The Art Of War (Final Battle) | Battleship | All Action 

i mean realistically thats what they should do, If an oder seems deranged, you have a right to speak up.

@@corkingcoggo8375 Most soldiers operate with the expectation they don't have the full picture. I don't think many soldiers would disobey, or even hesitate to execute, a command given during a combat situation where everything is on the line. Orders given when its quieter, maybe.

@@SendarSlayer while I do agree with you there, these naval officers are now trained to question the captian if they believe something is being done that could harm the ship

Guys former Navy here from back in 2000. This is all Hollywood and is grossly misrepresented as far as military tacks and so forth. The ship has several departments that work together but have their own chain of command contained in each department. We all communicate the basics of a mission, now no one knows what's going on "having the full picture" outside of the top of the command ie the CO (Captian), XO (2nd in command), bridge staff if it's talked about in the bridge, Nav/Com (Navigation and communication), CWO (Chief Warrent officer) maybe and that's about it. The rest of us get a ship wide briefing outlining the over all mission. There's also the scuddle butt (rumor mill) that goes around the ship about what's going on but outside of those mentioned we don't know much. The only way communication and things like you see in thisovie to happen is if 70%+ of the crew is dead or wounded and even then it would be ordered to return to port rather then be lost if the option is there. Another thing "dropping the anchor" in the open ocean is the best way to lose your anchor before even touching the see bed. Not to mention the extreme amount damage to the windless (the system that controls the anchor), the ship and everything else on deck. Believe it or not that entire system for the anchor is manually operated by team of sailors below deck on top side. And that ship wouldn't be doing a G slide to get into gun range, it would nose dive into the water and probably rip off the bow if the anchor WAS to catch something. Sorry for the novel long explanation 😅 some movies are close to getting it right and some....well don't really come close. Lol hope some of this helped. 😅

@@camelfilters3224 Knew the Gunnery Chief on the USS Missouri. He hates this movie for all those reasons.

A+😎

and her younger sister , or both 🥳

@@rickydasudasin 💯

I...uh.. is that what art of war really means ..

Did that to my ex. All it cost me was a 12 pack. She ran off with two n snuck off while i was at work and aborted our kid. Best payback i ever did. Her mother was 10x better 🤣

I second that and agree with you 💯

Even in the heart of heaven, angels can still feel fear? Diablo entering heaven d3

@@OliverJacobsen777 ไป

And then seeing those big guns be let loose

In a work of science fiction, we see the real fighting spirit of the USN.

Yeh but they also had Rihanna trying to act..

It's an actual centuries old naval combat maneuver known as "club hauling".

Allah! La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists. Neither slumber, nor sleep overtake Him. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on earth. Who is he that can intercede with Him except with His Permission? He knows what happens to them (His creatures) in this world, and what will happen to them in the Hereafter. And they will never compass anything of His Knowledge except that which He wills. His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and He feels no fatigue in guarding and preserving them. And He is the Most High, the Most Great. [This Verse 2:255 is called Ayatul-Kursi.] [Surah al-Baqarah 2: 255]

@@alkatheri-pk4hc If you say so.

@@txgunguy2766 Kedge or kedging off. Not Keelhauling. It is for moving a ship/boat by bringing the anchor out by ships boats, dropping it, reeling it in, repeat. It is for moving a ship when the wind is not in your favor. Though with a small enough boat, I guess you might be able to drift it :P Keelhauling is when you tie a man to a rope and toss him over the bow, then bring him back up at the stern, bounding him off the barnacle encrusted hull the length of the keel. It comes from the Dutch words for the keel (which is just 'kiel') and to lift or to haul up (halen... Frisian aside, Dutch is about as close to English as it gets) and you get "kielhalen". Or in English, keelhaul. Add in the 'ing' suffix and you get the present participle (i.e. doing it right now) keelhauling. caveat: 'halen' also apparently can mean "fetch" or "catch". addendum: "keel hauling" by rights would be moving a keel around somewhere, as in hauling the keel around, presumably at a shipyard. Keelhauling as in the punishment is a single word.

Honestly looking at their ships, their suits, etc, this was not an invasion army. This looks more like the aliens were like, a mining survey team. They had no ranged weapons, etc. They were likely shooting blasting charges. The tech is just that far advanced the equivalent of a Cat Backhoe is the U.S.S. Missouri in terms of offensive capability.

That's why they called it Art of war bro

Cry.

once watch the film bro

@@jamessmall6499 I couldn’t have said it better myself that’s why they were trying to call home to bring the Calvary and the actual troops this is a light security.. the fact the dude who posted this didn’t get this is hilarious and shows his low level of intelligence.

Lmao

What does it mean tho

@@secondaccounte1209 LOL.. ok.

yes, it's just a gun

Using the wrong formula and still getting the right answer lol

Yeah and I all but guarantee that when this movie came out, there was at least one U.S Naval Academy midshipman in the theater wondering if that would work.

Flying a tank is better.

Oooooooohhhhhh.

That is actually really funny now that I see it

It's not every day that you find somebody on the internet comments sections that maintains a pulse and a body temp right around 98 degrees Thank you sir for the comment...

Dude, thats brilliant.

That is hilarious. People didn’t know that????

Do I detect a hint of sarcasm?😏

Even managed to invite our neighbors from the andromeda galaxy to use their own battleship!

Only watching the trailer doesn't count🤣🤣

Hyper realistic anchors

Yep, heaviest anchor ever. haha

lobbing unguided stick grenades in an arc. Yes, very advanced technology. Much superior.

@@colonelthyran7755 They are an interstellar species bruh. Primitive concept ≠ Primitive technology

Stargate SG1 has entered the chat.

@@blackknight9156 exactly

A gun is a gun, it hurts shits and tear everything if it can

Allah! La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists. Neither slumber, nor sleep overtake Him. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on earth. Who is he that can intercede with Him except with His Permission? He knows what happens to them (His creatures) in this world, and what will happen to them in the Hereafter. And they will never compass anything of His Knowledge except that which He wills. His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and He feels no fatigue in guarding and preserving them. And He is the Most High, the Most Great. [This Verse 2:255 is called Ayatul-Kursi.] [Surah al-Baqarah 2: 255]

@@alkatheri-pk4hc What are you trying to accomplish by randomly quoting false prophets?

that wasnt a quote from any prophet. thats a verse in the quran describing the attributes of God@@jackr2287

@@jackr2287 No it isn't false'.

@@AstroNovelist54 Tell that to the severed aorta.

so self-aggrandizing

Yes until today none of the battleship ever been sink by aliens.

i agree.. goosebumps everytime.

Me too but i trigger on " lets drop some lead on these motherfuckers "

Yeah, that was a great line.

Ageed

Still a better story than twilight.

1st i thought it was just a fun Dumb action movie. but when i heard it was based on the board game im omg thats so bad XD

The more you watch, the more you realize it is very much like the game

Tokyo drift Battleship style

i have watched this movie more 10x i still get goosebumps.... it is a masterpiece 👌

Yeah it is fun to watch, but totally unrealistic. Even if the achor could touch bottom, (given the depth of the ocean around hawaii, i'd say it can't). Anchors are designed to keep a ship in place when stationary. And even then a ship the size of Missouri would use multiple. That is a 40.000 ton battleship. IRL she'd immediatly snap the chain and keep on going.

@@johanvanroekel8253 🤣 The anchor bit is unrealistic for you, but nothing about the aliens are? Anyway, it's just a movie mate.

@@johanvanroekel8253 Yeah, the most unrealistic things about the video is anchor apart from that everything is believable, like aliens with guns having manual aiming system and ships capabale of creating impenetrable dome of energy, humans with ability to see long distances with binoculars etc all are believable just the anchor part is unrealistic

yeah , so epic a few tons of that anchor turn the whole fucking ship like that lmao

@@ddm_- At a point where the ocean is 15000 foot deep^^

@@ddm_- Your name checks out.

@@ddm_- 🤣🤣🤣so true

Average... i wouldn't go that far!

it's even funnier because Art of War is a Chinese text

@@thechineserussian true. lol

And Sun Tzu was Chinese

sur 6 people for run a battleship :D

I've always had some awe for huge boats navy or civilian. They are like independent cities

@@J.Wolf90 Ever been on a WW2 battleship?

@@hadmatter9240 no I havnt

@@hadmatter9240 I've toured and explored the Alabama. Both claustrophobic and awesome.

Hit it!!!!

Give ‘em everything you’ve got!

ถูกๆ 4:41

Os netos: vovô adoro sua histórias

It's a genuine centuries old naval combat maneuver called "club hauling".

@@txgunguy2766 🙏🏼 then it’s even more fun!

Look up the USS Texas. The Fat Electrician does a hilarious sotry on it.

Battleships are useless in conditions of modern warfare. It's just big easy target for any modern weapon system. One good rocket can deal more damage on big distances. So you simply can't use this firepower for something else then bombarding some land targets.

16 inch fifty caliber armor piercing with high explosive filler to be precise

As field artillery I can appreciate big boom devices

BuT iT's a Museum Battleship. How did they get the armaments and charges so quickly before they sailed out...

amen. I recognize all the flaws and warts and still love it. a good friday night flick when I dont want to think and just want to be entertained.

People who say they love a movie even if its has all these flaws are the real gigachads.

I call a it a guilty pleasure.

Fkn love it enough to have it in my phone, just in case😂

There will always be a romance about battleships. They were the size of skyscrapers, punched so hard they induced localized earthquakes and did all that while moving almost 40 miles per hour.

That’s because the entire ship is CGI

Let’s drop some lead on those mother- FIRE!

putting warheads on foreheads

No it’s Let’s drop some lead on some motherfuckers

we don't have battleships commissioned anymore, that was the movie's point of calling that ship a relic.

@@Progamerguy101 Changed it especially for you mate.

The Missouri’s guns also have a range of over 20 miles so them getting within a few hundred meters and in alien tomahawk range is even stupider, they could’ve shelled the aliens from a different area code

@@RedDeadRanger Thanks

USS Iowa class (modified after cold War) 80s : 270m (L), 32m (w), 56988tons full load, 16inch main batteries (Mark 7) [9 shells/3turrets/9 barrels], 5 inch secondary guns (Mark 12) [12 shells/6 turrets/12 barrels], bofors machine guns ×2, Sea-Ram AA missile countermeasures ×4, comanche helicopter ×1, 2 slots of swarmer missiles, 30knots. IJN Yamato 1945: 263m (L), 38m (w), 73000 tons full load, 18.1 inch main batteries (type 94 SK model) [9 shells/3 turrets/9 barrels], 6 inch secondary guns [6 shells/2 turrets/6 barrels], 6 inch autocannons [12 shells/6 turrets/12 barrels], 5 inch autocannons/AA [12 shells/6 turrets/12 barrels], 24 AA 5 inch guns [72 shells/24 turrets/72 barrels], type zero fighter planes ×7, 27 knots.

100% should have happened

Just "There's a battleship out here!! It's Missouri!!" Admiral: _???????????????_

They probably cut the scene out because they can see when the barrier went down

No matter how flawed a movie, there are scenes that just stand out. This is one of them. This effectively demonstrated the awesome firepower of a battleship.

100% the shock of acting captain Hopper of USS Missouri radioing in permission to join the fleet and sailing as lead ship.

movies such as this require an actual lobotomy

I also love that movie i hope they make more

Suspension of "disbelief " ?

I enjoyed it too. Some people don't get it. It's a movie n not a documentary.

@@matthewdudael1931 "Suspension of disbelief, sometimes called willing suspension of disbelief, is the intentional avoidance of critical thinking or logic in examining something unreal or impossible in reality, such as a work of speculative fiction, in order to believe it for the sake of enjoyment."

It really could have been something if they nixed the secondary storyline with the hikers and dropped the ties to the board game.... movie has to be paid for somehow I guess...

Problem was that they released it at an very unfortunate time. Some Marvel Movie i already forgott, dropped at the same time and everybody just forgot about Battleship

@@andrefasching1332 yeah that's actually kinda sad. I watch this movie few times and never bored, since the conflict between human and aliens are pretty simple, and only happen inside a sphere Shield that around 300 km or more

@@andrefasching1332 I think it was Avengers in 2012.

@@andrefasching1332 I guess that was "The Avengers". in 2012 when both avengers and battleship released.

Not so much Battles, it was the Last Class of Battleships... so the Action was mostly over.

전쟁은 전략 전술 많은 무기보다 한방이 중요합니다. 무너지는건 단한방 전일보처럼 등짝에 손자국없으면 허리반동 사용할수없지여 손자국은 인간의 의지?!

It won’t be going down by aliens…. ……just not yet. PEACE❤️

@@MarkEmperor This Aliens are weak.

Battleships are built in a way that makes them virtually unsinkable by other battleships. The guns can only shell what is above the water, and during the Bismark vs the Royal Navy, 4 ships hammered the Bismark for hours at point blank and she didn't sink until some torpedoes from a destroyer hit it below the water line.

Ikr 🥶🥶

It made me laugh

hms hood lol

@@smythers1981 Hood didn't have armor.

Add Tirpitz too

They sunk because of the relentless fire they were subjected to.... Not because they were unsinkable.... They endured what none of the so called modern ships of today could even dream of ....... Take Bismarck, that thing was so strong despite relentless fire from basically the whole Royal navy, it refused to sink. Only when that destroyer HMS dorsetshire( sorry if i got that name wrong) launched torpedoes, only then did it go down.... Yamato, went down only because it was overwhelmed by the USAF.... Relentless torpedoing and dive bombing that thing..... Still refused to sink then sunk later. Hood on the other side was so unlucky.... Had weak deck armor and only needed a shell from Bismarck to pierce it and detonate the magazine.... Point is, nothing is too strong or too weak... It's just that fate seems to have a different destiny for all things...

@@sandeeppallapu it was scuttled by its crew of Bismarck... I read an article few years ago that a mechanic from bismarck claimed it was scuttled due to an order to put charges then abandon the ship. And i dont know if CV planes are covered by the USAF since those planes were from the CV of the USN

Same man, for me it's because it has good CGI and the story was pretty simple with a lot of action. I also love how it's not just typical "America vs aliens" it's combination from other country too that makes it look better

It's an entertaining movie I gotta say. I even enjoyed it myself. But it's just that. There're moments that are unrealistic and the most notable one for me, as a former sailor, is the one where they use the anchor to "drift" at sea. That's dumb. Even if it's a battle ship, the anchor chain is not immune to intense friction. If that anchor is dropped in that situation, not only would it fail miserably since the anchor chain will burn and snap or the gravity itself pulling the anchor block and decommissioning the entire windlass, there would also be a lot of factors to be considered. Even if by some miracle, the anchor chain didn't snap, is the anchor actually able to secure itself at the sea floor strong enough for the whole heavy battleship to "drift"? Worse case scenario the anchor wouldn't grab anything strong and instead of "drifting", the ship would still go forward and they still get hit by those alien Molotov. I can't blame people for thinking it's dumb even though it's an enjoyable movie.

😂

A retired US Gunnery Chief from one of those ships once said "This is even less believable than Under Siege and I didn't think that was possible."

God is always w US

And let's not forget this same vessel actually SERVED in 1991 during the invasion of Iraq, in Desert Storm. It even fired it's mains guns at some Iraqi Bunkers and artillery positions.

Well it's actually possible, since during World War a lot of Navy works on the deck even though those big cannon are shooting other ship

Not American, but why do you say it like that, is there some sort of conflict so to speak between the branches?

@Notmuchnoob it's an iowa-class, still technically true

No Navy guy would ever say that. Submarines are boats, battleships are ships.

@@howardsmith9342 I was army anyway. Go give some marines a ride.

@@Mike91337 LOL. I managed to not get drafted at the end of Vietnam. Never been in the military, but I do read a lot.

I would think by turning the ship that way your exposing more of the ship making a bigger target for the enemy and easier for them to hit u I would think by positioning bow first and firing bow guns would make your profile smaller and harder to hit if that makes sense

@@jaredharris1970 yes it would make you a smaller target but a broadside would absolutely destroy your enemy especially since battleships are designed to absorb a few hits. If you wanted to sink an enemy battleship then you would need a full broadside to do it.

Inland from Pointe Du Hoc on DDay. Special joint Army Navy Fire Control teams translated calls for fire from the Army system to Navy system. The 2nd Ranger battalion and the 116th Infantry were calling for fire from the Battleship Nevada targeting single German tanks. The Nevada fired rounds from its gun batteries for 80 continous hours. At one point the Captain orderef the ship closer to the beaches because smoke was obscuring the targets on the beach. Colonel Rudder of the 2nd Rangers made the remark. Today the Rangers love the Navy.

Bruh didn't some veteran navy just prove that this movement is impossible to do in real live? Go watch "insider"

It is impractical to design ships with the fire power they can carry, and have all guns able to fire forward. And the front profile needs to be slim for speed/maneuverability. So a broadside brings the most guns to bear with a turreted design. With ships as large as battleships getting hit is inevitable. So they were designed to take hits and exchange fire. Modern warships tend to have less guns but forward turret mounted I believe.

RIP

Indeed , people do forget this is escapism and not reality , I liked it , it was a fun movie imo .

That's also true of basically every space battle ever since any kind of remotely laser-like weapon could engage from 200,000 miles away.

They can’t shell the aliens from 20 miles away cuz they were trapped by the force field

@@benyseus6325 20miles is the range of the guns not how far I’m saying they should be, inferences are important Also if you think a forcefield that can be seen from space and encompassed Hawaii wasn’t bigger than 20 miles I got some bad news for you

@@achilles8804 Didn't they say that due to the aliens mobility their best chance of hitting them was to get as close to them as they could?

@@achilles8804 the reason why they didnt was because they had a limited ammunition supply and couldnt afford to waste it. yes a battleships main gun has a range of 20 miles but that doesnt mean it can accurately _hit_ a target at 20 miles. on average with an experienced gunner, a battleships main gun was only around 32% accurate at _nine_ miles.

Yeah the armor of the Iowa class is crazy.

You have no idea what you are talking about. The turret is completely destroyed and clearly blows up from the inside, dislodging the guns. The other hits occur on areas of the ship that do NOT CARRY ANY ARMOR. Yes that is correct, the areas around the main gun turret, including everything that is hit in this clip, are not armored at all. The plating in this location is only 30mm thin, or just over an inch. That is nothing. The main armor belt is 307mm thick, but only covers the waterline. The main armor deck is 150mm thick, but is located one deck lower in the ship, just above the waterline, connecting to the main armor belt. Just google "Iowa class armor scheme" and you will see what I mean. With the exception of the gun turret, no armor was hit in this scene.

​@@hisaddlethe armor of the Iowa class is rather average. It's not great or "crazy" at all. For the size of the ship and the time it was build, it is actually below average. Some comparisons: As mentioned in my other comment, the 48.000 ton standard displacement Iowa class had a main armor belt that was 307mm thick inclined at 19 degrees. The deck was 152mm with a 32-38mm bomb deck above it and a 16mm splinter deck. The French 37.000 ton Richelieu class had a 327mm belt inclined at 15 degrees plus a 170mm thick main deck plus a 40-50mm thick splinter deck. The British 36.000 ton King George V class featured a 375mm thick belt, contoured to the hull (so not completely vertical as often stated), and a 150mm thick main deck plud 32mm weather deck. The Italian 40.000 ton Littorio class had a 280+70mm thick belt armor inclined at 15 degrees, and a 150mm thick main armor deck plus 36mm weather deck. The German 41.000 ton Bismarck class featured a 320mm thick belt and a 120mm thick main armor deck plus 50mm weather deck. The French 26.000 ton Dunkerque class, the first of the modern fast battleships to be build and also by far the smallest one, featured a 225mm thin belt on Dunkerque and a 283mm thick belt on Strasbourg, inclined at 11 degrees, with a 125mm thick main deck and 40mm thick lower deck. The famous 69.000 ton Japanese Yamato class had a 410mm thick belt inclined at 20 degrees plus a 200mm thick main armor deck with a 50mm thick weather deck. It is important to remember that the Iowa class came a couple of years after all of the ships mentioned above, with none of the treaty restrictions, and with the exception of Yamato, the Iowa's were also far bigger and heavier than all of them. So yeah, pretty average across the board. And that includes the area/volume protected by armor, which was also pretty average. Now don't understand me wrong, the Iowa's were excellent battleship designs. And overall, they were THE BEST designs of the war, no questions there. But being the best overall does not mean they were the best in every single category, which is something many people tend to forget. And protection (armor and torpedo protection) was something that was not meaningfully improved in the Iowa's compared to the previous South Dakota and North Carolina classes, which were 12.000 tons lighter than the Iowa's (25% lighter).

@@xxnightdriverxx9576 and you clearly don’t pay enough attention! When the shells hit, their explosions snapped off the three barrels and partially crumpled the barrette but nothing below the deck was damaged. Whereas with the destroyers earlier, just two shells caused a hull breech in Samson and a few more destroyed the JMSDF ship.

@@fionawimber1028 you are right that there wasn't a hull breach, but we literally see the turret explode from the inside, leaving behind a burning mess in follow up scenes. The entire turret blew up. The explosion also logically traveled down into the barbette, though it is clear that it was stopped somewhere before reaching the magazines. When one of the Iowa's suffered an explosion inside her number 2 turret during I think the Vietnam war, 70 people died. This here looks like a similar explosion.