Sony 100-400mm VS 200-600mm Sharpness Comparison

Подписаться 51 тыс.

Просмотров 21 тыс.

50% 1

In this video we compare the sharpness of the Sony 100-400mm GM vs the 200-600mm.
Sony 100-400mm GM - amzn.to/2Gufk3O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UhdGpn (B&H)
Sony 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 - amzn.to/3c6ReeL (Amazon) bhpho.to/3EZkan8 (B&H)
Become a Member to get access to exclusive perks:
/ @stefanmalloch
See all links for my gear below.
Social Media
/ hypnotikphotography
/ hypnotikcamera
Business Contact
www.hypnotikphotography.com
info@hypnotikphotography.com
Below are affiliate links. If you want to buy these items or services through the following links, I will get a small kick back and it doesn't cost you anything. Thanks!
My Gear & Tools:
Amazon.com /.ca /.eu / B&H
Camera & Lenses:
Sony A7iii - amzn.to/2VZqO5M (Amazon) bhpho.to/3GWC1Ot (B&H)
Sony A7iv - amzn.to/3Tm2NU1 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VJ2svg (B&H)
Sony A6600 - amzn.to/2T02P76 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3B2WRI3 (B&H)
Sony 1.4X Teleconverter - amzn.to/303UMcL (Amazon) bhpho.to/3XMXE9N (B&H)
Sony 50mm F1.8 - amzn.to/2K0kkzb (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VE4a0L (B&H)
Samyang 85mm F1.4 - amzn.to/36J8wLf (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Vil4Ci (B&H)
Samyang 135mm F1.8 - amzn.to/3gJ4eNX (Amazon) bhpho.to/3uccV6w (B&H)
Sony 90mm F2.8 Macro - amzn.to/2oWUYe8 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OPiEsi (B&H)
Laowa 25mm Ultra Macro - amzn.to/3fCflb4 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3AYGEDG (B&H)
Sony FE 16-35 F4 - amzn.to/2VU2Ybs (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gNvavV (B&H)
Tamron 20-40mm F2.8 - amzn.to/3WvygF3 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3iqJZFc (B&H)
Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 - amzn.to/31WswJm (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UnFsRl (B&H)
Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 - amzn.to/3CgsGee (Amazon) bhpho.to/3AYaKaq (B&H)
Tamron 50-400mm - amzn.to/3GUUf2O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3uc6QXR (B&H)
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 ART - amzn.to/2ZTyOrj (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VEinLg (B&H)
Sony 100-400mm GM - amzn.to/2Gufk3O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UhdGpn (B&H)
Spare 3rd Party Batteries for A7iii/A7IV - amzn.to/2RLytWH
Godox Flash - amzn.to/2WeDOo7 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3H3RUCD (B&H)
Flash Reciever - amzn.to/2Tah7Q1 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Vimn4a (B&H)
Insta360 One X2 - amzn.to/3rRnwRa (Amazon) bhpho.to/3iw8OQk (B&H)
DJI Pocket 2 -amzn.to/3lcjgIQ (Amazon) bhpho.to/3H1LgwK (B&H)
Drones
Mini 3 Pro here - amzn.to/3QbPKCX (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VryrQH (B&H)
The ONLY Camera Straps I use:
Peak Design Slide - amzn.to/2NZrCWd (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OPkOrU (B&H)
Peak Design Slide Light - amzn.to/2r9GVCE (Amazon) bhpho.to/3XQg1dV (B&H)
Tripods & Monopods
Peak Design Tripod - amzn.to/399Hj8d (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OY4vJx (B&H)
Vanguard Alta 263AT - amzn.to/2O0oLwc (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OSymTD (B&H)
JOBY GorillaPod 3K - amzn.to/2CZHSjO (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Fj9bql (B&H)
Slypod Pro - amzn.to/3g0iVfh (Amazon) bhpho.to/3GUWl2G (B&H)
Slypod E - amzn.to/3Eu2fWL (Amazon)
ND Filters
Freewell ALL IN 1 - amzn.to/3E6R4TN (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gQ3BSS (B&H)
Freewell VND Mist - amzn.to/3qmfm28 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Uoxl6Z (B&H)
B&W 10 Stop - amzn.to/2XuaOd3 (Amazon)
Camera Bag
Tenba Solstice 10L Bag - amzn.to/3pSUosy (Amazon) bhpho.to/3ipvy4f (B&H)
Case Logic SLRC-206 - amzn.to/2CUNX0O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gJrz2d (B&H)
RU-vid Gear & Essentials
Voice Over Mic - amzn.to/3ilje4Y (Amazon)
Rode Wireless Go 2 - amzn.to/3XXMwHo (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OS9xXP (B&H)
Shotgun Mic - amzn.to/37wADx0 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gQdgsG (B&H)
Godox SL60W - amzn.to/2tFGrp8 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VLCSWo (B&H)
RGB LED Lights - amzn.to/3ljSxu8
Wireless Video Kit - amzn.to/3VkxZ6F (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OVTubJ (B&H)
Elgato Stream Deck - amzn.to/2WoFFZD (Amazon) bhpho.to/3ujwvxO (B&H)
Software
Adobe Cloud (Photoshop, Lightroom..) - prf.hn/l/8xEdXB0
Luminar AI - skylum.evyy.ne...
Tube Buddy - (Free!) - www.tubebuddy....

Опубликовано:

9 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 61

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

Which one is the best for you?

@tomlillandt1344 3 года назад

Both! :)

@RokPodaro 3 года назад

For me, I ordered G master😎,can't wait to try it😎.Great video,as always.

@chirsd666 3 года назад

Nice comparison, but for many wildlife and bird photographers, the important comparison would have been the 100-400 at 400 cropped to the same framing as the 600. That's what really counts for those shooters, and I think the results and conclusion would have been very different.

@parch_jurajski 3 года назад

Indeed. I own both and did that comparison myself. 200-600 is a winner here ☺️

@AdamCasada Год назад

Better yet, compare 100-400 with 1.4x TC vs. 200-600. This is the decision I am trying to make.

@stretch90 8 месяцев назад

I don’t think that’s a good comparison. Of course the 200-600 will be better than the 100-400 with cropping like that. The point is to compare how well each lens works in it’s own focal range.

@albertnebe8795 3 года назад

thanks a lot for the comparison, Stefan! It just would have been great to see a comparison at 400mm for both lenses. But really high qualitiy videos though! Subscribed :)

@Hacmm55 3 года назад

Love my 100-400 GM! I definitely made the right decision buying it.

@tomlillandt1344 3 года назад

Thanks once again Stefan for a great video!

@lesliesharpe4915 3 года назад

Interesting info, thanks!!

@gamerguy655 3 года назад

Thanks for the comparison

@bioliv1 3 года назад

You should have added the Sigma 100-400 mm too!

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

That would have been nice but its long gone now and wouldn't have been the same test.

@pf4773 3 года назад

Hi, Thanks, Stefan for your comparison video! Because I travel small size is important, as well as needing a long reaching lens that works with my APSC Sony A6600 camera. I found a wonderful high quality lens for a great price open box, after discounts, for under $550...the sony alpha 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G. Just a great, practical lens that is reasonably light, has a wonderful range of zoom, and with a small size that easily fits in my small travel bag.

@82zman1 2 года назад

Really odd that you did not compare them at the same focal lengths instead of using the extremes. And the best question that was not addressed was could the 100-400 cropped to equivalent 600mm top the 200-600mm at 600. Most of us that shoot wildlife are camping out at the long end. I

@stephenphillips7036 3 года назад

Good review, I've owned both and the 100-400 is a lot sharper and has better contrast it also focuses more accurately. I also have the 1.4x TC. I found the 100-400 with the 1.4 TC combination to be sharper than the 200-600 alone . I now have the 100-400 again. One point that might help people is everyone knows the 100-400 has good close focusing and the 200-600 only focuses down to 2.3 meters if I remember correctly but because its at 600mm you can still fill the frame with a butterfly and its close up sharpness seemed to me its best point.

@hozo101 2 года назад

Awesome videos! Great info on the 100-400 GM

@jamesseward9263 2 года назад

A fair comparison would have been to put a 1.4 TC on the 100-400 to achieve similar focal lengths. 🤔

@DennisvanderSpoel 15 дней назад

The fair comparison, which would be more interesting, is using the 1.4 extender on the GM. You need 600mm out there.

@davidligon6088 2 года назад

Not sure why you didn’t compare the 100-400 and 200-600 at 400 and 200, where they actually overlap, or the 100-400 cropped to 600 (APS-C mode), scaled to the same size image and compared to the 200-600 at 600mm.

@jamesb8818 3 года назад

i wonder why people dont compare the exact same settings to the exact same settings. put the gmaster at 200mm and the same f/stop and compare them

@AjaySingh-228 3 года назад

Good One bro..Both lens are amazing..I love it..Make a vedio for moon photography

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

Sure 😊

@AjaySingh-228 3 года назад

@@StefanMalloch 😊✌

@galenfong4377 3 года назад

Thanks for the test. May I know where to buy the test chart? Thanks!

@duranozer2652 Месяц назад

this video is very useful but i wonder what if you compare Sony 70-200mm g master 2 and sony 100-400mm for sharpness. do you have a chance compare these two lenses especially at 200mm for 70-200 and at 400mm for the other? and extra 2x teleconverter for the lens 70-200mm.

@TubTechGuru Год назад

Great video! Would be nice to see both at 200mm & at 400mm in comparison. The only down side for me on the 100-400mm is the external zoom & it’s longevity…due to air, dust & sands. I own couple of Nikon & Sony with external zoom lenses and it’s not that great anymore.

@user-oe5jl2br6u 6 месяцев назад

1-4 is sharper and focusses faster than the 2-6. Even with 1.4, the 1-4 matches the 2-6. Lighter and more compact, so replaces my 2-6.😊

@ZOB4 3 года назад

G Master is shorter, lighter, faster, and sharper - I would say it is definitely worth the extra money. Yeah, you lose the extra range, but I think over the course of the use of it (especially if you're going to make prints and sell them) it'll make up for the difference over time. Excellent comparison and review.

@stretch90 8 месяцев назад

Sure you lose 400-600 range but you also gain 100-200 and that makes the lens much more versatile.

@haaspaas2 7 месяцев назад

@@stretch90you lose the range you'd be shooting in 99% of the time and gain a range which is irrelevant for wildlife.

@stretch90 7 месяцев назад

@@haaspaas2 I disagree. I use the 100-200 range often for environment shots with wildlife.

@kazumitakemoto2543 Год назад

In general, I appreciate your comparisons. However, comparing two lenses at 100 vs 200 and 400 and 600? You must be after short sleep with hangover. You should have compared 200 vs 200 and 400 vs 200. Then you might add 100 and 600 as two different matters for those who need the range.

@vasiliosdinis 3 года назад

I would also test this with the tele converter too to see if it's compatible to the 200-600. Nice review.

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

It is and I have a few videos on that as well. Cheers

@danhorwitz7182 2 года назад

I would rather have seen a comparison of the G master lens at 400 versus the 200-600 also at 400 for an apples to apples comparison. Same at 200 vs 200, and 300 vs 300. Also the G master with 400 + 1.4x vs the 200-600 at 560mm.

@SonofTangra359 2 года назад

I don't get why most of the reviewers do not compare all 4 corners of the lenses. Most of the lenses have slight variance of the sharpness between the corners. At least provide RAW files so we can check them ourselves.

@themarksmanABP 3 года назад

So here's my thoughts. I have the A9 & 2-600 & it's a great combo! However... I will be upgrading to the A1 at some point. Now... would an A1 with it's huge cropability and the 100-400 cropped in to make up the 200mm where needed, be a better choice than the 2-600? That's my decision i'm trying to make lol. Even shooting in crop mode in camera on the A1 and 1-400 will give you similar reach to the 2-600... Thoughts?

@godsinbox 3 года назад

did you decide? A1 is very expensive, you could buy a canon and get bird eyeAF and long lens for cheaper than A1 body.

@KOKOBC 2 года назад

Wow the difference is really big, I’m sold(100-400mm)

@byjackli 2 года назад

I'm guessing both test photos were shot at the same distance, just the one shot on 100-400 was blown up to match the 200-600? Pretty sure there are many real-world scenarios where I can't physically move closer the subject, so I was just wondering.

@subutai8392 2 года назад

The difference between 400 and 600 isn't as significant as the difference between 100 and 200. The 100-400 is extremely versatile and serves multiples roles from wildlife, semi-macro, portrait, and even landscape. The 200-600 is truly a gem and afiak only exist in the Sony ecosystem (until Nikon releases theirs) but it's a specialized tool used primarily for birds, although it can be used for other things, that's where it excels in this comparison.

@crestonburks2141 3 года назад

Great review. Good information. Can you tell me where I can download the focusing image that you area using. And, what size have you printed it for this test and what is the distance from the cameras? Thank you

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

Hey I bought it in Hi Rez online. A regular printer won't print high enough resolution for proper tests.

@RickMentore 3 года назад

Almost in every case the lens with the longer reach looses!

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

True story but it still performs well!

@TVe200 3 года назад

The difference in sharpness was not big. Despite the price difference I would buy the 100-400. The 200-600 is to big. Now I own the 70-350 for APS-C, the 100-400 will give me a reach of 150-600 on an APS-C camera or in APS-C mode om full frame. Sigma 100-400 is a much cheaper alternative, still on both the Sony lenses you can use teleconvertes too.

@hiawrj 3 года назад

Remember your 70-350 is still giving you 525mm reach on APSC camera or in APSC mode on fullframe, even though it is an APSC lens.

@TVe200 3 года назад

@@hiawrj I know, after I bought it I have tried some bird photography. I struggle with autofocus and don't know whether it is me, the lens or the camera (a6500).

@hiawrj 3 года назад

@@TVe200 It's a G lens with the newest extreme linear motors, so I doubt it's the lens. The a6500 is a generation behind a6100, a6400 and a6600 when it comes to AF speed - but I don't have any birding experience, so it's all theoretical for me.

@TVe200 3 года назад

@@hiawrj I know that a6600 have better AF, it have also tracking move which is great for birds in flight. I had hoped for more improvements in a6600 than better AF, bigger battery and nothing else. I am waiting to se whether Sony will release a better APS-C camera or kill the APS-C totaly.

@hiawrj 3 года назад

@@TVe200 I don't think they will kill APS-C, it's their gratest selling line of cameras. But it's very wise to wait a little, since no new aps-c cameras have been announced for a while. Next gen sony cameras will all come with features like the ones we see in a7siii, if they are something you need.

@nivedmurali8523 3 года назад

Does 100-400 have linear motor drivers?

@StefanMalloch 3 года назад

Yes, 2 compared to the 200-600's one if I remember correctly.

@adairsteve Год назад

The comparisons are not particularly helpful, and the approach shows a clear bias towards the 100-400mm. The review compares each lens at its widest and furtherest reach. Such a comparison is not fair for two reasons. Firstly, providing sharp images becomes more difficult the greater the magnification; second, the apperature changes with zoom distance provide further deterioration of image quality. Under this type of review it is obvious that the 100-400mm has teh advantage. Hwoever, people that are considering these lenses would be wanting to know direct comparisons at the same focal focal length - how does each lens compare at 200mm, 300mm, 400mm, and what is the 100-400mm like at 560mm (with the 1.4x converter) compared to the 200-600mm lens at the same focal lengths. When this rdirect comparison is performed the 200-600mm wins in image quality at every focal length.