The Secret History of the Kennedy Assassination 

If Oswald really was a "lone crazy nutjob," then why not release all of the documents?

There is so much evidence proving Oswald could not have been the shooter. This guy doesn't mention any of it. He's a fraud.

Did this guy do any real research on the assassination? It doesn’t appear so.

This guy is good at promoting his book. Not much else.

No way could that guy who’s sitting on the wall identify Oswald as the shooter from that distance.

I think it's really amazing that he makes excuses about covering up the events after the assassination the research the medical team and everything like that

The Warren Commission didnt do any digging, nor did their lawyers. All they did was ask witnesses questions, hand picked witnesses that were never subjected to cross examination and never confronted with their original statements and affidavits.

From listening to this I now totally believe in a conspiracy!

This guy is adsolutely part of ongoing cover up, it's blatant!

I can't hear this through. He's lying through his teeth.

… and we keep hearing how important it is to “read my book”!

If Oswald killed Kennedy it meant he shot a rifle a couple hours before apprehended in a movie theatre. The real mystery is not why would he shoot Kennedy. Rather why did swabbing his face while in custody show no nitrates were present. If he did not have nitrates on his face it meant he did not shoot a rifle that day. So if he did not shoot a rifle why wasn't he released. And why did a mobster kill him. Keep in mind there is considerable evidence according to motive, means, and opportunity that the CIA and the mafia killed Kennedy. And why was LBJ on the floor of the second car in the convoy Before the Shooting Started. Why, why, why? Here is my answer. Treason doth never prosper. For if treason were to prosper None would dare to call it treason. Otherwise we have Oswald's Own words, I quote him. "I didn't kill anybody. I am the patsy." If he himself wasn't murdered The necessary evidence doesn't Exist. He would have been acquitted. And we now see three murders Were done that weekend. Kennedy, Tippet, Oswald. So of course the media had to do its Cover up and say for decades How it was slam dunk Oswald did it. And has spread the lie for over 50 years. It was a coup. And that is no lie.

Seen this guy on a couple of videos now - still smells like intelligence disinfo. Can't shake the feeling he's try hard to sell us something.

The moderator and the guest are both egregiously wrong about the Kitty Genovese murder. In my view, Catherine Pelonero's book about it is mandatory moral reading for them.

Starting at 33:47 "The scientists that know ballistics say that its not all that surprising the bullet wouldn't be more damaged , he had a reasonably good rifle, It was an easy shot"? This guy is full of it !

Oswald was what he said he was, a patsy, it may have been an imposter in mexico, there are no photos of him there, and the audio does not sound like him

No one today can honestly believe Oswald was the lone assassin. Too much information has come to light..

How many times does he admit that the was covered up all the information and the people's work and it was falsified and destroyed and he says it like it's okay we don't need to worry about who did it what the evidence shows we just need to keep it from the people

Surprisingly disappointing for a seasoned reporter. It almost seems like he’s playing a role, and badly; he does not know the material.

I find it interesting that on the basis of his book summing up the 9/11 commision, his next act is to write a book on a 50 yr old crime this next that there's 2000 books on already and contrary to popular skeptical belief his thesis ultimately supports the original official conclusion (if the WC is so correct does it really need another book supporting its' conclusion?). Now he pops up on Politico (and quoted in Town & Country of all places) to say that there's nothing to see here in the newly released documents (thanks for figuring that out for us pal!). Highlights: "scientists support {the single bullet theory}" and blaming JFK's grossly compromised autopsy on Jackie Kennedy (if only she hadn't demanded on a navy hospital and been in such a darn rush -she just wouldn't leave until the autopsy was completed!), and is an apologist for Humes burning his autopsy notes (there was blood all over them, and you know, they, might be in a museum someday!), BS about Howard Brennan (complete obfuscation). Interesting Freudian slip at about 32:09, where he says 9/11 commision where he should say WC. The questions and Shenon's answers seem rehearsed. On Jack Ruby his mob connections are "low level connections" - (yeah Sam G was low level! check the phone records before the assassination) And Ruby was "mentally ill", and nothing ever "panned out for him". Oh and the WC investigators are so angry, if only they'd known about the details that came out later, they would have proven their thesis even better.

I don’t know if the lecturer is trying to provide disinformation or actually believes what he’s saying. But, 15 minutes in, I stopped watching. After having read upwards of 20 books on the JFK assassination most of them exploring conspiracy, this guy already has two things completely wrong in 15 minutes; 1). Oswald likely wasn’t involved in the assassination as a participant but as the “patsy” just as he himself told the press. John Armstrong wrote a book titled “Harvey and Lee” detailing all the irregularities and outright lies surrounding Lee Oswald’s involvement in the assassination. Mark Lane’s series of books on the assassination also does a great job of detailing the impossible journey of Oswald to becoming the assassin with so many irregularities and things the Warren Commission says he did. It’s now 2020 and Oswald’s files and tax records are still classified and unavailable to the public. If Oswald were the true assassin, wouldn’t those same files have been released immediately to prove his guilt? 2). The speaker erroneously says Arlen Specter did a “bang up job” as a member of the Warren Commission. Numerous books that have been written detail how Specter outright chose to misrepresent and deceive the public and anyone who might read the commission’s report. His creation of the “magic bullet theory” is a gross piece of fiction that not only defies the known laws of physics but also logic itself. So, I appreciate the effort of the lecturer but it’s quite obvious he hasn’t done much truthful research on this subject. He says that he didn’t want to be just another book on the assassination without having something to add. Sadly, he ends up exactly as the countless others who all either intentionally or unintentionally conclude wrongly.

When I saw that this was presented by National Geographic, I fast-forwarded to the middle of the vid to simply confirm my suspicions going in; that this vid would be yet more propaganda BS, and I was neither disappointed, or the least bit surprised.

You said that there was no way Oswald could shoot 3 times and that's how the magic bullet came about, but that is wrong. There were ABSOLUTELY at least 3 shots fired, as one missed and hit the sidewalk and then hit James Tague. The Warren Commission acknowledged this.. If he couldn't fire 3 shots, due to the Zapruder film, as you say, then Oswald either didn't do it or didn't act alone.

As soon as he starts talking about Oswald being the only person who shot JFK, that's it goodbye...

Yep, agree with others who say it is just trying to work in favor of the coverup, after stopping this smelly piece of obvious propaganda after 7 minutes.

Bogus, completely bogus.

The elites still think we're stupid.

Don't waste the electricity

The Warren Commission well deserves all the ridicule.

The CiA - killed the Kennedys with help from the Mob was an inside Gov job , but CiA also killed Martin Luther king , Malcolm X , an John Lennon who was anti war campaigner in 70's , the main stream media tell lies 🤯

This guy seems to pick and choose the facts he mentions, also he struggles with some of the basics of the assassination- I.e. distance from snipers nest to JFK motorcade & the fact he said that "it looks like an easy shot". Marine sharp shooters struggled in the time & with moving targets with only a handful achieving. Was not an easy shot evidently.

this guy is a mouth piece of the government , everything he's saying is here say .

I just watched an interview with Roger Craig, a Dallas police officer who said they were instructed to just be spectators and in no way involve themselves with the security for Kennedy. It's hard to believe this writer was unaware of that.

The reason people believe in conspiracy theories is because they're so many conspiracies

The Bethesda Autopsy was a sham. The idea that Army Doctors or Naval doctors had more expertise than Parkland who had experience with hundreds of gunshot Autopsies is just patently false. They (the Secret Service) pirated the body and the Limo out of Parkland at gunpoint so they could control the autopsy so that they could ultimately hide the truth. Dulles and Spector worked to come up with one conclusion and one conclusion only. Oswald acted alone and there was no conspiracy. And the only way to ensure that would be the final conclusion was to exclude all other evidence.

Shenon fails to say that Frazier reported Oswald slept in that morning - failed to say that LHO & JFK had each had brand new babies but JFKs had died; and both were Catholic - whole country knew of the tragedy - fails to say that DPD Chief Curry wrote in 1969 that he could never put the weapon in the kid's hands. Shenon fails to say that Ruby begins stalking Oswald Friday afternoon

In the Book of Revelations it says; 'There will be a great deception in the last days'. 'Satan will appear like Christ'. Here, you have a perfect example.

Food for thought: Mr. Oswald said that he ate his lunch on the first floor and then went to the second floor break room to get a Coke from the vending machine. His co-workers Charles Givens, William Shelley, Eddie Piper, and Carolyn Arnold were on the first floor with Oswald in the “Domino room.” They all said that Mr. Oswald ate his lunch with them and then went upstairs to the second floor break room to get a Coke. Motorcycle policeman Marrion Baker and building superintendent Roy Truly both saw Lee Oswald in the second floor break room drinking a Coke. Victoria Adams and Sandra Styles were on the fourth floor when President Kennedy was shot. They saw Jackie Kennedy in her bright pink clothes moving around in the car. They immediately hurried down the stairs after the shooting took place. Dorothy Gardner was also on the fourth floor. She saw Victoria Adams and Sandra Styles hurry down the stairs and shortly thereafter she saw Officer Marrion Baker and Roy Truly run up the stairs. According to the Warren Report Lee Oswald ran down these stairs from the sixth floor after killing the president. According to the testimony of NINE people the Warren Report is a LIE! The testimony of NINE people back up Lee Oswald’s testimony. He was accused of killing John Kennedy and J.D. Tippits, but the paraffin test conducted by the Dallas police PROVED that Mr. Oswald had NOT fired a gun. With the testimony of nine people and no gun powder residue on his hands or face any judge would have released Lee Oswald after hearing this evidence. That is why Lee Oswald was murdered so quickly. His death prevented this evidence from being presented in a court of law. You can look up the names of all of these people and read their stories for yourself. A coup took place when JFK was murdered! People in our government KILLED the President of the United States and people in our government covered it up. The Mainstream News Media still maintains that Lee Oswald killed JFK all by himself. Another coup took place recently. Joe Biden became president through some very elaborate cheating. The Mainstream News Media said that Joe Biden won fair and square, nothing to see here, let’s move on! Just as the Warren Report was a lie everything that Mainstream News Media says is a LIE! Our corrupt government breaks the law everyday and controls our corrupt news media. We are in an awful situation in this country! The lies never end! What can We the People do? This corruption has gone on for many years and continues to take place. What can we do?

The author's first assertion that the evidence points to Oswald is wrong. Next...

Naval pathologists knew they had limited experience and had the chief Army forensic pathologist Dr. Pierre Finke assist in the autopsy.

He was barely a Sharpshooter by only 1 point I was a expert By 10 to 20 I was a Rifle Range instructor in the military and still that fast and hit all target All Gunmen were all shooting the same time

The answer to whether Oswald shot Kennedy is hiding in plain sight. It therefore requires thinking about it two or three times, rather than skimming past; so THINK. You are Oswald. You either did or didn't kill President Kennedy, and that afternoon only YOU know for sure. If you didn't, then why are you in handcuffs? If you did, then what were your motivations, and what is your mindset as you are now caught? They take you in front of that "show up" room filled with reporters, and one of the reporters asks, "Did you kill the President?" Oswald says, "No, no one has said that to me," or similar words. He actually looks surprised and then he looks PISSED. (go find the footage) THEN he says, "I'm just a Patsy". You can actually WATCH Oswald's mind in that footage. Now just think about it. If you just killed the President, you're either going to want to be famous for getting rid of a guy you hate, OR you're going to deny it with some preconceived story. After all, you've just planned and pulled off the assassination of the President. Oswald has nothing prepared. All that he has to offer is what he thinks or KNOWS is the truth- So he says: "I'm just a Patsy". One more thing, and although you might think it meaningless, it is not. In 1963, NO man is going to easily call themselves a "Patsy". Oswald is going to say, "I was at work". Or "I was at lunch". Why the hell would he jump right to "I'm just a Patsy", anyway? Now you've got to answer more questions- "Who do you think set you up then?" "Why would anyone do that to you Oswald?" AND, you are de-facto implying that you ARE somehow related to this horrific crime. Nope. It all suddenly dawned on Oswald at that "Police show-up" thing with the press, and he blurted out what came to his mind. Two days later they made sure he didn't have the chance to answer those last two questions.

THIS GUY SAYS THE 3 SHOTS WOULD BE EASY????????!!!!!!!!

Oswald was just a patsy like he said he was. He was framed. JFK's autopsy was a total fraud.

At the very least, what a cool and calculated fellow this Phillip is.

Is this about finding answers or is it about selling books?

Well I made it 3:59. They were given the conclusion they had to only disclose evidence to bolster that end result. Bravo👏

Anything that comes out of a New York Times associate is either the party line or total fabrication. This guy obviously buys the magic bullet theory and ignores the exculpatory evidence that shows at least 4 different groups had a solid motive to have JFK murdered.

The Zapruder film that we see has been 'doctored'. Why alter the film if Oswald was a 'lone nut'?

34;30 His discussion of Oswald's presumed marksmanship and his assessment of the Mannlicher-Carcano, which could not even be fired in the condition it was found, is baloney. They couldn't duplicate the shots.

It's really not a reasonable position to back the Warren Commission's official version. Every part of this case, has at the very least, an element of doubt about it. If you accept that almost any case will have some anomalies then it would be reasonable, but alas, there is a mountain of aspects that contain serious doubt - and quite simply, you'd have to have some sort of pre-existing agenda to dismiss that amount of contradictory evidence (a few to wit: witnesses who heard shots from the grassy knoll, Oswald's intelligence connections, Ruby's connections, the misidentification of the Mauser/Carcano, Oswald on the second floor, LHO being driven away in a rambler, the shambolic autopsy, the casket being different in Dallas, the timing of the shots, the head of JFK going back and to the left, the acoustic evidence, the unlikely nature of the single bullet theory and many, many more.) All of these individually could be debated and ultimately dismissed but it's just silly to dismiss them all, in fact, it would be bizarre given the massive amount.

photo’s of Oswald in Mexico City ? Source ? The photos of oswald at the embassy was not oswald .

It is still very relevant, because it changed the course of history. It is important that the people are told the truth of that awful event.

If Oswald was such a good shot, how did he manage to miss the other guy he shot at the months before the assassination? That guy was a sitting target, not moving in a car.

Thanks for sharing this with Teresa 💪

THEY SHOULD HAVE LET DALLAS COUNTY CORONER, EARL F. ROSE PERFORM THE AUTOPSY, HE HAD EXPERIENCE DEALING WITH GUNSHOT WOUNDS. THIS WOULD HAVE STOPPED ANY CHANCE OF A COVER UP AND PROVEN WHETHER OR NOT THEIR WAS A CONSPIRACY.

With all the dis-information all we have is assumptions. You know what happens when you assume.

Not true, this is horrible!

Howard Brennan timeline doesn't add up regarding police radio descriptions of "Oswald," let alone that Brennan described the rifle as a "Winchester." M

She said they recommended to Jackie to get an autopsy because her husband had been the victim of a crime but just a couple of hours earlier they hosed off all the blood of the limousine destroying the crime scene... I call horseshit

I've had to revise my original opinion, as it became plausible to me he went to the theater to connect with someone, possibly to help him leave the country to Cuba. The "patsy" claim does suggest he had co-conspiritors. I'm troubled by the conflicting early statements of the rifle being a Mauser, then a Carcano. The fact no "curtain rods" were found, on one hand, and the fact that the package he carried hardly seemed long enough for an assembled Carcano. A reassembled Carcano might explain the badly missed first shot, which may have grazed the light post arm arching over the route, and subsequently hit the curb and the man's cheek by the underpass. The scope misalignment might have accounted for that and adjusted for by a good shot. Recent analysis couldn't find a graze on the light arm. How LHO might have successfully removed all gun powder is a question. I don't know the factuality of the claim about the rifle being taken to the morgue where agents pressed his palm on the stock. The angle in the window suggests the shooter had to be left handed to swing far enough to the right for the last shot. But the eye witness docs who saw the small hole at his upper right scalp line and a gaping hole at the rear, brain matter on the trunk but little in the seats, these points certainly have to bring a question of a second shooter into the realm of tenability.

A police officer by the last name of Baker heard a shot from the book depository. He looked up and saw a rifle barrel poking out a window. The rifle was quickly pulled inside the building. Officer Baker ran into the building and spotted a Mr. Truly. Apparently he knew Mr. Truly and ordered him to accompany him on his journey into the building. They ran up the stairs and in the 2nd floor break room they spotted a man walking away from them holding a bottle of Coke a Cola in his hand. Officer Baker asked Mr. Truly, “Who’s that man?” The man turned around and Mr. Truly said, “Why that’s Lee Oswald, one of our employees.” Officer Baker said, “OK!” Then they ran up the stairs to the other floors. Three female employees were on the 4th floor looking out the window when they heard the shots. Because of the trees blocking their view they couldn’t see what happened, but they feared the worse. Two of those ladies immediately went downstairs to the 2nd floor break room. Who did they find in that break room drinking a coke? It was Lee Oswald. Four witnesses could place Lee Oswald in the 2nd floor break room just a few seconds after JFK was shot. Had Oswald shot the president he would have to have ran past those ladies to get to the break room since there was only one set of stairs in the building and the Freight elevator was not working at the time. The “Powers that be” had two kill Oswald quickly because these 4 witnesses could prove that he was innocent. This author obviously left this important piece of historical evidence out of his book because in his opening remarks he is blaming Oswald. This author is either deliberately misrepresenting the truth or he was too stupid to find it! Either way his book is a waste of time and so is this video!🙄

Anyone who believes the single bullet theory cannot analyze information well

The fact that he can claim with a straight face that Oswald and probably Oswald alone, assassinated Kennedy, quite apart from being depressing in itself, gives me good reason to guess that his book on the 9/11 Commission goes a similar way......

Allegedly, LBJ had something on Warren, following is a quote from Russ Bakers “Family of secrets” in the chapter about the Warren report : Page 46, LBJ in a taped phone conversation with Senator Richard Russell, “ Warren told me he wouldn’t,t chair the commission under any circumstances...he came down here and told me no-twice.And I just pulled out what (FBI Director) Hoover told me about a little incident in Mexico City..And he started crying and he said: I won’t turn you down, I’ll do whatever you say.........nothing to do with starting WW3 !!

19:30: "What questions would the autopsy photo's have answered, especially in the light of fact that the single bullet theory is so persuasive?" Persuasive, your mother. What a clowns

This guy is a mouth piece for the government.

Why in the heck didn't you record the introductions or beginnings of a bunch of these videos???

To explain the magic bullet theory, we have to ignore the doctor who said the neck shot entered from the front, we have to believe that the bullet did not enter jfk's back but 8" higher where Ford just moved it and that Connelly was sitting about 18" to the left where no seat wa and that for some reason the bullet ended up on JFK's stretcher instead of Connelly's leg. .

Wasn't photos of Oswald in Mexico City proved to not be him or even look like him very much? That I thought was a false bit of evidence dropped on him to complete his cut out work of being the actual assassin.

They were trying to get a fast moving strain of cancer by way of mexico to someone to kill Castro

But was it the Warren Commisson's fault? They were at the mercy of the FBI and the CIA for key information, and the CIA in particular kept important information from them.

Three Commissioners disagreed with the single-bullet theory... that seems to be forgotten. Their names were Richard Russell, Hale Boggs and Sherman Cooper. Even Allen Dulles was known to have been less than impressed. The reason: The testimony of Gov. John Connally and his wife Nellie, both testified that the bullet that hit Connally was AFTER Kennedy had already been hit. Yet they still went along with the idea that there was a single shooter, when the evidence they had required more than one shooter. It seems that was dismissed. That alone makes the Warren Commission flawed and more a political document than anything else.

what joke.

More systematic misinformation. The apologists for the Warren Cover-Up never quit. But now too much has come out. We now have enough information to know it was a massive conspiracy and that it was covered up by people in the very top echelon of the government. They are still holding back evidence. We must continue to DEMAND full release of the documents they continue to hide,

🎯. The “Wise Men” did what they were asked to do, here, and again and again.

There were witnesses that saw one or two shots hit the street behind the limo, they were ignored, a man considered to be the best sniper in the world at the time, could not duplicate the three shots in the time frame using the piece of junk rifle that was supposed to have been used and the scope was off, other experts tried and failed also, only years later under very controlled circumstances was anyone able to. Oswald was not a good shot, other soldiers said he had maggies drawers, a lousy shot and his scores show it, if Oswald wanted fame etc, why did he deny it? He was a double agent and knew what was going on but not a shooter, he was set up, one or two others shot from behind and one from the front, the carcano was planted, it was a Coup D'etat, LBJ gave the ok, the CIA carried it out with help from the mob. If you want a good rundown, read The JFK Asassination Evidence Handbook by Mike Davis

Why does Oswald say he is just a “patsy”? What did he mean by this? Doesn’t this suggest a conspiracy? Oswald was a very average marksman, could ge have pulled off those shots?

Are these guys FOR REAL???? This whole thing is RIDICULOUS and should be categorized as SATIRE!!!! At 32:04, this guy says "THE 9/11 COMMISSION", when he meant to say WARREN COMMISSION!!!! People, watch here on YT, either "James Fetzer JFK at 50, Who, How, Why" or "Everything is a Rich Man's Trick."

Also, look at what Russ Baker has to say about Poppy Bush, big oil interests & the fact that JFK had threatened to disband the CIA (deep state) George W H,s natural home, oh yeh & Dulles had been fired by the President & was on the commission, are you kiddin me ? The commission was a cover up not an investigation !!

I never believed that Oswald did it, no one that I knew at the time or anyone I ever met believed tha Oswald did it. Oswald had to die before any court. He was shot dead in The Dallas Police HQ by the head of Dallas Mafia. always described by the media as a Nightclub owner, which he was also.

He “settled” issues. Frankly think he served a superior intent. Blanket accounting for the lack of historical evidence in an historiographic fashion, attempted to position this book apart from the “lot”, as an impartial review. Note the answer on the credibility of past officials after 41:36. Also body language at 19:00, and the condescending account on Stone’s film.

Thanks for sharing this with Teresa

Trump says LBJ now in hell. What does he know on LBJ that public can't know ?

That they didn't have the best autopsy experts performing the autopsy along with the parkland doctors there and instead they had doctors who never done gunshot autopsies before tells everything.

So were the x-ray doctored since Warren adored the Kennedy family?

Everybody should read that book It is a great work for history and of history Thank you for having dedicated 5 years of your life achieving that great document

Does the Secret Service agent saying that he found the Magic Bullet on the rear seat of the limo and that he's the one that placed it on the stretcher, change your view of the Magic Bullet/Lone gunman theory?

DID this guy get his info from the warren commission? I just read that Oswald was on the 2nd floor of the book building, not the 5th. A witness confirmed that she was in the stair case and saw No one coming down the stairs. The cop that Oswald alledgedly killed had bullets that did not match Oswalds little gun. Oswald may have had some problems with government but I don't think he was able to make a gun shoot from the 5th floor (which witnesses say the shot did not come from that building) when Oswald was on the 2nd floor. Then all the BS that went on at the hospital for the autopsie, the Drs were kept away, And the mysterious bullet that hit the curb that Dallas police have that section of curb in evidence that the Warren Commission deny the shot happened... NOTHING MAKES SENSE out of the Warren Commission. Then the facts about the possibility that Then Vice Pres Johnson was behind it with overwhelming facts of how and why he was involved. The bottom line is they say the Gov was directly involved with the assassination. This guy is full of......... nonsense.

Watched convincing videos to the effect that Oswald was a trained decoy and that there had to be another shooter due to the injury. There are interviews with folks who attest that the windshield was replaced that showed that and so on. What do you think of this kind of material?

What is the name of the book and the last name of the author?

Harvey Oswald Shoots kennedy from behind but Kennedy lunges BACKWARD when hit …. REALLY???

The researcher Mae Brussel read every employment record of everyone at the school book depository and all of the local businesses owned by the book depository. ZAPRUDER FILM was changed as discovered by Stone and General Prouty.

The Genovese storyline being blown out of proportion, so I guess we’ve been exposed to fake news for a much longer time than we thought. What’s more surprising about the bullets is why one remains relatively intact and another one of the same manufacture fragments into many small pieces. If you’re interested in a more logical version,get the book “Mortal Error “. Oswalds ‘s role with a tragic accident with a subsequent coverup,which fuels all of the conspiracies.

The mob whacked JFK along with CIA

So the government wants us to believe that Lee somehow missed an easy - unhurried - simple shot on a stationary target from 75 feet (with nobody around) on April 10 and he hits a moving target twice (once in the head) when there is a large crowd watching and only having seconds to accomplish it from about 250 feet away...As if

NY Times = Coverup. Arlen Specter highly worth praise. Absolute BS. Not worth watching this.

It is true that they are wrong on how the plot went down and who was involved, but interesting in their discussion of the various personnel in the investigation. Especially in the mishandling and destruction of evidence that turned promising paths of inquiry into dead ends. Evidence should be safeguarded for future investigation when new techniques are found and new information developed as is done by your local Agencies. This video is an example of investigation run amok and tainted by incompetence

Where is the question of VP Johnson’s involvement???

Lt Cmdr William Spitzer took CCTV of autopsy. See his story on Spartacus educational website. Other honest medical staff at Bethesda was Dennis Davis on same website. Paul O'Connor on LHO mock trial explains brain removal. O'Connor was rather cryptic.