Citroën is the best option because: 1. Lowest price. 2. Lowest consumption per Km. 3. Better confort TO DRIVE AND SECURITY; Extra high standing if necessary in a countryside road. 4. Full tank of 70 Liters ! Same as Volkswagen Sharan ! It also means how long you can drive without re-fueling your tank (= autonomy). 5. High Cx profile to drive on highways with low resistance to the air. 6. If engine is a reliable 2.0 hDi or a TDi only the turbo isn't enough good. About the esthetics I don't care so much.
I always did like the first Mondeo but why would you choose the sedan over the hatchback. Apparently the fact the Xantia doen't come as a sedan is a negative point in this review. But what is the point of sedans!
@@enriquemalparidabermejo8332 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9S2f76Kjx0c.html It really depends how you develop a car. Length, width, height, do you favor more room in the cabin at the expense of trunk or vise versa etc.
Nie można porównywać tych trzech pojazdów, jeżeli jeden ma całkiem inne zawieszenie i resztę podzespołów ... Te dwa złomy, do Xantii nie pasują . Xantia też nie pasuje do reszty . To są odrębne tematy.
Depends on the model year. It became an optional extra on the SX for the '96 model year. Before that, it was fitted on every two-litre Xantia. At least in the Netherlands, that is. I don't think the 1.8 was ever fitted with hydractive suspension, even on the SX (or even on the later 1.8 Exclusive, for that matter)
