Tense Cross of Psychologist in Depp v. Heard Pt. 1 

She auditioned and won the roll. Nice payday coming. The jury will see right through this tactic. Especially after the defense puts on their own expert who was actually a treating psychologist and not just a hired gun.

@@tellthetruthna8523 maybe the most delusional person I’ve read comment about something on this trial. Supporting Amber in this is delusional as it is but this is by far the most mentally deficient belief I’ve heard.

She's not a doctor, she's a psychologist. The "old" lawyer is doing a great job at discrediting her and showing how Depp's attorneys committed malpractice.

No I don’t think that but I do think she’s biased But all expert witnesses hired by either party are. It’s why are system is not fair. The witnesses should never have been solicited or hired by any subject or party or there attorneys. They should be court appointed and preferably randomly

@@Christina4758 it’s definitely the other way around. Dr. Curry clearly corrected Ambers attorney on many occasions. Correcting her on misinformation. Ambers attorney even tried to get Dr. Curry to explain why Amber is a victim through questioning behaviours related to victims of abuse and she accidentally proved Depp the be the victim more than Amber.

who

@@nenej12 The psychologist.

Exactly! The lawyer is thousands of steps behind. Had she highlighted what you’re mentioning here, I feel she’d have a stronger argument.

Dr. Curry has more than 15 years of experience providing therapy and assessment services across military, forensic, and community settings. As Director of the Curry Psychology Group, Dr. Curry helps military and civilian clients transform their relationships, overcome grief and trauma, and achieve overall life improvement. She is committed to social justice work, and serves on the advisory board for the University of California Center for Unconventional Security Affairs (CUSA); engaging in research and programming to address global issues of poverty, warfare, violence, and sustainability. Her own research on culturally-responsive trauma therapy in international communities has received awards from the American Psychological Association and Psychology Beyond Borders. Dr. Curry regularly serves as a psychologist expert and independent forensic evaluator for state courts, law enforcement agencies, the U.S. military, and private attorneys. She enjoys utilizing her psychological expertise to provide clear, articulate, and well-researched opinions in both civil and criminal matters. Dr. Curry is a certified forensic examiner for the Hawaii Department of Courts and Corrections and a registered psychological evaluator for California courts and law enforcement agencies.

@@SkySharma wtf? Are you her manager?

Lawyer is doing a great job discrediting her.

@@katethegreat2222 Dr. Shannon Curry is a clinical and forensic psychologist, licensed in both California and Hawaii. She owns the Curry Psychology Group, a leading multi-specialty counseling center in Orange County, CA, and has 15 years of experience conducting research, therapy, and psychological evaluations pertaining to trauma, violence, and relationships.

@@Christina4758 Dr. Shannon Curry is a clinical and forensic psychologist, licensed in both California and Hawaii. She owns the Curry Psychology Group, a leading multi-specialty counseling center in Orange County, CA, and has 15 years of experience conducting research, therapy, and psychological evaluations pertaining to trauma, violence, and relationships.

Thats there job.

Whilst I'm skeptical of the situation, it is her job to prove Amber to br telling the truth.

She brainwashed them with all that passive aggressiveness

@@janiznick *their

Yeah the muffins thing is stupid

She's cancelled any future chances of being hired. Her own incompetence cause that

Very unlikeable... Amber's male attorney as well.

It's not an attorney's job to be likeable.

@@adrienne3802 his comment is not about this attorney not doing her job. It's just about her being unlikeable.

If you want to win it helps a bunch! The people in the jury are human.

Legend has it he is still in the courtroom, it is empty and he is still repeating one question- "DiD I ReAd THat RiGHt?"🤣😆😁

*You're not really....

@@January. Scat.! Get outta here.!

@@maxbigaveli3791 No

I find most old lady lawyers to be. Orthopedic shoes and all

She is not doing a good job for her client, are they not seeing this on Heards side?

Well is it a success if in a 300+ transcript the defense finds 2-3 inconsistencies with flipped answers?

RUDE

@@hithere3897 But DID they? I saw that when they "thought " they had discredited a witness, it was by using "partial" testimony & not the entire phrase. The only witness discredited was the one who saw headlines & clips of court proceedings. And that was mislead.

I'm having my daughter text her!

His feelings are almost certainly justified. But that doesn’t equate to being slandered. And that doesn’t equate to $50 million dollars.

I could listen and look at her all day

@@hithere3897 That is the argument AH attorneys will try to make. She did smear him. Judge's instructions to jury will be critical.

She caught a few inconsistencies which for her is probably a success. She’s trying to discredit her

@@hithere3897 not real inconsistencies there. I would say the opposite the whole think showed how desperate Amber's side is to discredit her

It's embarrassing to watch her. She fails every single time she gets up there I'm shocked theyre still letting her speak to anyone

Correct

I cought 2-3 flipped answers but seriously the deposition was over 300 pages long and probably conducted years ago And some of the questions are very open ended not just straight yes or no

Agreed on 98%. But that defense attorney did catch her in 2-3 flipped answers. Obviously she was being truthful but her job is to undermine her credibility

Not all doctors and psychologists are competent.

@@January. True, but they're always smarter than lawyers.

No, others far more highly trained as well as a judge said Amber was assaulted dozens of times and has no evidence of the conditions they are trying to lay on her. Thia is sad to see the public so caught up in this

I think Elaine OD'd on Amber's BPD.

@@wintercomesearly She was feisty today

@@fernandaolivares7926 The team is getting desperate. Need more popcorn.

Do you know the muffin man?

@@janiznick that is the REAL question 🤔😅

I worked 5 years as an administrative assistant and part-time DV/SA advocate. A lot of facilities don’t house men, but ours did. It was rare for men to come in, and a lot of that is because society conditions men to just tolerate abuse. I hope this case causes men to feel safer to come forward.

Yes, there should be more awareness. But, an abusive, alcoholic, drug addict whose wealth & power far exceed his partner's is not the best spokesperson for male victims of domestic violence. It just looks like bullying to anyone who isn't in love with him.

@@tellthetruthna8523 To be fair, the case should probably be dismissed. It seems they were mutually toxic, but she does look to be the aggressor.

@@michelejackson7934 It should have been dismissed a long time ago. She has a first amd right to write an opinion piece saying she is a domestic violence survivor. She never even used his name or gave a single detail about their relationship. It would have all blown over by now had he not started filing lawsuits. Sad what people do to themselves and each other.

I have similar experience. I have a friend of mine who at some point started making typos quite frequently, so I was making fun of her since she actually studied linguistics. And now I have noticed that I am starting to make typos more frequently too. I have actually heard before, that lack of physical activity can affect that too. Since COVID started, I worked mostly from home office and at one point I stopped going to gym too and I have noticed my focus and my memory went down too. Is it possible you went through decline in physical activity too?

She's trying to confuse the jurors to believe the lady on the stand is the person who presented those findings.

There are nearly thirty exceptions to the hearsay rule under the federal rules of evidence; state rules can vary somewhat. I'm not going to watch the full cross-exam to try to figure out what you are referring to but suffice it to say the hearsay rule is not what non-lawyers believe it is. It's complicated.

To be completely honest with you, I think it is hearsay. Sometimes the attorney can get away with it if it’s not caught by the other team: if they don’t object for “hearsay”, she can continue. I think you caught something the legal team missed or just didn’t think was important

In this case, since she is being used as an examiner for the case she had access to the other doctors’ notes to thoroughly review accounts. Since she was brought upon the case to examine other experts’ information to form an opinion, she is able to use those details to form a professional opinion as she is unbiased within the case. Since this is civil court, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff though- so my understanding is that to bring suit she is meant to provide context for the situation it doesn’t mean she is rooting for any side, even if she was hired by counsel on one side or another. Ultimately this allows everyone to better understand what would have led Amber to make accusations + slander Johnny. The best thing for Amber’s team would have been to play into her having symptoms of the fore mentioned disorders, coming to terms with her abusing Johnny and using that to settle. But since she is going all out to prove she was telling the truth she is just making herself look bad.

@@joellezima3506 I don't know what question the op is asking about. He didn't provide a timestamp. But, unless it involves an out of court statement made for the purpose of proving the truth of the matter asserted it's not hearsay. If it is hearsay the analysis turns to whether it meets one of the many exceptions to the rule. You are right that not all hearsay, or potential hearsay, is objected to.

@@IDalexy What are you talking about? Amber didn't bring this lawsuit. I doubt JD wants to settle although he should. The rest of your comment is just word salad.

It's just sad. Johnny is dragging both of them through the mud. The studios aren't going to hire him no matter what the outcome and he knows it. He is uninsurable. His relationship with his ex-wife would have blown over had he not started filing lawsuits. Not many people read her op ed piece and he knows that too.

He didn’t stay that long. They were only married for 2 years!

15 months is not a long time anyway in the big scheme of things

Our Johnny, wtf does that even mean?

Don't see her threatening to burn his body and put him in a trunk or other criminal threats or actions...lots of money to be made by the mess as typical in communities these days instead of the obvious reality of her suffering and response to get him to change seen for what it is and his abuse addressed. He should have been charged. Untold numbers of women suffer in exactly the same fashion. He refuses accountability and to take responsibility whatsoever as is so clear leaving her to fight impossibly for the relationship with such a disinterested person driving her to extremes

@@littlepony8571 he wasn't threatening her he was saying that in a text to his friend. He never directly made that threat to her. You say he needs to take responsibility but this woman has made so many lies against his character where is her responsibility? She has made actual victims of abuse less likely to be believed because of her lies. You seem to think because she is a woman that she must be the victim but men can be victims too. Your mentality towards this case is exactly why most men don't come forward about their abuse.

The jury isn't comprised of Johnny stans.

I think at this point she may be trying to score points with Ms Heard. I think Amber would be upset if she wasn't so aggressive. At some point, lawyers have to realize that they need to get paid once it's all over. I can see Amber withholding fees should she not be happy with the performance of her legal team.

Ha ha great description !! She is very matronly.

@@chrisgerald4536 I'm sure she got a retainer fee up front that will cover the trial. Stop making stuff up. You can do better.

@@tellthetruthna8523 I've tried to do so in the past week. My friends have noticed too. Thaknk YOO!

Karen syndrome 🤣

I was thinking the same... lol

‘Condescending old bag disorder’

Thank you!!!! It's so annoying

I am guessing in general any victim of domestic abuse have tendencies to cover their bruises. And especially in case of an actor, when she is filming, her bruises would be covered by make up artist, when auditioning, most people doent see her regularly. So if she didnt happen to be filming, her only regular contact professionaly would be her agent.

Sounds like it’s Johnny

It's "The Cat-Lady-Badger Defense Lawyer breathing into that podium mic.

@@IBCHARLALALA yooooooo 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Sounds like someone’s asleep

@San Dra lol!!!

I think it was court ordered.

I also think she could lie her way through and cheat the system

Amber was claiming that she had PTSD, so the court ordered her to have an IME. Amber was initially trying to have the court order Johnny to have an IME, but Johnny wasn't claiming to have a mental issue. Abusing alcohol and drugs is not a valid reason to undergo an IME.

🤣

She is a Hottie, with all respect. A very attractive woman.

🤣🤣🤣🤣Perry Mason

Shades of the UK trial and the elevator scene of her picking through and throwing away food on the carpet. She seems to be a weird grazer.

@@wintercomesearly What??

@@straykitten4998 How she handles food. You recall how she chewed food while the attorneys waited for her to swallow while taking depositions in the UK? Then there's the CCTV of her and friends at the elevator in Columbia East, they're holding the elevator for her while she leisurely picks through a plate of take out and throws the pieces she doesn't want over her shoulder to the floor. Bizarre.

and somehow, she still looks better than that weird ass lawyer

@@taethesensei8128 Yup. Messy bun works fine for her.

@@taethesensei8128 And 99% of the audience in that court!

😂

In early briefs AH attorneys are saying Depp's counsel made claims as to what Dr curry was going to testify. Here, she says she does not draw conclusions on legal matters so they may have overstepped. I don't know if that's true or if it has any consequence as re the defamation issue. Elaine was sure hammering it.