Fulda is my hometown. And as a Kid we usally had some manoveurs in the forest behind our house. We loved to see the tanks and to trade our homegrown vegetables to the GIs, though we could have a ride in the M103. As we grew older we became aware, why this all happened, and Im really glad that in 1989 the menance from the east vanished. My father, who was an ingenieur for streetbuilding, told me in 1990, that some of the manwholes, that which had an iron cross on top, were build to be mines, to blow up bridges or destroy streets in forests or narrow passages.
I completely agree about playing the AI. Is about trying to use real tactics and minimizing losses. Is quite fun especially stratagizng with someone in co-op.
Something I've noticed is that tripod MGs cost absolutely nothing to deploy so, while I am aware they are not good, to put it kindly, there's no reason not to spread a few out between your main fighting positions to act as a sacrificial deadline and at least reduce the chance of a MANPAD team or recon squad sneaking through your lines, as the AI seems to like doing.
If it’s set to defensive a vehicle with smoke will automatically deploy it if it’s engaged by a unit it can’t fire back against, useful for taking a bit of micro load off sometimes
Playing this campaign from the pact side, there are so many units but taking out the stacks of bradley + abrams with east german t55 is quite frustrating.
Superb play... though Im not sure why soviets pushed so many targets down the kill zones. On the other hand... maybe I should not be suprised. I come from Poland. My father had to serve in army - as a conscript, not regular - and everybody said that the army we had, while large, and quite rich with equipment, was an amateur army, since nobody really cared about doing some real training, it mostly a drill for sake of a drill. This was not the army capable of doing any sophisticated stuff...
I’m new to this game.. seems like it’s just one tank at a time coming at you. Is that considered challenging/interesting within warno community? Am I missing something?
@@armandolara8210 to be honest bro i recommend playing multiplayer with some friends, that's all the fun of warno, single player campaign is boring for most, on the other hand playing against actual players is really fun
Imagine the code needed,for this game damn impressive. I wish you get like adaptive learning ai. Where it learns from you if you shit with the game its easy the better you get the better the ai gets
The fact that the T-55s stand any chance against Abrams shows how arcadey this game is. In reality, a single Abrams could easily take out half a company of T-55s without more than a scratch, as evidenced by the Gulf War.
I am biased as I enjoy the game a lot but yes is absolutely worth it. Broken arrow is a different kind of wargame. I am going to play and enjoy both. The two are not mutually exclusive. I have yet to play Broken Arrow for obvious reasons but watching gameplay of it and my time in warno they are quite different in execution. There are things I like in both and dislike in both but overall both are and will be excellent rts wargames.
Game looks beautiful, oh boy oh boy I wish Eugen doesn't turn it into a DLC milking machine! Aaaand thats already happened. Fun game, (it seems), just hate the overpriced dlcs they're giving us.
The extra divs are okay priced at $10 for two. The expansions usually come with 4 divs plus 2 campaigns and is well worth 24ish. The campaigns are quite long each and if going by SD2 they will get even larger in scope.
Not really, just that there's so much to pay attention to. I'd recommend pausing and using slow motion alot until you get the hang of things enough to play normally
