Take a time out from your routine and learn the ins and outs of Time Outs administration.

Подписаться 12 тыс.

Просмотров 13 тыс.

50% 1

This Rule Review segment is going over plays involving time outs. This video is dedicated to educating basketball officials on understanding when and when not to grant a time out. Watching actual videos of plays involving time outs, along with some basic instruction explaining the rule, helps officials learn faster and retain rule information better. We can all learn together by continually discussing the rules as they are written in the NFHS rules book and viewing actual high school basketball games reinforces that learning.
Because time out administration is a point of emphasis for the NFHS for the 2021/2022 basketball season it important we all try to get on the same page with a proper understanding of what is required to correctly grant a time out request. All too often we see time outs granted when the ball is loose or even when two opposing players are fighting for possession. This will be the focus of this Rule Review segment. All video clips we reference in this segment on screens come from high school games and focus solely on the NFHS high school rules book.
Video #1
- A pass is made to a teammate who has turned and started walking toward his bench. The ball hits him and bounces away toward an opponent, but instead of a steal going the other way, the official calls a timeout. Watch to find out what went wrong.
Video #2
- After a shot, the ball bounces out and causes a scrum of players scrambling to retrieve the ball. A time is called by officials but it appears as thought the ball was loose. Was this time out called correctly?
Video #3
- A stolen pass turns into a press situation in the back court with the ball getting tied up between opponents. The officials calls a time out in favor of the offensive team, but what he right to grant this request by the coach?
Video #4
- A ball is being dribbled up the court but on the other side there is an injured player down to his knees. So why are the officials not stopping play? Let's review the details of a time out during an injury.
Watching video clips is a good way to stay connected to the skill of officiating basketball but true education and learning can more effectively be attained when each video is annotated with diagrams and shading to point out key teaching points.
The Officials Institute, and the Rule Review segment, creates videos that don't leave you guessing about whether there was a foul, violation or not. Even though we cannot officiate in slow motion or freeze frames, by watching and reviewing video video in this fashion, we are able to "retrain our brain" so we can start seeing plays more accurately when we do see them in real time and increase our ability to get the call right.
#timeouts
#timeoutadministration
#grantingtimeouts
#basketballrules
For more videos by the Officials Institute subscribe to this channel
/ officialsinstitute
OR
click the following video links
Rule Review - Screens
• What is screen? What m...
5 Play Challenge - Screens
• How many Screen plays ...
Live Meeting - Correctable Errors
• Correctable Errors. Th...
You can also find us on our website
officialsinstitute.org/
Join our group on Facebook
/ officialsinstitute
All rules referenced in this video are taken from the official rules book provided by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS). To find out more about the NFHS, you can visit them at nfhs.org/

Опубликовано:

4 ноя 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 22

@dannyortiz8079 2 года назад

Love your videos Josh... Very informative, always backed up by the rules and challenging... Keep up the great work!!!

@OfficialsInstitute 2 года назад

Thank you kindly. And thanks for watching.

@michaelj529 2 года назад

The last clip was extremely helpful!!

@OfficialsInstitute 2 года назад

Glad it was beneficial to you.

@daveclaude1412 2 года назад

I agree.

@realtruthseeker521 6 месяцев назад

Third clip was spot on and pretty obvious it was a bad time out.

@OfficialsInstitute 6 месяцев назад

Thanks

@chriskerr2540 2 года назад

In the first scenario, you said the team didn’t have control when the timeout was administered so it shouldn’t have been granted. However, the same thing happens in the second clip. The official awards the timeout after possession is lost. How are these two different?

@OfficialsInstitute 2 года назад

Because human reaction time must be considered. In the first clip, the ball is passed halfway across the court, hits a teammate in the back and bounces to the floor. After 3 seconds elapse, a whistle is sounded. This is much longer than it takes to recognize and grant a timeout request. Video two, the officials immediately see the player control and the coach requesting time out, but the whistle and signal lagged only a fraction of a second. This reaction time falls within the acceptable range. Does that make sense? .5 seconds to react-ok, 3 seconds to react-not ok

@robertbarr6725 Год назад

@@OfficialsInstitute Is consideration for reaction time in the rule book? or just something that makes sense to the "Officials Institute"

@OfficialsInstitute Год назад

@@robertbarr6725 No mention of reaction time in the rules book. This is just a common sense general rule of thumb.

@realtruthseeker521 6 месяцев назад

Ok. Please clarify. In the very first clip the coaches clearly asks for a time out while in possession of the ball which should be granted. If the player passes the ball before you blow your whistle you are saying we should not have granted it? We just went over this in class and they said it’s not when we blow the whistle but when the time was requested he did have possession. It’s like when two rebounder of opposite teams both grab a rebound, as the referee is sounding his whistle one player pulls the ball down causing the other player to fall on him. Coach says “thats over the back”. I say coach I have jump ball first. I guess with this mindset I should call the foul since I had not yet blown the whistle? It is hard to blow the whistle at the exact time the coach calls it. This is why time is sometimes added back on the clocks. So I’m confused.

@OfficialsInstitute 6 месяцев назад

The request is ONLY a request and is not granted until the official sounds the whistle and gives the signal. This is because the official needs to ensure all factors are met before granting a timeout, otherwise a coach could request when the ball is loose or in flight on a pass. Make sense?

@robertbarr6725 Год назад

This could all be avoided by changing the rule that a coach can call a time out to save a possession. For an official to grant a time out to a coach he must visualize that the time out was actually called by the coach and not someone else (another coach, bench player, fan etc...) and while he's making that determination the ball becomes loose it's very tough but it would be very easy to correct with a rule change

@OfficialsInstitute Год назад

Until then…

@aldrichchua9298 2 года назад

Live ball while white player is down because of injury. Can the official stop the play for injury timeout instead a coach is asking for a timeout?

@OfficialsInstitute 2 года назад

Correct. The coach is not required to request a time out in injury situations.

@realtruthseeker521 6 месяцев назад

Even more confused now because the second clip contradicts the first. In the first you just said it should not be granted because the ball was being passed when he blew the whistle. But in both cases it’s the same thing. The ref recognized that indeed there was possession when the request was made however when the whistle was blown there was no possession in BOTH? So yea idk. 🤷‍♂️

@OfficialsInstitute 6 месяцев назад

Recognizing while the ball is in possession then blowing the whistle within a reasonable amount of time (no more than a second) is acceptable. Recognizing at time of possession then waiting multiple seconds to blow the whistle after the play has developed further is not good.

@Panarchy9 2 года назад

Your example at the 5:01 mark discusses Dual Control. "Dual Control" is not a phrase found anywhere in the rulebook, and I think it's a word officials should stop using. There are a billion coaches and officials who are of a mind that you can call a timeout during a held ball. If there's dual control then you have 2 players in control, and if one of them is my player and I am a head coach I can call timeout, right? The NFHS points of emphasis didn't even clarify this in their section on player control, which is a real shame. 4-25-1 says that a Held Ball is when "Opponents have their hands so firmly on the ball that *control cannot be obtained*..." This wording, IMO, implies that player control is not happening during a held ball, because if it was happening then the rule wouldn't say that it "cannot be obtained". If there is no player control during a held ball, then neither team can call timeout because it's not a dead ball and neither team has player control. For such an important point that a LOT of coaches and officials often get wrong, that's an undue amount of lawyering that NFHS is putting an official through and a lost opportunity by NFHS during the clarifier. Either way, though, the example in the video is excellent. Great work as always.

@OfficialsInstitute 2 года назад

We try very hard to use proper terminology in all our videos, however, we also try to simply rules to make it easier to understand. This line can be a fine one and we sometimes blur the technical and common sense language together inadvertently. Our hope is, even if we sometime miss the mark on the exact terminology, the correct understanding and application of the intent and purpose of the rule is received. Thank you for you comments on this important aspect of officiating and helping to ensure the language we use continues to be rules oriented.

@Panarchy9 2 года назад

@@OfficialsInstitute Let me clarify: you have nothing to apologize for. I love your work, you've been a HUGE help to me getting my officiating career off the ground, all of your work is awesome and this video is too. I don't think you missed the mark at all.