A 20 year old boy was somehow able to get onto a roof and is able to point a rifle at a former president and presidential candidate from a distance of 120 meters whilst the audience is shouting to police and security pointing it out and they ignore them. La La land.
Our eyes are not lying to us, numerous witnesses saw the Assassin and we saw the videos as well. Where the f**k did Adler come from? He has a mouthful of words to say very little.
Please can David Adler not be invited on again? He's totally useless. He managed to say nothing of substance, whilst also coming across as ludicrously partisan and a peddler of conspiracy theories.
why is the American guy rejecting a stat because he doesn't like it without coming up with a counter statistic to show his thinking on the subject ? the stat maybe 100% wrong but we have to have a basis for scepticism
@@briskyoungploughboy sure but i think we have to be saying shit yes we should not be doing this kind of shit ever not i dont believe your stats when we dont like them
To his credit, the host here is at least trying to say 'hang on, there are questions raised about the security services and the shooter here' and the idiot guest keeps putting his fingers in his ears and going "conspiracy theories, conspiracy theories!'
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts" - Sherlock Holmes/Sir Author Conan Doyle
This idea that puberty blockers didn't exist in the past so why do we need it now, is like saying we don't need cancer treatment because we lived without it in the past. Sometimes, taking something away is worse than having never had it. The 80s, 90s, 00s were a time when "man in a dress" jokes were rife. Surviving was the task. And treatment in adolescence for many people felt like a pipe-dream. Having actually felt the some of that positive change only to have it snatched away is beyond cruel in my opinion. If I had a trans kid I would be leaving the country as we speak.
He wasnt bullied at school that has been debunked. The kid talking wanted his 15 minutes of fame. He never knew him and was years below in the school. Take note of the large person in the pink top (his friend) next to the liar saying bullied - he is very uncomfortable and avoids saying the lies. Ghee what a world
Talkin' round the houses these two or WHAAAT! 🤔 If someone is already on a hormonal or hormonal blocker (means to an end) medication, NO WAY they should suddenly be deprived of it!! Personally I opted for three monthly di-peptyl injections for two years to further my treatment. The injections are used to reduce the hormonal function of certain Cancer sufferers originally ie. regarding the Prostate gland. These injections stop all hormones from respective cis gender patients and the desired gender hormone is then prescribed so there is no hormonal battle raging in said patients thus relieving dysphoria. That's the theory. It certainly worked okay with me. Years of never ending hanging around for physical and psychological change was achieved in just a few months. Saying all that, I am not a pre-pubescent minor but as far as medical safety goes for such treatments I believe it's safe, that is from my own experience. To me the real issue or question that this podcast raises is.. Are these people calling the shots pushing them for medical reasons or for political ones? I suspect it's the latter. Ohh, and another thing, as for the opinion that there has suddenly been a rise in numbers of trans-gender dysphoric individuals in recent years due to there being more diversity..? What utter poppycock! There have always been people of that ilk and number through the ages, they literally had two choices.. Live in denial or in secret (Cripes! Look how feminine the styles for men were back in the day.. Robin Hood in tights ffs, Robespierre in wigs.. it's even going on in the courts right now! The other choice dysohoric souls had was the assylums. ☹ My ❤ goes out to them. Inshallah 🙏
Puberty blockers have been used for many decades with cisgender children undergoing precocious puberty and cisgender youth with hormonal disorders with absolutely no hand wringing about the safety of the medication. It only became a problem when the public became aware of their use with transgender youth. It is absolutely political and not medical
Guest spends first 3 minutes telling us that there's lots of different opinions in the world today. Spices this bore burger up with a few sprinkles of "kaleidoscopic" but it only helps the bland sound annoying and bland now. Can't speak a sentence without his eyebrows nearly flying off his face. What is this BS?
As Someone From Western Pennsylvania, You Need To Understand "Law Enforcement" In Pennsylvania. The Outside Of The Perimeter Was Supposed To Be Guarded By "Local Police". Most Local Departments Outside Of Major Cities, Like Philly Or Pittsburgh, Are Very Small, Like "Mayberry" In The "Andy Griffith Show", With Only A Handful Of Cops. Most "Local Policing" Is By The Pennsylvania State Police. Even Municipalities With Police, The State Police Patrol In Off Hours (In My Town, With Only 3 Cops, The State Police Patrol From 10pm -8am).
Why are you even talking about policing in Pennsylvania? Your explanation of "Law Enforcement" is just pointing out how you find your local police department smaller than average? Also, what is it with the excessive capitalisation?
The fact That Cass didn't consult with these services in the UK and Europe should tell us how prejudiced the Cass Review was. She did visit the US though and met with anti-trans groups, its disgusting.
She throw out dozens of studies for not being rigorous enough, based on not using unethical and impractical methodology, and then heavily relied on retracted and heavily criticised studies which aren’t accepted by anyone but anti-trans cranks
@@MetalSamantha it's just outrageous. Am I correct that she basically threw out studies that didn't include 'double-blind' analysis.....when a study of that kind would be beyond unethical and/or impossible?
I hope this is the case. However, with all the half truths and conspiracy theories flying around it's important to verify any info. Do you have a source for this please?
The Day of this alleged donation is also strange- Jan 20 '21? The very day Biden was sworn into office? Kinda like the donation equivalent to closing the barn door after the horses have already gone?
@@ryanfraser167 you really don’t understand sarcasm do you. On top of that Trumps wall didn’t stop anyone from getting over it either. 1. They climbed over it. 2. They cut through it. 3. The tunnelled under it. 4. It fell down on its own because Trumps shady friends can’t build $hit. Not only that his mate Bannon defrauded the cult of money for a wall he knew he couldn’t build and was caught living it up on a yacht, then Trump pardoned him! Still they follow him, he really does like the poorly educated.
@@ZER0--I think the main point trump had was she's happy to protect herself and her own but not the rest of the country... The wall is a deterrent, not a solution.
Adler is biased, a little manipulative (keeping on trying to suggest that Trump injured himself without actually espousing that theory), and says a whole lot of nothing
That correct. Thomas Matthew Crooks was 17 years old at the time. In America you're not allowed to make a political donation until you are 18 years old.
It was him. He donated to ActBlue to get his vote counted in a spam email. Source is Majority Report 15th July 2024. Sorry I don't have a time stamp. They may have clipped it by now. @casparrii
They say we should be following the bible... okay: "And I saw one of his heads as if it had been mortally wounded, and his deadly wound was healed. And all the world marveled and followed the beast." Revelations- Chapter 13; Verse 3
The Cass Review is complete and utter bollocks, and should not be the basis of anything at all As a trans young person in the 90s I can promise you that I did *not* “manage ok” and that’s my answer to that one. I had a complete mental breakdown due to my dysphoria
@@anonnymous4684 for some it was. Same thing goes for people going through with the surgery. Like Chole Cole for example. She didn't do it for fashion.
It is disturbing how so many people are conned in to investing so much emotion in to clown circus politics, opposition politics divides the human mind, the wise remove the 'feelings' and follow rationality.
@@dbarker7794one party owned by corporate money and Israel. Another party owned by corporate money and Israel. Only one party will kneel for a photo op while voting against the people's interests
Southgate is one of the best managers England has had since 1966! When was the last time England got so far in any football cup season or European cup? Give the geezer a break. Maybe by some miracle, they might win next time but don’t blame Southgate for England’s inadequacies! England has been on a losing streak before Southgate was born !!!
I've felt like I was being gaslit for the past few weeks reading online commentary about Southgate. I'm ignorant about football, and even I could tell some games weren't that great for the team, but the simple fact is, under Southgate, we kept winning and made it to the final - *again*!!! How can anyone possibly talk about him going?
Look at the team he’s had, and look at what hodgson had to deal with. The truth is Southgate doesn’t bring the best out of these objectively world class players. You’ll see when he returns to club football, that Southgate is not very good
@@thegoat11111 " Last night he played defensive after Palmer equalised" Did he? The only times a football manager gets to greatly influence a game a football whilst it's being played is by making substitutes and giving a team talk (at half time or during extra time). What substitutes did Southgate make after the Palmer goal? Only one, taking off Foden for Toney, which is not a defensive substitution. What killed England's game was the desire to keep kicking long during goal kicks, which clearly wasn't working but the team persisted with it anyway. We gave away so much possession from these goal kicks. This may have been part of the strategy that Southgate had before the game, but it clearly wasn't something that changed after Cole Palmer's goal.
Armchair critics! England may have lost a game but they came second in a European championship…..why is everyone so obsessed with an entitlement to something we’ve not won in 58 yrs. Get real. If we stopped this ‘it’s coming home’ obsession it would take the pressure off and they’d have more chance of winning….. Thank you Gareth for proving we have a team of worthy finalists, and congratulations to the Lions for a silver medal performance.
@@blablah538the term American is ambiguous. If you’re talking specifically about someone from the USA, what do you call them? A United Statesean? US American makes the most sense.
@@Spengleman2 you're suggesting that saying "Americans" most often means all people from North and South America? You do you, boo. I'll be over here with the normal people and the normal meetings of things.
I think it's important that whenever we talk about the findings of the Cass report that no experts were involved in compiling the report. They were concerned about bias, so they excluded experts (yet included people with known anti-trans politics). What other medical review has ever excluded experts? Would you trust a review of a heart medication that excluded all cardiologists from producing the review?
That's not true. The Cass Review had input from 102 professionals, including GPs, paediatricians, psychiatrists and psychologists, including a Gender Specialist. Over half of these professionals rated themselves as on the more gender-affirmative side of spectrum. The fact the other contingent defined themselves as more cautious on gender-affirmation isn't a conspiracy, but their considered medical opinion. Personally, I'd want a consultant to exercise some skepticism before artificially arresting a tween's natural puberty for purely psychological reasons. God forbid you say that to a member of the Novarati tho', they'll want to take your kids away.
@@camdencobain1460 Kids must be allowed to advocate for themselves, blocking puberty is reversible and is still used with kids to prevent precocious puberty and for other conditions such as cancer, there's no reason trans youth shouldn't have the right to block their puberty until they are old enough to make a choice what puberty they want to go through.
@camdencobain1460 16 trans kids have died on NHS waitlists, without treatment, in a 3 year period. That's dead children. Still want to deny treatment to others?
@@queenvagabond8787you can make an argument for the use of a medication, but you can't make it based on "it's used for this pathology, so it must be safe and appropriate to use on a healthy body" because that's not how it works. Stopping a 6yo from having precocious puberty until an age appropriate for their growth, and stopping a 11 yo from having a normal puberty at the appropriate age so that they can have it when they are almost adults, is not the same and doesn't have the same effects on the body or mind. As for cancer, it's a ridiculous argument considering most of the therapies available are "let's destroy your cells and hope the cancer gets destroyed as well". There isn't a single medication that you could sell me by saying "they use it for cancer too".
American exceptionalism on display in Pennsylvania! What are my brothers and sisters across the pond really thinking about the American political apparatus? Would you trade your system for ours? Or is it the same soup just in a different bowl?
Would it be possible to do primaries for a party's candidate for a constituency in a parliamentary system instead of having some central office select them? Primaries are much more small-d democratic in theory than in practice, but they're one of the very few features of the US system that I prefer over the UK
@@uncleogrimacy All parties in democracies get to choose their own leader. There's is too many trolls in the public to leave it to us but it would make for a more entertaining political sphere, not necessarily a functioning one.
@@fry_me I wasn't referring to the macro scale party but rather within a constituency Feels like it would be more democratic for the party members within a constituency to select their MP candidate rather than counting on party bosses to choose one for them, especially if it's a reward for being a good backer
What is wrong with that guy? What is his expertise? He speaks so well for someone that doesn’t seem to have a firm grasp of reality. I’m not that old but some younger people are beginning to trip me out. Too much time in front of screens or something.
Prime Minister Truss. "Once a Prime Minister, always a Prime Minister, always a dear Prime Minister, always a beloved Prime Minister. Regardless of party affiliation" 🤪
No mention that hormone blockers have been used for years and years by "children", the information exists that they're not "dangerous" if following prescriptions. This was all covered really well (IMO) by SciShow on YT recently, with the video title: Actually Understand Hormone Replacement Therapy
Just wondering when Novara is going to do a video on Labour calling for a ceasefire in Gaza in just it's second week in office. It's also stated in willingness to recognise the state of Palestine. All I've heard the last year is their genocidal position while being on the opposition benches which no one else in world politics actually cared about.
Policy hasn't altered, legal challenges to arrest of Netanyahu are still being backed, Labour's cabinet is stacked with candidates amenable to the interests of Labour Friends of Israel. Palestine has not been recognised by Labour nor will it be. Labour had already called for a ceasefire publicly but they did so four months months after the genocide had been initiated. In private Labour are continuing to back arms sales to Israel and are not placing any material financial or legal pressure on Israel to alter their policy. Their signalling on 'Ceasefire' talking point is fuelled by their justifiable anxiety about their mirage majority with lots of pro-gaza marginals now factoring into public relations conversations.
Unfortunately my responses are being deleted so I have no defence to your argument. For the record I'm a Novara media fan. Their downstream interviews are brilliant but I find their political positions often short sighted and patronising. We on the left need solutions to problems not a moral high tower to hurl our grievances at the people down below.
David Adler has for a long time appeared on this show and is always articulate and insightful - especially on international and specific Latin American politics. The comments are not reflective of his skill or intelligence. He was verbose this episode, but a great contributor. Come back David Adler!
No, it is correct to call Trump the Former President and his title is Former President Trump. Personally I never put Trump and the word President in the same sentence.
I do think we have to be careful of private (for-profit) providers and what are still unproven medications not just according the cass review but Swedish, Finnish, French... medical academies and researchers. It would be nice for you to interview some people that are not just private providers. I"m not a fan of streeting at all, and an outright ban is not what the cass review said either, but can we please stop pretending this issue, as it relates to drugs, puberty, science, health, private-health industries, and many more players.... isn't more complex
Its pretty simple for trans youth, I can reassure you. They want to be listened to, they want the right to block puberty if they wish to give them time to consider their options. Also puberty blockers are already used safely on kids for precocious puberty and cancer.
Nah you're not allowed to have a nuance approach with complex things like this Either your 100% onboard with for profit companies & activists or you're a bigot Just remember to ignore historical examples such as for profit companies lying about research with smoking once considered safe & burning fossil fuels had no impact on the environment according to the science Or more applicable long term health side affects not being known until later See asbestos or radium both perfectly safe so long as you don't look beyond a decade
So the cass review says there isn’t enough long term data. Then you present a study that had a duration of 7 months, but puberty blockers take months to have effect. Unbelievably low quality partisan journalism there. If the cass review said what you wanted you’d be behind it in an instant.
If you know anything about such protections you know that every roof, window, and path is marked and blocked snd driones are employed at every outside event.
Some are saying h'e's a n'eo fas'cist tho as a socialist gen z i kinda agree and didn't agree so... yes autho'ritarian yea i can agree but the fas'cist part is a little more conplex
Just another "Human Error" accident study. Classic Swiss Cheese model. Security Theatre vs Expectations of perfection. All made less comprehensible by instant media.
He got very defensive about the suggestion that political violence by the left should be as much as 11% of overall political violence. Tbh, I would expect it to be more given the old adage that politics is a sport for the wealthy but life or death for the poor. Which side is more likely to think "if things don't change, I'm screwed!"? So I don't trust that statistic in that I expect the percentage that is left is probably higher. Then again, Americans have strange ideas about what right and left mean.
It's sooo annoying how you refer to President as "ex-presedent" instead of Former President, as you as a native English speaker😢should know all too well.