Star Citizen added this, and it's insane.. 

Lol

and next to the engine on/off... so if you misclick you REALLY switch the engines off.

Same. I hope they fix that.

@@WhooshtaApparently they will with flight control surfaces, they briefly showcased it during CitCon.

There are flaps and other aero flight control surfaces that have been worked on. Another thing is dynamic engine alignment. Instead of just VTOL mode or "regular" the engines will rotate along whatever path they can to get to a vector. Depending on the ship some of them might move quite a bit during maneuvers.

@@Billy-bc8pk love to hear that!

they tried long ago on the cutlass mostly, problem with with dynamic and realisitc tthruster they main engine were going insane in all direction and wasn t looking smooth. but yeah it would be cool

would honestly love seeing like a dozen or so of these coming out of a carrier

@@justinfourie3422 right!? Would prolly have to be a Bengal or a Pegasus tho. Those are the only ships in lore right now with hangars big enuff to carry more than like 6 mediums fighters.

Now, an idris rolling up with like 16 misc furies. Oh I just might wet myself.

You just need an Atlas... it's not as fast... but it'll get you from A to B Pretty much the first thing I buy for any light ship. And why I set my starting spawn at A18 - as it's closest to the only place you can buy one. It's great to think of fighters and small ships as only having planetary system range - but most of us don't start out with long range options. We start with our starter ships, which, with the exception of the Cutter, with the fuel tank they added an extra 0 onto the size of the fuel tank... Well, they all have range like we see here. I don't think that having more efficient drives is a problem, the fact that they go slower is the trade-off.

whatttt, that would be cool

@@Olli43 agreed!

I mean, the razor is also under Mirai, which is not very military lol since it's a racing ship

@@kingcorey9762 fair but that ship was created before the idea and they added it due to being performance.

I mean the Fury is a snub fighter I think Olli wants a Mirai ship that can QT and fight bigger targets and that

Thanks!

an rtx 2060oc can do these gfx at 2k...games not as demanding as peeps think

SC is CPU bound. It will run well on a 1060 if your CPU is strong enough. The game really isn't graphically demanding.

I have a 6950XT toxic with a 5900x. The GPU is usually 90%+ util Vs 50% util for CPU. These fluctuate of course but the GPU is utilised a lot more and I play on 2k (upscaled in AMD software) , high / very high quality and high for the other settings. I've played around with the Vol. Clouds and get around 80/90 in space and 40/50 in cities stations. Saying this would run well graphically on the cards you listed even with a beast CPU is a head scratcher for me

@@shiftsamm And yet it runs at between 30-50 FPS in 1080p on 1060, along with an i5-9400F which is well within the range of Star Citizen on the high setting. These days I'm running an XFX speedster 6950XT alongside a 12th gen i7, and the GPU doesn't even break a sweat. It sits at 30-40% utilisation (underclocked by about 30% because power is expensive lately) versus the CPU which hovers in the 80-100% utilisation range. I'm sitting at 120 FPS stable in Space and 60-90 fps planetary barring usual SC hiccups. My bottleneck is the CPU, but when people say the game is CPU bound, they don't mean utilisation percentage. They mean the game isn't using p-cores on Windows 10 (because you can't), and the multithreading and core utilisation is basically nonexistent. This will change with the arrival of Vulkan but in the meantime, the client renders sub optimally because the game isn't using your CPU properly. So 40% utilisation doesn't matter; your CPU is still throttling you. If your gpu is pulling high utilisation for star citizen then there's a wrong configuration there, or you're trying to run it at 2k 168hz or uncapped (bad idea, always cap FPS) or something.

With a 2060s and 5600x I got 30-70 fps. With a 5800x3d I got 45-140. With a 5800x3d and 4070 there was no notable difference. All at 1080p

Just been hit hard with winter bugs. Getting back into it now. Lots coming!

You're joking right? Tell me your not that misinformed. And the vocabulary word "released" doesn't mean squat anymore, to determine the games playability or enjoyment from it. Games that released and did how well? CP77, redeemed after a couple years Starfield, the mod community will fix it. Or you pay for the DLC that will. The Day Before Hows Elite Dangerous going. MSFS planning to release another iteration after only 4 years of people pumping money into it, then being forced to pay for another "released" version to get the latest upgrades. Yeah "released" titles are awesome, and the be all to determine how great a game is. SC cost me $110 10 years ago, and I have never been required to pay more for the ever expanding content. I have spent more in less time buying the latest Train Sim World release. And its being built on an existing game engine made by another company.

@@festersmith8352 Half the time I can't even play SC because the servers lag and my shots don't register. Every update is just more ships. Single player looks promising. I used to play with 20+ friends and now no one can be bothered because it's dealing with bugs that have been around for 5 years, laggy servers but new ships lol

@@EaGilgamesh If landing shots is all you wish to do in this game, and there is so much more to do, then why play it when there are so many other games that have that same gameplay. Its gonna be a long time to dev a game that is trying to do everything in one game, that every other game offers. I have 10 games on my desktop that involve landing shots. But only one that allows me a life to live in space. I waited 10 years for basic salvage. I can wait for the rest to come.

@@festersmith8352 I want to like SC but i feel like theyre working on too many things at once, it's disappointing for me to log in after a year and still experience the same game breaking bugs and poor server stability. I just dont get where their priorities lie when everything new i see is just new ships. That's all im saying. This game obviously means a lot to you and im not saying its total trash i'm just disappointed it's not much better after so many years and so much money. I'm sorry if my comment made you upset that wasnt my intention in the first place but if im going to devote my time and hard earned money to this game i'd at least like the ship i spent 5 hours grinding for not glitch out and my projectiles to actually hit a target the game says it's there without my buddy saying that i'm shooting at nothing and the my target is flying around somewhere else.