Sir Roger Penrose: Are Singularities Real? (090)

Подписаться 270 тыс.

Просмотров 64 тыс.

50% 1

#SirRogerPenrose #BlackHoles #NobelPrize Join me for a very special discussion with Sir Roger Penrose, co-winner of the 2020 Nobel Prize in physics. We will discuss Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, Black Holes, and of course, Nobel Prizes! GET OUR SLIDES: kingsumo.com/g/vn03wc/sir-rog...
A very special episode with Sir Roger Penrose, co-winner of the 2020 Nobel Prize in physics. We discuss Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, Black Holes, and of course, Nobel Prizes! Roger is a mensch. He always makes time for me and provided one of the first and most enthusiastic "blurbs" for my book, Losing the Nobel Prize. He has always been so generous with his time, even after winning the Nobel Prize when demands for his attention are relentless.
You may also enjoy this video recorded at UC San Diego in late- 2018 "Hawking Points in the CMB Sky", based loosely on his precursor book, "Cycles of Time: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, Hawking Points in the CMB Sky" • Nobel Prize Winner Sir... Get Cycles of Time: amzn.to/2JCdKl7
Sir Roger Penrose and I will discuss his latest research including this article: Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky academic.oup.com/mnras/articl...
He will also share insights into the thinking of a modern day theoretical physicist. Is the Universe destined to collapse, ending in a big crunch or to expand indefinitely until it homogenizes in a heat death? Roger will explain a third alternative, the cosmological conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC) scheme-where the Universe evolves through eons, each ending in the decay of mass and beginning again with new Big Bang.
Watch my most popular videos:
Sir Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize winner: • Nobel Prize in Physics...
Sir Roger Penrose • Sir Roger Penrose Nobe...
Eric Weinstein: • Eric Weinstein: Geomet...
Juan Maldacena's First Podcast Interview: • Video
Jim Simons: • Jim Simons: Life Lesso...
Sabine Hossenfelder: • Sabine Hossenfelder: T...
Stephen Wolfram: • Has Stephen Wolfram di...
🏄‍♂️ Find me on Twitter at / drbriankeating
🔥 Find me on Instagram at / drbriankeating
📖 Buy my book LOSING THE NOBEL PRIZE: amzn.to/2sa5UpA
🔔 Subscribe for more great content ru-vid.com...
✍️Detailed Blog posts here: briankeating.com/blog.php
📧Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
👪Join my Facebook Group: / losingthenobelprize
🎙️Please subscribe, rate, and review the INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast on iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/i...
Google Play: play.google.com/music/listen?...
A production of imagination.ucsd.edu/
We'll also discuss possible observational searches for these cycles possibly encoded in the Cosmic Microwave Background. Lastly, tune in to hear what it's like to receive an early morning phone call from the Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences and learn you've won half a Nobel Prize!
Sir Roger Penrose, Emeritus Professor at the Mathematical Institute of the University of Oxford, winner of the Copley Medal and the Wolf Prize in Physics, which he shared with Stephen Hawking, has made profound contributions encompassing geometry, black hole singularities, the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity, the structure of space-time, nature of consciousness and the origin of our Universe.
In 1989 Penrose wrote The Emperor’s New Mind which challenged the premise that consciousness is computation and proposed new physics to understand it.While you wait, please enjoy my previous interview with Sir Roger Penrose, about this book: • Nobel Prize in Physics...
Get the book here. amzn.to/3kZWmV0
Watch my most popular videos: 🎥
Jim Simons: • Jim Simons: Life Lesso...
Eric Weinstein: • Eric Weinstein: Geomet...
Juan Maldacena's First Podcast Interview: • Video
Sara Seager Venus LIfe: • Did Scientists Discove...
Sabine Hossenfelder: • Sabine Hossenfelder: T...
Stephen Wolfram: • Has Stephen Wolfram di...
🏄‍♂️ Twitter at / drbriankeating
🔥 Instagram at / drbriankeating
📖 Buy my book LOSING THE NOBEL PRIZE: amzn.to/2sa5UpA
🔔 Subscribe for more great content ru-vid.com...
✍️Detailed Blog posts here: briankeating.com/blog.php
📧Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
🎙️Podcast on iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/i...

Наука

Опубликовано:

5 ноя 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 335

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

**DOWNLOAD SLIDES FOR THIS TALK: **kingsumo.com/g/vn03wc/sir-roger-penrose-on-the-into-the-impossible-podcast-slides** **

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

Ok Sr why dont we see stars clamping one in to the other near the BH so to make a bigger star as GR predicts it should hapens? Why do an orange star get the jump in speed way up far to the right from the blackhole spot that most around go?

@emoosavimehr 3 года назад

Why is it asking for my consent to receive sales and promotion emails? Doesn't sound fair to me.

@Nameeejz 3 года назад

Is there a link that is still active? seems odd to not have it up permanently

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks I fixed it!

@bipolarbear9917 3 года назад

Hello Brian, great talk with Roger, as was your talk with Stephen Wolfram and Eric Weinstein. I have a question about entropy (2nd Law of Thermodynamics). Why is it that entropy still increases in a Black Hole? That seems counter-intuitive. Roger touched on it, but I'm still baffled. Wouldn't the fact that everything is being brought together and converging be lowering the entropy, and that a White Hole the entropy would be increasing, because everything is spreading out and diverging like the 'gas in a box' example that Roger used? Yet Roger says the complete opposite (black holes increasing entropy, white holes decreasing entropy). Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'm confused about this aspect. I look forward to your explanation.

@flowerpt 3 года назад

It's cool that Roger has been recognized, no matter how old his paper was. His new work will get more attention, which is very exciting. My ultimate goal in life is to be as sharp and vivacious as Roger at the same age!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Me too!

@JasonAStillman 3 года назад

Penrose's 2020 Noble Prize is one of the few best things to come out of 2020. Warms my heart... :) Great pod Brian!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thx! More to come this week Jason!

@sailorr4287 3 года назад

This happened for me as well. I am still feeling great about this award for Sir Roger Penrose.

@PetraKann 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating I can understand not being able to snare the other two 2020 Nobel Prize winners for Physics but why would you dilute a potentially wonderful interview with Roger Penrose by superimposing Trivia from Weinstein and Levin. Doesn’t make sense

@MichaelAntonFischer 3 года назад

Penrose is the best physicist since Einstein and Feynman. Well deserved and overdue

@JasonAStillman 3 года назад

@@MichaelAntonFischer Yes agreed! Penrose diagrams are the Feynman diagrams of spacetime.

@Boballoo 6 месяцев назад

How humble can you be to hang up on your Nobel Prize phone call, saying, "They'll call back if it's important."? I love this man and his brilliant mind.

@Grandunifiedcelery 3 года назад

Thank you so much Dr Brian and Sir Roger. It was a great time!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

My pleasure!!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Telemarketers! They suck up time more relentlessly than Black Holes

@eipplusone3395 3 года назад

Thank you Sir Roger for your contribution to the knowledge of the universe, your books and your class and kindness. You are a world treasure.

@klgamit Год назад

What a lovely way to show appreciation to this lovely man, few deserve such recognition more than Penrose

@markcarey67 3 года назад

We will meet again in the conformal future when we are all redshifted into each other

@richardgalea9884 10 месяцев назад

Following Sir Roger all my life, I feel that the Noble Prize was long overdue……

@praneethbvs 3 года назад

Sir Roger, A Great inspiration. My Hero! Greatest Mind of our times. I wish him all the good health. Hope I can attend one of his lectures in the future. Cycles of time - What a beautiful book. This is a great talk. Thanks for doing this Brian and keep them coming.

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

I do it for the fun. Stay tuned. Send more recommendations!

@quickies9561 Год назад

but seriously, the range and power of Penrose's intellect is amazing. he reminds me of Michio Kaku, in the respect that he thinks without limits

@Orpheuslament 3 года назад

This is just awesome. I love this podcast. Thank you so much for making it.

@monkerud2108 3 года назад

great stuff, sorry i missed the live stream, congratz :)

@talmoskowitz5221 3 года назад

Thank you for this!

@stormtrooper9404 3 года назад

Am really sorry I couldnt watch the live-stream! But 10k view overall is criminaly underrated!

@vaughngzenda2000 3 года назад

You're doing important work here Dr. Keating. I really appreciate it.

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks Vaughn. Do you have guest recommendations or other improvements to suggest?

@johnfyten3392 2 года назад

Found another great Roger Penrose interview and just subscribed to your channel. Looking forward to checking out your wide variety of videos. They all look intriguing. Well done on this one for sure!

@DrBrianKeating 2 года назад

Thanks very much I hope you like it here 😀

@shaunlanighan813 3 года назад

My all-time favourite Professor since 1976 when I read 'Relativity & Cosmology' and saw Penrose diagrams. I've been fascinated by this subject ever after. What wouldn't I give to have a mind like Sir Roger. Ah well, go stand in the corner Shaun and just listen, you might learn something!

@MrBollocks10 7 месяцев назад

Who was your all-time favorite before Prof before 1976?

@JH_Phillips 3 года назад

Roger Penrose AND Eric Weinstein?! Brian, you’re coming out with the best content/guests I’ve seen from any podcast lately! Thank you!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

It's truly my honor ;;; let me know other recommended guests

@robbyr9286 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating Daniel Schmachtenberger has a lot of insight, more about society & philosophy than science per se.

@PaulJohnBalderston 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating John Preskill

@timc7035 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating Jim Baggott and Scott Aaronson would be good guests

@benjaminandersson2572 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating Frank Tipler, Douglas Hofstadter, Jim Gates (2nd time), Hans Moravec? Greg Egan (Science Fiction writer).

@CronyxRavage 3 года назад

Brian, dude, turn your phone off (or on silent) when you're hosting a podcast.

@johntavers6878 3 года назад

dont be mean he's doing his best

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Damn telemarketers...they suck more time than a Black Hole!

@CronyxRavage 3 года назад

@@johntavers6878 I'm sure that you're right, and I wasn't intending to be mean. I appologize if it came off that way. However, my intuition, is that "your best" is not fixed, but is a floating variable, and while you could in fact be doing Your Best, as Your Best is defined right now, Your Best can change, such that future versions of Your Best can be greater than past versions. Through graciously assimilating good faith constructive criticism, we can push Our Best to ever greater heights. :)

@rwm1980 Год назад

Why? It gave the guests the opportunity to speak freely, don't be a Karen!

@rwm1980 Год назад

@@DrBrianKeating lol

@kountification 3 года назад

Great content Brian!!! I absolutely enjoy listening to Sir Roger Penrose...His brain is so vivid and he is simply a charismatic and humble human being!!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Bernard Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation? Please join my mailing list to get FREE notes and resources from this show! click here: **briankeating.com/mailing_list.php*

@snarzetax 4 месяца назад

It's always a pleasure to listen to people who love discussing these topics.

@carsonclugston7511 3 года назад

Love how he picks up right where he left off after the frozen part. Too funny. Great podcast!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks!

@epistemologicaldespair68 2 года назад

I was astounded, its like he never stopped.

@WhoDoUthinkUr 3 года назад

Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

@fredb2022 2 года назад

Thank you to our host and guests. Masterfully done and you make it fun, too. I am a layman and not gifted in the sciences.

@DrBrianKeating 2 года назад

Thank you, very much Fred

@missshroom5512 3 года назад

Aaawwww that’s AWESOME! Congrats

@youtubebane7036 4 месяца назад

I had just left a comment on one of Eric's videos a couple weeks ago about how he was my second favorite mathematician and physicist, in the world and that my very favorite was none other than sir Rodger Penrose.

@dannyfergusson3243 3 месяца назад

He has 4 papers and none of particular note lmao

@primetimedurkheim2717 3 года назад

The real Mr. Rogers

@rebelwave100 3 года назад

1:13:15 Roger Penrose hodling back a laugh like a pro. Im Dyin XD

@billsybainbridge3362 2 года назад

I love Penrose's off-handed use of the terms "swirling around" and "swishing out again". Those are official, professional physicist terms! ;)

@jeremiahmacclure 3 года назад

I love Sir Roger Penrose and his work.

@marietta5316 3 года назад

Salute Sir!

@DaBulgarianQueen 2 года назад

Thank you

@nickpain6827 2 года назад

Been a total Penrose fanboy since my brother gave me a dog-eared copy of The Emperor's New Mind. Now a Keating fanboy too... Thanks for the great content - accessible and fascinating even to a curious layperson like me :-)

@DrBrianKeating 2 года назад

Thanks Nick love hearing that

@theforlanjoker4457 3 года назад

Im nothing but a simple brick layer and roger has always been a hero of mine,

@cwjian90 3 года назад

@Dr Brian Keating There seems to be some sort of cut/jump in the video at 38:40

@rahusphere 3 года назад

Hi Brian, thank you for this interview. Can you get Donald Hoffman please. Cheers

@CognizantApe 2 года назад

These talks with Roger Penrose are so awesome. Lol 🤯🤘⚡

@DrBrianKeating 2 года назад

James Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php

@ezza88ster 5 месяцев назад

Aw! Eric looks in love, whether Roger Speaks. 😊

@jellevannoort8743 3 года назад

From 42:00 Sir Roger speaks about how the 'core' of the singularity is more like a space than a point. I heard him also say that it's more non-local. I don't understand physics but that sounds a bit like the implicate order of another great physicist David Bohm. Could there be a connection?

@miltoncaramcaram3630 6 месяцев назад

I adore him. I could listen to him forever.

@gregoryhead382 3 года назад

I never really wanted to solve equations for black holes, Hawking radiation or Giza gravitational results. I just wanted to see what Einstein and Newton had to say about g.

@DarthLink1986 4 месяца назад

After this I want to try and find his speech accepting the prize! Thanks for the video

@DrBrianKeating 4 месяца назад

Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/list

@nigelpalmer9248 2 года назад

I came here from Gogier I must say I enjoyed this as I always enjoy Penrose

@DrBrianKeating 2 года назад

Glad you’re here

@MrJPI 8 месяцев назад

Ahaa! Brian has the massive book Gravitation second from the left on his bookshelf! Luckily the spcetime curvature caused by it didn't render this video incomprehensible like it did most of the text in the book when I used to study it-

@martintopinka8295 3 года назад

What was sir Roger's answer to the conformal mapping of singularities then?

@sonarbangla8711 Год назад

Like Sir Rogers, I also was inspired by complex analysis and the magic of quaternions and octonions and when the octonions explained the quarks, I was all gaga. Later I learned the limitations of octonions and how reality wasn't reflected by mathematical models. Yet like Penrose I was impressed by mathematics beyond description. Only a mathematician could explain a singularity and explain what happens at the end times, with massless Higgs fields. Thank you Sir Rogers, only you could claim mathematics id based on faith.

@desperateastro 2 года назад

The point about the British acceptance of unusual and eccentric and unorthodox intellectuals , as being actual respected INSIDERS (itals) in British society, deserves intensive and detailed analysis; because it may help us to mould our societies into those which accept Off-beat and Non-standard(BUT ALSO detailed and scholarly, AND encompassing real knowledge & insight) investigations and theories, as being worthy of our consideration. This more pronounced Societal and Public and Intellectual and Academic acceptance of unusual and unorthodox and boundary-crossing intellectuals is a definite feature of Britain; it doesn't seem to matter (or it matters less) in the U.K. what clique they belong to, or what their formal qualifications are, or whether their work seems a bit crazy.....the intellectual bad boys in Britain are at least given a hearing, and good numbers of them are respected. Also, good science communicators and explainers have quite a high status in the UK. The studied disdain of the practicing scientist for those who spend most of their time explaining science is Not(!) justifiable; the ability to Extremely Clearly explain scientific concepts to non-specialists may be as rare a skillset as the ability to make a significant scientific discovery.

@_John_Sean_Walker 3 года назад

What an enormous privilege to be able to watch such an interesting and stimulating interview with this brilliant giant. Good questions from Dr. Keating and Dr. Weinstein.

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks John! Stay tuned for more great guests!

@hamandchees3 3 года назад

Constructive feedback: Your multi-cam setup is cool but how often you switch views and fiddle what's displayed on screen is very distracting. You need to pick two or three "scenes", have the overlay for each calibrated in advance of recording, and only switch between them sparingly.

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks for the good advice

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thank you, both! I’ll try to improve my switch skillz.

@julienlandrey8265 3 года назад

where does the = sign come into the equation relative to maths and physics

@justinsutter3602 3 месяца назад

I really want to hear his response to Roy Kerrs recent paper on this stating the singularity is avoided because of centrifugal forces and that the affine parameter of Falling Light does not conclude with a singularity because light does not experience time. Kerr said the interior is not dissimilar to a neutron star and that a real singularity does not actually exist.

@milanpintar 2 года назад

contour integrate around anything to get rid of the singularity. You don't have to worry about black holes.

@garyjohnson1466 Год назад

Humans are mostly who’s living on a flower, unaware of the universe outside their awareness….fascinating discussion, as clear as mud but covers the subject, and platypus are the only mammal that lays eggs..

@Michael-tq6xm 3 года назад

Live yes

@MalcolmAkner 4 месяца назад

Something about crossing roads and scientific discoveries. In "the making of the atomic bomb" it is described that Leo Szilard got the idea of controlled nuclear fission chain reactions while crossing the street as well. Perhaps a potentially dangerous situation that kicks your brain into a different gear? Fascinating nonetheless. Roger surely is one of my all time favorite physicists, thanks for making this happen!

@HalfassDIY Год назад

Sir Roger Penrose is amazing !

@jamesrmorris1952 10 месяцев назад

I do like this CCC idea I've always felt that 13.5 billion years ain't that long when you consider how long the universe will last before heat death and when you consider our planet has been around for 4.6 billion years too.

@quickies9561 Год назад

the smartest people in the world and they can't balance the audio

@sonarbangla8711 Год назад

Mathematician Ramanujan worked on SINGULARITY and deduced two singularities. He was probably the first to discover them, but maybe not event horizon as Penrose discovered much later.

@victorching6278 8 месяцев назад

So like plane geometry, there are postulates that differ according to the curvature of time and space, where rules in one type of geometry do not necessarily apply to to spherical geometry. Where angles in a triangle can be more or less than 180 degrees and parallel lines do not exist. So there may be branches of physics where quantum theories work and general relativity doesn't.

@ramkrishnadas4230 Год назад

Brian, I sincerely wish you get Noble. I hope you are working on something which would lead you there. You have my Noble anyways for making me interested in Physics.

@MartinHeyamBieleckiBigArt 3 года назад

1:06:18 "The temperature goes up when you squash the future -- the temperature goes down when you stretch the big bang" -- That sounds super fun -- I did not know that :D

@TheIsmaelIsaac Год назад

Look at the symmetric movement positions the strings behind him. The do make perfect match with his body alignment. Debunked once and for all

@jasonhumber5378 2 года назад

NIce list of other channels.

@martintopinka8295 3 года назад

Can we download the slides without signing for spam ads??? It would be nice.

@travisfitzwater8093 3 года назад

Being inspired at about the 30 minute point, I think I've had a brain-material quantum coupling because I'm wondering what a Black Hole would say to us if we could anthropomorphize it. I'm thinking it might point out that it's substrate is, at least from its perspective, ordered and the substrates of all the things outside of a black hole is what is actually entropic. But, I'm probably missing something and the math will likely work anyway. It's just like "Just cancel out a minus sign."

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

The 2 cones to the left of the picture were the bottom one is upside down and the one on top its tip end meets with the bottom one where a letter P is to the left of the picture right in between there must to be a disk that is like a splash of both energys sides since it looks to me both sides get treaded at the center by making the neutral or the equator at the middle of the systems in between the 2 cones that is my suggestion based in a DNA PICTURE is form done by DNA PHOTOGRAPH VIA X RAY DEFRACTION in you tube where all entangled pairs CROSS same middle center point.

@Burevestnik9M730 3 года назад

Singularum Infinitum filled with electro-magnetic energy, that is what we have here. This electro-magnetic energy is transformed into bodies in the next eon and these bodies are moving charges hurling through space and exxerting force on the surrounding ether, which in turn exerts a force on bodies that we perceive as a gravitational force.

4 месяца назад

Wow. Yeah you need Eric level to get interesting stuff out from Roger. Not that I understand much of it. But thank you so much for this conversation.

@Burevestnik9M730 3 года назад

At one point, Penrose said in the boring universe there are photons and something else. What did he have in mind?

@ToxisLT 3 года назад

couple of suggestions I've learned after doing many migrations around the world never lifting my ass from my homebase:) -have secondary comms channels (chat apps/voip/mobile) to confirm internet/power down events -when adding additional people, check if other were not put on hold automagically... because skype -magic yourself up on rogan's podcast (ask eric for a favour;) - then get yourself a jamie with a phd - so that you don't have to multitask - you are missing interesting hooks for possible streams for the conversation ;) .. oh, and ditch the overhead camera - it's awkward, adds nothing and shows when you are multitasking and just semi following the conversation;) edit: keep up the awesome job!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks I really appreciate the feedback. I’m always learning. This isn’t my day job but I want to be as professional as possible!

@ToxisLT 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating hope this didn't sounded harsh, as it was put with much love;)

@markb9347 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating It may not be your day job, but could still prove to be some of your most important work. Posterity may look back and be as charmed by the minor foibles as I am today. As you implement the feedback, we might sadly miss some of the relatable human element. Thank you, I thoroughly enjoyed the whole thing. A hearty congrats to Sir Roger! Eric W always inspires! Keep up the great work!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

Thanks Mark! I’ll try to improve. Keep suggestions for improvement and guests coming. I’ll have Janna Levin this Tuesday morning then a huge livestream Tuesday night.

@monkerud2108 3 года назад

its a really cool mantra tho, eat food shit heat. its the story of life, food eats light, we eat food, we emit high entropy light.

@gekkobear1650 3 года назад

Read The Entropy Law and the Economic Process by Georgescu-Roegen

@johntavers6878 3 года назад

wow you figured it all out

@hyperduality2838 3 года назад

If black holes have entropy (Hawking) they also have syntropy or entangled entropy! Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics. "Through imagination and reason we turn experience into foresight (prediction)" -- Spinoza describing syntropy. Syntropy is "converging information" or mutual information resulting from rational thinking to create optimized predictions which are used to track targets -- teleology. All observers track targets! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). Randomness (entropy) is dual to order (syntropy. determinism). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. If black holes have syntropy then the question becomes are black holes conscious, are black holes alive?

@gekkobear1650 3 года назад

@@hyperduality2838 yes they are. So are stars. And Gaia is real too

@hyperduality2838 3 года назад

@@gekkobear1650 Entropy becomes mutual information in Shannon's information theory! Mutual or common information, entangled entropy = syntropy. Duality converts entropy, information into syntropy or predictable information.

@TheoriesofEverything 3 года назад

Given Brian Keating's intellectual pedigree, tenacity, and unexampled style, I predict this title will one day renamed to "Two Nobel prize winners converse."

@ahmedmak5927 3 года назад

Let's hope it's renamed to "Three Nobel prize winners converse" or Eric won't be too happy!

@DrBrianKeating 3 года назад

@@ahmedmak5927 Maybe four with Janna Levin too!

@ahmedmak5927 3 года назад

@@DrBrianKeating I didn't realize she was on but that would be the dream! My bad, tuned in too late haha

@alex79suited 7 месяцев назад

I hope so? If he has the courage. Peace ✌️

@benjaminbeard3736 7 месяцев назад

Good to see you Curt. That would be a nice bit of instant karma.

@alex79suited Год назад

What no picture Dr Keating I'm disappointed, I believe I deserved a picture SIR. I love Penrose he is a great dude.

@lvuyk2408 Год назад

There seems to be more at the nano scale of strings and flexible propeller shaped fermions. AND FLEXIBLE PHOTON STRINGS.

@garysamuel9521 Год назад

Please have Sir Roger return to discuss how differences in the equivalency principle at changing places alters the local vacuum or describes how the local vacuum is varying from place to place accordingly. At video time 48:30.

@maciekwar Год назад

I wish a dust in my apartment was collapsing into a single spot... then I would place a bin there :)

@PhysicsNative 3 года назад

The physical distinction Penrose made numerous times between the Weyl curvature and the Ricci curvature is appreciated, and not often elucidated. Also a reminder of Gauss’ law in calculating net charge from a closed surface around a charge density, which could be infinite. However, Penrose’s singularity theorem is not as accessible as these simple concepts. He uses advanced analytical geometry to prove geodesic incompleteness, in the form of a closed, trapped surface that “focuses” all light rays inward together. This is equated with a breakdown, a singularity. However, this could be alternatively interpreted as a local observer reaching the edge of spacetime in a finite amount of time and then forever frozen in time. One can then ask whether the singularity ever forms in a finite amount of time.

@roberthanson7423 Год назад

Why is there no discussion of the effect of angular momentum on the shape of the singularity?

@alex79suited 7 месяцев назад

I will have a look.

@evolagenda 3 года назад

Brian mute your shit if you're not talking lol. That phone was a buzz kill

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

Free fall in an spanding universe? As my self see north can not fall to south either south can emerge to north so how then that could be?

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

south can not merge to north nither north may submerge to south due that even light as matter falls in by atomic weight. Back to the board?¡¡¡

@_John_Sean_Walker 3 года назад

@@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace Do they have high schools and universities in your country?

@alex79suited 4 месяца назад

So I'm quite happy that I've moved science forward, in real life time. Sol was an interesting listen especially the EMFSYSTEMS part. I have much more much more. But let's see where they go. Peace 😎 ✌️ from Canada, eh.

@sunroad7228 3 года назад

Entropy / wear and tear internal to matter... "No energy system can produce sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it. This universal truth applies to all energy systems."

@milanpintar 2 года назад

I loved contour integration.

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

Well done Dr keating and crew exelent conversation with Sir Penroe congragulations to you good man, is my plasure to listen to you all, thanx for the space to share ideas. - Excuse me but is there just one in flash or are there 2 flashes one from the inside that hits the concave inside part that rays wil be returned and converged to a central point is my guess if the flash is inside a sphere, now if the flash is coming from the out and hits the out complex side what happens here is that the rays will in the most be reffracted to all directions, in my opinion both rays(the incoming and the outgoing) dont have much of a chance to converge in kind of half and half but the inside flash will be forced to concentrate at center of the sphere while the complex outside diverges the flash rays to every where so the differense of the outside willbe much less than the inside. - See it in the sun as an exemple the sun sphere must to be stronger than the inside explosions so it may hold the explosions full of matter and light that just a bit of it goes out from the sun white sphere, lots of matter and light is reffracted back to the inside sun, at this place just out the sun light is way more strong than any incoming matter-light from around space so it goes out almos free but as it goes up from around this so hot light is refractted back little by little due to some other electromagnetism that the systems have to all around, some light goes out the solar system that the same hapens to other stars so is the light that we see from around. - The incoming light from the cosmos and the out put from the stars from all around they kind of get both to a neutral point that is much alike to a galaxie form that looks like an UFO FLY CRAFT or kind of the form of Teslas one flying craft disign. Think that if the explosion happens at the center of the sun light would just go up and down back and forth.

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

to a point that it will be diminished as it goes up and down from the center of the sun to as high from all around it could get same thing will be fro the out side reffracted light due to the other electromagnetic halos that star systems must have so at bounses out the system and to the inside of the systemlight gets demolished more and more, anlist this is my point of view but my self could be wrong.

@donaldpenman4241 9 месяцев назад

Do we still have matter within a singularity? If it was just energy then it could occupy the same space.

@Dr_LK 2 года назад

The link for the slides is not working...

@richardhunt809 11 месяцев назад

Hopefully the cosmic gravity wave background will show more Hawking points.

@TheMrCougarful 2 года назад

That was awesome. All of them fine gentlemen, great minds yet honest and humble. The best of humanity on display.

@DrBrianKeating 2 года назад

Thanks very much !

@nilanjankmukherjee234 3 года назад

Is it possible to edit the subtitles?? Can anyone do that?

@flowerpt 3 года назад

RU-vid recently killed that feature.

@nilanjankmukherjee234 3 года назад

@@flowerpt ohh

@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад

The big is for the small and the small is for the big they shood both some how be united sinse no matter how big you tell me a system is it for sure as well the others will be of atoms, so how a thing may go off not to be entangled when all inside atoms of any body must all be entangled one to an other.

@gio.k291 3 года назад

How can singularities exist as physical objects made of known matter?

@hyperduality2838 3 года назад

@tolkienfan1972 Год назад

I personally think that the measurement is simply us updating our knowledge of the quantum system.

@davidwilkie9551 3 года назад

Or, "Is Oxygen really needed?" Newton demonstrated optically what the Quantum Operator minimum action, the Singularity Apature of Actuality Conception communicated in conformity rates of time-timing sync-duration of Pure Dynamic Mathematics 1-0 probability superposition-spin-spiral recirculation holographic quantization. Logarithmic Time.

@davidwilkie9551 3 года назад

A curious question to ask, by and to, Physicists, but maybe not Philosophers. Mathematicians are exempted by demonstration of the Actuality Singularity positioning Principle. Are we here-now-forever equivalent in temporal cause-effect terms. (Rhetorical) But if the concept of "era" is assumed to be a period of "something in nothing", self-consistent discrete time, or "physical" universes are atemporal, separable, and Conformal Fields are not legitimate mathematically, then it's logical to apply the Disproof Methodology of "everything is connected" at this point in time = Singularity Conception. Unity of Infinity, .dt@ zero-infinity sync-duration connectivity, or e-Pi-i AdS/CFT circularity quantization wave-particle Holographic Principle, superimposed-superposition implies pure relative wave-particle coordination-identification, ..Mathematical motion composed of time-timing period-length Polar-Cartesian self-defining logarithmic coordination. The (in)visible existence of Time Duration Timing resonance.