I deal a lot with multicast and am interested in learning more. I heard your coming series will cover large scale multicast and looking forward to it. Thanks for all you do
- As much as I loved your deep explanation of the core you built incorrectly on purpose. I feel it was very advanced for me in a way to fully comprehend what you were saying details wise.
Hi Rob, even though you read my question, you didn't reply to it 😄 I understand that you run out of time. Could you please get back to that question during next "AMA"? I'll repost this question here: "Hi Rob, thank you for the answering my question. I also think that just Layer 2 link (trunk) between distribution switches is the best design. You also mentioned that it's possible to run routing protocol with SVIs over Layer 2 link (trunk) between distribution switches and you wanted to explain something about it and then your attention was switched to another question. Could you please tell more about this design? I think it's not very usual design. In which kind of scenarios it can be useful?"
Hello Rob I really enjoyed your videos and keep it up. Can you give us detail explanation about Cisco IOS types? In which Cisco hardware’s do we find them? Where do we apply them in the Enterprise Network Infrastructure? ISO-XE IOS-XR IOS-NXOS IOSv IOS IOU
09:57 - My first part of the question is, why do we have some customer sites that have 2 routers connected physically, ANDD they run iBGP too? And this configuration is done by the ISP. So why add the iBGP when we have a static GigaEthernet cable connection between both CEs that act as our default gateway?
Routing. How do you get traffic that comes in one CE that may need to get outbound based on my breakdown? iBGP between them allows the ISP to direct the traffic accordingly.