Spider-Man [PC] vs Spider-Man [PS5] | Direct Comparison 

Congrats on getting engaged!

Congratulations on your engagement. Wish you a quick recovery 🙏🏻

thought you quit youtube there for a second.. :(

@@stellabell9074 nope. Just doing life things

Ohoho, nice, congratulations 🎊 🎉 🍻 🍻

Very true! It's crazy that an almost 10 year old system looks that good!

Agreed.

looks good but almost unplayable imo. it feels like it runs at 10 fps

@@qrispinator what are you talking about? After 10 minutes getting used to it, you don't even realize it's running in 30 fps. Totally playable!

@@johnkapnias Yeah not for me. I played the game halfway through on the ps4 version and I couldnt stand it. I ended up upgrading my version of miles morales to get spiderman remastered so I could play at 120.

Spider-man 2 will release atleast 5 years later.

@@muhtasimmahin5057 I think it’ll be more like 2 years since that was when the remastered version of Spider-Man was released and miles morales

I also can't wait for Miles Morales and the winter setting, it looks gorgeous.

@@RayyuEdits lol no. it's been 4 years since sm released and miles is a spinoff...it makes sense why they releasing it now to get more people to buy the sequel with both characters.

@@jondasek is miles morales confirmend to come on pc?

Yeah I saw a few people post about this - you're right. Definitely some AO issues atm. Add that to the list of things that need attention for this one.

HBAO still looks like crap.

I still get the HBAO+

same

If only I had a playstation or a PC

That’s why you sell your kidney and buy PC and PS5!

I recommend you get the HP Pavilion Desktop as a starter PC, it's $600 and for the price it's a steal! I've had it for almost 2 years and it runs pretty much any game on medium-high settings with 60+ FPS

@@JoseRamos-qr7vo dont listen to this guy lol

Already feeling a bit better. Not quite 100% but had enough energy to finally sit down and get back to writing :)

Bug.

it's definitely a bug. As it's launch is little buggy and gameplay is in slow motion sometimes.

@@maxcanonstunner6532 not for me

Def a bug

@@Das-gn6jr because you might had a patch at actual launch. But it was buggy and slow in early launch according to cabose.

some graphics options are like that, texture quality is always like that in every game, effects vram not framerate, yet you see people only 8gb+ cards using low textures on competitive games despite it actually making it harder to play

Make everything on playstation day 1 on PC too

PC getting all the games from all platforms. We're soo spoiled lol

@@eytbits Nintendo? Unless you are okay with emulation we don't have official nintendo games on PC

@@MobikSaysStuff yes, emulation is fine. One of the perks of playing on PC. Finished BOTW on 4k 60fps. If you want official, we have monster hunter rise on Switch and PC. no other consoles.

Thanks man...but some of playstation fanboys are getting really mad. why these fanboys are getting mad over almost 5 years old exclusive ported on pc is beyond me. I guess some people are just imatured

Yeah, I felt more impressed with the ps5 remaster than the pc. Actually disappointed with the pc, frame drops are more often so that you have to lower settings

It's because the PC has hardware features that the PS5 doesn't and it was the publisher who tried to implement those features into a game that just wasn't designed for those features. It would require a new set of code and many, many hours of testing to implement those features, if I understand 3D modelling correctly.

Yes in the pc settings he is using hbao+

Also on some AMD systems, mine included, there are some really bad bugs while u swing like shadows and lighting popping in.

Yeah that's what many are explaining , i don't know how digital foundry didn't mention this. Plus there are micro stutters every minute while traversing fast !

@@Zeegoku1007 odd I have 6900xt and 5800x3d I don't have that problem.

Big brain

Can't wait for Arkham World

@@sdp640 Oh mate for sure.

could be a vram issue that's causing the frame dips. Also, out of curiosity, what card do you have and what settings do you use?

@@Papa_Parry You coul be right! i have a 3070..using High Texture Settings (not very high) RTX on and on High Settings and 6 Range. Then DLSS on Performance. SSAO instead of HBAO+ also medium Depth of Field since medium looks good enough.

@@sehrschee Oh nice, I also have a 3070. I would try this once i get the game but i don't own a 4k monitor lol.

me too 3080ti frame dips for no reason...

Yeah..yr not running 4k if you have a 3070 my guy

Same here

are you on a hard drive

@@LilithSoul4 No, my OS and the game are on an NVME SSD.

I noticed that in the settings when I changed it. The ssao looks better, also no ray tracing problem and I believe the hbao is the problem for the ray tracing problem.

gtx 1080 ti i7 6700k 170hz Displayport monitor 2k resolution no upscaling (tried igti, no ghosting... have you turned motion blur off?) all maxed out 60 to 120 fps (even 145 fps in some static cutscenes or inside buildings) depending on the moments, but smooth as f*** and my pc is old, 99%gpu usage and 60/80% of cpu usage, enemies stuck in walls sometimes thats true, never crashed but i played only 3 days to finish story and 1 dlc story, i feel its well optimised, considering my hardware is pretty old

instead of fsr or igti i used some tweaks of Antialias from nvidia control panel combined with the native of the game

very rare drops to 58/59 fps, thats only bcuz i play at maxed out settings

@@fukzee also playing at 2k on a 240hz true gsync monitor. Motion blur is disabled. I am also playing with Max settings and ray tracing. I think ray tracing is the issue.

@@austin_colt ye i think too, maybe they will fix that, i cant use ray tracing with 1080 ti so i cant tell

I dont honestly think so. I would bet that its because the reflections are locked at 60hz and Nick is running the game on a 120hz display.

I tried locking my framerate to 50hz out of curiosity and the reflections were still lagging behind

@@Nick930 huh? Well then its propably just a bug on how it handles raytraced reflections. Hopefully it will be fixed soon enough

The PC port being sloppy and still performaing and looking that much better than the PS5, with overall quality of effects, kind of doesn't tell me the port was sloppy at all or the PS5 version wasn't as well optimized as you're saying OR the PS5 lacks actual compute power already. You can play the game without a dedicated GPU on a Ryzen 5800G. There's multiple videos on that CPU's IGPU alone. I don't know where the game is sloppy on PC having played it myself and exceeded the PS5's overally fidelity while also exceeding the performance. I personally think it's multiple issues.... the PS5 is severely already underpowered, the PC port was well made all around for PC, and the PS5 version is just not as optimized as you'd like to think when it cant handle even 8x antriscopic filtering. It's using 4x. Just to let that sink in.... the very barebones systems running the game with an integrated GPU can easily without any performance issues, top out the antriscopic filtering to x16. The PS5 not being able to do that tells us it's already at it's limit and they literally had to reel back that feature that costs almost nothing to most other computers. The CPU on the PS5 has always been a really anemic and sorry CPU. It's just been even with the rumors of it's existence before the ps5 came out. It's not going to get better for the ps5 unfortunately which is why I'm guessing sony is realizing it's best to put real man hours and money into the PC sector. It just makes more sense. MS knew this but I think sony had to give it one last go before they switched and all their new services point to just that....PC is where it's at and always has been.

sloppy?

@@pushpopLoC909 I wasn't where it was at for the Spider-Man 2 movie game. Though you can of course emulate that these days... The PC version was nothing like the console which was superior. ;)

@@damienlc8895 Ya, if a game looks only slightly better on a PC thats way more powerful, just means it has not been optimized, so yes sloppy. The PC division for Sony is new. So thats not shocking. We wont see the best results till we see games developed and optimized for PS and Pc from the ground up. If Sony is really invested in PC, we will also see these games keep getting updates so they take full advantage of PCs better hardwear.

@@nanfoodles You literally don't know what you're talking about at all LMAO. You're proving my point even further with that comment cause you've doubled down on that statement. If it's not optimized and yet an integrated GPU inside a CPU can run the game with some settings turned to max while the ps5 has low to medium equivalent on PC, then the ps5 is just horribly underpowered. I'm literally saying, because I know big words are hard, that it doesn't even take a powerful PC to run it. It takes a $300 PC to run the game at playable framerates and with some settings turned up due to the fact that the CPU is MILES better than the ps5's CPU. To simplify it further... the PC port was not bad at all when a PC like that can run the game. Computer Science 101. lol.

ha. Well I guess you can always just plug in a dualsense controller and things are back to normal right?

You need a high end to get to the ps5 level….Need to know where you get this at £1500 😂. No pal a high end pc is 10x the power of any console and cost minimum £3000 upto £5000 if you want high spec everything. Probably find is is just a normal mediocre pc and is probably far high resolution than the PS, however you won’t see this due to poor video quality. Most PlayStation AAA games are 1440 upscaled to 1800ish and achieve 30fps or 60 if reduced to 1080p upscaled. With a pc we generally use dlss if you have rtx and can be used. So you get 1440 upscaled to what looks like native 4K, max everything, path tracing when game support, max retracing and all the bells and whistles with 200+ fps with regen. Phenomenal to say the least.

@colinbrydon7659 So your problem is that I said high end? This was over a year ago, and I was pointing out that, at the time, a system costing £1500 was needed to get similar results. That's all.

@@phoenix___7747 Even a year ago the top hardware was the same. Nothing much has changed apart from marginally quicker cpu’s. Optimisation might be relevant with consoles but not so much on a great spec PC. So I am going on the assumption it’s still relevant now.

@@colinbrydon7659 I wasn't talking about the absolute top end. When I wrote this, a system running on anything less than a 3070 was having trouble with this particular game.

Access to mods will make it more than worth while. It wouldn't surprise me if people released custom missions too.

​@@mreverybody1150 yeah you're right

Meh

@@sliderit Why ?

@@Zeegoku1007 no modifications can be created on PS. The fps with hz is low for me too.

@@sliderit I sold my gaming PC, got a ps5 and an oled for the same price, when consoles can do 4k 60 (even 1440p) i told myself that was enough, well were here. (too much time messing with settings rather than gaming) to each their own.

@@NadaTheyLive wow, too much time to set the game settings? I hope thats ajoke. PS: not my fault you couldnt get a normal pc.

idk but swinging feel so realistic at 30fps IMO

60fps vs 120fps wont matter in 60hz monitor lol

In a singleplayer game, id rather 4k 60fps over 1080p 120fps. Obviously it depends on the monitor you have. And of course, you'd need an rtx 3080 to get those frame rates.

I confirm, have switch to a 1440p 144hz montior last year can't go back to 60 hz

@@deagle7602 2k 90/100 fps with rare drops to 70/80 all near to maxed out settings (just lowered shadows a little and texture to max not super) on 1080 ti i7 6700k, 5 year old pc hardware (170 hz 2k monitor)

just reflections, no Rt lighting in this

welcome to playstation man! what other games have you played besides both sm games? we got a pleura of phenomenal exclusives...it's insane.

@@introduction1266 I am taking my sweet time with Ghost of Tsushima. I freaking love that game. Also, Returnal, simply amazing!

@@AMITAWAGHADE if you have ps plus, I would highly recommend Yakuza Like A Dragon if you like turn based rpgs. It's one of the monthly games so make sure to add it to your library to play later.

@@AMITAWAGHADE glad to hear that. I love ghost too. Easily one of the best games I've ever played. I took my time with it as well after finishing the base game.. I'm now doing the dlc. I'll have to check out returnal...I heard it's great

@@BerryNiceToMeetYou Yeah I got PS Plus. But I started playing Yakuzas on game pass before. So currently I am going through all PS classics which I always wanted to play. I got Shadow of Colossus next on my list.

PS5 has faster loading

Ps5 is slightly faster even after installing on an m.2 drive. But the difference is really small. Not that big a deal either way

@@Nick930 still think it deserves a mention.

@@jack_knife-1478 It deserves a mention but it takes literally like 3 seconds to load off a gen 3 nvme ssd which is how Im playing it.

40fps? what year is is xD

@@fourohsevenfishing why those the year matter alot of people on PC also play 30 fps everyone has a great graphics card

@@fourohsevenfishing I'm saying 40 feels a whole lot better than 30

@@JesManVP i've never met anyone in my life who plays pc at 30fps unless the game is just locked to it or their computer is a potato

@@JesManVP 60 to me feels sluggish nowadays

I'd love to see anyone find or build a PC that matches the PS5 for less money than the console costs.

@@timothyranck exactly To match the PS5 standards, a pc that has the price of almost triple to that of a PS5 price might be needed

@@timothyranck that would be awesome, maybe in a few years? :D

If you want something that can match or beat The Ps5 or Series X gaming performance, Its really easy to do. Get a 3gb/s SSD , a ryzen 3700x cpu or newer and a Rtx 2070 graphics card. The ps5 is basically a 2019 mid range gaming PC without all the pc features. To note, Even when the ps5 first came out sony was Talking about its "Next gen " graphics performance. Its Ironic because "next gen" was something that pc gamers had already been using for the last several years. Anyone whos listened to sony fan video channels has probably heard tales of how 'game changing' sony's SSD is. unfortunatly if you compare the real world performance of that Drive People discover that The decompression technology is very rarely useful. The ssd's only true purpose seems to be giving technologicallly ignorant "sony super fans" something to talk about. They believe the ssd and its special features are providing performance gains. In reality, the ssd is just doing the same SSD thing that all ssd's do and really isnt all that impressive at all. Fanboys gotta fanboy though. IT IS cute to sit back and listen to people console war, talking up their favoriate plastic boxes while they talk up how "revolutionary" their chosen side is. Some day , both sony ponies and xbot's will realize, their little game boxes are BOTH just Pc's that have been Lobotomized by sony and microsoft .

do you care i have a ryzen 5800x and a 3080 ti?

@@Bk_owns I think you missed the point of my comment... Has nothing to do with me.

@@Bk_owns nope, he doesn't and neither does anyone else in this world

@@thomas12997 highest tier gpu before the idiotic 90 series is midrange now... k

@@thomas12997 ah yes I am sorry

Gotta make the switch to 1440p!

I'm also about to upgrade to the 2060 and was worried it wasn't gonna run as well, so, did you have ray tracing turned on and it ran fine? (I also don't care about 4k, my current monitor doesn't even run it)

@@turrurim It was pretty much a smooth 60fps experience at all times, no noticeable famedrops. Not to me at least. I don’t use ray tracing. But when I turned it on, I think it went down in FPS quite a bit, although I wasn’t sure if the exact number. Was definitely noticeable though. Maybe 40fps.

Because everybody on PC has different hardware. They have to add options so we can tweak the graphics to our desired settings because we all have different builds. Consoles have set hardware, so developers optimize the console versions to be played on that hardware.

Yeah that would be cool. I bought the ultimate edition of miles morales or whatever it’s called so it’s basically like buy one get one free. It was pretty cheap on eBay like $20. I would love a physical copy though

Looking at the game menu it seems that dual sense has full featured support on PC as well...

Yep, dual sense is fully functional on pc. You even get the web sounds on the controller speakers

You can connect your controller to pc

U get the features if u connect thru usb

Consoles are suppose to be cheap. It's a good toy if you only care about is game. PC will always be more expensive at face value but is definitely worth the value than any consoles.

@@eytbits I agree and the mods will keep this game fresh for a loooooooong time.

@@eytbits meh. I do buy gaming systems to play games lol...crazy right?

@@introduction1266 you buying a toy for bare gaming right. We buy hardware for better gaming experience AND other practical reasons.

@@eytbits a toy? haha...clown what is a pc then lol. just admit your jealous and butthurt that you spent a fortune while only getting slightly better results. I buy gaming devices to game like most people.

PS5 runs 100FPS with vrr

I see what you did here😉

RT requires more cpu more geometry to calculate

you're the first nonbiased pc player i've seen here lol. thanks for the insight. I agree.

No, it only goes to show how devs aren't willing to push PC options for the sake of console parity. As a non-fixed platform, high end PCs will always be much stronger than consoles, it's on the devs to actually implement higher graphical options so that the hardware can take advantage of it, and to make sure that PC and console performance scales linearly when using the same presets.

Look how far consoles have come....or rather look how far PC has fallen. The reality is a high end PC has stupidly powerful performance but nothing is made with that in mind (like Crysis was back in the day).

@@softluxuryone2169 this is the only answer

@@omarcomming722 yeah I'm not saying that a console can rival a high end pc on power. Then again, considering the price of the ps5 its impressive what you get out of it

"Most low end PC's". Literally everything outmatches low end PC's. Who would've thought? What a stupid argument.

It's holding for now but once new pc hardware come out this q4 there's literally no reason to buy it. All exclusives comes to PC eventually.

@@eytbits sony exclusives coming ~ 4years after PS launch. By the time Spiderman 2 comes out on PC I wouldn't be surprise there's a PS5 pro.

It's holding its own on a game that's a last generation PlayStation exclusive. I'm not dissing the ps5 but one game designed for a ps4 isn't a great sample size.

@@adamm784 after ps5 pro you'll be stuck again with an outdated hardware while PC keeps advancing each yr. Pc gamers can "wait" no matter how long. we have tons of games to play and can even use it for other things if we want to.

Eat your green vegetables

I always prefer playing 3rd person single player games with a controller, especially games built heavily around melee combat like batman and spiderman

@@Nick930 ok thx

@@Nick930 would the game work with a ps4 controller?

@@thorlightning1249 Yes

@@thorlightning1249 I would suggest if you have ps5 controer to use that. It has amazing trigger effects