I bought a canon T7I and quickly upgraded to the R10 probably close to a year and a half ago. Bought an RF50mm and upgraded to a sigma 24-70 f2.8 also fairly quick and just recently bought a 30mm f1.4 from sigma. I’d recommend it all of it to anyone just depends what you wanna do.
Hello! I would like to develop photography and videography skills. I want to be able to capture beautiful moments with family and friends. I also want to be able to do photography, and videography as a side gig/hussle. I’m more of a buy once cry once kind of man. Could you recommend me a camera from either sony or canon that will take me far before I have to upgrade?
@@yesnomaybeso5755 Full frame: Canon RP, Sony A7IV (get an EF lens-Sony E or canon RF mount adapter APSC: Canon R50, R10, Sony A6500/ZvE10 (get an EF lens-camera mount adapter) MFT(very best for video): LUMIX GH5II, LUMIX GH6 Get native MFT lenses
@@F59PHIand for taking pictures of clothes in an urban area? It’s because I own a clothing brand and I would like to know which one is better for this field.
Well this is a very good camera for beginners. R50 would be enough or even a DLSR like 250D/SL3. But of course this would be a good choice. Just not so budget-friendly for many.
Any camera is good for portraits if it's paired with a large aperture lens. If you just want a camera under $1500, I'd recommend the Sony A6700. But then, of course, nothing beats Canon color science.
Dang i would never be able to afford this, i just bought a 60D body and borrowed my friends "helios" lens (old analog camera lens) and i gotta say it's enough for me
@@DelaneyMedia A few months later but I'm interested in the r50 because of its features which would satisfy me as well as the low price. How does it compare and is it worth the $500 or so gap?
does anyone have any recommendations for a cheaper but good quality camera? I mostly take nature pics, i live in washington (marsh. Lotssss of marsh). But also hiking in the mountains. If any features seem especially good for those sceneries of if i’m just being dumb lol.
Canon R50 and R100 weren’t out when I made this video but they’re both good options. If you need cheaper than those, I’d recommend trying your luck with an older DSLR on the used market
So specific. Think it's more based on the lens than the camera. You would want a F1.4 or F1.8. Unless you are looking for which cameras high ISO looks best.
Will it be a big change if i replace the canon d1300d with the canon r10, i will add that i am intermediate and want to photograph birds, animals and sometimes landscapes and some portraits
for birds and animals the R10 is the better pick over the R or RP But i would rather go directly for the R7, so what the R10 should have been, or go full budget line with R50 (or really live with a R/RP)
Yes any camera is better than a phone. Think about it. Your supper small 1cm lens ( yes has like 64MP) but its not really 64MP like a real camera. If your very small sensor was the same or better than a real camera. Why wouldn't the make cameras smaller. So Yes a Camera is better than a phone.
Depends… on most cameras there’s a recording limit of 30min even though your SD card still has plenty of storage. They usually do it for overheating purposes.
Not a formal comparison video. I use my R6 every day, so when I noticed the cheaper R10 can do some things even it can’t do, I wanted to point them out
Here's how you know the person doing the review is just trying to get views on RU-vid : Reviewer : "Here is a reason why you should get the R10 over the R6" Question : "what did you use to shoot this video?" Reviewer: "The R6"
@willoughbykrenzteinburg R10 is a much better option for beginners over a more expensive camera. I’m not a beginner. If my goal was to make money don’t you think I’d be pushing the more expensive option?
@@DelaneyMedia uh....no. You're not making money when someone is Kansas goes out and buys a camera because of anything you said in a youtube video. The hell are you talking about?
@@DelaneyMedia Hi,Can we take pictures with body only without any lens.Are pictures good with this or definitely need lens for taking pictures.I am beginner and want to with this, requirement nature and family photos.plz reply or suggest whether to with this camera with body or any other camera.
Spending less than this (i.e Canon Rebel T5) will give you results comparable to most fairly recent smartphones. If at least $800 is out of the budget, I just recommend people use whatever phone they have.
Too expensive Only if you can profit from the APS-C sensor and more features you should look for the R10. I would recommend a 2nd hand EOS RP and adapting EF glass!
I would rather recommend the EOS RP, R7, R50, R8, R6 (Mk1 and 2) Ofc every with its downsides you either can live with or not. I personally had the EOS RP for over 2 years, but as much i LOVED this camera for basic photography, adapting old and affordable EF Full Frame glass, Astrophotography,.... as i got into wildlife and video it just had to go since it cant do animal eye autofocus, its slow in bursts (3-4 fps) plus it cant do any slowmo video at all. I was also shortly looking at the R10 (and R7), but R10 was "too bad" especially for its price and R7 was okish, but even more overpriced in my opinion. Still i got soon later the R7 instead of the R10 - just the better pick if you want to keep the camera for longer, the R10 would have felt outdated to me in the beginning already.
@@DelaneyMedia the thing is… a 2nd hand xt3 is better and cheaper than a R10. As much i would like to agree with you, the R10 is really bad value for its money
