1:19 The low key blue look. 2:03 The high key look (vibrant colors). 4:23 The muted yellow look. 5:18 The bleach bypass look. 7:03 The cross processing look. 8:01 The hot day look. 9:03 The brown look.
Gah thank you so much. It's so nice to see the looks actually written. I know he says the name of them in the video, but I'm a visual person, and it helps me to see it.
Thank you for this simple video. I've been travel vlogging for years and recently, in the past year, have been dabbling more into improving my skills in color grading. This has helped a lot.
Congratulations! Your explanations are concrete and accurate. I have a question ... do you know why when rendering my colors come out desaturated? they don't look like the correction I make in the program.
I’m just getting into Color Grading (primarily because Nikon Ninja ProRes RAW doesn’t have profile support in FCPX and/or LUTS) and I’m trying to keep to an Old English Study with rich browns and highlighting gold.. and avoid “orange” and keel skin tones with a flicker from the fireplace... dark story telling...
Thank you, useful information. However, I feel I appreciate the pace of your older videos - there is so much information, so a short breath between different looks could be useful for audience.
I think it is the default view which you start with. If you need to go back to your default view go to Workspace menu on top and then hit Reset Workspace. It will restore the default workspace. If you are still facing problems this forum thread might help you: forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=98411
I Created all the looks in one clip with different node...naming the node....just turned off....didn't delete and at the end.....i turned on all of them......and i can't sleep
Colour correction is bringing all shots to the same starting point. Whites are white. Colours are true. Moderate saturaton, moderate contrast. Grading is giving a "look" to the image. In the example here, he starts with a colour correctedimage then applies 7 different coour grades.
If you are trying to say that your camera doesn't supports log profile, then you can go to your camer's manual contrast, saturation and sharpness adjustment menu and modify it to flat footage style. This way you will get a lot of detail when you are color grading the footage.
Yes, you absolutely can. You have to be more careful when shooting, because without raw you are losing data (if you are working with 8bit files) and dynamic range. You need to watch your highlights and shadows and pay more attention to lighting and framing (if you don't have lights, try not to shoot in front of windows, and that sort of things). If you get a correct exposed image, even with 8bit you can go a long way in color correction. I shot this years ago with a Canon 650D (no Magic Lantern raw) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AqF-FkpyUBA.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zVFC0lyrPsw.html
@@nord7556 with 8-bit codecs and relatively low bitrates its usually better to shoot in standard/natural and get it as close as possible in camera. "faking" a flat/log image will only make it worse in post when adding the color and contrast back because the lack of data. You'll rarely get more dynamic range etc just faking log, and the colors will break earlier in grading. At least this is the case for my panasonic g85, and I've seen others prove this as well on other 8-bit videos. But to be certain, do some testing on your own setup to be sure. That said, sharpness is usually the one thing you can always turn down without much fear of it going wrong. It's usually too high to begin with and extremely easy to add in post if needed.
When starting any of these grades, let's say I'm starting with a LOG image, would I do my luma and color corrections first to bring it into the Rec 709 range, then make a new serial node to proceed from there? Technically I would have two nodes for luma and color, then a new node for the look corrections, and of course layer nodes after that for the other looks. Or do you use a technical LUT and proceed from there? Lately I've been staying away from correction luts, and manually correcting my log images. The results have been better, and just want to know if any workflow methods that work well with what you discussed?
@@valentinmanyanin9871 lol yeah what does how he grades have to do with you??? Say something nice or don't say anything. Try be a little more helpful....
