Spiderman 2 Was A Disappointing Sequel 

Actually it's 5 years of development. The New Game Plus not being on launch was Sony's fault for pressuring them. Insomniac said they were supposed to get it ready before the end of 2023 but the hack happened causing a delay and 1 week after the hack they announced the delay. Marvel's Spider Man 2 is objectively better then Miles Morales.

That's how I feel too like the game just didn't feel complete, but i still enjoy it more than the miles game

*3 years. A much less grounded story

It had COVID delays.

@@ehangovani1851 Miles Morales was made by a separate team

100% agreed.

Yea I agree with gameplay spiderman 2 is definitely better but spiderman 1 has the better story

😒 “Rushed”? BRUH. Nothing about Spider-Man 2 was “rushed”. Stop grasping at straws.

​@@wingsoffirefan3156Maybe not rushed, but undercooked. To me the 3rd act felt way too short and it felt like they wanted to do way more than what they actually did, the game just has this weird aura that there was more stuff they wanted to do but couldn't, also the colors feel more washed out to me compared to the first and I just like the more vibrant colors of the first game

​@@wingsoffirefan3156Bro come on. 3rd act is definitely rushed and thats objectively true because the director himself said it. The Symbiote city was rushed. The Symbiote arc was rushed. VENOM was rushed. STORY Content was cut because of the damn MJ missions. They wanted to make her a hero.

Exactly I think if they had the time to do everything it would've been such a better game

The symbiote abilities are amazing and I really enjoyed using them once I unlocked them

that's fair I was just surprised with him as a character because I wasn't expecting him to be such a prevalent character in this game

I agree if they had more time I think this game would've been unbelievable but still a very good game

Same here I still loved playing the game it was a lot of fun just had it's issues imo

you can critic what you love, and not just kiss the ass of the devs.

@@Killer22246 um… okay…

The side missions and random crimes haven't improved or evolved. Car chases have gone through a clear downgrade. Way to much time was dedicated to walking around as Peter, MJ, or Miles' girlfriend doing non-superhero fantasy things. Yet somehow there wasn't enough time to flesh out Harry Osborne or Venom. Content like replayable main & enemy base missions, time/weather change, time trials, and ng+ were missing at launch. It took them months for some of those basic features to be added. The symbiote powers doesn't go beyond a couple of abilities with cool down times. Most of which can be replaced by Peters gadgets. The majority of iconic Spider-man villians were either killed off or reformed. Besides Wraith, the characters on Peter's side including Peter himself are all Mary Sues with no real flaws. The only time that changes is when the Symbiote is introduced. After it gets taken off, everything resumes back to normal with no consequences outside of Harry's possible death.

Story is the only thing that makes a game good unless it isnt a story based game and something like an online game which this isnt

Disappointed was a harsh way to word it but I didn't know how else to word it when I was expecting a little bit more from the game it was still a great game tho

So many good points that I agree with here@@anonymous_5016

Thats how I feel to a point this game is a single player story game so I'm gonna put a heavy emphasis on the story when judging this game and the story wasn't that great@@heyecanlioyuncu9682

story was worse than the 1st, sorry but they rushed it and admitted to rushing it and cut content out 💀

@@dobersquad1042 nah story is great but definitely the first one has a better story (the only thing that the first one got that's better). Bryan Intihar only said the third act was rushed with all the Venom stuff being cut. That was on Sony for pressuring them.

@@Shahriyararin63 It just lacked a lot and was lazy we should have seen Kraven kill off all of Spidermans villains and that was lazy. They changed writers and that was a bad decision

@@dobersquad1042 1) That was the only cool thing Kraven did off screen. Even though he did more cool stuff on screen, I still would love to actually see that in action 2) The kept some of the same writers from the first one while also using the new ones. Storywise is solid but as I have already agreed, the first one has a better story.

Yea that's a good point with Peter's symbiote, and I agree with the side missions they were definitely one of my biggest issues with this game

Thank you buffalobot8

Well,unlike you,buffalobot822,I strongly disagree with Earthguardian.

Might've been a slight exaggeration, I liked the first game more but 2 is a lot better in a good amount of areas still

Earthguardian must have thought your comment was a compliment since he liked it for some bizarre reason.

@@wingsoffirefan3156 What the heck?

same here I still really enjoy the game just not as good as the first

BAd take