jaim haas Well , for them it is not really a priority. I seen banks “forget” about smaller factories , houses and vehicles. Some times they just don’t care about it , other times it just isn’t a priority and they have other things to focus on and then there are situations where the higher ups thought they sold them , while they didn’t (usually because miscommunication and not double checking).
@@gawainethefirst Well they were paying something. If someone told you, "I'll pay you $20 a week, or $0 a week," which one would you choose? $20 is still better than $0.
ChuChild. whats bad is if you allow family or friends to stay in your home for awhile just trying to help them out in a bad time they can legally stay & you have to go thru the courts to have them removed. if they ever start getting mail there youre in deep legal sh** to get them removed. the system is broken.
Because, you may not have such a understanding landlord, and maybe your not trash. I don't rent out any more I also had some renters who did not want to pay Trust me I was not understanding. They got out quickly. These people are simply Trash.
They would eventually but it would take several court orders and a lot of money and aggravation. Trespass isn't a crime it's a civil infraction. You have to sue to get your property back. In most jurisdictions anyway.
I live in the UK and that's the way it can work here. In some situations the squatter has the legal rights of owner against everyone except someone with proof of ownership who may attempt to evict the squatter.
People stayed at my house for a weekend it turned into 3 months from 3 days and they tried getting squatters right but onetime i was up at two and the man who was with his girl and 2 kids staying broke into our house and he is suppposed to be out back in a camper but no he broke in luckily im a hunter and my dad is also a marine general and he hunts so i grabbed "my" .40 its a pistol and got him to get to the ground like i was citizen arresting him u just put my knee into his spine untill the cops came and they whole family was forced to go homeless or whereverr they went
In case youre curious he was arrested for this incident and a condition of his bail was to leave the house. He's left and a new couple has bought the house.
@@YtOfficialhoonanigans no. the house was paid for by a bank and then sold between multiple banks over time, whether a person inhabited it or not does not mean it was not bought and paid for by a bank. and fair? fair is working and paying for a place to live. nobody deserves a free ride, nobody.
@@logandowner7405 i think rylee is referring to back property taxes. there is an idea (very commonly talked about in Tn as a matter of fact) that paying back taxes on a home that is abandoned it becomes yours. if the banks owed taxes on that house then the state and or county should have made contact with a bank before letting him pay it and move in. im gonna have to research more about this whole back taxes thing but this is a very common belief in tn and if the laws have been changed alot of people are about to forced out of homes in tn when "original owners" show up and kick people off "their property" whether its a person or an entity like a bank / business. dude def fucked up when he chased that crew with the axe. i wonder how many times he had been provoked until a news crew stepped onto "his property" lololololol he could have prob stayed there no issue besides being harassed. the news fucked up by actually showing this footage because no all the other people that have paid back due property taxes and kept the property maintained. selling debt should be illegal if anything is actually a problem with it. moving in is a bold move tho. if i would have paid the taxes and maintained the property, i def put a lean on the house tho for sure.
When a house has been forgotten about, what's the actual issue? That is literally why squatters get some rights because a place is abandoned and there are homeless people galore.
@@Andrew_Sherman homelessness is wrong, hoarding houses you dont need is wrong. Finding a solution to both those problems seems like two wrongs making a right.
@@--Nath-- there’s always more to a situation that leads them to be homeless. It’s why shelters are there and why the govt needs to step up. Taking private property isn’t right, ever….
mattc941 probably not to thrash at all considering he's going to try to buy it from a bank that owns it in eight more years for very very very very very very cheap have a good day dip shitt
I have a relative in Florida who's retired that actually gets paid by the financial institutions to live in foreclosed mansions so squatter's don't take over. Every day he goes to however many he's in charge of and moves cars around turn lights on and off in different rooms, keeps the yard's maintained, and collects the mail. What a career.
@@ceeled2566 No, he's getting paid to keep the grass cut, the bushes trimmed, the swimming pools clean and much more. It's not as easy as it sounds. That's why I didn't take him up on the offer to do it.
I hate how squatters get so mad at people for confronting them when they are living on unowned properties or owned properties where the OWNERS live. Its so annoying.
capitalism 101: houses and store fronts remain empty or are allowed to crumble as 10s of MILLIONS of americans are homeless. the rich "own" 6, 7 mansions, 20 or more luxury apts and numerous vacation properties THEY NEVER USE! they buy them as tax right-offs. meanwhile homlessness skyrockets, the streets become MORE dangerous and society falls apart. what's wrong with this picture? i'm about to become homeless myself although i have a steady income and can afford REASONABLE RENT! corporations have bought up all the rental properties nationwide driving up rents and making illegal and ridiculous DEMANDS on renters. so i'm denied commercial rentals and property ownership, public housing have years-long waiting lists and even the so-called "tiny houses" have so many additional costs and roadblocks i'm denied them too. we aren't ruled by govt anymore but by corporations and their CEOs who've bought up america and bargain basement prices. they've bought our medical system, our housing industry, our retail access, the internet, our justice system and our govt. and the media, the politicians and you people do NOTHING!
That won't happen. If you've ever worked for a large bank, you would know that there are many people collecting a nice salary for doing very little. If the bank gets in trouble the federal government bails them out.
Banks got bailed out by government ( got their money back first time ) then banks has insurance in case if they have to foreclose on house ( got paid second time on the same house) plus whoever bought it before put downpayment and was paying to some point ( 3rd time banks getting paid for same house) , all the foreclosure process , securing the house , eviction , etc ( bank was getting 20% of the cost back -4th times they were getting paid for same house ) , then bank forgot about it -meaning didn’t want to pay taxes on property and take care of it ( grass cuts , basic maintenance ) which took previously money for it from bailouts . It’s simply money maker however you look at it .
Blah b Bonuses? They're called penalties and they're levied because YOU didn't pay the bank on time like you agreed to when you signed the contract. I don't like banks but when you cheat on the contract don't call the banks greedy because they're holding you to the contract, that YOU signed. No one forced you to buy the house.
Property rights laws in most states are pretty complicated. Those who know the loopholes can game the system pretty well. What do you think major real estate firms, banks, wealthy private individuals and any other game the system asshole has been doing for years? While i don't condone this, why is it any different because he's wearing cut off shorts and has a ridiculous haircut?
One of my neighbors moved. The moment that "For Sale" sign went up, the squatters kicked in the back door and moved in. The police would do nothing. Several of the other neighbors preformed an impromptu eviction. It must have worked. They didn't come back.
For the curious: He vacated the property after a court ordered him to, and "Pischke pleaded guilty to one count of reckless aggravated assault in the case involving the Channel 5 news crew and received two years of probation, according to court documents." Also, the home was bought by a "young couple," who, presumably, moved right in.
Maybe just maybe it's because the jails are full as your country is okay with it's people are doing time for self medicating with marijuana. LMAO. America is so damn weird.
This is the first one where the house was almost ownerless... If this dude could have kept his mouth shut and the yard clean he might have gotten to stay. But domestic violence, stolen cars, and a littered yard don't make you popular. Squatting is such an outdated concept, but at the same time the housing situation in this country is awful. A part of me that's fed up with slumlord landlords, outrageous prices and fees, and entitled rich people roots for these squatters sometimes. Rarely, but sometimes.
If this ever happened to me and the police said they can't do anything, I would hire a local gang of thugs to give him an ultimatum. Leave quietly and quickly or get your kneecaps busted
Shane Sawyer - Don’t bust both knees. Leave one alone and shatter the other one. That way he can walk but every other step will make him your boys had just gone ahead and killed him.😊 Fucking trash - that’s all he is.
They were just the news crew, if they had been cops they’d have been justified in shooting him, but then he wouldn’t have acted like that if they were cops.
frazler Official There seems to be video of him grabbing the axe and chasing the camera man with the axe up on his shoulder appearing to be ready to strike etc.. If I was on a jury, I would vote to acquit.
As a retired realtor, I've seen similar incidents occur. In one case a client listed his house with me because his wife had left him and he had no money to carry it. The house was in a nice area and only 12-15 years old but had been neglected by this man. Eventually moved out in the night and when I went over to show the home he had taken some of his personal stuff and abandoned it. I called the large bank holding the mortgage to inform them and they promptly cancelled my legal listing as was their right when abandoned, and locked up the place. I had several clients that were very interested in the place and I informed the bank of this. They weren't interested in my clients and kept stalling me. It turned out that the house sat empty for at least for 7 months until it was sold to a new party through a bank sale for far less than what my clients were prepared to pay. An inside hanky-panky job in my opinion.
Banks must be buying homes with no interest in selling & sending squatters to live in them to cause neighbors problems. There is more to this situation & where did the man get money to pay off back taxes?
@@PollyT.Pocket22 the elites are doing their bidding at wiping out those under them. until people wake up and start fighting them, this will keep happening.
Easy, a file gets lost, personal come and go. There are tens thousands of properties like this, among hundreds of thousands of properties changing hands all the time.
The real crime is the bank foreclosing on the mortgage kicking out the owners and not even selling. Why kick the original family out if they can't even be bothered to sell it
Jono Hutton do you know how the us economy works? Theirs a reason we have a credit system so we don’t have to track everyone. If I can’t pay back my next investment loan they would seize my assets that’s the exact reason rappers and NFL players get their property seized. America is still the land of the business man as long as your not stupid,
Also to answer your first question if I kick a family out next week and I don’t have the time to sell it . I would still kick them out because they didn’t give me my money to maintain and keep that asset. Why should I have to do extra work to instantly sell the place. I already did all the work to loan and out my money into it I don’t have to fee bad for a family who didn’t feel bad about taking food off my plate.
Jude Pischke, 46 was charged April 26 with three counts of aggravated assault and three counts of reckless endangerment for allegedly charging the camera crew with the ax. He made a $6,000 bond the same day according to Wilson County Jail records, but Pischke was placed back in jail without bond May 2, because of the probation violation according to jail records... The man who charged a reporter and news crew with an axe on April 26, has finally vacated the home he was squatting in.
I blame the news network that the reporters are employed with because they're likely anti 2A meaning they couldn't conceal pistols without risking their jobs. Otherwise they definitely ought to have shot this man multiple times and gotten cleared of any charges.
@@darthrevan704 You mean the people who educated themselves and worked hard and saved their whole lives so they could afford the house? The people who take money from hard working people like this so they can have food stamps and welfare are the pampered spoiled retards. How is it the fault of the couple who wanted to buy the house you are jealous, bitter loser? It's none of your business who buys the house.
@@lonewolf4429 dude he paid the back taxes that's the gangsta move look up educated now. The banks where suppose to pay the back taxes. That's how you acquire others peoples shit
Sounds like if he wouldn't have had domestic disputes, a bunch of shit in the yard, and stolen vehicles, he could live there for as long as he wanted no prob.
My thoughts exactly, the problem is the guy obviously has no class. A guy that in that situation that could emulate the ways of the people around the area would have a much higher chance of getting them to warm up to him and perhaps even make a case for staying.
@@YTSYSTEMOPERATOR It's a shame, because there are some very good, hard working people who are losing their shirts in this crisis who deserve that house.
Squatting is an art and congratulations to those who get away with it. While it may chap your ass, no one was getting harmed by the squatter. Want to blame someone? Blame the system in which banks can "forget" about a property, and in which law enforcement fails to adequately address the situation. It took a TV station to get this done? Please.
@@mikephalen3162 actually people are getting hurt by squatting. They lower the resale value of a property they do not have title on and they lower the property values in the neighborhood. They are criminals
@@cdmichaelb Most people aren't poor, and they don't live in big cities. This kind of house, aside from it being cabin-style, is nothing exceptional for a middle class suburb or small town. It's hardly a big house, let alone a mansion.
@@unnecessaryapostrophe4047 Middle class doesn't mean average, Most people are actually poor / lower class. And most people do live in big cities. Where are you getting your info? lol
Yes, all the lending people were just passing the buck and ignoring their duties. Made the issue far worse. I wonder HOW this jerk knew about the house, maybe a friend at the bank or something. Hope they investigate that, too.
It's insane how many comments want to protect the banks but not the people. "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered."
Yeah, the news station is essentially doing the ban's work for them. I'm a lot more upset by the bank kicking someone out of the house than some guy moving into it.
Liberals got control for too long and now the criminals are treated like the victims, and real victims are ignored completely or treated like criminals.
LOL you morons always find a way to bring it back to politics when politics has fuck all to do with this. If you're a right wing nut, fuck yourself. If you're a leftwing nut, fuck yourself. You're all ruining the planet with your cancer ass thinking.
I just dont understand how this can happen. That would make anyone that leaves their house for the day (other squatter articals) and someone can just take over your house. Why cant this guy be arrested. This is insane.
Squatters have more rights than the owners. Police can't make them leave because it's a civil matter and the owners have to take them to court to evict them but that usually don't work. Now with a bank owning it I would love to see the outcome. Normal people owning property like this, the house is usually destroyed when and if they ever get them to leave. I can't understand either why the law allows this. The law needs to change but if that was my house and I had only been gone on a weeks vacation don't think I wouldn't break into my own home and get the fuckers out myself. I worked hard for what I have for some piece of shit to try to steal and destroy what I own.
@@animeboy9801 Doesn't make sense, it should be classified as home invasion, guess its only one if you're there, but if you're out, your 300k house is up for grabs from some low life shitbag.
@@camouflage81 as a law student I can tell you that a break in requires some type of force upon entry and if the house is vacant no one would be able to prove that force was used. Also if the property is vacant and the presumed owner isn’t readily ascertainable it’s going to be very hard to charge him with breaking and entering or even trespassing because once he makes improvements to the land or property the law grants him certain rights that can’t just automatically be taken away. The same way the law can’t charge you with breaking and entering your own home it will not (likely) charge him of breaking into his new home. Ppl always want to know why is this allowed? Well if the rightful owner doesn’t care enough to take care of their own property then why should the law step in and remove someone else who is willing to do so? Abandoned homes are bad for society they bring crime and are wasteful economically if someone is willing to step in and maintain the property and make the best use of the land (when the original owner would not) why should the government remove them. Imagine the house is an abandoned baby the original parents dipped and someone else stepped in to raise it and feed it and make the kid look presentable again. 3 years later the original parents come back and want their child. Well is it really theirs anymore?
I live in a area where the homes are non squattable! Empty one day and the plumbing including the commode, sink and doors would be gone. Any Cooper wire, and pipe.....gone in two hours!
I know a guy that did exactly that during the housing crisis. The home was foreclosed on and sat empty for months. One of my coworkers moved in and lived in the home for 4 years before anyone at the bank realized it and kicked him out. Honestly, I thought the guy was just lying to us at work...but after it made the local news we realized he wasn’t.
@moneyrunnr 30-years. Only people to defeat the US Government on this continent and capturing the US Flag. But it wasn't in battle we succumbed too. It was disease and starvation.
he paid the back taxes did you not watch the entire video? they can take your home for back taxes and you can pay those back taxes and then own the home.
@@squin9954 Yeah but surely someone else could squat on the squatter then the original squatter wouldn't be able to throw the new squatter out....if that makes sense 😂
To the contrary. He's gaming the system perfectly. It isn't right, but he understands exactly where the line is an how much he can get away with. His squatting falls into gaps in our laws and this guy is playing this like a harp from hell. Look for this same guy to move into an empty home near you. IQ doesn't really measure how clever someone is that goes this route. Most career criminals know the law better than the police do. It's hard to charge someone with a victimless crime. There is no homeowner. The property belongs to a bank and they don't appear to care about it.
I could not care less about the squatter. This news anchor is facilitating the illegal dirty work of the bankers who stole billions from hardworking taxpayers. All affected property should be ripped from the banks (just as they do when they evict people) and the money made should be paid back to taxpayers to cover the *giant scam the banks pulled off.* Since when did stealing become legal for them but no one else?
the biggest mistake made in this sequence was that a bank rep wasn't there at that time with a locksmith to change out all the locks and clear out all of dude's crap while he was locked up.
"The criminal had an axe. He approached me in an aggressive manner. I tried to back away and deescalate the situation. I was in fear of my life and felt it necessary to discharge my firearm on him for my own safety and for the safety of my film crew. Oh he died? That's terrible." Americans need to start taking justifiable actions against lawless criminals in their homes. They all appear to be threatening and they all appear to have a firearm. You know how it is.
I'd say it is because he is a go-getter and has no qualms about breaking the rules. If you're white, you're respected for this. If you're not white, you're going to jail.
The banks didn't know which one owned the property. That guy was in possession of the property so it was his property. They showed up on his property. He could have protected himself and the property that he was currently in possession.
I am baffled how poorly most governments handle squatters. My buddy in France told me that there if someone can sneak in to your house for a few days and go unnoticed, they have a legal right to be there. Wtf?!
All the proof needed to show we live in an unjust world. The best justice is revenge. It's the natural way to repay evil people justice, leaving any forgiveness to the mercy of the victim. The victim should have all rights and choices. The perpetrator should have no concessions that the victim doesn't freely offer them.
if you want a squatter out of your house there is a fairly simple method that wont cost much money either. 1. learn your squatters routine. 2. enlist the help of 5-10 men 3. day of action. when your squatter leaves the house make your way into the house. have your 5-10 men remove 100% of the items in the house and thrown into a waiting roll off trash container. 4. have roll off trash container removed from property 5. change locks 6. reward your men with some cold beers and wait for squatter to return. 7. have your 5-10 men inform squatter(s) that they have never lived at that address and that their health and well being in danger by continuing to say without and invitation.
This is the example the media will show you so you turn on your own cold and starving instead of turning a leery eye at their friends the bank. Fortunately it only works on the dumbest mother fuckers to ever crawl of their retarded mothers gash. Thank goodness you're not nearly that fuckin stupid and gullible though right...?
I own a home. I can't say there would be a peaceful solution if someone tried to claim residence of my home. Then again I'm a regular working stiff, not a bank.
He 'brandished' the axe, then came forward in a threatening manner. That's an attack. In your mind, does he need to bury the blade of the axe in flesh before you consider it an attack?
@@mpeters220 There is a difference between a threat and an attack. He was being filmed, he was never going to actually use the axe. It got them away from him though.
Yes...and it's against the law to "threaten" someone with an axe. You don't need to bury the axe into flesh. Once you "brandish" the axe and come forward, you have broken the law. If he would have done that to a cop or if a cop was there he might have been shot - Why? Because he posed a deadly threat when he brandished that axe and came forward like he did. The fact that cameras were rolling is irrelevant. Are you trying to say that because the cameras were there, it guaranteed that he would not attack? I don't think you'd make that good of a lawyer.
capitalism 101: houses and store fronts remain empty or are allowed to crumble as 10s of MILLIONS of americans are homeless. the rich "own" 6, 7 mansions, 20 or more luxury apts and numerous vacation properties THEY NEVER USE! they buy them as tax right-offs. meanwhile homlessness skyrockets, the streets become MORE dangerous and society falls apart. what's wrong with this picture? i'm about to become homeless myself although i have a steady income and can afford REASONABLE RENT! corporations have bought up all the rental properties nationwide driving up rents and making illegal and ridiculous DEMANDS on renters. so i'm denied commercial rentals and property ownership, public housing have years-long waiting lists and even the so-called "tiny houses" have so many additional costs and roadblocks i'm denied them too. we aren't ruled by govt anymore but by corporations and their CEOs who've bought up america and bargain basement prices. they've bought our medical system, our housing industry, our retail access, the internet, our justice system and our govt. and the media, the politicians and you people do NOTHING!
*Cop sees a nug of weed* "You're going to jail for years" *Random guy takes someones home and doesn't pay anything for years* Cop: "well looks like theres no crime here, everything's fine. Can't do a thing"
@@m2svirtual384 it should be a criminal complaint when someone breaks into a house and decides to live there. Tack on some property damage and possession of stolen property for every item the owner had in and on the premises they've used removed or modified while there too
@@Scrap_Goblin Did we watch the same video? There was no family there. The bank owned the property and everything in it. Do you realize that, depending on what state you live in, you can abandon an asset, like say a car, and after a period of time, anyone can claim it? Because it's abandoned. Again, did we watch the same video? Because in the video I watched, they labeled the house as 'abandoned' over and over again. He, or anyone, is entitled to claim that property until taken to court and a judge orders an eviction and the property turn over to the person or entity who holds the title. But that's what courts do. No Sheriff dept. or local PD are equipped or trained to interpret property titles. It's the business of CIVIL court, not criminal. If a court judgement calls for the squatter to return possession of the property back to the title holder, and he does not, then it can turn into a criminal matter. Do you know why this is? It's not to protect the squatter, tho he does benefit from the protections we are offering here... we're protecting that adorable couple with kids who won the highest bid at auction. If they had moved in with their beautiful children and furniture, the bank could at any point call the PD and have them arrested? In your world, that would be perfectly acceptable. Arrest now, ask questions later. But no. We have civil courts to sort out property and possession issues, and it takes time. And while that time is passing, NO one needs to go to jail. Welcome to 'merica.
How is that the right thing to do? Let him live nobody was worried about the property it sat empty someone started using it for once and everyone suddenly has a problem with it and tries to evict him, sounds like some nosey ppl to me
When he was arrested the bank should have had someone come in, change the locks and move him out. Also they should have went forward with pressing charges against him for assault.
Have squatters next door to me for like 15 years they have the whole family living in the house like 3 generations. House is also neglected and falling apart has even been for sale. Its a mess. I hate squatters.
Uhhh 15 years and your upset...lol..sorry but you are about as active as the squatters. What were you doing? Squatting next door? Grow up and do somthing before its 50 years and you decide its a good time to do somthing. Psh.
have been turning them in for years nothing happens to them. why would you think im squatting I bought my house with my money that I earned and worked very hard for.
j v You need to turn up the heat on the local politicians! Get news cameras in their face, write the states Attorneys General, maybe even run against the Mayor. The more embarrassment the sooner something gets done.
He was evicted from the property back in August 2017 and is on probation and is not allowed to return to the home, the house now has legitimate owners who bought the house for 500,000$
Longfellow Deeds They were not trespassing. The owner of property invited them. The ax-wielder was the one trespassing. And someone there should have been carrying. Squatters are nuts.
Update: So I guess after this guy bonded out of jail ($6,000) on the aggravated assault beef, they learned his arrest violated his probation, and he was sent back to jail for 17 days. Karma? Anyway, he and his family/friends (it's believed he lived there with multiple families) have left. The 4,000 sqft property was eventually put up for auction, starting at $231,000.
Who was paying taxes on the house? There was a supreme court decision just a few days ago where a community took a womans house over unpaid back taxes, sold it and kept every penny!!! Fortunately the court ruled against the community.
The town, village, city (or any other municipality) has the right to seize property for unpaid taxes. Failing to pay usually goes on for years before action is taken. The idea is to get the house back onto the tax rolls because when tax revenue is not coming in from that house, all of the other taxpayers in the tax district end up having to make up the shortfall. Seizure is quite justified.
This is so weird. You'd think the bank would want a paying tenant in the property. Banks barely even let you withdraw money for free, yet they let this slip through the cracks.
These situations are so s in the past to deal with, homeowners have a personal financial incentive to do so but bank employees do not, so it's easier on them to just ignore or pass it on to somebody else.
Because he isn’t trespassing. He is squatting. The difference is that it only becomes trespass when a proper warning is issued. Because the bank gave no warning, or any care for the property, he is allowed to squat there. TLDR; squatting is legal and even protected under law, trespass is not. The law was made that way to prevent large corporations from buying up a bunch of land and using it exclusively for investment with no plan to occupy. Squatting rights are for the people. If you can’t occupy the land, you shouldn’t have rights to it even if you buy it.
It’s not abuse. This is how they were intended. If squatters laws didn’t exist, then there would be a bunch of land the bank owns that isn’t populated, which leads to a displaced undesirable group of people living where people don’t want them. Think of it as indirect population control.
A sad example of a human being - an aging man... the mind of a nine-year-old with anger issues and a chip on his shoulder. His only way to respond to the responsibilities and challenges of life is to threaten and use physical violence. He thinks he's a tough guy but can't even control his own emotions. All in the context of stealing property that isn't his.