Flute: Charlotte Roth. Piano: Owen Heritage. Performed as part of the free lunchtime concert series presented by KAMS, every first Friday of the month at noon at the New Albany Library. More details at www.gokams.org
I'm playing the piano accompaniment for this for a high school student, she is very gifted. I listened to this recording when I first got the music a month ago to figure out the tempos for the movements. I marked the Vivace at 80, but when I practiced with the student, she was playing it at 112 because that was what her teacher instructed her to do. What is stylistically correct? I feel like my hands are going to fall off after the second page just going 80 😆.
Bravo for having tried to play this tricky sonata. But I'm wondering where the tempo 'Vivace' and the traverso are... It's also played as it were classical music, which is absolutely not. These people had a good idea to share this kind of music, but need maybe a journey in Europe... because overall, it seems to be painful for the player(s)...
I agree. Unfortunately most of everything instrumental composed before 1900 is thrown under the umbrella term of 'classical', which leads to the misinterpretation of many pieces. It's still one of the better renditions of the Sonata that I have heard recently, though.
@@bengaltiger8790 I know in fact 2 recorder recordings (I'm a recorder player) that in my opinion are played in a good way with some respect to the historic context: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-o-Y8EntyeOs.html; ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wXTAi93EpWw.html (historic version of Brüggen)
@@lucabrandolini3547 Thank you! I'll definitely check that out! This artist has a good rendition of the piece Madrigal, although I am unsure if it stays true to the time period or not. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wDW8pExB--0.html
