Thanks for your simplicity and explicity to differentiate between the two approaches. Your pronunciation is great and well-perceived for me as a non-native learner of English.
I‘m working on my essay assignment: the three approaches to teaching grammar. The lesson is well explained and easy to understand. Thank you very much.
Thanks Mr. Edward for really highly informative, helpful and comprehensive talk, you explain the differences between both inductive and deductive teaching in an explicitly unique way😊
Thank you so much for your sharing, there are many teaching methods, sometimes we just used the one we familiar with the most, thank you for the review video. ^^
Doing my PGDE and need to understand this so i can tak about it in my assignment. I hate it all so much now dont even have energy to complete it. Thanku for this video to help me x
Amazing explanation! 🥂 Now, is it possible to say that an Inductive Approach to Teaching Language is similar to the Communicative Approach to Teaching (or CLT/Communicative Language Teaching) ? Thanks.
Thank you so much for this informative video. It's to the point and helpful. I have a question sir "teaching the present simple yes no questions to beginners aging 14-17, which approach is the most suitable for this lesson?
Young learners don't learn rules in a deductive way. They can't explicitly analyze language for structure and form. They learn language more naturally in an inductive way. Repetition and meaningful practice (for example with toys) are good. You can use drilling (audiolingual method), TPR, visual support, realia, guessing games, flashcards, songs, etc. Lots of practice and then check through questions and observation.
YLs can't analyze language like adults so inductive way is better. Perhaps they won't be so good at rule discovery (due to lack of analytical skills), but to help with that we can simplify metalanguage about grammar (for example we say "action words" instead of "verbs"). I'd argue that inductive way is the only option for YLs.
