The Assassin's Assassin: A Case Study of the Jack Ruby Trial 

Fast forward

Weally ??? Grrr !!

holy god FFS... I came here to warn people.

Ok I'll watch it starting at 7:20..lol

Your a true American hero thank you

I skipped over it. Its startling what they get paid! Why isnt the director a Dallas native?

Thank you

The interesting bit about that is the two "government men" who ordered her NOT to put the call through. I find it of a piece with Oswald not being provided legal representation even though the SCOTUS handed down their decision in Gideon v. Wainright in March 1963. Even if you don't believe there was a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, there clearly was a conspiracy against Oswald.

Yeah u let that shorty in with a gun...a club owner just breeze in....????

@@jacklynsalleh6033 8:42 Love how they cut out the boss telling the agent to get away from the car... Yeah, nothing suspicious with that... 🤔

@@jacklynsalleh6033 OH BOY, did they cut a lot out of this...

And where specifically did you get that information from? It's funny, people don't like to trust the government, yet will blindly believe random people on the internet giving no sources, no actual evidence, nothing! I agree it's good to be skeptical of the government... but at least they put out tens of thousands of pages to support their claims with the Warren Report!

@@grobbs666 But that's the problem the more pages you have the further you get away from the truth. It's just like the larger one's vocabulary, the more you can spin anything into meaningless...

@@vernpascal1531 Well that's funny, because usually conspiracy theorist claim the opposite, that they are hiding and not releasing more facts, files, testimonies, etc. There's multiple levels you can get into. They released a short conclusion in Warren Report, first 25 pages. If you want more detail, you can read the whole detailed report, 468 pages. If you want more, read the 18 appendix they added, another ~500 pages. If you want even more, you can read the 26 volumes of testimonies and pictures/scans of documents of evidence, nearly 20,000 pages. Or you can read any of the 5+ million pages that have been released due to demand by conspiracy believers. So, to recap... conspiracy believers demand more information... government releases it... and now you're saying them releasing so much is evidence there was a conspiracy?!? And there's been countless conspiracy researchers who go through ALL of those pages and files with a fine tooth comb, searching or anything... even the slightest hint of any possible conspiracy... so they can write their new book with new evidence. Despite that, all they have is the same old, tired claims they repeat over, and over, and over again, which have all been explained.

Let's look @ everything first Oswald was supposed to shoot general walker same gun aledgedly 2nd for Oswald to get off let's say three shots and kill jfk as a Lone gunman unreal because any even trained sniper with great skill and kills would be really nervous shooting the president So yes had To be more then Oswald now look @ Ruby to walk up in a crowd and shoot Oswald only hitting and killing him had to have experience shooting or killing someone before maybe a few times to be calm enough to pull this off So yes ide say Conspiracy by the documentary evidence Peace n Love to all righteous people

@@jamesbergerson7158 is english your native language

Because theres a good chance it did not happen

@@randyharris3175 Oh it happen, Those of us who were alive back then clearly remember Dorothy and her being at the trial everyday and her interviewing Ruby.

Cathy youre telling me you werw in the room when Dorothy intreviewed Ruby there is no way possible you could know that really happened everybody knows she was at the trial

@@randyharris3175 No I am not saying I was in the room, I am saying she was there and she interviewed him multiple times, she was about to publish what she learned when she mysteriously died. All her notations disappeared when she died.

@@randyharris3175 that's what I am saying, she was there, she did interview him, she died mysteriously and yet not a mention of her in this video. that's what I'm saying. No I was not there in the interview room.

Yea these guys saying called he was called sparky because he gets the job done?! Makes no sense.

You know more than these men? You know they asked rubys family member why he was called Sparky they all had a different answer

OMG is that funny! I am literally bark laughing out loud Well done

Ha ha ha Jura,that is THE RU-vid comment of the day. Take a bow.👍

That is hysterical and a keeper! Thanks!

Wow almost 8 mins of Karenglish. Eeesh

Ive studied everything there is on the death of Lee Oswald. No stone left unturned and i can say with a high degree of confidence .. this was NO accident!!

Ken Edwards well, he was wrong. Everyone else could easily tell it came from the back & numerous reconstructions & even studying the film made of that moment show that the head reacting the way it did was due to an involuntary motor reflex. (DUH!)

"he went to his grave convinced the fatal headshot came from the front." ken hi ken thanks for posting . what he was convinced of ken was the nature of the head wound that he saw . he saw a large area of damage in the occipital and parietal areas . which for the readers here not familiar with the bones of the skull is the area just above and BEHIND the right ear , and traveling backward and leftward to the right of center of the back of the head . that is the right rear of the head . now whether the shot that caused that damage (damage he saw from just inches away) came from the front or rear is one issue , the main issue tho is that he saw that damage . and he was corroborated by other parkland staff . yes some later would for reasons only they know do a 360 and change their statements . but they originally in most part corroborated mclellend . what the parland staff did not know in 64 and would never have known but for the ARRB is that Bethesda witnesses including fbi agents also corroborated them . they told the hsca that jfk had a right rear head wound , some even drew this wound for them . the hsca proceeded to seal away these testimonies for a minimal 50 years so that the people alive in 78 would not know the truth . they then BLATANTLY lied and falsely stated that all Bethesda witnesses agreed with the autopsy report on jfks wounds and that they CONTRADICTED the parkland staff . all lies . talk soon ken

"well, he was wrong" @@MrKmanthie so the opinion of a person who NEVER SAW JFKS BODY and who wont even supply their real name or indeed ANY name lol , is that the man (Mclellend ) who was just inches from jfks head that day WAS WRONG . this despite the corroboration of some of his fellow parkland staff and Bethesda witnesses .

@@Ransomhandsome Know name really hits on the button...................... Of stupidity and by putting duh at the end of a sentence really hammers it home....lol Now take it away my favorite Texan...ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SRzu2VX81QU.html

"McClelland "went to his grave" waiting almost 50 years to write a book co-authored with two known conspiracy theorists" terms accepting for a moment that you are right , that mclellend wanted to write a book do please explain to the readers here why that would in any way discredit this FIRST HAND WITNESS . if he wrote a book explain to the readers here why that makes him un reliable or a liar , im sure they would be very interested , just as I am . "after he lost his medical license in a real estate fraud case" terms it appears you want the readers here to take simply take your word for this . im sure you can detail this ? complete with proof ? . I mean there must have been a court case ? , and im sure if he committed fraud and was found guilty that the law punished him ? . all this should be easily provable shouldn't it ? . a doctors licence is removed for medical malpractice , anything contrary to the oath they swore when becoming a doctor . fraud is the domain of the police , fbi etc . I look forward to reading the proof you have of your above claim . "McClelland had become desperate and "cashed in."" terms so he "CASHED IN " ? , I take it that that means YOU ARE SAYING that he earned lots of money from jfks death .in which case im sure you can detail via proof all these monies you claim he earned from jfks death . you mention that mac perry mentions none of the "nonsense" , in fact I will quote you . "Dr. Malcolm Perry, the senior doctor in the ER at that time, spews none of the nonsense about frontal shots espoused by McClelland" terms as YOU say mac perry mentions none of the nonsense that mclellend espoused I must take it that you are saying that what mclellend said he saw SINCE DAY ONE , detailed in early 64 in testimony and SAME repeated up to his death 56 years later is a LIE . yet multiple parkland staff corroborated mclellend (including perry) , and as we now know multiple bethesday witnesses also . you mention none of this WHY ? . I think its obvious why . MALCOLM PERRY, MD: In a note written at Parkland Hospital and dated, 11-22-63 Dr., Perry described the head wound as, "A large wound of the right posterior cranium..." (WC--V17:6--CE#392) Describing Kennedy's appearance to the Warren Commission's Arlen Specter Dr. Perry stated, "Yes, there was a large avulsive wound on the right posterior cranium...." (WC- V3:368) Later to Specter: "...I noted a large avulsive wound of the right parietal occipital area, in which both scalp and portions of skull were absent, and there was severe laceration of underlying brain tissue..." (WC--V--3:37--2) In an interview with the HSCA's Andy Purdy in 1-11-78 Mr. Purdy reported that "Dr. Perry... believed the head wound was located on the "occipital parietal" (sic) region of the skull and that the right posterior aspect of the skull was missing..." (HSCA- V7:292-293) Perry told Mr. Purdy: "I looked at the head wound briefly by leaning over the table and noticed that the parietal occipital head wound was largely avulsive and there was visible brain tissue in the macard and some cerebellum seen..." (HSCA-V7:302-interview with Purdy 1-11-78. these are original statements and testimony not later changed stories . let me help you with the above . RIGHT POSTERIOR CRANIUM , PARIETEL / OCCIPITAL , OCCIPITAL , CEREBELLEUM. the occipital bone is at the REAR of the human head , between the ears . the bone covers an area as above at the REAR of the head between the ears , it goes down to the upper most of the neck and up to about the level of the top of the ears . the cerebellum is located LOW on the REAR of the head , that is the under side of the REAR OF THE BRAIN in the low occipital area . would you care to inform the readers here how witnesses could possibly see cerebellum from a small bullet hole sized entry either at the EOP or in the crown (depending on what lone nutter you talk to ) or from the UPPER right front of the head ? . "In fact, Perry remembers hardly seeing much of McClelland in the ER" terms perry was a little distracted , or didn't you know that ? . he was quite busy trying to save jfks life , so I doubt he was all that interested in jotting down the names of all present in that room , when and how long they were there . what is important and what sadly for you is inescapable is that beyond any shadow of a doubt MCLELLEND WAS IN THE TRAUMA ROOM EXACTLY WHERE HE SAID HE WAS AND WHEN HE SAID HE WAS THERE . "Apart from all that, ER doctors are not forensic scientists or pathologists, nor bullet trajectory experts; and thus should not be offering "expert" opinions on those subjects." terms this is the idiocy where terms tries to tell us that trained/qualified doctors and nurses including would you believe NEUROSURGEONS cant be relied upon or trusted to know what part of a mans head they are looking at SIDE , FRONT , REAR lol lol . these trained and qualified medical people cant possibly be relied upon to look at a hole in a mans head and KNOW ITS A HOLE lol lol . nurses and doctors , neurosurgeons etc are perfectly well qualified to offer medical opinions based on what they have seen with their own eyes and what they know to be medical fact .

No one got away. Oswald got shot by a "concerned Nightclub owner" Ruby died in jail after catching the flu and being described by Dr. Jolly as insane when he gave him a shot to treat the flu, and was dead a few weeks later. Nobody was silenced unless you count all the strippers, Dorothy Kilgallen, Rodger Craig, Deputy Constable Weitzman, and a few journalists who visited Ruby's apartment on Sunday Night.

I have no respect for this museum since it perpetuates a lie. Coincidentally, tomorrow I will be speaking with one of the leading experts in the JFK assassination, Mr. Gary Fannin. I enjoy networking with leading experts in other fields that involve governmental actions because I'm hopeful that it will ultimately lead to eradicating the rampant corruption that permeates our government. Very Best Regards, Tom Scott Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System _Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_ _Our American Injustice System_ “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul, _The Revolution: A Manifesto_ (United States: Grand Central Publishing, 2008), preface, p. 5.

Good question. Interesting question.

CIA contributed the Presidents frontal lobe in a mason jar.

Obviously there's no truth to your comment. I was there in the 90s and they had Ruby material then but keep pushing your nonsensical conspiracy fantasies so you don't have to deal with reality.

I recall that the 6th floor museum are Warren commission apologists.

It's probably true that the shooters don't even know who killed JFK, in that they had no idea who was actually pulling the strings. Nobody but the conspirators really know

@@choosetolivefree The Dulles Russian doll plot

@@lebeautymarq8834 nice phrase

this is true Michael . police chief curry said "We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did. Nobody's yet been able to put him in the building (Texas School Book Depository) with a gun in his hand." jesse curry dallas police chief

His Double Was on the sixth floor to be identified. Museum is like the movie "TheGame" Fiction

Even the Warren Commission could not prove that he was at the window of the sixth floor at the time of the shooting.

@@TRINZINI The Warren Commission could have cared less what really happened. All they did was invent their own narrative of the assassination so the case could get closed.

Oh please 🙄 The first question they asked Oswald: "Did you kill the president?" and he says "I haven't been charged with that". Why not just say "no, I did not kill the president." ??

Is this true?

@@DaveSCameron yes it is true.

Gary, They actually did mention it.

didnt know that

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in a unanimous opinion that Jack Ruby's jailhouse confession was improperly admitted into evidence at trial and additionally, that the trial court erred in refusing to grant the motion for change of venue. The appellate court overturned Ruby's conviction and death sentence, and ordered that he be retried in some location other than Dallas County.

@DannyBoy: He stalked him for 2 days, but didn't shoot. Finally, he'd had enough.

He also called cops night before try and stop it .. called on himself... MOB forced him.. CIA MOB FBI HIT HIM ... FOR ALL THE MEN THEY WORK FOR IE OILMEN ECT.. .. THE DOCTOR FOR RUBY WAS MK ULTRA DOCTOR CHECK OUT JOE ROGAN INTERVIEW WITH TOM O'NEIL.. SAME DOC AS MANSON AS CIA AND FBI WETE RUNNING OPERATIONS IN CALI AND JAILS AROUND U.S. .. SO MUCH WHAT A JOKE

No he didn't.

Those are very lonnnngg seconds

@@raymondmanderville505 Yep - a couple of days

Quite! And he denied it when questioned by journalists, " no, in fact this is the first time I've heard (about) that." - Mr. Oswald quote, freely available on YT.

Yeah, our innocent until proven guilty some how doesn't seem to apply in the most impactful American murder since Lincoln was assassinated. The WC is a prosecutor's brief that was anything but brief(Info on Ruby's Mother's teeth?)or fair to the murdered accused. Think about how dominant prosecutor's would be if every case had no defense, no real cross examination and no real evidence cross examination and testing. Then, when average Americans came out with their findings on LHO they were bashed for even questioning the WC.

Wrong Carl those calls were investigated found to be related to his labor troubles with his girls wrong you are

Benny's the bag the man was guilty as sin you know it I know it stop all that bullshit talk he was never convicted wonder why let me think oh I'm done thinking he was dead first

@RandyHarris: As much as you would like to, you really can't argue over the fact that Oswald was never convicted. He never was.

Lol You are a 🎈

tim o'neills years of research could not connect the 2 in ANY way. Watch his interview on jre 3 days ago on charlie manson, the 2nd half is on ruby and the like.. Its fascinating.

@@mattcoffee1269 -Except there are about 15 or 16 people at the time who said they knew each other, including several of Ruby's employees or those who performed in his club.of course if you are stupid enough to believe in Magic Bullets, or Neurospasms then you may fall for that, or that Ruby wanted to be a hero by killing Oswald.

@@vernpascal1531 i dont believe in magic bullets , i believe jfk was taken out. i believe oswald was also taken out.

@@mattcoffee1269 Agreed. Good to know. I have no patience for people who give you garbage like 1. Oswald Acted Alone 2. The Jews did it 3. Jackie did it 4. Hickey did it 5.. Greer did it. Too many of these disruption Agents running wild. Whether they are being compensated or not is hard to know,but still adds up to the same thing quickly.

@Snaggle Toothed ... same bridge team I read?

Still, better than yours.. think about it.

@@johnd7435 If you don’t get it better to refrain from commenting. If you haven’t got anything don’t say anything.

@@jopflah416 And who are you? A Troll, vainly hoping to smear an honest effort to put the info out there. Go find yourself a 'kook' facebook group and swap all the stories you like--just keep them off RU-vid if you don't want to hear from me. You have no particular right to infringe on this site. Get it better? Take the medicine, not the Kool-Aid. LHO was guilty, and it is a waste of time to talk with you until you do the homework.

Nancy Sanders He also yelled police brutality after trying to shoot Office McDonald in Texas Theater and punched McDonald in the face before being arrested .As soon as Oswald saw the crowd outside of Texas Theater he yelled “ Police Brutality “ Oswald had killed Tippit minutes before .His calls for an attorney was his way of saying “ Poor me I am being mistreated “

@@barryirvin2417 people do strange things once they've realized they've been fingered for murdering a president, knowing that in short order they will cease to exist..

@@kenamaro3942 Very true !

@@barryirvin2417 Oswald didn't kill Officer Tippit

@@MrAmbassador11 Really .How did Oswald get to Texas Theater ? Why did he bolt TSBD and never asked what was going on ? Why was he ID by several people as Tippits killer ? Why was his pistol id as murder weapon ? Who killed Tippit ?

CTers have been defending Oswald's innocence for almost 60 years.

There's still a mountain of evidence against him, right down to him being caught red-handed trying to shoot a police officer during his arrest!

@@aaronz7056 Exactly. It makes no sense that an innocent man would try to shoot a police officer when he's arrested.

@@robertromero8692 Of course, the conspiracy nuts still always will bend over backwards trying to make excuses for Oswald: he wasn't really trying to shoot him, somebody else got his gun off him after he left the rooming house, shot Tippit with it, then planted it back on him before his arrest, every witness and cop involved in this whole thing is a dirty liar except Oswald himself, etc. It's all terribly funny, isn't it?

@@aaronz7056 Actually, it pisses me off that people try so hard to make Oswald into some kind of pure, innocent victim who wasn't even a Marxist. That asshole Oliver Stone even tried to paint Oswald as a fucking HERO.

A lotta lumps in ruby s gravy train. Mostly lumps

You are full of shit. Completely unsubstantiated. So silly.

You have no evidence that Oswald's murder was a mob hit.

I never knew that-do you have a source?

If Ruby had stuck with that first lawyer who wanted to plead the charge down to murder WITHOUT malice, he'd have probably been out on parole in five years ...

No government conspiracy was needed for the assassination.

2006Crusaader2006: The 6th Floor Museum never said that the head shot didn't happen. However, they clearly do not side with the make-believe version of a shot from the front, which all the medical, photographic and ballistic evidence flatly contradicts. If you don't like what the Sixth Floor says, then go open your own museum, calling it, let's say: "The Grassy Knoll Weed 8 Floors High Depository of Assassination Fiction."

@@apointofinterest8574 You come up with the as you say"make-believe shot from the front" while there are eve doctors who claim this! Keep living in your bubble of nothing! You are as all who comment just a troll with an emty account!, just like your brain!

@@2006Crusader2006:Doctor Malcolm Perry, the first responding and the most senior of the doctors attending JFK maintains, "'There were no wounds at the front of the head at all." Perry believes some of the speculation on the front-bullet entry stems from one Parkland doctor, Robert McClelland, who wrote about a temple wound. The basis for this was an intern seeing blood on Kennedy`s temple, but there was no wound there, Perry said. Of the five ER doctors at Parkland that day, only Dr. McClelland has ever suggested that the bullet entered Kennedy's throat from the front. The record shows that Dr. McClelland is not an expert in forensic pathology or ballistic wounds. Subsequent multiple investigations confirmed the truth of SBT and exposed the lie of a frontal shot.

@@apointofinterest8574 Another troll/empty shell account!

@@2006Crusader2006 Yes, that describes your one-line/no content comment to a T.

it depends on the version of a story they are pushing . they obviously are pushing the lone nut version of events , or should o say LONE NUTS . as they are also pushing the nonsense that ruby walked past that ramp saqw and heard all the commotion and wondered what it was all was about . so he thought HEY ILL WALK DOWN THIS RAMP AS THE COMMOTION SEEMS TO BE DOWN THERE , then saw lee and thought HEY ITS THAT OSWALD KID WHO SHOT THE PRESIDENT , and then thought HANG ON A MINUTE IS THAT A SMIRK I SEE ? , WELL IM GOING TO WIPE IT OFF HIS FACE . WOW SURE IS LUCKY I JUST HAPPEN TO BE CARRYING A PISTOL IN MY POCKET . BANG . if anyone believes that i have other fairy tales they might like to hear . ruby never came down that ramp . officer vaughan guarded the ramp , no one went down that ramp who was not authorized to do so . he passed not one but 3 polygraph tests (lie detecter tests ) in this regard . some people cite another man that was there called napoleon stating that he saw ruby on the ramp , this was not the case . no one saw ruby on that ramp . vaughans superior (dean) also took a polygraph test . he even set his own questions , and HE FAILED . ill come back to mr dean . there was a tv camera right across the street from the ramp entrance recording from a time well before ruby is said to have gone down the ramp . this camera would have had to have caught ruby walk along the street and turn right down the ramp , and it didnt . if ruby was on that film HELPING THE LONE NUT CASE you can bet we would have seen it a long time ago . we havent because it doesnt exist AND IT SHOULD EXIST if ruby went down that ramp . clearly the 6th floor museum are not deterred at all by this unavoidable problem . they just carry on as ever telling us that fairy tales are true . so if ruby didnt go down that ramp (and we now know he didnt ) that means that ruby lied . he lied about going down the ramp and his reasons for being in that basement . so how did he get to that basement ? , he got there via a door in the back of the basement , and he went under the railing that was by that door . how do we know that ? cops and press in the basement saw him do it . there is film from the basement not long after ruby shot oswald , ive only ever seen it on mainstream tv one time , in the men who killed kennedy . in it the cameras are rolling and basement witnesses are saying on film where the man (ruby) came from , from that area in back and under the railings . so he came in there through the door behind the railings , that door led to a stairs going up that led to another door , and from there it can lead to a REAR DOOR . if you look on google maps now you will see the western union building , then a parking area , then the rear door of the police building . thats how ruby got in , and the hsca (who were no less dishonest than the warren commission ) did actually look in to this and from that we know that the above route is the route that ruby took . back to mr dean . he said he had the door to the above mentioned stairs locked and that he had two men stationed there . there were two men there for a while , but they then were sent outside on traffic duty . so there then was no one guarding that door at all . dean said he had the door locked , if the door was locked why would it need guarding by two men ? .but we know that dean FAILED his polygraph , so i dont believe a word he said . thats not to say that he allowed ruby to get in or that he had any knowledge of what ruby would do . but he knew very quickly that his ass was in a sling , when he saw that it was ruby HE KNEW HIM , he was seen and heard saying JACK , GOD DAMN IT , YOU GOT US IN ONE HELL OF A FIX . meaning his pal jack had just put him (dean) well up sh-t creek with no paddles . we also know that ruby had seemingly pretty unrestricted access in that police station from friday to that fateful sunday . he was photographed / filmed feet from oswald several times , plus he was again near oswald in press conference in which he corrected DA wade in regard the fair play for cuba committee . the warren commission decided to turn a blind eye to just how much influence ruby had in that police station . he they decided to conclude he knew just a small amount of cops , when in fact he knew hundreds . he left standing orders with his bartenders , COPS ETC WILL BE COMING IN , THEY WILL BE DRINKING FREE , CHARGE THEM FOR DRINKS AND ITS YOUR JOB . there had to have been numerous cops that saw ruby all that weekend in areas of the police station he had no right to be in , its not like he was hiding in the shadows . yet not one of them told him leave , why lose your free ride at the carousel club ? drinks and girls free ? . check out nancy perrin rich , her testimony is online , also she spoke in detail in mark lanes rush to judgement which is on youtube . she even said that DA WADE knew ruby . so ruby got in the door that led to the stairs , if indeed it was locked that means that someone A COP opened it for him . again this in no way means that anyone helping ruby access the basement had any idea what he would do . they just did their old pal jack a favor as they had all weekend . if ruby didnt enter the basement in the manner he claimed for the reason he claimed AND HE DIDNT , that then means he lied . that he lied means he had something to hide . our friends in the warren commission and in the 6th floor museum clearly had no problem in ignoring all of the above .

6th floor museum = fantasy land nothing more

@@fobrien1 It’s absurd to think that a hit man for the mob would not shoot Oswald in the head, or at least his heart, when he was right next to Oswald and it would have been so easy for him to do so. Because Ruby actually shot Oswald in the stomach, Oswald’s dying wasn’t a sure thing. In fact, he survived for almost two hours after the shooting. Indeed, Dr. Malcolm Perry, who worked on Oswald, told the Warren Commission that despite the severity of Oswald’s injuries, he and his assistants “were very close, I think, to winning the battle…At one point, once we controlled the hemorrhage and once I had control of the aorta and was able to stop the bleeding [in] that area, I actually felt we had a very good chance.” To quote from a book about Ruby, “Ruby was, as his mother had been, an incessant talker. He was brash and mercurial and never would have been trusted with knowledge of any plot to silence Oswald that would cause him to wind up in the arms of the police.” It was also known that Ruby loved his dogs (he called one of them his “wife”). Yet he left them in the car while he was supposedly carrying out this carefully planned, orchestrated hit on Oswald. When Ruby went to the Western Union office, there was only one customer ahead of him.3 If there had been two customers in front of him, or even if the lone customer had had a transaction that took the clerk just a minute or two longer to complete, or if the clerk, for whatever reason, took longer than he should have, or if he was interrupted by a telephone call, Ruby would not have been able to shoot Oswald. We know that the twenty-five-dollar money order Ruby sent that morning, and the receipt for it, were both stamped 11:17 a.m. and that Ruby shot Oswald four minutes later at 11:21 a.m., the O’Neal Funeral Home logging the call it received for an ambulance at 11:21 a.m. How long was Ruby in the basement before Oswald appeared and Ruby shot him? Although it is not completely in sync with the above times, we know it was less than a minute, probably in the vicinity of thirty seconds. Local television station KRLD was videotaping everything that was taking place in the basement area and furnished its tape to the Dallas Police Department. Dallas investigating officers Lieutenant C. C. Wallace and Lieutenant P. G. McCaghren, in a report to Chief Jesse Curry, said that they “timed the video tape from the time Lieutenant R. S. Pierce’s car left the basement and started out Main Street [the time Ruby entered and started to walk down the Main Street ramp] until the time the shot was fired. The time recorded on the video machine and checked twice was fifty-six (56) seconds.”7 Indeed, an NBC newsman testified before the Warren Commission that he saw Ruby coming down the Main Street ramp into the police basement “not more than fifteen to thirty seconds” before he shot Oswald.8 Ruby himself says he saw Oswald emerge from the jail office “just as I got to the bottom of the [Main Street] ramp.”9 If Ruby was a hit man for the mob, how is it, then, that they would cut it that close? If Ruby was a hit man for organized crime, how is it that for at least five minutes or so before he shot Oswald, he wasn’t lying in wait for Oswald to appear in the basement garage of City Hall, but instead was approximately one and a half football fields away waiting for the person in front of him to complete his transaction so Ruby could wire his money to Karen Bennett Carlin? No one said it better than author Norman Mailer. If Ruby killed Oswald for the mob, he asks, “Why was Ruby standing [in] line [at the] Western Union waiting his turn to send $25 to a stripper while time kept floating away and Oswald might be moved at any moment? Ruby often carried a gun, since he walked around with large amounts of cash.

@@fobrien1 is

@@robertromero8692 sorry but you do seem to have missed the bit where multiples of basement witnesses ON FILM and in testimony said that ruby did not come down the ramp . that they saw him emerge from an area in back , from under the railings there , in which a door was behind that led to a stairs , that led to another door that patrick dean said he had two cops guarding . in fact no cops were guarding it at that time , they were sent to traffic duty . in addition a tv camera was set up and running directly across the street from the ramp from i believe if memory serves me 30 minutes before ruby shot oswald . no film exists of ruby walking along and entering the ramp . in regard your claim that ruby was some sort of hit man for the mob , well i made no such claim , nor did i ever infer such a thing . as for your quote there , you seem to be quoting bugliosi quoting seth kantor , i have little faith in bugliosi or his book . "he wasn’t lying in wait for Oswald to appear in the basement garage of City Hall, but instead was approximately one and a half football fields away" the western union building was really only seperated from the rear door of city hall / the police station by a car parking area . it was a short walk . and as i have stated many witnesses refute that ruby walked down that ramp . and the hsca (who were no less deceptive or lying than the warren commission) were forced to agree that ruby did not enter the basement via the ramp as witnesses said . in fact officer vaughan who was guarding the ramp said ruby did not walk down the ramp , he took not one but atleast three polygraph tests and passed them all . meanwhile his boss pat dean took one polygraph , set his own questions and FAILED . so if ruby did not come down the ramp , and witnesses said he did not , then he came in via the door and stairs mentioned above . so ruby lied . the question then is WHY ? . as for mailer well his book could hardly be called unbiased , its titled oswalds tale . the new york times reviewed it , they notoriously refuse to review any jfk conspiracy oriented books , even if they top the new york times bests seller list . so that they reviewed mailers book alone speaks volumes .

Do the same for interviews of LBJ,Dulles, Ford etc. when they are asked key questions about the Assassination.

Telling which way

@@randyharris3175 wouldn't you like to know?

Yeah, it said "**** happens."

Ruby was known to the police and yet the police saw him posing as a reporter at the police station and correcting the information about Oswald 🖐🤔

What an absolute crock. (Not from you, Peggy, but in regard to that actual notion)

Ah yes, another belter of a conspiracy, these steamers keep getting the fantasists wound up with their utter tosh. Steamers & dreamers, where do these bangers get their credibility? Well, they don't. Carry on then!

@@Strype13 No, from Peggy too for trafficking in bull.

Just watched his presentation at the Allen Library before this video came up

too bad you did not have enough patience to listen to the truth

Try starting at around 7:24. The introduction is tiresome.

Exactly, that’s why a majority of Americans have always believed there was a conspiracy. Most people don’t have a clue as to what actually happened.

@@Ckom-Tunes most amerikans don t have a clue

Probably trust google too lmao

@@mattcoffee1269

@@mattcoffee1269 lol, I agree.....

@Google User: If you ever said anything (which you didn't), no one would believe it.

@@apointofinterest8574 Dude, come on man. You can't even put a sentence together correctly. Go back to school, get an education and maybe then we can talk lol. Also stop being a liberal. You will thank me for this advice some day.

Brian Smith He shot JFK then ?

brhan smith - yet ya present not a single fact to back that opinion

@@jb-vb8un I would have to type a reply a mile long. But simple speaking if oswald shot kennedy in the back of the head JFKs brains wouldnt be all over the top of the trunk of the car

@@BrianSmith-yq7ys and yet instead of ANY length, ya present NONE - - - Frazier, who testified several times before the Warren Commission regarding his findings (see sidebar), is well aware of the many conspiracy theories surrounding the Kennedy assassination-but he remains convinced that Oswald was the only shooter. “There has never been anything to indicate positively that anybody else was involved,” he said. - - Q: Can you explain how you are able to come to a conclusion that a cartridge case was fired in a particular weapon to the exclusion of all other weapons? Mr. Frazier: Yes, sir. During the manufacture of a weapon, there are certain things done to the mechanism of it, which are by machine or by filing, by grinding, which form the parts of the weapon into their final shape. These machining and grinding and filing operations will mark the metal with very fine scratches or Robert Frazier, circa 1963turning marks and grinding marks in such a way that there will be developed on the surface of the metal a characteristic pattern. This pattern, because it is made by these accidental machine-type operations, will be characteristic of that particular weapon, and will not be reproduced on separate weapons.

@@jb-vb8un good luck I did my own research don’t feel like arguing with random internet people

@TermsofService Ice Wolf saying ( use his real name) ,what about you 'Ice ".

TermsofService Yes

@TermsofService Ohh...hit a nerve ? Why is that then ?

So your sons real name is Ice Cube Wolf!

@TermsofService Heh Heh!!

..another fun fact, I've got a clear unobstructed pic of Jagger just out of the copter before he gets punched.

@@kenamaro3942 Nice one Sir and get sharing.

He also acted in the original Star Trek in "And The children Shall Lead"

Ruby's phone calls were about labor troubles. He explicitly denied there was any conspiracy.

@@robertromero8692 Yes, of course. He was just so upset about Jackie Kennedy that he needed to kill Oswald to save her from any more grief? LOL, Some people will believe anything. Ruby was camped out at the Police Station all weekend.He had a job. Kill Oswald. And he did it.

@@davidarbuckle7236 No, Jackie wasn't Ruby's motive. He was a very emotional man, prone to acts of violence. He greatly admired Kennedy, and actually thought he'd be hailed as a hero for killing Oswald. It’s absurd to think that a hit man for the mob would not shoot Oswald in the head, or at least his heart, when he was right next to Oswald and it would have been so easy for him to do so. Because Ruby actually shot Oswald in the stomach, Oswald’s dying wasn’t a sure thing. In fact, he survived for almost two hours after the shooting. Indeed, Dr. Malcolm Perry, who worked on Oswald, told the Warren Commission that despite the severity of Oswald’s injuries, he and his assistants “were very close, I think, to winning the battle…At one point, once we controlled the hemorrhage and once I had control of the aorta and was able to stop the bleeding [in] that area, I actually felt we had a very good chance.” To quote from a book about Ruby, “Ruby was, as his mother had been, an incessant talker. He was brash and mercurial and never would have been trusted with knowledge of any plot to silence Oswald that would cause him to wind up in the arms of the police.” It was also known that Ruby loved his dogs (he called one of them his “wife”). Yet he left them in the car while he was supposedly carrying out this carefully planned, orchestrated hit on Oswald. When Ruby went to the Western Union office, there was only one customer ahead of him. If there had been two customers in front of him, or even if the lone customer had had a transaction that took the clerk just a minute or two longer to complete, or if the clerk, for whatever reason, took longer than he should have, or if he was interrupted by a telephone call, Ruby would not have been able to shoot Oswald. We know that the twenty-five-dollar money order Ruby sent that morning, and the receipt for it, were both stamped 11:17 a.m. and that Ruby shot Oswald four minutes later at 11:21 a.m., the O’Neal Funeral Home logging the call it received for an ambulance at 11:21 a.m. How long was Ruby in the basement before Oswald appeared and Ruby shot him? Although it is not completely in sync with the above times, we know it was less than a minute, probably in the vicinity of thirty seconds. Local television station KRLD was videotaping everything that was taking place in the basement area and furnished its tape to the Dallas Police Department. Dallas investigating officers Lieutenant C. C. Wallace and Lieutenant P. G. McCaghren, in a report to Chief Jesse Curry, said that they “timed the video tape from the time Lieutenant R. S. Pierce’s car left the basement and started out Main Street [the time Ruby entered and started to walk down the Main Street ramp] until the time the shot was fired. The time recorded on the video machine and checked twice was fifty-six (56) seconds.” An NBC newsman testified before the Warren Commission that he saw Ruby coming down the Main Street ramp into the police basement “not more than fifteen to thirty seconds” before he shot Oswald. Ruby himself said he saw Oswald emerge from the jail office “just as I got to the bottom of the [Main Street] ramp.” If Ruby was a hit man for the mob, how is it, then, that they would cut it that close? If Ruby was a hit man for organized crime, how is it that for at least five minutes or so before he shot Oswald, he wasn’t lying in wait for Oswald to appear in the basement garage of City Hall, but instead was approximately one and a half football fields away waiting for the person in front of him to complete his transaction so Ruby could wire his money to Karen Bennett Carlin? No one said it better than author Norman Mailer. If Ruby killed Oswald for the mob, he asks, “Why was Ruby standing [in] line [at the] Western Union waiting his turn to send $25 to a stripper while time kept floating away and Oswald might be moved at any moment?

@@robertromero8692 The problem with that idea is that Ruby had right-wing tapes of Howard Hunt in his car with the dogs when he shot Oswald. That whole line that he was fond of the Kennedys is total nonsense. It is almost as ridiculous as Oswald being in Mexico City trying to get a Visa to go to Russia. It didn't happen.

@@davidarbuckle7236 "Ruby had right-wing tapes of Howard Hunt in his car" Sounds like a bullshit claim. What is your evidence? "Oswald being in Mexico City trying to get a Visa to go to Russia." Get your facts straight. Oswald had already BEEN to Russia. He went to Mexico City to try to get to CUBA. MULTIPLE Witnesses saw him there, including people at the hotel, Cuban consulate, and Russian Embassy. Oswald’s own possessions reveal that he was at the Cuban consulate. Silvia Duran at the Cuban consulate said that even though she was unable to give Oswald the immediate visa he wanted, she wanted to be helpful to him so she gave him a piece of paper with her name on it, as well as the telephone number of the consulate, which was 11-28-47. Silvia Duran’s name and the consulate’s phone number were found on a piece of paper among Oswald’s possessions after his arrest. That same piece of paper contained the phone numbers of both the Soviet embassy in Mexico City (15-61-55) and the Soviet Department of Consular Affairs (15-60-55).

Behold his mighty hand!

Who would have paraded Oswald in front of a crowd ? How could Ruby get by the police guards ? The Chief of Police said in an interview that he was instructed to show Oswald to the press . To show that he had not been harmed by the police , when in fact he shows bruises on his face . So who instructed the police? Why don’t they talk about the mayor of Dallas & his brother , the Deputy directors of the CIA ?

YES! Dallas mayor Earle Cabell was brother of Charles Cabell, who had been deputy director of the CIA and "coincidentally" had been made to resign (aka fired) by JFK. Also it seems that E Cabell had been a CIA asset since mid 1950's AND apparently had been in charge of overseeing trip arrangements for JFK's trip to Dallas. Also, Allen Dulles, the longtime CIA Director fired by JFK, was a member of the Warren Commission. So much for the official story, as far as I can tell. .

The bruises came from when they where apprehending him. It's Dallas police, no doubt they gave him a good pistol whip before putting the cuffs on even though he never struggled

The two police officers holding Aswan’s are pure hired killers! I am sure after they held aswald for ruby to kill they more than likely were either themself killed or the retired to Florida with several million dollars from the CIA slush fund for hired killers!

Yes, it seems he even set up his faithful stooge Buddy Walthers to be taken out.

@@lebeautymarq8834 The only significance about Walthers is that Groden, Livingstone and Garrison all claimed he found a bullet in the grass which disappeared, that nobody knows who took it, that he was never asked about it by the WC, and that he might have been murdered by a fellow officer... all of which are bald-faced lies, the kind those three were so adept and comfortable about telling. The WC did ask him, and as a matter of fact Walthers explicitly denied there was a bullet found in the grass at all. He was killed in a gunfight with an escaped convict named James Cherry who was of course, recaptured.

@@aaronz7056 There are photographs showing Buddy Walthers in Dealey Plaza picking up a bullet or bullets and handing them to an unidentified man (who looked distinctly like one of the 'men in black' you mentioned elsewhere)!

@@lebeautymarq8834 No, there are pictures of Walthers and several other men standing there while your man in black ie. a guy in an ordinary suit like a billion others were wearing in 1963, Oddly enough this myth of there being a bullet comes from lies told by Jim Garrison (what a surprise). His blow-up of a photo at the scene shows some poorly-defined something he insists is a bullet. Neither of the photographers present ever supported the story it was a bullet, and as I said Walthers explicitly denied there was any bullet there, they were examining the turf. He later repeated there was no bullet when Garrison lied about it in 1967. Garrison would have us believe there was an intact bullet just lying around in the Plaza infield?

@@aaronz7056 So everyone close to the case is wrong about it, except you?

Ha! Then Magic Bullets and Neurospasms would sound perfectly reasonable.

@@vernpascal1531 They made way for Ruby to apply the shot. The man in white gave good sighting for the man in black. Oswald.

@@vernpascal1531 Here enjoy My friend tell u the truth ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SRzu2VX81QU.html Dead but not forgotten

Hey mark you are showing your ignorance of the facts he told lavelle he did it because he wanted to be a hero so obviously he was clearly aware if what he did he made that up later

If lavelle heard you say that dispersing his reputation he would kick your sorry conspiracy butt

So, what does this mean? They've mentioned that in the lecture anyway.

I have heard others who knew Ruby claim that the nickname was due to Ruby's short temper...

You seem to be talking about the Dallas Police Department dictabelt recording, and no, that recording does not prove there were at least two gunman. After the original acoustical analysis of the recording was presented to the HSCA in 1978 as "proof" of a second gunman, the recording over the next few years was analyzed by other acoustical experts who disagreed with the original analysis and said that the recording did not capture any gunshots after all. By now, quite a few different acoustics experts have analyzed the recording, and the majority of them do not agree that there are gunshots on that recording. So today the dictabelt recording cannot reasonably be considered a bonafide audio recording of the gunfire.

@@Caeruleo The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) determined that the acoustical analysis proved that *four* shots were fired at President Kennedy. An independent company, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., did the analysis. The HSCA concluded "that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy". It was only afterwards that the FBI (a state body) claimed that they were mistaken. You know, the same state body that never properly investigated the case and have allowed President Kennedy's murderers to escape justice to this day.

@@Caeruleo Don't forget those acoustics boys who came up with the dictabelt recording evidence (never mind that actual people near the plaza firmly heard only three shots, but moving right along...) were so embarrassed by their goof they have refused to be interviewed on the subject ever since.

@@lebeautymarq8834 The acoustic evidence relied upon by the HSCA was discredited, not by the FBI, but by independent analysis. Assassination researcher Steve Barber repeatedly listened to that recording and heard the words "Hold everything secure until the homicide and other investigators can get there" at the point where the HSCA had concluded the assassination shots were recorded. However, those words were spoken by Sheriff Bill Decker about 90 seconds after the assassination, so the shots could not be when the HSCA claimed., which showed that the police motorcycle wasn’t where the HSCA experts thought it was. Further analysis by a branch of the National Academy of Sciences (NOT under the FBI) also discredited the acoustic evidence of a fourth shot.

​@@robertromero8692 The analysis of the independent company, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., has not been discredited nor disproven. In response to the National Academy of Sciences analysis (Yes, NAS is not under the FBI, but is a government funded NGO…..which is kind of a contradiction in terms don't you think 🤔), Dr. James E. Barger wrote to G. Robert Blakey on February 18, 1983: “Barber discovered a very weak spoken phrase on the DPD Dictabelt recording that is heard at about the time of the sound impulses we concluded were probably caused by the fourth shot. The NAS Committee has shown to our satisfaction that this phrase has the same origin as the same phrase heard also on the Audograph recording.[29] The Audograph recording was originally made from the channel 2 radio. The common phrase is heard on channel 2 about a minute after the assassination would appear, from the context, to have taken place. Therefore, it would seem . . . that the sounds that we connected with gunfire were made about a minute after the assassination shots were fired. Upon reading the NAS report, we did a brief analysis of the Audograph dub that was made by the NAS Committee and loaned to us by them. We found some enigmatic features of this recording that occur at about the time that individuals react to the assassination. Therefore, we have doubt about the time synchronization of events on that recording, and so we doubt that the Barber hypothesis is proven. The NAS Committee did not examine the several items of evidence that corroborated our original findings, so that we still agree with the House Select Committee on Assassinations conclusion that our findings were corroborated”. 🤗

James Bookhout may have posed as Ruby to do the shooting it seems. Ruby’s face is never seen in the photos.

I know and always wondered about that .so much has been hidden from the public.

Excuse me? This is simply a review of Rubys trial!

Yes and with Donald J Trump the swamp is getting deeper.

It was still a book depository in 67, did you work there?

Top men Lois..... top....men

LBJ

Only in the mindset of the delusional & wishful thinkers Doctor.

@@KeithWilliamMacHendry -Yeah right..You mean you are in the minority!

“What about the late night visit to the mortuary to fingerprint Oswald’s corpse” That was simply the FBI confirming Oswald’s prints. They did not want to rely solely on DPD. Your attempt to say this is “proof” of a “conspiracy” is a complete failure. “and the subsequent identification of a print on the gun that had not been sighted prior” NO fingerprints other than Oswald’s were found on the Carcano. “or the Mauser rifle identified at the scene” It is easy to confuse the Italian-made Mannlicher-Carcano with the German Mauser* as well as with several other European military rifles. Firearms expert Monty C. Lutz prepared an exhibit for the HSCA showing five European-made rifles-the German Mauser among them-of very similar shape and size, all containing the same right-sided bolt handle (common on all bolt-action rifles), an ammunition magazine protruding below the receiver (immediately in front of the trigger guard), and bayonet studs (allowing a bayonet knife to be attached to the barrel of the rifle). Lutz testified that “many of these rifles could very easily have been confused with the [Italian-made] Mannlicher-Carcano to the person who did not make a complete and thorough examination of that particular rifle.” Further, Lutz noted that the difference in caliber between the Italian Carcano and the German Mauser, about forty-thousandths of an inch, could hardly be determined by the naked eye. There is no evidence to suggest that the officers peering down at the weapon between two stacks of boxes ever read the rifle’s markings. Moreover, the legend “CAL. 6.5” was stamped across the rear iron sight, which was partly obscured by the scope sight mounted above it, and therefore hardly visible to Eugene Boone and Seymour Weitzman. In a 1967 interview, Weitzman said he had “no doubt” that the rifle identified by the Dallas Police Department as being a 6.5-millimeter Carcano, and as having been found on the sixth floor of the Book Depository Building, is “the rifle we found. It was strictly a mistaken identity which anybody could make. If you know anything about guns, a Mauser is a Mauser. What make it is, what country it was made in, can easily be misidentified because mostly your Mauser mechanism looks very similar.” Weitzman went on to say that the Carcano “was a Mauser-action rifle” and really was “an Italian Mauser.” * In one of the leading books on rifles and other small arms, the author writes that the Mannlicher-Carcano is even “known occasionally as the Mauser Paravicino” and is, in fact, “a modified Mauser” (Smith, Small Arms of the World, p.474). FBI firearms expert Robert A. Frazier testified that “the Mauser was one of the earliest, if not the earliest,” of “bolt-action” rifles “from which many others were copied. And since [the Mannlicher-Carcano] uses the same type of bolt system, it may have been [erroneously] referred to as a Mauser for that reason” (3 H 394, WCT Robert A. Frazier).

I have no Idea what you are trying to say.

​@@2A-Bear-ArmsHe obviously picked up on the haunting atmosphere of bullshit.

van wylde - ya lack any FACTS OR EVIDENCE

The trial was in 1964

Autshot20 exactly, Hell a man was fixing to assassinated, without warning... He'll they had to make sure all hell didn't break loose when it did! Without security who's so say ruby, the sheriff and a few more wouldn't get lynched... Hell, the whole police station could have been over taken

TermsofService Sure life is full of coincidences, but those coincidences or a slim majority of Typical. circumstance... Yes we called him coincidences because they are uncommon enough that they stand out... But my point is this any and every thing that happens like this on a government level is 100% coincidence everyone of them all the time, Just can’t be so. If coincidences were common occurrence there would not be a coincidence at all

@@thespiritof76.. agree

TermsofService i agree it’s an overstatement, o guess that’s our tendency when responding to an overstatement, at least it’s my tendency...

Emma Bradford seems so simple, to me at least... coincidence and all aside it’s the only “probable” conclusion... Isn’t that supposed to be how we judge things that we are forced to speculate on? All in all, it’s the only thing that’s probable... The reason the station was like and armed camp is because there was something happening that day much more important than the transfer of a so called (at the time) “lone nut assassin”... The sheer amount of resources given to security of that transfer had not happed before or since...

She thought red roses, how strange. Then afterwards, she thought... red roses, ....blood. She told this to her biographer.

Ohhh did u know TEXAN IS KNOWN AS THE MOST HATED CITY.....MILLIKNS HATE TEXAS UNLESS UR IN OIL BUISNESS

Not for jack ruby

What a farce..

I don't think Ruby needed luck, IF the shot did not do it, plenty of time to help the shot on the ride to the hospital.

Lucky for them Oswald, while appearing on live TV, didn't jump up and down screaming his innocence, beg protection for his family, hence making them untouchable, or make any attempt to begin spilling what he knew or suspected about a conspiracy, hence making him untouchable, instead of just mumbling pretty passively about legal assistance and whining about the cop he tried to shoot having the nerve to punch him while disarming him.

@@aaronz7056 Or you could say more accurately that they made their own luck, Mr Z....no notes or records of the 12-13 hour interrogation, no legal representation for Oswald, no adequate precautions for the jail transfer...

@@lebeautymarq8834 Your words completely do not address what I said above, but okay...

@@aaronz7056 It appears that even you don't seem to understand what you said above, but okay....let me repeat - Oswald was interrogated for 12-13 hours and the public was told there was no record made of this interrogation - so who knows if he didn't "jump up and down screaming his innocence, beg protection for his family.... or make any attempt to begin spilling what he knew or suspected about a conspiracy"?

And it would take two years and the judge and the lawyers get paid the whole time

i dont know anything about them being hired by cia . but the men are both dead now . the man in white was jim leavelle and the other man was L C graves . leavelle lived till recently enough dying i believe at age 99 . graves died if memory serves in 1995 . leavelle funnily enough tried to say that the oswald line ups were conducted fairly and honestly lol . they put oswald in line with WELL DRESSED TALL BROAD BLONDE MEN . later they lined him up with teen boys , oneof whom was latino DARK SKINNED . even one of the witnesses viewing the lineup (cab driver whalley ) said in testimony that THEY WERE RAILROADING OSWALD . this same witness said he was handed an already written statement saying which person he picked in the line up so he would sign it , BEFORE HE EVEN WENT TO THE LINE UP . and the late mr leavelle had the neck to say the line ups were conducted fairly and honestly lol .

No doubt, since you are happily accusing people (whom you clearly know absolutely zero about) of being accessories to murder, you are about to come forward to the world with your ironclad evidence against them, and while you are at it openly challenge their families not to sue you, then? "Hiring out to the CIA to help kill Oswald...." LOL

@@aaronz7056 Still haven’t realized your silly mistake, have you Mr. Z? 😂😂😂

@@lebeautymarq8834 What, that two cops were not guilty of murder, or that accusing people of murder with no evidence is not obscene and beneath contempt?

@@aaronz7056 Nope 😂😂😂🤣

@lebeautymarq8834 There were no "men on the sixth floor" at the time of the assassination, only Oswald. Re: the absurd story peddled in the Sample/Collom book: Numerous TSBD employee gave statements to the FBI, the DPD and other investigative authorities. None stated that they saw any "strangers" in the building on the day of the assassination. Ruth Ann, Factor and Wallace, all strangers, must have done a helluva a job hiding not only their physical form inside the TSBD, but also the rifles that they apparently carried into and out of the building that day. And of course there's no evidence anywhere of the ammo they fired. What a joke of a book, not even good as a comic; which explains why such an unfunny clown like yourself would recommend it.

CIA gun runner Mafia FBI A good respectable business man 🤣🤣🤣