Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos ru-vid.com/group/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Brazilian Systems videos ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aRxkkSYYkRk.html Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos ru-vid.com/group/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k
Hi, I enjoyed watching your videos. May I suggest the speed for wordings and specs be increased, or better still just present them immediately, rather than type them out alphabet by alphabet because they are lagging your voice. Thanks.
I have enjoyed the Brazil Esquadrilha da Fumaça (Smoke Squadron) exhibition flights several times during my trips to Brazil, they always put on a good show.
@@user-kr1di7bx1g you mentioned the reaper that is 64 million. the MQ does not has the capabilities that a supertucano has. and the price of the mq DOES NOT INCLUDE THE COMAND CENTER needed for its operation.. i think the one that has to study the material is you :).
@@user-kr1di7bx1g by the way a super tucano is arround 9-18 M that contract surely includes more than the plane.. like long term maintenance and flight simulators
@@user-kr1di7bx1g hey bother supertucano is cheeper, more reliable, with far more capacity and armament than a mq-9. mq9 cannot compete in any category with a super tucano. not even in flight hour cost, weapons capacity etc. the real competitor to super tucano is the reaper.. but it costs 6 times more 64 million a piece!. and can be hacked like Iran did. supertucano is superior!!! accept it!.
Now that my country Philippines have the Tucano, our pilots will add more to the excellent combat records this aircraft has with our usual insurgent groups down south.
Brilliant plane. Can be fitted with quite advanced sensors and weapons. And operate from primitive air fields. And it got an impressive loiter time. About 3 times more than an Apache helicopter.
@@user-kr1di7bx1g MK1 eyeball= The pilot that can use his eyesight and whatever EO sight that is mounted on the plane. Ask any forward observer, that has been in contact in real life, what he prefer, and he will want a manned aircraft over any drone. Very important in time critical situations. And you have the choice of using guns, instead of bombs and missiles.
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel eletronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything.
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel eletronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything.
Of all my time on youtube i hardly found two non nationist channels that put the information out like it deserved to be put out. This is one of them 🙏🤲🙌. Most people on internet have got such big ego and forgo logic - such a shame. Find a weapon system for the role - for heaven's sake 🙂
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel eletronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything.
I hope no one mistakes something that the powers noted after the II World War: not everything needs expensive, top-notch technologies. Most of these "little wars" around the world aren't against Soviet Unions.
In my humble opinion, as rightly mentioned in the info motion feature, the air-superiority achieved through swarming tactics deploying smaller aircrafts in variable mission programs, addressing both surface and air based threats, on a theoretical note, does seem an economical and effective tactical solution for a combat aviation operator deploying limited fleet and equipment cache for small to medium scale conventional warfare. However, a scaled up scenario with 4+ generation aerial combat platforms and advanced satellite network based surface to air defense systems in the foray, the effectiveness of such a swarming tactic would demand an overwhelmingly differentiated approach; not to mention, a formatively new set of avionics and advanced aerial combat assistance systems. If hypothetically ideated, a lot would depend upon the engagement scenarios, proximities to surface support and armament effectiveness. Not to mention the combat operators' skill and experience from both the factions. Theoretically, in a toe-to-toe scenario, 4+ generation avionics and guided weapon systems would hold a definitive edge over any aerial combat platform of previous generation, especially those which are primarily surface attack platforms. Salute'
I wonder if we see such planes hunting cheap drones in the future as well. Older SPAAG systems have found new purpose with the rising drone threat. A couple of these in the air can fly up to hours on patrol, have NATO arsenal compability and are way less maintenance heavy than a jet doing the same job.
and importantly too due to its stately pace, you can get great photos of the opposition as their body parts twirl gracefully through the air, after you hit them, innit !! excellent !!
Enjoyed video about EMB314 Super tucano aircrafts for ground attacks with clearly explaining its characteristics and its publishing on the planet, also its different versions...video shared by excellent channel ( weapons detective)
the A-29 Super Tucano light multi role strike fighter twin-internal cannon could do with a larger 23 MM calibre . . . the A-29 is perfect for deploying air-to-ground guided munitions . . .
Given that this is a LIGHT CAS attack aircraft, its two wing-mounted .50 Caliber Machineguns are actually the BETTER option because they allow the Tucano to hit targets in very close proximity to ground troops without endangering them. This was one of the reasons the US Army's Kiowas were so popular as well. Their armaments wouldn't threaten nearby troops.
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel eletronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything.
Very informative video, thank you! Some people sometimes mix up things and start tracing comparison lines between A-29 and the 4th+ aircraft generations. But that’s a dumb comparison, they’re not meant for the same job. A-29 is combat proven, cost-effective and very versitile for the type of combat he’s required.
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel electronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything. Indeed, this plane is a mix of Brazil Israel and United States technology.
Thanks for your interest. This information has not been confirmed by the Military Balance of IISS, which we use as the main source for inventory data. Also, we could not reach any visual confirmation. So, we did not mention it. If you have any visuals, please share them with us.
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel eletronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything.
um avião já usando em combate real des da guerra do golfo a guerra do Afeganistão, mostrando que mesmo que seu desempenho sendo reconhecido mundialmente sendo que até a Rússia no anos 2000 quis comprar essa aeronave ❤❤🇧🇷🇧🇷
Good Video. But if you let me just one correction. Min 4:18, Equatorian Air Force has two Combat Esquadrons of his remaining 17 airframes of A-29B (01 was lost in 2012), Esquadron No. 2311 and No. 2313 and as i told you they are Combat Squadrons, they are NOT training squadrons, they only made recurrent training for their pilots and crews and only for transition pilots from basic training to operational and combat training. Thus they're NOT for only training duties As a former WSO of this aircraft from another latin american air force can asure you that. Cheers!
THERE IS A CITIZEN WHO ONLY SPEAKS HUNGARIAN IN THE SUPER TUCANO PROJECT. BUT HE IS ROOTED IN BRAZIL. IT WOULD BE SIMILAR TO THE UNITED STATES IN WHICH MANY OF ITS PRODUCTS ARE MANUFACTURED IN CHINA, THIS IS NOT THE CASE IN BRAZIL BECAUSE THEY ARE MADE IN BRAZIL.
Do you know what can down a super Tucano? Would a man portable Stinger type missile do it, or do you need a dedicated vehicle system like that BUK that down that Malaysian plane over Ukraine?
Melihat pertempuran di Ukraina hari ini, pesawat seperti Super Tucano ini juga sangat rentan dihajar oleh Manpad yang sangat mobile dan sulit diidentifikasi hingga detik terakhir. Prediksi saya ke depannya mungkin peran semacam ini akan lebih banyak diemban oleh Drone/UAV yang meski rentan juga namun korban manusia sangat bisa dihindari. Drone juga relatif lebih murah hanya saat ini kekurangannya dikapasitas angkut senjata yang masih kecil, namun ke depannya saya yakin engineer dan militer akan menemukan solusinya
Colombia has a lot of experience with this nice aircraft....now they will be getting the Rafale, will see how they put these Rafale to test against guerillas, drug trafficking, ilegal mining, and all other types of crimes where criminal camps are located. It will be specially put to the test when in comes to seek/hunt drug aircrafts.
Most of the countries on the list of buyers have little or no external threats. They are buying the plane to use against their own people. Instead of enriching the Brazilian military industrial complex, those countries should use their military budget to enrich and care for their own people.
It is very good indeed for its mission of low-intensity conflict, especially if the weapon loadout permits some standoff. Does it have the capability for chaff/flares as missile defense?
This plane is brazilian and was designed by the hungarian Joseph Kovacz, a world famous aircraft designer. The panel eletronic is from Israel. The engine is from the United States factory Pratt - Whitney, with 1600 hp. This plane has electronic devices for almost everything.
Because sometimes you need humans to make decisions. And in this case, the risk for the pilot is usually minimal, as the target has no reaction power for an air attack. And I think most of the use is the interception of drug aircraft.
The Brazilian Navy has the A4 I think are the most modern in the world. The A4 has a higher cost of flight time, its higher speed makes it difficult to intercept slow planes and the avionics of the Super Tucano are more modern. But mainly the Super Tucano is an airplane that is in production and all kinds of maintenance is done with ease. Already the A4 are becoming unfeasible to operate due to lack of spare parts and the structures are reaching the end of their useful life.
The Brazilian Government should consider a generous donation to Ukraine to test the super Tucano in a real high intensity war. It could be very useful to destroy Russian drones.
what do you mean ? these planes are meant to fight shitty insurgent groups not a well trained army that has advance weaponry to shoot down planes I don't think insurgents armed with AKs and RPGs will do much on the Tucanos.
@@smileyface2915 well i can imagine some shit ton of Toyotas mounted with soviet 14.7mm machine guns or some sort of autocannons shooting it down. Not to mention nowdays even shittiest of insurgents could get a stinger or so.
@@ladybernkastel5696 it is successful in the countries it's in service in also successful in Afghanistan that alone tells it's capabilities plus they don't just blindly send in prop planes in combat they assess the situation if it's low intensity or high intensity then send in a support plane ideal to the situation that's what Drones and AWACS are for gathering field intel.
@@SirAMG63 lol they got 1 or 2 units and no maintenance crew nor logistics for spare parts let alone any skilled pilots to operate it all flew out of the country cuz they'll be killed, better strap on some suicide vest on the pilot to make use of it.
To use his quote-inspired terminology, the A-10 is a great sledgehammer for hammering down those big nails and railroad spikes and such, but sometimes you only need to hammer down a basic 4 cm long nail.
Do you have any doubts that the country with the biggest drug problem in the world is the USA? In Brazil, a big part of the problem is being the route from producer to consumer, since both are outside its borders.
@@wallacemjr You probably should stop believing the left wing anti American news media as any time spent in the Phllippines or Russia will change your mind about illegal drug epidemic countries. Also if people in America are selling thier 6 year old children to be sex slaves in other countries ,I am not going to blame the other countries for what Americans are illegally supplying them.
Epic Censorship: It’s Cute and all But Basically defunct Useless in forward thinking And utterly Suicidal to fly against even some of the most Y modern Militia Designed to Y the Pilots, pocket the Cash The Context it fit’s into is too Luxurious and too niche
Up to 18 million dollars! That's a rip off. You can buy 2 x SU SU 25 for that. I'm sure you can make an exact replica of a P38 lightning, Mustang, Mosquito for a million or two. The L39 jet trainer can be Bought for 300,000 dollars on the second hand market. You could buy dozens of them for the price of a Tucano
Very true. The next question that I'd like to know as part of your argument is what do those cost per hour to fly? No trying to be a smart ass but I do wonder how they compare for per hour costs. I can't find any sources that seem reliable or accurate.
That's like comparing a Ferrari 125 to a Lamborghini Murciélago. Just because it's a propeller plane does not mean you can compare WW2 planes to it. Without looking at specs, I highly doubt twin-engine planes from the 40s will compare in operational costs and/or range, also, good luck sourcing parts to 80 year old planes in good enough condition for military use.
The built-in .50cal is a waste of time, space, and unnecessary weight. That airplane will spend 99% of its time in the patrol/observation mission. The FLIR is more important than a couple of MGs. If your mission calls for strafing you can always load up a couple of pods.
I disagree. The sort of mission profile these things would often have might have them stumble upon enemy insurgents or similar small forces, and being able to strafe the enemy if need be is a useful flexibility. And pods would take up a valuable hardpoint that could be fitted with missiles, bombs, rockets, or (assuming it can use them) drop tanks. The placement of the MGs also doesn't appear to interfere with having a FLIR on it.
