Hollywood entering a 4 way match to regain the title. By the time he wore red & yellow again, WCW was entering its desperate phase. He had 3 more PPV events, to defend his title against Kevin Trash and then against Sting. It's really hard to say that Hogan being at the event made it draw more money. The early part of the year simply had better story lines, though it wasn't the peak of WCW. Don't forget that WCW made 30 million in 1998, but lost 9 million in 1999. However, it must be said that the start of 1999 was going well, and the losses came later in the year. So obviously, if we are going to make a claim that Hogan draws attention, viewers, and money; it worked better as bad guy Hollywood Hogan. I still think WCW was more enjoyable, but that doesn't change that WCW refused to evolve and do new things. WWF developed Stone Cold, The Rock, HHH, Kurt Angle. They kept The Undertaker popular & relevant by doing new gimmicks. As evil as what Vince did the Bret Hart was, it at least showed he knew how to get rid of wrestlers that weren't right for the company. I guess McMahon loved his company, while Turner was just some rich guy who could have fun with it.

hello

Well, i'm sitting here in my underwear watching 15 year old wrestling shoots so....Probably not great.

@@Bertisevil666facts

​@@Bertisevil666lmmfao