Supreme Court Rejects Bid To Restrict Abortion Pill | The View 

Ove never seen a woman except in the case that she is a victim that can't prevent pregnancy

What's w/Sara today? YIKES.

@truthbtold8697 that's because you haven't talked to a lot of women. Birth control fails.... Ectopic Pregnancies Happen.... Incomplete miscarriages happen.

That's horrible. Even the Bible agrees with me! Numbers 5: 11 - 5: 22 allows chemical abortions. 😮 ​@@truthbtold8697

Now to see what Trump is asking the Republicans to do to keep his a== out of jail!

Change the Supreme Court. Expand it or demand retirements of Alito and Thomas.

You're right. It was rejected based on the STANDING of the case and NOT the merits. Basically SCOTUS said the party appealing had NO grounds to plead. So now other states who do have grounds on standing (Basically to claim to be victimized by the law to provide contraceptives) will try to. It ain't over and they will now try to ban this on merit once they get past the standing issue. P.s. Sarah (which sadly is starting to become a reoccurring event) is wrong here.

To have legal standing, a party must demonstrate that they have a sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party’s participation in the case. The U.S. Supreme Court has outlined three key elements that a party must satisfy to establish standing: *Injury in Fact:* The plaintiff must have suffered or be imminently threatened with a concrete and particularized injury. This means that the harm must be actual or imminent, not hypothetical, and must affect the plaintiff in a personal and individual way. *Causation:* There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of. The injury must be fairly traceable to the defendant's actions and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court. *Redressability:* It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury. This means that the court must be able to provide relief that directly addresses the harm suffered by the plaintiff. *Additional Considerations* Prudential Standing: Beyond these constitutional requirements, courts may impose additional prudential limitations on standing. These are judicially created rules, such as the prohibition against litigating generalized grievances more appropriately addressed by the legislative branch, or the requirement that a plaintiff's complaint fall within the "zone of interests" protected by the law invoked.

@rgomoffat Those two will retire when Trump is relected. They want to retire under a Republican president. They are needed when we can't settle a problem. Such as Bush -Gore.

@@HelloToYours For some reason Sarah has taken upon herself to defend the conservatives and the supreme court at any cost. So sad.

Funny fact here, if women didn't vote we would never have a Democratic President again. True story

White women who vote for the GOP are the problem.

I sincerely doubt that. Repubs are the ones always infringing on women's rights constantly while having taxpayers pay for VIAGRA for congress and the military. ​@hunterjr666 are you just hoping more women will want to be #tradwife and only do what their husband says.

Women need to vote… in THEIR best interests.

@@hunterjr666you think ALL women vote Democrat? That is NOT true! If BLACK women didn’t vote, there would never be a Democratic president. There IS a difference!

Read as *compromised*

compromised*, but yes.

Only when you disagree 😂😂😂

Yes it is comprised. Public education failed you.

@@truthbtold8697 MAGA Dk

Im sorry you can’t buy contraceptive pills sir. Lol

Me neither 😢😢😢

I still have no faith in old men running my republic

😂😂we know ❄

@@edzzz5043 MAGA TRICK

You're right. It was rejected based on the STANDING of the case and NOT the merits. Basically SCOTUS said the party appealing had NO grounds to plead. So now other states who do have grounds on standing (Basically to claim to be victimized by the law to provide contraceptives) will try to. It ain't over and they will now try to ban this on merit once they get past the standing issue. P.s. Sarah and Sunny are wrong here.

It shouldn't. When a better case comes before them they will do it then.

It shouldn’t have to just be “necessary” for someone to have an abortion. They should be allowed to have one just because they simply do not want a child.

He who is without ovaries shall not make laws for those who do! Fallopians 5:12

​@@evamclaughlin1585Numbers 5: 11- 5: 22 allows chemical abortion.... what's ridiculous is this Bronze age text limits this process to the husband's decision. Kind of contradictory on many levels.

@@MemphisTiger not if they aren't responsible with their sex lives they are not!

@@brad3706 we do not care what they thought or what any misogynists think this isn't men's business!!

Exactly

💯

You're right. It was rejected based on the STANDING of the case and NOT the merits. Basically SCOTUS said the party appealing had NO grounds to plead. So now other states who do have grounds on standing (Basically to claim to be victimized by the law to provide contraceptives) will try to. It ain't over and they will now try to ban this on merit once they get past the standing issue. P.s. Sarah (which sadly is starting to become a reoccurring event here) is wrong here.

The Supreme Court is not a popularity contest. Their job is to interpret the law based on the constitution and legal precedent, just like Sara said.

@@HelloToYourshow many times did you paste the same comment?

Not all of them are clowns. There’s three on the right side. Calm down.

its funny to watch CNN and the " view" whip you idiots into a frenzy.... they follow the constitution thats it

I don’t trust democrats and liberals

We wouldn’t even have a country anymore if it wasn’t for the Supreme Court and just because they don’t bend to the will of psychotic progressives does not make them clowns.

yes they did because no one can just say they want something removed just because they personally oppose it

no one has standing, the drug is safe.

For you and our children..a MAGA nightmare coming for us again.

To my everlasting shame I voted for that stumblebum biden last time .. never again..MAGA in 2024. ✌️♥️🇺🇸

That's a good slogan lol

Sure!!! What about defending the real woman’s in sports? Oh they are not important enough for your agenda huh!!

TRUMP 2024🎉 I will be voting for TRUMP.

Exactly, who the heck are they, are they the Mosiah? Will they be there when The Mosiah call on me

they have no right! don't listen to them.

SCOTUS includes 4 women

They have no say! Me and my doctor will be the ONLY ones making my medical decisions!!! Now and Forever 💯💯🙏🙏

Mabey because it's not Just your body once you are pregnant it's also another body. I can't believe you women are THIS DUMB.

They are not scared at all they are in complete control and psychotic progressives crying because they can’t have their way is the fuel that drives them. You need a reason not to vote blue look at Canada lol.

Imagine being a woman of colour?

Women have access to birth control, no need for abortion, only under some situations.

no it isn't they cannot take away this medication just because misogynists want them to

That’s what they said!

no one. It's a safe drug!!

She is not very bright

Sara represents all the ditzes out there. I find her annoying.

She has always been extremely naive.

She just yaps

Please no more oy vey it’s over Lindsey Lohan

We marched in the sixties and we now have BIRTH CONTROL.

women are still using the drug that's what counts and the drug is safe

So they can put more conservatives on it? How will that help?

I came all the way down to see of someone else caught that 😂😂😂😂😂😂

I don't think you understand what *HIPAA actually is

HIPAA doesn’t relate to this issue.

​@@lukerinderknecht2982In order for lawmakers to subject people to punishments regarding health care, they would be accessing that private medical information.. which is illegal under HIPAA regulations. ​

@@Birdsong-Annalee thank you these people (men) don’t get it but us women do 💜

@@lukerinderknecht2982 yeah right

You can’t vote them out

😂😂the fact you think you can vote Supreme Court Justices out

Would be nice. However, their appointment is for life.

​@@johnhoffman1161can vote out the republicans who appoint these justices

Vote out to the GOP!

no senator Whitehouse isn't backing off he's trying to get impeachment started on some of them.

When will they be making that decision?

they are afraid some of them will be impeached because of Senator Whitehouse

We don’t know the official day, but SCOTUS goes to recess in June/Early July, so we should expect a ruling sometime before then.

They've already done what Trump wanted. They've delayed his court case.

Wtf are you people on? We invented BIRTH CONTROL!!! 🙄

That's simply not true. Pro life people are over represented in adoption, women's and babies shelters etc. But keep shelling the narrative that works for you.

no it won't

they have no standing

What released tapes? I dont think I have heard about them.

Yes because Senator Whitehouse is exposing their corruption and impeachment is coming to them soon.

That’s what the GQP is trying to do, for worse

Civil wars never work...they just change the dictators

Yea everything has to be extreme with you clowns!

the drug is safe and women are using it and stocking up on it everywhere

Me too. Sarah's rightwingerism rears its ugly head in almost every topic these days.

Why? Is it because she has common sense and integrity. Unlike Joy saying that the right wants women in the kitchen with ten kids and no way to feed them. No one wants that.

they will be when they are impeached

Actually, I think it seems like it's more of a freedom of choice and bodily autonomy issue. A woman's right to make any and every choice about her own body has been cancelled wherever abortion bans have been instituted. Also, the concept of privacy is relatively new. One could also argue that if even one person knows your "secret" or private info., then you may technically not have any privacy due to the possibility of your info being revealed.

@@m.w.njoroge7438 I agree with your assessment

yes they did. the drug is safe and it's still being used right now

stop fear mongering!

Then stop sleeping around.

we're not listening and now we can stock up on the medication

women you don't have to obey men especially not misogynists

don't obey their misogynistic laws either

And who is supporting, educating, housing, clothing, feeding, and nurture these children? DNA tests make these males pay for everything in a manner the same as his family. Rich family, kid gets the best of everything including a home for the child’s mother. Plus schooling, including college and university VIP style. Let’s see how many of these males are willing to sign before the act that F a child is produce from that union, the male pays for it all

They rightfully let the individual states determine their own abortion laws.

Birth control is choice. 🙄

no the drug is safe and has good standing

@@Love_Daisys the problem lies not in the drug effectiveness

@@tjahjadijudono-zc5jn look please give up misogynists are not going to win this or the election

@@tjahjadijudono-zc5jn yes it does because if it doesn't hurt anyone besides their little feelings they have no standing and the supreme courts said they don't take these cases

So true! That's exactly what I thought!

Of course ! That's expected . Trump will be immuned from the law.

that's wrong! they are afraid because the Justices may be facing impeachment especially Alito and Thomas and Roberts too

Trump 2024🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

@@mslolalucky trump jail 2024 🇺🇸

God will always win.

because the drug is safe

they can't take this drug, it's safe but stock up on it anyway and learn to help women who need safe abortions by learning how they're performed in case of emergency situations

I think you misunderstood. I was talking about the Supreme Court appeasing the women temporarily for votes like a sucker moment. I never had to go through that ordeal. I worry about the future for the children/women who have difficulty with pregnancy or graped victims.

Jr. Is a swear word now😂...but good idea😊 💙

How many talk show do you know about? Sponsorships determine what you watch. This show became popular and now has a bit more freedom to voice their opinions instead of the political rhetoric on sponsor reliant less watched shows.

You mean younger viewers are incapable of sitting down, listening to women older than them, and respecting what the older women have to say. Younger viewers need to engage with all ages within the population. So stop practicing ageism.

@@blue-vu1ek no, it wasn't as serious as all that. I thought it would be a fun show. That is all.

As she should. DT for Prison 2024!

@@Heartboy1031 This is a crazy bot that's been posting meaningless comments since forever. Don't waste your time responding to it.

Glad!

nope they know some of them are up for impeachment

the drug is safe, they are being exposed and want the heat to back off

Spoken like a true elitist.