Перетяжелил конструкцию-это раз! Во-вторых, пропеллеры надо было выше поднять, чтобы поток воздуха на взлёте и посадке мог подсосать дополнительную "подушку" и общая устойчивость в полёте тоже улучшится. С шагом воздушных винтов тоже поэкспериментировать не мешало бы, по-моему шаг можно было бы увеличить?! В третьих, для лучшей аэродинамики пропеллеров их надо заключить в кольца( это повысит и безопасность тоже). Но, главное, "похудеть" во всём( и самому пилоту тоже😊) и убрать всё лишнее, чтобы хотя бы на метр высоты взлететь, а не "чуть-чуть подпрыгивать"!
@@abuahmed3054 Уважаемый, сами пропеллеры достаточно хорошо отбалансированы и при вращении играют роль маховиков гироскопов. Так что, как минимум, 4 гироскопа уже имеется!😉 Да и в автопилотах( миниатюрный автопилот здесь тоже не помешал бы, т.к. слишком велика вероятность вручную сильно "раскачать по крену и тангажу" этот летательный аппарат, со всеми вытекающими печальными последствиями) уже давно применяют лазерные гироскопы, разве не так?!
@@user-vr5do7dj2d Где в этой "жужжалке" аж 4 двигателя по 100 л.с.???😂 Там вижу мотоциклетный движок, хорошо если он 40 л.с индикаторной мощности выдаёт, а с потерями ременных( а какие там могут быть ещё, цепные стальные, что ли?😊) передач к пропеллерам там вообще с мощность завал! С себя всё тряпьё надо было "лётчику" скинуть, оставить лишь лёгкий комбез и каску! Конструкци аппарата переделать по-авиационному ажурно на пределе запаса прочности-"летучей" сделать, а не такую "паровозную" раму мостить и колёса от магазинских тележек по килограмма полтора каждая! Углеродно-графитовых композитов нет там, разве что, пропеллеры из них сделаны?! Но это и хорошо, что не взлетел! Он бы разбился сразу, с такими-то очевидными проблемами устойчивости аппарата по-крену и по-тангажу!😂
No good solution design here. I would power the quadcopter with 4 independent electric motors controlled with a Naze32 type flight controller (Betaflight firmware or similar) and with a buffering battery and use the motorbike strictly for electricity generation to keep the battery at a SoC between 30% and 80%. Further I recommend to put the Quadcopter component ABOVE the driver and not below it, to make it more safe.
You need: 1. Propellers curved to provide upthrust and lift. 2. Distance between propellers and flat ground needs to be increased. 3. Guard the propellers from creating harm to you or anyone. 4. Weight distribution.
He need full armor not only helmet see those blades if fall off and touch the blade it's all over no safety on blades he should fully cover those blades
There is the mesh metal floor to protect him if he ever falls … The biggest issue it’s all constructed with steel and that made it so difficult to lift … either make it lighter or somehow increase the power :) … also it needs to be balanced :) might as well start from scratch :)
Ok so the engine sounds maxed, but i think it needs a torque converter style automatic clutch with better gearing. The catch screen needs to cover all blades, or be built as a mancage, the safety gear needs to be a double stitched layer of leather, A6 cut resistant fabric, and impact armor. Lighten the load on the landing just use gear just use 1/2" round or square tube three point attachments. Looks fun though.
Lol everyone talking bout it being a human blender meanwhile my first thought was if that engine suddenly quits because it's being absolutely maxed out and isn't designed to be at max rpm for very long it's just gonna drop like a rock out the sky plus how hard it is to control since they all spin at the same speed instead of having individual control so he has to use his body weight to control a probly 1200 lbs unwieldy monster
He should definitely find a way to keep the blades from chopping off someone’s head or something and make like a cage to fit over them ! But it’s definitely a good idea and I don’t look that expensive!! Congratulations on your first attempt!!
For 1 it looks WAY to heavy for the motors your using.🤔 you should have built it around a go-kart frame and use as much carbon fiber as possible to make it strong but light
There is a reason the Air Force gave up on trying to build things like this in the 60s. It’s too hard to make it stable. You need a computer, varying the speed of each corner constantly to keep the vehicle stable. Even if you had a computer and four internal combustion engines, it would be unlikely you could vary the output of an internal combustion engine quickly enough because of throttle lag and the differences in torque over the RPM range. But you also need a computer, computer, fast enough and software clever enough. Which is why quad copters didn’t really become a thing until the last 10 or 15 years.
I saw one of these. I think it was in China and they were actually flying around on it. It wasn't like trying to take off. It was actually doing quite well as a flying machine
As hélice deveria ser envolvida em um tubo para direcionar o ar com hélice invertida para estabilidade, a regulagem de vôo seria janelas que fecham a entrada do ar, deveria ser inclinado as hélice ou seja o motor para ter maior estabilidade, colocar um pêndulo ou peso como nos navios para estabilidade, se vocês colocar um pêndulo central vocês pode colocar os motores em linha 2 atrás e dois na frente com rotação opostas para estabilidade veja todo pássaro tem barriga e peito para estabilidade a moto seria o pássaro a tendência é virar abraço
If the Earth was actually a big round ball instead of a flat plane this contraption might actually work down under because the bulk of the weight would actually be on the right side.
