Тёмный

Terrifying Flying Submarine - The Convair Nuclear Submersible Ramjet 

Found And Explained
Подписаться 712 тыс.
Просмотров 344 тыс.
50% 1

New channel: / @aviationstationyt
Check out: Aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Discord: / discord
BUSINESS INQUIRES: Jared@foundandexplained.com
The year is 1961. USA needs an edge agaist the soviets. They turned to military supplier Convair, who at the time was looking into various applications of nuclear power in aircraft for the US navy. They had already proposelled the very imaginative submersible seaplane submarine hunter, and naturally had the imagination to think outside of the box. the engineers had so far thought up unmanned nuclear VTOL drones, aircraft caffier launched mach 3 strike craft, both projects that desperately need a future video, as well as giant nuclear seaplanes, much like the Lockheed flying nuclear tug that I put up last week that you can watch right here.
But the US navy wasn't satisfied. they needed something that had the deterrent capacity of a submarine, but would also be able to reach inland targets far from the ocean - after all, if you have ever seen a map of the world, much of the USSR was very far from the sea, and missiles used in the era lacked the flexibility of a manned aircraft.
Thus they needed a craft that could approach enemy terrorty without its presence being known, and then strike quickly. This is what the team at convair came up with.
this top-secret black project would be called the submersible nuclear ramjet. It would be unlike any other aircraft design of the era, and would resemble mroe of a manned nuclear missile than anything. It would have a long sleek design with a diameter of eight feet, as well as being 190 feet in length, with two fuel tanks, one at the front and one at the back, with four different exhaust areas at the rear.
It would have a sea weight of 350,000 pounds, which would lighten up to 240,000 pounds when the tanks were empty. It would be able to carry around 20,000 pounds of nuclear tipped weapons, 24 in total, that would be deployed as parachutes over the target area, allowing the jet to escape quickly. Remember this is the early 1960s, and self guided missiles were sitll just emerging technology.
This is how its mission would work.
this submersible Nuclear Ramjet mission would be one a quick, retaliatory strike. It would be used for operations which had little or no warning, or for when the powers that be deemed a first strike.
The crew of nine would start their deployment being subltly located near the teriroty of a nation, submerged under the sea sitting quiet. The mission profile was long, and would have employed life support systems designed for space missions.
When code red was given, the team would spring to action and pressurise the ballast tanks. These tanks would slowly be heated by the nuclear reactor, forming steam. This would simtaniously start to be released and the aircraft, if we can call it that, would rise from the ocean floor. The water would be vaporise and the jet would launch from the sea like a submarine nuclear missile today.
As the aircraft rose to the sky, it would tilt over until it was facing forward and scream towards the combat zone low to the ground. the ramjet would slowly switch from water to air as a reaction mass and increase up to around mach 4.
Upon reaching the target area, the nuclear weapon would be deployed via parachot from the top of the plane as it soared over ahead, as to not impact the ramjet inlets, and slowly fall down. It would come to rest on the ground, before detonating.
The jet, now presumably outrunning the blast and reaching safer open water, would throttle down its ramjet. It would pull into a vertical climb and then deploy special drag breaks. This would stall the aircraft and it would start to fall almost vertically tail first. Before it hit the water, it would use rocket jets for a rough final deaccelation - much like the space x rockets that we see today!
Once in the water, it would refill its tanks and descend under the waves.
So if it was so incredible, whatever happened to the design?
You might realise that this concept seems very simular to a later one, project pluto, which envisioned a flying nuclear cruise missile, that once completed would dive into the deepest part of the ocean, the marianas trench, to protect the world from the raditation. But as scott from aerospace projects review said in his original aritcle on this topic, the crew are very unlikely to want to sign a one way trip to the darkest and deepest part of the world.
By 1964, nuclear ICMBs were proved to be far more reliable, accurate, harder to stop, and didn't have pesky crew onboard who might have morals about attacking enemy cities with 24 nuclear weapons after spending long months underwater. The project was sunk... well, as far as we know on the USA side.
Whos to say what insane technology the russians have been working on. But thats a video for another time.

Опубликовано:

 

29 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 417   
@AsbestosMuffins
@AsbestosMuffins 3 года назад
corvair really seemed to think nothing was impossible if you threw enough money and engineers at the problem
@weddellseal8414
@weddellseal8414 3 года назад
you have just described Rescarch and desgin
@Daimo83
@Daimo83 3 года назад
An attitude we've sadly lost today
@73_65
@73_65 3 года назад
As one who has played KSP, I think it's safe to say that isnt exactly incorrect.
@Unmannedair
@Unmannedair 3 года назад
@@Daimo83 are you kidding me? Have you looked at Congress lately? That's all they think! They don't even bother with critical thinking anymore. Economy in trouble? print money! Boeing's new rocket doesn't work? Print money get more engineers! Nobody wants to work? Print money! Get more social engineers! Inflation is a problem? We're out of computer chips? Janet Yellen lost her glasses and can't read a stock market ticker to save her life? Print money! Contact Pringles! And for gosh sakes get some IT in here to install a jumbotron!
@abuBrachiosaurus
@abuBrachiosaurus 3 года назад
@@Unmannedair Get an engineer working at Boeing, it's full of Business men and investors, thats why the 787, 737 Max, and Starliner are crap. Sad the great company of Boeing destroyed itself by moving from Seattle to Chicago's Wall Street.
@Aniket2712
@Aniket2712 3 года назад
5:01 … OH! This is SICK! 🔥
@anticarrrot
@anticarrrot 3 года назад
The Convair Nuclear Submersible... That doesn't sound so bad. ...Ramjet There we go.
@MullahSteinberg
@MullahSteinberg 3 года назад
Thank you from China. Give us a few weeks
@bocahdongo7769
@bocahdongo7769 3 года назад
"There's more plane underwater than submarine airbone." They said
@sonnyd.6777
@sonnyd.6777 3 года назад
I can PLANEly SEA the logic of this!!😄
@freedom8480
@freedom8480 3 года назад
@@sonnyd.6777 Schenkelklopfer 😆
@dustinmark6808
@dustinmark6808 3 года назад
@@sonnyd.6777 yuyyyyyyyyyyuyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyuyyyyyyyuyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyuyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyuyyyyyyyyy_
@karbengo
@karbengo 3 года назад
The closest thing to a real life Thunderbird 1 I've ever seen.
@danko6582
@danko6582 3 года назад
Wow, it's EXACTLY TB1. Nuclear powered ramjet rocket.
@dorsk84
@dorsk84 3 года назад
5...4....3...2...1! Thunderbirds are GO!
@garycorbin2789
@garycorbin2789 3 года назад
Agreed , and lends it self in concept to the Flying sub from voyage to the bottom of the sea
@76rjackson
@76rjackson 3 года назад
Atragon!
@CreeperDude-cm1wv
@CreeperDude-cm1wv 3 года назад
Thunder bird 1 but with nukes
@SirFawzar
@SirFawzar 3 года назад
I'm starting to think that Nick REALLY likes seaplane concepts (can't blame him, I like it too)
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Its a great concept!
@architect0187
@architect0187 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained yes i like it
@QueenDaenerysTargaryen
@QueenDaenerysTargaryen 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained of course👍
@LNo-re7sk
@LNo-re7sk 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained do a video on the seaplane fighter jets. You could launch a squadron out of any River that's big enough for a landing and take off. Or or the ability to turn smaller vessels into effectively aircraft carriers.
@stevenmaclellan3791
@stevenmaclellan3791 3 года назад
​It also keeps China, CCP at bay!@@FoundAndExplained
@minimalbstolerance8113
@minimalbstolerance8113 3 года назад
I would love to believe this thing only happened because some overworked weapons designer in 1950's America was so tired he accidentally put his plans for a submarine and an ICBM in the same folder before submitting them.
@spartanonxy
@spartanonxy 3 года назад
If anyone other then Convair was responsible I would actually think that more likely. Problem is well Convair was crazy.
@kennedyjoseph7398
@kennedyjoseph7398 Год назад
Was saying the same thing
@CreeperDude-cm1wv
@CreeperDude-cm1wv 3 года назад
Imagine being a plane carrying an anti submarine bomb, your flying to your target and then it jumps out of the water and engages you in a dogfight.
@kennedyjoseph7398
@kennedyjoseph7398 Год назад
I would be laughing if that was a thing sounds funny as hell 😂. Submarine Hunter: Target just ahead. SubJet: *Jumps out water* out looking for me
@jeromewagschal9485
@jeromewagschal9485 Год назад
Speaking strictly for myself I'd be shitting bricks...
@garnix5612
@garnix5612 3 года назад
Okay, know honest: How much was the Ecstasy- and Cocaine-Consumption in the Design Bureaus to have such bonkers ideas?
@martinxy1291
@martinxy1291 3 года назад
Given that Cocaine was used like sugar not that long ago, I'd say about as much as mexico makes in a week
@Zaprozhan
@Zaprozhan 3 года назад
Wright Brothers flying a plane in 1903. Jets in combat in 1945. Supersonic in 1947. Mach 2 in 1953. Submarine nuke-driven in 1955. First Air-to-Air Missile in service 1956. First satellite in 1957. Man in space 1961. Aerospace and tech were going hard in 1961 and the money was available for wiener-measuring Cold War craziness. WHY NOT?
@73_65
@73_65 3 года назад
@@Zaprozhan Too bad the great advancements in aerospace tech have largely died out and its more inline with the tiny improvements of cars, trucks, ect, just immagine where we could be today if that wasnt the case.
@adhitya105
@adhitya105 3 года назад
Yes
@lolshark99b49
@lolshark99b49 3 года назад
Amphetamines. Amphetamine use went way up in the 50s and 60s, and the Air Force in particular used a ton of it (esp in WW2) for long missions. The same people who served in the war, who ran the military by the 60s
@iliketrains0pwned
@iliketrains0pwned 3 года назад
And I thought the _underwater_ supersonic submarine concept was a crazy idea
@OffGridInvestor
@OffGridInvestor 3 года назад
The nuclear powered thing WAS CORRECT and NOT going to spew radiation everywhere unless damaged internally. The first generation nuclear power plants ran pretty similar but weren't allowed to get that hot (except for the Chernobyl accident which was a steam explosion).
@sulfuricacid877
@sulfuricacid877 3 года назад
imagine seeing this and thinking it was a missle and going "wo it missed us" famous last words
@ian1231100
@ian1231100 3 года назад
Newsflash: Convair out-Belkas Belka.
@hopelessgaming2732
@hopelessgaming2732 3 года назад
Another Newsflash : 70% of Convair employees are Belkan .
@jasper_saberwolf
@jasper_saberwolf 3 года назад
Convair then changes company name to Gründer Industries
@RedBeardTheFirst
@RedBeardTheFirst 3 года назад
Long live Belka
@nickfury1279
@nickfury1279 3 года назад
Torres would’ve succeeded if he had one of these
@AnkitKumar-fo2iz
@AnkitKumar-fo2iz 3 года назад
Just don't know how many more mind-blowing planes we have yet to be seen
@lolshark99b49
@lolshark99b49 3 года назад
Everyone in military industrial complex in the 50s and 60s was on amphetamines
@adamfrazer5150
@adamfrazer5150 3 года назад
Just tuned in - really appreciate the production values, makes the information much more digestible. Oh those whacky 50's era designs of insanity, always fascinating to learn about. Cheers for all the hard work 👍🍻
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Dude thanks so much for your kind words!!
@adamfrazer5150
@adamfrazer5150 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained don't mention it man, credit where credit's due ! 👍🍻
@freedom8480
@freedom8480 3 года назад
Flying submarine? Like the one Scott Manley build in kerbal, right? 😆
@marcoplayz7911
@marcoplayz7911 3 года назад
it’s literally the rapier engine
@donwilliams495
@donwilliams495 3 года назад
I'd like to see the documentation for this video. As an employee of General Dynamics Astronautics during that time frame, I worked on tracking and guidance of the Atlas missile which had it's first flight test in 1957, there was no need for such a weapon as described here. Astronautics shared a facility with Convair at Lindbergh field before fully moving to Kearny Mesa. Convair also had a major facility in Fort Worth, Texas. Beyond that, General Dynamics owned Electric Boar, the submarine builder, and any such underwater programs would have been originated there. This whole video bothers me.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Sure the original source for me is Aerospace Projects Review. But here is what they have said on the matter References: “ANP Program Review,” ZP-313, Convair San Diego, September 1960 “ANP New Naval Applications,” ZP-329, Convair San Diego, March, 1961 “Identification of Certain Current Defense Problems and Possible Means of Solution,” Institute for Defense Analyses Advanced Research Projects Division, The Pentagon, Study No. 1, 1959
@donwilliams495
@donwilliams495 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained I don't think Convair or Astronautics got involved beyond a simple discussion. What I can now disclose is a previously secret program that was into actual development before it was cancelled. It was called "Wizard" and was intended to be an anti-missile missile. That project was cancelled in the pre-design phase at Astronautics but there were several other related programs that are still classified to this day. I had actually been solicited by Astronautics when I was working at Bendix Pacific in North Hollywood. One of the programs at Bendix Pacific was what was then know as "The Standard Missile", an in-production ship to air defense missile, and I apparently had some skills that Astronautics needed. The video is very creative but doesn't represent what any engineer would suggest or implement. READ ON- One far-out program in that same time frame was a nuclear-powered missile proposed by the General Atomics company in North San Diego. I had friends working on that program which proposed to use small atomic blasts to boost a missile. It never got beyond the discussion stage, just too radical. General Atomics, after a few ownership changes, has a very successful Aircraft Launch and Recovery system, EMALS, which uses electromagnetic rails to launch aircraft and retrieve them on aircraft carriers. Much more effective and space saving on the carrier compared to the steam catapults. One advantage is that the force can be adjusted for the specific aircraft and the force can be changed as the plane goes down the launch area. Energy is stored in large gyroscopes and some energy is recovered by the capture of a landing aircraft. Over 8,000 launches and captures have been executed on the USS Ford carrier. General Atomics first became successful by designing a fail-safe nuclear reactor, now available for experiments. You can find more by doing on-line searches.
@donwilliams495
@donwilliams495 3 года назад
I just remembered the name of the atomic rocket program. Project Orion. The actual project, initiated in 1958, was led by Ted Taylor at General Atomics and physicist Freeman Dyson, who at Taylor's request took a year away from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton to work on the project.
@adityapande3084
@adityapande3084 3 года назад
@Don Williams 😂 I am studying engineering and I too, used to think that with unlimited Nuclear power, anything is possible. Just out of curiosity, that missile which was to be propelled using nuclear blasts, how was that even considered?😂 I think a much better way to harness Nuclear power was the NERVA program that NASA was working on. Basically, they were going to use a reactor with liquid hydrogen as a coolant. Any thoughts on that?
@donwilliams495
@donwilliams495 3 года назад
@@adityapande3084 I don't think the Orion project ever got near to conjuring up an actual missile. I would guess that the NERVA program would use hydrogen as a mass to eject, creating thrust, and not as a coolant. A bad choice in my opinion.
@captain_commenter8796
@captain_commenter8796 3 года назад
“The terrifying Flying Submarine” Me: OH MY! THEY FLY NOW! Fans: THEY FLY NOW? F & E: THEY FLY NOW!
@captain_commenter8796
@captain_commenter8796 3 года назад
Ngl, the coloring and the shape makes it look like a fricken sniper bullet shell
@Barabel22
@Barabel22 3 года назад
I’ve got the two volumes on Convair Advanced and Secret projects.....and I’ve never heard of this one, thanks for the cool new info.
@DigD97
@DigD97 3 года назад
I think it’s now officially called a “TicTac”. Ha Ha
@test-qz4dq
@test-qz4dq 3 года назад
Lol k also though about the Recent uap Report. But the Tic tac didnt showed any signs of a Populsion system...
@HelminthCombos
@HelminthCombos 3 года назад
if the exhaust wasn't radioactive and the seafloor was level this would be an amazing design.
@OffGridInvestor
@OffGridInvestor 3 года назад
The exhaust WASN'T radioactive. Nick knows NOTHING of nuclear technology to even assume it would be. This is exactly the same way that first generation nuclear power plants ran, just not allowed to get that hot (graphite rods).
@erika002
@erika002 3 года назад
wait. F l y i n g S u b m a r i n e s a r e n ' t a m e m e ? Man. This channel is always keeps giving and it's solid stuff that I always don't expect!
@richardscathouse
@richardscathouse 3 года назад
Flying submarine, from Voyage to the bottom of the sea. Loved the show. Pity no one could survive the landings. 😒😄😄
@brandtbollers3183
@brandtbollers3183 3 года назад
Even as a Child I Ciringed watching the Cheif and XO fly into the Water at High angle.lol.
@sonnyd.6777
@sonnyd.6777 3 года назад
We all live in a Flying Submarine, Flying Submarine., Flying Submarine
@pauleveritt3388
@pauleveritt3388 3 года назад
Project Pluto did not have a crew aboard. It was automated. One of the proposals for Project Pluto was to allow it to keep flying, spreading radioactivity over enemy territory until the reactor broke up sufficiently that the trust would drop to a point where it would no longer fly.
@juanarce3203
@juanarce3203 3 года назад
*The 9M730 Burevestnik or Skyfall has a Nuclear Reactor for it's propussion*
@richardscathouse
@richardscathouse 3 года назад
Useful nuclear engines were developed in the early 60s
@richardscathouse
@richardscathouse 3 года назад
@@piotrtrebisz6602 Not failed, that's supposed to happen with an open reactor
@test-qz4dq
@test-qz4dq 3 года назад
@@richardscathouse en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyonoksa_radiation_accident
@theOrionsarms
@theOrionsarms 3 года назад
Somebody has reading " Master of the word "by Jules Verne, in the 60"th, but forget to add wheels to roll on the ground too.
@davidlindsey6111
@davidlindsey6111 3 года назад
Convair had some crazy, advanced aircraft concepts. Really impressive
@pseudotasuki
@pseudotasuki 3 года назад
Using water as a means to solve the issue of getting a ramjet to operational speed is ingenious. Unfortunately, it only works for a *nuclear* ramjet. But hey, with the advancements in materials science they might be able to make it work using a heat exchanger.
@LarryPhischman
@LarryPhischman 3 года назад
Actually a nuclear ramjet can be built so negligible radiation escapes the reactor. The trick is simple to make the casing of the fuel rods thicker.
@losttownstreet3409
@losttownstreet3409 3 года назад
There where still issues with the air cooled nuclear reaktors (some of the the first nuclear reaktors where air cooled) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-j5wZoswSNwc.html
@Freedom2x462
@Freedom2x462 3 года назад
Give the plan to SpaceX! It could probably be built in two weeks and cheaper!
@RaimoKangasniemi
@RaimoKangasniemi 3 года назад
It took 15 years for SpaceX to make a first manned Crew Dragon flight after they started developing the capsule. This thing is, 60 years after, still beyond what we can do with tech.
@steffennilsen2132
@steffennilsen2132 3 года назад
I just cant wrap my mind around how they intended to construct the hull of such a craft. Submarines are the only armored combat ships left as they need to resist the pressures of the deep, while aircrafts typically are built as light as possible, just how much thrust do you need to keep such a ship airborne? A ramjet also only works when the engine has sufficient airflow, typically requiring a missile/craft to already fly faster than mach 1, how did they intend to accelerate to that speed, from the water no less, prior to reach critical speed for the ramjet?
@76rjackson
@76rjackson 3 года назад
Maybe they were planning on using water in the scramjet first then transition to the atmosphere. Drag would no doubt be a problem but, hell, you have free infinite fuel that you just have to heat up into plasma. A hot nuke would do the trick but it's gonna turn the ocean into gumbo before it reaches transition velocity!
@OffGridInvestor
@OffGridInvestor 3 года назад
You REALLY DON'T get nuclear technology do you. It would run from thermal expansion, much the same as aircraft today. Dramatic heat would do it. Also, if nick thinks it was going to make everything radioactive he obviously has ZERO clue EITHER. Because this is much the same as first generation nuclear power plants. Realize that both yhe Americans AND the soviets later worked on nuclear powered aircraft engines. The Americans got to the point of getting individual components to work.
@didiandiano
@didiandiano 3 года назад
4:03 how does the gold colour scheme prevent it from breaking up in high speed???
@daltonmojica
@daltonmojica 3 года назад
Probably made out of a metal with better thermal properties?
@pk5489
@pk5489 3 года назад
looks cooler
@bocahdongo7769
@bocahdongo7769 3 года назад
@sourav jaiswal Not gold This is some batshit version of brass sort of
@AnkitKumar-fo2iz
@AnkitKumar-fo2iz 3 года назад
@@daltonmojica Russia had most of the gold at that time ..imagine getting shot by a missile plane made out of gold ,supplied by you 😂😂
@daltonmojica
@daltonmojica 3 года назад
@@AnkitKumar-fo2iz That’s exactly what the US did with the SR-71. Except it was Titanium, and no missiles involved.
@Crashed131963
@Crashed131963 3 года назад
Not sure of the point of it. In 1960 they had the submarine launched "UGM-27 Polaris" ICBM. It launch from 50 ft under water and traveled at 6000 mph to orbit and once in orbit it went 15,000 mph before releasing it H-Bomb warhead. The Polaris was a submarine for 50 ft of underwater travel at launch.
@larryclemens1850
@larryclemens1850 3 года назад
9 months, 9 people living in a vertical tube, translating operationally horizontally in minutes. There is a LOT of complexity to make that functional. Then there is the problem of selecting a suitable launch site, where you can remain vertical amid currents, terrain and biologic hazards. Then there is the problem of selecting a recovery site with all the same problems.
@saqibsultantemuri2437
@saqibsultantemuri2437 3 года назад
The Russians: We have Ekranoplane!
@ДмитрийХабаров-ю1ъ
the concept really is quite funny, but the flaws you've listed aren't actually flaws. Guess what the best radiation insulator is? If you said "lead" - you're wrong. Because it's water. So it would actually be very much safe for the crew in that rocket-sub as long as they were separated from the reactor by some water barrier wall. But the concept is ridiculous nonetheless.
@mixererunio1757
@mixererunio1757 3 года назад
I'm nitpicking, but you forgot to paint Kaliningrad Oblast as part of USSR at 0:16.
@Mint-Lynx
@Mint-Lynx 3 года назад
I thought Convair's Aerosub was wild, now I learn of this.
@dafiltafish
@dafiltafish 3 года назад
Why were convair black projects so batshit insane?
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Now that is a mystery video I can't explain :)
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts 3 года назад
Project Pluto 2: Electric Boogaloo
@magnetospin
@magnetospin 3 года назад
I guess they didn't have ICBMs back then.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
They didn’t! So they needed a way to get bombs there fast
@CharliMorganMusic
@CharliMorganMusic 3 года назад
Don't you just love when your engine makes everything uninhabitable after flying over it
@OffGridInvestor
@OffGridInvestor 3 года назад
TOTAL BS. This is the same way that first generation nuclear power plants ran. Nick obviously has zero idea of nuclear technology. The Americans and soviets BOTH worked on nuclear powered aircraft engines. The Americans had individual components of the engine working on their own.
@kingkea3451
@kingkea3451 3 года назад
Great video as always Nick - would you happen to have any ūpcoming videos regarding SSTO spaceplane concepts or truly crazy things like that flying aircraft carrier?
@infernusifrit9348
@infernusifrit9348 3 года назад
They watched way too many episodes of a "Thunderbirds".
@marknorville9827
@marknorville9827 3 года назад
You say never been built, but who really knows. You have a lot of USO's that has been reported by the navy etc flying craft that come out of the sea. The conspiracy is that these are alien craft, however, could they actually be man made craft? The USO has been well documented through the years.
@leonelgaldinomonteiro4783
@leonelgaldinomonteiro4783 3 года назад
I think same.
@flynnpury
@flynnpury 3 года назад
Haha rocket go * nooooooom *
@justakhalid
@justakhalid 2 года назад
I'm actually the most shocked about how the propulsion can work properly. Like literal water/air going into the engine and getting heated so much by nuclear reactors that the exhaust could propel it up to Mach 4? Sounds extremely sci-fi to me.
@RapideWombaticus
@RapideWombaticus 3 года назад
Mach 3, Nuclear, Convair... You got me. Great video mate
@-NOCAP-
@-NOCAP- 3 года назад
Mach 3? Bro get up to date with Mach 25 Hypsersonic missles
@-NOCAP-
@-NOCAP- 3 года назад
@@lucouellet6315 even if it is unblockable for now which will change once one of the three laser projects goes to mass production as well as when SpaceX finishes launching the low to Earth military grade satellite array that the Air Force has contracted them to Launch. At which point not only will they be able to get tracked even if they traveled 2 inches above the water but they will be intercepted at the speed of light which is a hell of a lot faster than seven times the speed of sound. But until then they can't block our nuclear missiles either. The US is the only country to ever prove that they can intercept a ICBM. Which China and Russia both got pissed at the US for doing so. That fact by it's self gives Merit to the fact that they haven't been able to intercept it yet, because if they did accomplish it many years ago like they claim, they would have no reason to become pissed off that the US finally became capable to do it many years later. So whether they're traveling too low to track, or being propelled by rocket high up in space, makes absolutely zero difference because they both have the same outcome.
@alecsandstedt8478
@alecsandstedt8478 3 года назад
Or, hear me out… just launch nuclear missiles from a submarine, like the ones that exist already lol
@Vespuchian
@Vespuchian 3 года назад
Amazing how wild some of these concepts were before the missiles just got better and totally removed the need for the 'replacement'.
@DoktorStrangelove
@DoktorStrangelove 3 года назад
A submersible Project Pluto, nice ☢️
@lolsleepyboi8388
@lolsleepyboi8388 3 года назад
Project Pluto is a bit ironic, no? Develop a flying nuclear powered cruise missile but make it dive to the Mariana Trench once it’s done so it doesn’t spill radiation everywhere… … after using it to nuke the Russians… … which you know… spills radiation everywhere…
@MrKentaroMotoPI
@MrKentaroMotoPI 3 года назад
The lack of this channel's technical knowledge is the most astounding aspect of this video.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
hey man, some of these ideas are totally unrealistic but its the actual idea from the time. stuff we know NOW is unfeasible, back in the 50s was a different story.
@MrKentaroMotoPI
@MrKentaroMotoPI 3 года назад
@@FoundAndExplained Hey man, I wasn't referring to the content. I was referring to you.
@OffGridInvestor
@OffGridInvestor 3 года назад
If you know ANYTHING about nuclear stuff it ACTUALLY WON'T SPEW radiation EVERYWHERE AT ALL. Unless it's damaged internally. You OBVIOUSLY HAVEN'T SEEN anything about the nuclear powered aircraft the Americans AND soviets experimented with. The Americans had individual components of the engine working on their own.....
@Daimo83
@Daimo83 3 года назад
The Russians are making an autonomous underwater cruise missile, which is somewhat similar.
@pvosoccer1585
@pvosoccer1585 3 года назад
Unmanned Autonomous Vehicle (UAV) of 'heavy fluid', and that is truly a special version of the "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle", but this UAV is also a missile. So, understandably there is nothing terrifying about that, just this kind of UAV is terrible only at its performance! Keep you eyes and your mind open to the idea of wasteful defense spending for the psychological factors of warfare (a psycho-war.)
@bnaivar
@bnaivar 3 года назад
Irwin Allen did it better. :)
@michaelcombrink8165
@michaelcombrink8165 3 года назад
When submerged the ballast tanks would already be full, you don't need to pressurize, the water falls in
@johnc.bojemski1757
@johnc.bojemski1757 3 года назад
Nuclear submarines with ICBM and other missiles stay out at sea UNDER water for many months per patrol. This wouldn't have been that much more different.
@classicalimproviser407
@classicalimproviser407 3 года назад
Imagine if all were built
@erikhendrych190
@erikhendrych190 3 года назад
Going mach 4 under the radar? SR 71 went mach 3 at 15km and already was getting pretty hot. Mach 4 under 100m agl? Insanity. Also I suspect it wouldn't manoeuvrer very well so any mountain in the path could be a problem.
@josejose-fu9dd
@josejose-fu9dd 3 года назад
is there a pumpscramjet?
@sonnyd.6777
@sonnyd.6777 3 года назад
" Uh, M..Mr. Tracy?...I..I...think I have another Thunderbird craft for you!"
@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692
@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692 3 года назад
No one.. Absolutely no one Inperial Japan : we have submarine aircraft carrier... USA : hmm how about i make it my idea... Lets see [we have submarine aircraft -carrier- ...] Now it's perfect.
@sebastianreijatvis8954
@sebastianreijatvis8954 Год назад
You're an Aussie like me, it just grinds me that you pronounce 'Soviet' as 'SOV-I-ET' when it's actually pronounced 'SOW-VEE-ET' - Only the Brits use this weird pronunciation.
@FIGHTSEEN
@FIGHTSEEN 3 года назад
Horrible concept as a weapons system...but excellent as a late 60s /early 70s TV series. 🤣 Sneak your pro-nuke propaganda in with a coed crew of whoever was hot in that era. (Angie Dickinson/Raquel Welch/Lee Majors...etc.) Put then in shiny tight fitting suits. Annnd...voila!
@JonRaborn-gp4ff
@JonRaborn-gp4ff 8 месяцев назад
The saint david's foundation texas. various different lower & upper orbital manned space flight vehicals & NASA administration payloads & space colony construction material & mechanical construction labor forces & robotic based construction & manufacturing material & engineering specialists texas.2024 texas. Mobile loaves & fishes inc.hog eye rd.austin texas.
@hotmailcompany52
@hotmailcompany52 3 года назад
That nuclear reactor looks a lot like a SciFi fusion reactor ;P
@pgantioch8362
@pgantioch8362 3 года назад
Update your maps - USSR broke up 30 years ago. Not sure why ordinary ballistic missile submarine couldn’t be the platform. And why would you want a crew aboard? A nuclear ramjet sub? Just like the Sean Connery movie The Hunt for Red October?
@garyh.boulding9096
@garyh.boulding9096 3 года назад
The Nazi WW2 SSP utilized WW2 submarines with space propulsion system for space flight.
@dereineGorden
@dereineGorden 2 года назад
Couldn't they have used the nuclear reactor to split the water(H2O) in to hydrogen(H2) and oxygen(O2). These would perfect fuel for the ramjet engines Did I just missed something important or would that be a way better solution?
@seanbigay1042
@seanbigay1042 3 года назад
Thunderbirds are Go much? Or should I be thinking SHIELD? Or maybe SPECTRE ...
@JonRaborn-gp4ff
@JonRaborn-gp4ff 8 месяцев назад
The saint david's foundation texas. Earth bound steal cable anchors & space elevator tight-cable tie system's & construction material texas. Mobile loaves & fishes inc.hog eye rd.austin texas.
@JohnPaul-gh1fh
@JohnPaul-gh1fh 3 года назад
This video needs many more pop-up ads for things like weight control, diabetic medicine, underwear, travel, etc... to make it more fun to watch... grrrr...!
@georgearrivals
@georgearrivals 3 года назад
Me: Mom, can we get PROJECT PLUTO? Mom: We have PROJECT PLUTO at home. PROJECT PLUTO at home:
@IsaacKuo
@IsaacKuo Год назад
This concept is absolutely bonkers, but a variant might have some merit. Instead of nuclear power, it's possible to design a water breathing ramjet that burns magnesium. Or a magnesium/aluminum mix. Or rather than a ramjet, a magnesium-water rocket that uses refillable sea water tanks. That way, the vehicle doesn't need a fancy water breathing ramjet intake, and it spends minimal time underwater boosting up to speed. Such a magnesium-water rocket plane might be a radical alternative to carrier jets. Instead of aircraft carriers, you have smaller ships and/or subs which resupply the rocket planes with magnesium fuel and weapons pods. Unlike a normal carrier jet that simply flies level in the air, these magnesium-water rocket planes would make successive boost-glide hops.
@sspeedy2859
@sspeedy2859 2 года назад
It was a crazy time... It's rumoured that the USSR was going to build the words largest bomber and it only weighed 750 lbs! Hard to believe but that's what they say!
@rolflandale2565
@rolflandale2565 2 года назад
Little thay people knew, it's a concept very close to a perfect SSToL craft for orbital flights, just amagine it in the ratio scale of the Sea dragon rocket, or Starship, mix breeding aqua-jet blades, to jet & ramjet convertion, before exo rocket potent boosters fuel, phase versus stages.
@patrickbonin137
@patrickbonin137 3 года назад
Nothing new...I worked on a similar idea but it was dropped in favour of less complicated system....
@RaimoKangasniemi
@RaimoKangasniemi 3 года назад
Pentagon has, and had back in 1961, far too much money. You couldn't built this thing even with 2021 tech.
@virajdoshi
@virajdoshi 3 года назад
Why does US think the Soviets rather than competition ? You don't have territorial, religion or culture issues. Do the Americans and Russians know that their artificial enemy approach has caused how much dage to the world ?
@vustvaleo8068
@vustvaleo8068 3 года назад
so basically a Thunderbirds ship but not used by International Rescue.
@tgmccoy1556
@tgmccoy1556 3 года назад
Convair had the NB-36 Flying reactor concept. They actually built a hangar and runway at The test site at Idaho falls As I recall there's a NERVA carcass parked There too. Truly thankful we never built these concepts. NERVA well,maybe.
@73_65
@73_65 3 года назад
From my understanding the problem is more that they needed more R&D, not that they couldnt have been made safe.
@fredcarr3550
@fredcarr3550 3 года назад
All of this is meaningless when there is a weak Pres. who on the advice of additional weak generals won't approve its use. In the long run it only means jobs for the constituents of power hungry politicians many of whom, who couldn't care less about the security of the country.
@kimnielsenthewordyvikingett159
@kimnielsenthewordyvikingett159 2 года назад
Why not make a manned plane that can do that instead of a bomb. Talk about a wild ride huh? Wouldn't that be one blank of an interesting conversation with the conning tower? I'll be entering the Atlantic just off the coast of Florida and leaving the water just off the coast of Africa bound for the Indian gulf over.
@Azov374
@Azov374 3 года назад
Russian tried to do this begging from 2019… but it never happened …only cartoon once was showing …
@interpl6089
@interpl6089 3 года назад
You Know, When Alicorn is not that much, you need flying submarine, torez is proud.
@psammiad
@psammiad 3 года назад
I don't like that wobbling camera effect on the images, makes me feel slightly seasick. Appropriate for this video but please skip it next time.
@MyNameIsChristBringsASword
@MyNameIsChristBringsASword 3 года назад
in addition it is spewing radiation as it flys around
@ailediablo79
@ailediablo79 2 года назад
If it AI control and with modern nuclear technology it can fix the main issues. Maby use an accelerater nuclear reactor. Just some ideas.
@williamcroft5432
@williamcroft5432 3 года назад
Funny how all these so called whistle blowers from the secret space force 20 years ago said they was using basically retired fitted submarines in space. 😂
@TimothySword
@TimothySword Год назад
Is it coated in aerogel? Does it use a desal, electrolysis, and a compression system for its HH, and O rocket chamber?
@Chanel42597
@Chanel42597 3 года назад
First make some medicine for own people Can't even make a paracetamol Always looking to destroying others life
@shreybhandari4233
@shreybhandari4233 3 года назад
The barrier the money barrier stops everything found & explained you replyed to my comment on the video space shuttle being a space bus
@zukisamabusela61
@zukisamabusela61 3 года назад
Clearly a stupid propaganda fiction story because the science just doesn't add up🤣🤣
@JMiskovsky
@JMiskovsky 3 года назад
Only thing which is more insane is SLAM project ie flying crawbar.
@skumomcbee9280
@skumomcbee9280 Год назад
Ok... if I was looking at super weapons at the time this would be my number one choice.
@richo9138
@richo9138 3 года назад
This is definitely the " tit tack" from the recently released ufo footage. Seems there aren't aliens checking up on us 😔
@R4baDader
@R4baDader 3 года назад
The world could've been ace combat
Далее
The Secret Race To Build A Nuclear Powered Plane
13:47
Просмотров 262 тыс.
БЕЛКА ЗВОНИТ ДРУГУ#cat
00:20
Просмотров 626 тыс.
КАК БОМЖУ ЗАРАБОТАТЬ НА ТАЧКУ
1:36:32
Sidewinder - The Weapon That Changed Air Combat
10:53
Star Raker! - The Giant Insane Mach 7.2 Space Plane
20:48
The Mighty J58 - The SR-71's Secret Powerhouse
5:56
The Aircraft Carrier: Everything You Need to Know
1:37:29
БЕЛКА ЗВОНИТ ДРУГУ#cat
00:20
Просмотров 626 тыс.