@@FroschBube Arent we all ? what is your reaction when you see somebody with a MVMT or Fillipoloretti or Vincero or any watch which isnt ticking at all aka the battery is dead or the watch is but he/she still wears it as an accesorry
@@Cortesevasive There is a difference between overpriced fashion brand watches and actual affordable quality brands. I can´t fault anyone for not knowing much about watches when they get one of their firsts. The first watch I bought was a Hugo Boss Pilot Edition. Everyone starts somewhere.
I stood around too long now this watch is way too expensive for what it's worth. It's funny though there's a Chinese version of it with an NH35 movement. Same price as the Timex. Perhaps I should do one of those. Oops. I just noticed the Batman is sold out. It's only available in Pepsi with a NATO strap. Maybe I'll wait.
I really like the Timex Q, it's a watch made for the masses and it's designed to do one thing and do it well, tell time at a glance. Nothing more, nothing less and for that, it's perfect.
A timex was my very first watch as a kid. And among my collections today I still own a couple of timex watches as a reminder of my love and journey with watches. That’s the beauty of collecting anything you are passionate about regardless of the price. Appreciate the review of an iconic brand
Timex is my favorite watch brand personally. I love all the vintage pieces out there - Marlins, Viscounts, Mercuries, Divers, etc. I'm actually wearing a 1950's Southampton as I write this!
@@jakekaywell5972 To clarify, I love vintage Timex - especially from a design standpoint. They were the working man's watches - tell the time, and maybe the date too. Tough enough to wear daily for years, yet inexpensive enough to buy a replacement should you bash the hell out of it. Modern Timex, however - I agree that it's a different story. I guess I feel Casio is probably the new Timex of today, with their mega cheap quartz analog pieces, and their indestructible G-Shocks.
@@bigblob27 Both the Soviet Pobeda/ZiM as well as India's HMT are better in that regard of serving the everyman. Timexes of any vintage are nothing more than a cruel joke, escpecially since Waltham is more appropriate for the title of "American working man watch of old." Not only was Waltham this nation's oldest watchmaker, it was also the first that bothered with interchangeable parts. Quite a win for the everyman if you ask me.
It's the watch I am most frequently complemented on. It's just fun. Everyone loves it. Well, Everyone who doesn't take themselves too seriously, loves it.
Yes! I suggested the Timex Q watches on the Tissot PRX video for those for whom the Tissot might still be too expensive. I was immediately scoffed at by someone in the comments which at the time struck me as such a shame! I love the Q watches (especially the Falcon's) for everything you mentioned. They are unpretentious and simple while still feeling fashionable and fun, and at $179 they are a wonderful way to get into the world of watches. Timex may be the antithesis of a luxury brand but that doesn't mean the company hasn't earned a spot in the history of watches. They have their own sort of unique pedigree and I for one get a kick out of having a Timex on my wrist. Thank you as always for the wonderful content, and for taking the time to look at some of the brands that are too often neglected. Happy Holidays!
Omg I clicked on this video the moment I saw it. I bought my Q when it first launch and it was sold out that day later in the afternoon. I still love it today. I just couldn’t believe you did a video on this! Thank you!
@@nicks8026 i want to disagree with you but then I take a look at my casio edifice efr-s108d with sapphire crystal, 100m wr, all brushed stainless steel case and bezel and very well aligned japanese quartz movement, all for 120 usd, and well yeah.
@@TheDonCucaracho In the mechanical watch world, both the Soviet Pobedas/ZiMs as well as India's HMTs are heads and tails better than Timexes while still able to fullfill the "watches of and for the people" ethos they were created for. The fact that we in the U.S. apparently decided that pin-lever Timexes were good enough in light of this is a tragedy.
@@jakekaywell5972 I'm starting to become curious of the indian brands. For the Russians, I still want to buy a couple of vostoks but I don't trust too much the shipping part. Since I'm in Mexico, they'll use our local currier and boi does is suck. Like, it takes 3 days for a package to arrive from Germany, then 3 months ro be delivered to my house
@@TheDonCucaracho That does suck, but I'd still say its worth it. Meranom's shipping is normally reliable and so are the Eastern European/Russian eBay sellers weirdly enough. Personally, I'd recommend you'd get a Raketa first from them, then branch out. It's the India Post you have to be really careful of. Out of the 5 HMTs I ordered, only 3 arrived and one of those only showed up three months late.
The Timex GMT improves on the original reissue in almost every way: applied indexes, date only, Swiss movement, (arguably) better bracelet. I've owned 3 Qs, and I'm sticking with the Pepsi GMT. 👍🏼
Unfortunately it literally feels as cheap as a $1 gum ball machine watch. It probably costs $2 to make and should be sold for $15. I wore it once and then gave it to my son. On a positive note, another great video.
I’m totally in agreement with your comment regarding production cost and what the retail price ought to be. $179.00 MSRP is ridiculous! One reason a Swatch watch would be a better buy is that at least they have a style aesthetic. They also offer an automatic model using an ETA 2824 movement for $179.00 or less (I’m not sure of the actual cost & I don’t feel like doing a search now). Stay safe, well, and joyful during this holiday season! ✨
Definitely there are far higher quality watches available at the price. Mechanicals too. Interestingly the dial and hands don't suffer so badly under macro.
What bothers me the most from this watch is the inconsistent kerning in the QUARTZ word on the dial. I saw it at the beginning of the video and couldn’t unsee it for the rest of the video. I’ll just get a Casio in a rolled-links bracelet.
It’s sad to think TIMEX thinks it’s in the same league as the Casio GSHOCK line, I got my GA-2100-1A1 last March and I paid $125.00 Canadian, being in Montreal.
@@MichaelandCathy1999 --- I got one new in the box $120.00 US the triple black also. It will be fun to wear. Completely different from what I'm wearing as a daily driver now, 1963 57GS 43999 Grand Seiko with date and SD dial. Rare watch. Needs winding every day but that's part of the cool factor of a vintage mechanical watch.
As a brietling owner , this watch give me the vintage feeling , the minimlist and that eye catching that my brietling do not does ... My wife give me the Timex as birthday gift .. Love to dive with It ... Its not the price of the watch , its the feelings with It ...
I found 1 today a Kermit that was marked down to $79.00. I figured what the hell I’ll give it a go. I love this watch it’s simplicity, yet elegant made with cheap material but something about it just says…. Look at me! I’m loving this watch so far but admittedly if I didn’t find it for the price the only timex I’d own is the weekender I already own!
I love how you managed to bring all of the components of it to be desirable. That is exacly why i love my Vostok Amphibia so much. Though Amphibia has unbroken lineage with no big changes like Lada does. Maybe it would be worth a video. Especially when thinking of the design development and solutions they went with in design that is cheep as possible and best performance posible build with and around what they had
I wonder if you wear this Timex Pepsi nonstop on the wrist for one week, and wear a Rolex PEPSI bezel model on your other wrist nonstop during the same week, how many seconds will each watch lose?
Totally nailed it Timex has always been about low cost watches even back in their mechanical days, now with their current series of “retro” watches you get to pay bigger prices for that cheap feeling. They even avoid some logical improvements like upgrading them by adding their indiglo backlighting to some of their LCD retro offerings.
Excellent video. Ive always considered Timex a company that produces a device that keeps time. Not a fashion designer and not a trendy brand. It keeps time with out flash and does not hurt my wallet when I buy one. This video makes me want to buy another one.
Yeah it’s another iconic vintage resurrection. And it’s way overpriced just like the rest of them. With its cheap rolled steel, plastic bezel and crystal, and 10 cent movement, this should’ve been a $50 watch. The only reason people paid $180+ was because of all the ad agencies and watch journalists (same thing) telling everyone how “great” it is.
As romantic as that all was, if all you want is 'a watch', no frills, no brand name, etc. surely there far better options for less than $179? I wouldn't even call that particularly cheap!
Love this bit. I own Rolex/Omega (guess which) and a cal 11 Heuer Monaco. I also own innumerable Seiko's, TWO Swatch (one quartz reminiscent of the 80's watch that saved Switzerland and a new Swatch 51 Auto just because it was cheap and disposable and popped up in my newsfeed and has a cool story). I've also bought a few Timex pieces over the years. See, I work in Aerospace. I need a watch that tells me when my meeting is, when my break is, when lunch is, when my next meeting is, what time my parts are coming from the warehouse, what time the plane rolls to paint.. My hands are constantly banging on airplane parts and assemblies. I stick my hands in engines and wings and AC bays and heat exchangers, electronic racks and hydraulic tubing. I pull up floor panels and crawl on my hands and knees with a flashlight in my teeth looking for a dropped washer under the first officer's seat. I'm exposed to all manner of industrial solvents and lubricants. The absolute LAST thing I need to be concerned with is weather or not my watch is going to get scratched or dinged. I've been eyeballing these for a while.. I think when the current crop of Swatch pieces die I'll replace with these Timex watches. It's a working man's watch for the working day. It's the watch I wear when working that pays for the watches I enjoy when I'm off the clock. (see what I did?) Also I loved you gave this Timex the same video treatment you give VC/AP/PP/A.L&S/RM et al.. It truly spotlights the craftsmanship and attention to exacting detail these pieces command..
For just under $200 you can buy an Orient that will easily be twice the watch. I have nothing against inexpensive watches but these new Timex releases are more than a little junky.
I have tried so many times to convince myself to flip this one, but somehow it keeps up ending on my wrist. It's fun and legible and useful and surprisingly durable. One BIG issue though, is the factory bracelet. Chuck it in the bin. Get a flared silicon strap from timex for 12 bucks and enjoy this little 80s yuppie the way it was originally intended: as a cool looking watch for someone who can't afford a GMT.
The reviews are just my preferences and honest opinion on high to low end watches. If you got the money and want to buy watches for value these reviews are good.
honestly it's annoying how every watch review RU-vidr puts bargain in the title just for views (not talking about watch finder) when the watch may not even be close to a bargain lol 😂😎👍
Am I the only person in the world that prefers acrylic to sapphire crystals? 😯 My first watch was a Timex.. A mechanical one with a black face and leather strap... It must have been about 1982 when I was 10 years old.. I've been into watches ever since.. 🙂
Honestly, if it just had the sapphire, I would grab one. As is, it’s little more than a Lego level watch. I suppose that’s the point, but even at this price point, I’d like to be able to enjoy it with a scratch free glass over time. Regardless, brilliant vid as usual. Liked and shared 👍🏼
@@michelemariotti8198 yep, after a minute or two of polishing, it's back to brand new. I prefer plastic to mineral and sometimes even sapphire, for fingerprint resistance and lack of reflectivity.
@@acrspeed not to mention, the warmth of an acrylic crystal too. People who mindlessly bash on acrylic crystals (without at least saying "i know its pros, but I prefer sapphire") are just broadcasting their ignorance. Most likely they don't even have a single watch with an acrylic crystal. Or maybe they did as kids. Then they should realise that those watches they had as kids lasted that long because of the shatter resistance of an acrylic crystal
@@acrspeed beforehand getting my speedmaster I had a mineral Citizen, and after a few years it was horribly scuffed. Had a speedy for 4 years now and all I do i polish it for 1 minutes every 6 months or so, basically when I notice a scratch
Timex has been killin it lately with all the right moves. I still don't care about quartz. But they're bringing back all these heritage pieces with Miyotas at great prices. Seiko began ripping people off by upping prices without any upgrades (still slow ass beat, no hack, hardlex, but want 500$ etc). Timex is stepping in to fill that gap.
Sorry, for $125.00 Canadian (I’m in Montreal) I picked up from eBay a Casio GSHOCK GA-2100-1A1, now that’s worth it, not a TIMEX with plastic “crystal”.
I know it isn't exactly as budget as this, but would you guys be able to do a review of the American Documents series? The AD watches show what Timex can do as a legit watchmaker, even pulling an old-school manufacturer by importing another brands movement.
My brother just bought a Citizen Eco Drive that looks nice, got Titanium bracelet and Sapphire crystal for just $200 and I found that awesome and underrated
Can you guys review the Victorinox Inox? I see Victorinox watches as proper, no nonsense, durable Swiss watches with a great price point, ultimate durability, Swiss craftsmanship and style. Would love to see your take on them. Thanks!
It's a shame really because IMO this is an awesome take on a handful of iconic watches rolled into 1 and unlike a lot of others this is still very easily distinguished as a Timex, but a quartz and that price point together ruin it. These can be picked up for less than £100 now, and even that's still a big decision to be making whether a Timex lover or not.
I actually just recently acquired a vintage Timex automatic. Vintage at this price point if that exist. I believe a simple black and white railroad dial, chrome case with a strap.$25 from a pile of junk watches. It's an absolute gem to me. Never seen an automatic Timex. 70s?!?! I take for granted American name with a Japanese movement? Uniquely different without an organ price...lol
As I watch this video I am wearing the Timex M79 automatic 21 jewels, made by Myiota. It is a special addition updated version of the “Q” in this video. Upgraded to automatic movement, 120 clicks to the black bezel with silver numerals and see-thru case back. The only flaw is the background of the day and date has changed to a dark color, making it hard to see the soft-white numerals and numbers. Dark background would have been ok if they had used bright font. I bought it online direct from Timex and paid $279.00 for it. Maybe you could do a segment on this watch and compare the two.
The true "working class American hero" as far as watchmaking goes is Waltham, being both this nation's oldest watchmaker and the one who first bothered with interchangeable parts. A Timex of any vintage isn't worth the materials it's made out of.
@@jakekaywell5972 sorry didn’t see this post before. Nice mention of Waltham but Disagree. As with any video on watchmaking and the relevant point that is trying to be made- context is everything. In the case of this video, it is of the modern context. This is important, as there very few people alive today that associate Waltham with a “working class” modern watch. Quite the opposite. Most individuals today have no clue of the history of Waltham. However if you asked any American or British, if they know a Timex, there’s a chance they will say yes. Context is everything. Also the usage of the name of Waltham on a watch today is not close to anything that it was on its heyday. P.s. I personally own an early 1920s Waltham and a 1960s timex watch. Also have a Waltham factory book in my bookcase. Hence why I’m aware. Thank you for the comment!
Its a fun watch but it's playing in a price range above Orient ray 2 or mako 2. I couldn't justify this watch at this price. Too many better options at cheaper prices out there
The answer is an easy and unequivocal "nope" - it feels like a toy. In fact, every recent Timex I've handled has the quality of something you'd win from one of those claw machines on a dodgy boardwalk. The marketing boffins at Timex deserve fat raises because they're almost literally making something from nothing.
alas price and value is in the eye of the beholder. If you can't easily afford a luxury watch, you'd say "i can get so much better specs in brand X". And if you can't afford to enjoy some nostalgia and historical significance for just a 100 pop, then you'd say "i can get better in a claw machine!"
Dear Mr. Talking Hands & Friends, Huzzah! I have fond memories of my first watch, a Timex of course, and I still own and love several pieces today. Thank you for a great video. Sincerely, J.S.B.
Watchfinder man: "This watch is made up of lots of not good things, look how good it is." I saw one of these in the wild at my job and complimented the person wearing it, because it's a bold and cool choice of watch.
I have to note that this is my most accurate watch in my collection besides the Casio with mb6. its accuracy is 0 sec in 30 days! I can notice that it runs fast like 0.5 sec after 30 days but still does not reach the 1 sec. I have had a few other quartz watches, all of them gained or lost 6-8 sec in a month so I could barely believe this crazy accuracy from a cheap seiko quartz movement
A Timex watch that didn’t receive as much fanfare as the Q reissues is the Waterbury TW2U99100 model. That watch has a simple GMT, clean, polished look and is much cheaper than the Q reissues.
So I look at a Rolex and compare them to Ferragamo shoes and I look at this $150 Timex and think Converse chuck Taylor’s. I’m more the converse person now, so I bought the Timex it’s plain cool!!!!
Hideous things... remember had one similar as a kid & the pain it's bracelet inflicted on my wrist!! I'd complain if I got one free in a Christmas cracker 🤣 So for me, even though rose tinted glasses (or maybe because of) for me it's a "nope" but to each their own. Happy Christmas folks 🎅🏻🥳🍻☃️👍👍
Quartz technology, in my opinion, is more of a technological advancement, and less of a killer of mechanical movements... in the same way today's cars, also relying on mechanics, will be let behind by more advanced technology that makes them defy gravity and float (i read this currently exists...)
Personally, vintage Soviet watches are the way to go. More history, MUCH better quality, and often less expensive. Even their quartz models are unique, such as the Luch 2356 I'm wearing as I type this comment.
The PRX was slightly too big for me. I might have to give this one a shot in 38mm. I love these reviews of budget pieces. Especially ones that fit a certain aesthetic.
I own a blue PRX powermatic and it fits just right, but I’m with you; I wish the PRX was this size instead ! Might get the timex rootbeer version of this !
I still find it funny how small the “watch world” actually is, to almost every person outside of it, there’s only three tiers of watches, Timex, TAG Heuer, Rolex. Everyone knows those brands, even if they don’t know why.