The BIRD BRAIN Judge Call... 

That Barrier Statue is also locking out their brain

DistantCoder: Tribute summon Erebus, YES or NO? Alex41893: *proceeds to explain the entire lore and story of each of the bird, and how this deck is the best deck ever*

"Did you allow erebus yes or no?" "Bruv which answer means that i can activate stri?"

God the amount of times I have seen players arguing with a judge on DB instead of just answering yes or no is way too much, always hilarious when the judge rules against them

I respect DB judges for dealing with shit like this, holy fuck what a brick wall of a brain lol

Smartest Floowandereese player gets out of Master Duel and this happens

This whole situation is literally the Manta Ray and Patrick meme. Coder being Manta Ray and Alex being Patrick.

Honestly Floo is that 1 deck that invites people who refuses to learn the game properly to come back and ruin everyones day, it's disgusting.

I would love to see more of these judge vids even if it means they are not as fun as this one.

Do you want to see more judge call videos like this, YES or NO?

MR. Distant: Yes or no? Floo player:Why?

So dude whiffed Stri's effect by saying the opponent can just go and proceed, and then want to rollback to a state where they still have Empen and able to use Stri's effect. Like, IMO, I guess I can see that as an honest mistake but, man, the way they demand for that is definitely wild. "No you don't know what you're talking about", said the player to the judge.

The floo player's mind is still in the dueling monsters arc where you can summon blue eyes white dragon without tribute summon.

shoutout to that guy using monarchs what a gigachad

The fact that this whole video is about cl1, cl2 is hilarious

I always love the judge call videos

Coder: YES or NO?! DB Duelists: Maybe…

“I will be reporting you coder” LOL

I think in this case the floo player simply didn't know when to call stri effect and miss it. What would have been best for them is to admit they've done something wrong, and ask where they should have put stris' effect in in order to resolve it. By insisting they can, they're refusing to learn.

This is the type of stuff that makes me dread playing on DB, some people don't even know what their own cards do, I can't expect them to know what mine do, and then when they miss activation windows, they get confused

"Please explain step by step" "NO BUT I DID THING 4 STEPS LATER"

Coder: "YES or NO?!?" Alex: "But muh birb."

You know when I first came to DB I didn’t expect to get back into Yugioh so easily and my first couple of matches someone did lead me to your channel from a bit of misplays, but I don’t regret it for a second because I’m glad I found your channel when I’m in school I just wait till I see an upload from so I can watch and laugh my ass off from Master Duel Bs or DB judge calls.

"I am going to report you Coder." God, this guy really thought he was in the right?

I think the Floo player has played a little too much Floo in their lifetime to the point where their brain is as big as a pigeon.

this guy should go to an in person event for a wakeup call lol. coder is being extremely lenient by comparison

When a 14yr old takes his master duel deck to dueling book

Ayo more judge calls, let's go!

This is the most painful judge call I have ever witnessed 😅😂

This literally is the manray with patricks wallet meme

I love simulators, the system ensures the rules are being followed always. And if you play enough in a simulator you are supposed to learn the deck correctly because it only allows valid moves.

0:16 judge truly was his opponent

This is why I stick to Edopro lmao. Yes it’s automatic but that way if something happens that we didn’t expect we can read the cards to figure out why it ruled that way. It’s way easier that arguing with a judge about nothing for 20 minutes and inconveniencing everyone.

Coder: Choose A or B Player: Choose C

I missed these judge calls! Always love seeing them hope for more :D

floow players are so smart

Homie knew he was wrong, and was trynna find a way to get away with it lmao

Smartest Floowandereeze player

idk how soon he figured it out, but he definitely understood by the end. he was intentionally dodging the question to try to activate stri.

Flunder players are something else, the deck fits their asinine personality so well

He thought he was playing a floo mirror with custom card art

Coder - YES or NO? Alex41893 - The Adventurer Engine typically is comprised of 8 cards - 3 Rite of Aremisir, 3 Water Enchantress of the Temple, 1 Fateful Adventure, 1 Gryphon Rider, and 1 Dracoback. The combo is very simple, and goes like this: Enchantress searches Rite from Deck. Rite creates the token and then adds Fateful. Fateful searches Gryphon. Gryphon special summons from hand, which triggers Fateful to search Dracoback. Dracoback can be equipped to the Token. That's it. The Adventurer Engine is extremely popular because it can accomplish a lot of things for you before you commit any summons with your other deck engine. The Token itself is crazy strong with 2000ATK and 2000DEF, Dracoback bounces a card back to hand (Doesn't destroy so this removes most problem cards in the game off the board), Gryphon protects you once from anything, and Fateful additionally protects the Token from destruction once as well. It's easy to summon this, and takes a decent amount of resources to remove. Any deck that can utilize this should do so. Decks that summon often love this (such as Prank-Kids) because the Gryphon protects you from Nibiru. It also makes your opponent commit some of his hand traps to preventing Adventurer before you've begun your other main deck engine. For example, If I use Ash Blossom to prevent Enchantress from adding Rite, I lose my best interruption card for Prank-Kids. The DPE Engine is 2 Fusion Destiny, Destiny Hero Celestial, Destiny Hero Dasher, DPE himself, and Verte Anaconda. It's also extremely popular because DPE popping one card for turn is a strong effect and he is very difficult to remove, as any effects targeting DPE can result in DPE chaining its own effect to take itself off the board, only for him to return next turn. He also lowers the attack of all your opponents monsters by 400 while Celestial and Dasher are in the grave. This engine can slide into almost any deck, as long as you can make Verte with relative ease. All of this is easily facilitated by most good decks as you can summon DPE by using the effect of Verte Anaconda, an easy-to-make Link 2 monster, which copies the effect of a fusion spell in your deck. The accessibility of DPE through Verte is why we see it so consistently - I would expect its usage to drop if Verte were banned, as many players are asking for. The DPE engine is chosen over other possible fusions like Dark Dragoon because the supporting cards (FD, Celestial, Dasher) are all strong in their own right - Celestial's ability to draw 2 is incredibly useful in many scenarios, as is Dasher's special summon. Dragoon by comparison requires normal monsters with no additional usefulness to be used for its summon, and Red-Eyes Fusion itself is a bad card compared to FD as it comes with many restrictions as well. Finally, consider how all of this pairs together. Using Prank-Kids as the example again, I can use Ash to prevent the Prank-Kids combo, and the opponent can follow up with the Adventurer cards. I can interrupt this with Ghost Ogre perhaps in response to fateful adventure. My opponent can still continue if he then plays fusion destiny from the hand, and still has a good board with DPE if nothing else. Having Adventurer and DPE opens up many more lines for the decks that use them, making them Tier 1 inclusion for any deck that utilizes it well.

Difficult smooth brain players

"don't bruv" that made my day lol

very smart to argue with the judge, surely that'll make them side with you

flunder player struggling to understand how extra normal summon gain effects work 💀

Dear god, these poor db judges.

Damn like 12 midrolls? Gonna have to fire up the good ol' ad block for this one

Judge call videos are my favorite videos for sure.

Bro I almost had a brain aneurysm watching those two.

flow players brain's are inflected

Bro I couldn't be a judge someone would argue me and I would immediately say you wanna argue with me ok game loss

This judge call and the flow deez nutz 10IQ reminds me my old days when a cheater tried to argue with me that he isnt cheating,i just yeeted him a "4 screenshot ban" so he had to upload screenshots (that i made his CounterStrike take) on to forum *to show that his client side is not having cheats turned on or anything* then he gets an unban,never seen the guy again,not a single post or anything,GG :)

How the hell does someone play floo and not understand how resolving works? The entire archetype revolves around resolving on summon effects asap and interrupting chains.

HAHAHAHA MY FAVORITE TWO LINES FROM ANY PLAYER 🤣😂🤣 "Judge Please" From the dude who didn't get the loss too

When Coder is so tilted he misspelled Issue at the end.

Coder you let that shit go way longer than I would have if I was a judge 🤣

Like I feel like I am having a stroke just watching Coder deal with this. Imagine if I did do this. I would fucking self implode.

Damn, I’m just jealous you did hold my hand… I would have held it for as long as possible. Love ya Coder!! Have an awesome day!!

I just noticed a weird interaction in master duel that have dark sanctuary, and someone attacks you directly but you have checksum dragon in hand and activate it, causing a replay, dark sanctuary can still negate the attack and do damage even if they don't go through with the attack.

most intelligent flunder player

Would've been funny if after you said "Have a nice day" the guy responded with "Yes" instead of "Oh I will." lol

That loss issued was the most satisfying part.

The moment he said. IM THE TURN PLAYER. And I ALLOW IT. He made an Open gamestate thst allowed his opponent to do his play before he could. I may be a monkey but as far as understanding goes thats How it should work. If you allow it to go through, then its too late to respond. He may have the potential to win because of his cards. But he did not have the skill or Capacity to compute what he did. He could have recovered from it, but decided he didn't misplayed for not Reading his opponents stuff. Reading is OP. And Also. This is a good Reminder that Anything you say can and will be used against you Distant coder and Law enforcement Shaking hands

and then they ask why im playing only master duel

"bruv" already know this will be a certified banger

i play floo irl but even i was dumbfounded when he said summon stri then proceed. if he said summon stri then stri effect on chain resolution he would have been fine. dude called judge to either tell him how to play his deck or to correct his error so he decides to play dumb.

Looks like another day at the judges office lol.

Just your average Floowandezenuts player lmao

gosh i love thos judge call videos

Just an exploration of your average stun player's brain.

This reminds me of that SpongeBob ep where Manta Ray is trying to give Patrick his wallet back lmfaooo

6:30 that's not how i expected this to go. I was expecting the patrick star meme (You are patrick star meme)

Just declare a draw after every judge call

If you call a judge, listen to the judge, lmao.

smartest floo player

They know who they are and can speak for themselves.

You have t-shit meme right there with this video" "YES?!!! OR NO?!!!# "

Watching this gave me secondhand frustration

wouldnt have the nerve coder had, what the fuk even was that Aahhahaha

some of these calls must have coder banging his head against a wall. but imo this player must have caught the bird floo to try and argue through the process of explaining the chain summon when he already told him you can't do that. 🤣

Omfg. If I can facepalm a million times because of that Floo player, I would. Even as a returning player, I can immediately understand the issue before DC started the "yes or no" chain.

I don’t know where to go for these questions so here we go. • I chain book of moon to Mist Valley Avian. Still bounce/neg? • I steal a crystal wing synchro dragon that’s already used its effect with an enemy controller. Does it refresh for me? If not, do hard once per turns refresh since I’m a different player?

Psycho Judge Streamer man Persona 3 style

Alex41893 has a weird afliction that only allows them to see the words yes or no when they are capitalized.

God I've missed Coder judge call videos

"But Mr. Judge, if I allowed them to summon Erebus, then I would lose, so why would I do that?"

I feel physical pain watching this

This is like that Patrick meme

bro...just let him use his bird... LOL

Dear Judge, a question. Cl1 Eidos, Cl2 Map. Map Summons Stri, he has to pass to blue. Cl1 Eidos resolves. Now he chains Stri effect in new chain? I guess thats what he was about.

So after a few times watching this, here’s my read on the situation. I think red thought Eidos’s effect worked like Floos, where it causes an immediate Normal Summon. He even tributed his Empen when his opponent instructed him to. My guess is that he then reread Eidos and realized he fucked up, so he brought back Empen in an attempt to rewind the game state and use Stri. This was the dispute that caused the judge call. I think his plan was to claim that blue summoned Erebus too fast for him to use Stri, but when you pointed out that he sent Empen to the graveyard, that was no longer an option. He was forced to claim that was an accident because any other answer would likely get him slapped with a punishment for cheating. Similarly, he could not answer the question on whether or not he allowed Erebus to be summoned because neither answer would end up in his favor. If he says “yes,” then that means he allowed an open board state for blue to Tribute Summon Erebus, red won’t get Stri’s effect, and he’ll just lose. If he answers “no,” then you just point back to where red sent Empen to the bin when blue pointed at it, implying that he did allow the Tribute Summon, which puts him in a losing position AND gets him punished for lying to a judge. The only way red could get out of this was to dodge the question and play dumb, perhaps in hopes that you’d say “Oh, he’s a beginner. No worries, I’ll allow take backsies. I know I shouldn’t assign malice to what could be explained with ignorance, but the way red answered the yes/no questions suggests to me that he knows damn well where he fucked up and that he’s using a judge to try and cover for his mistake. I get the feeling he should’ve been given a more severe punishment-if not for that call, then for the future.

"im sorry, thats no ass..." proceeds to correcct his "accident" lol

-YES or NO!? -Bruv 🤣🤣🤣

Maybe it was cut out, but coder does what a lot of judges do where they give a rulling and either give a very high level explanation for the reason why something works like x or no explanation at all. I think as judges we need to take better steps to actually give simple explanations to why we are rulling the way we are. Explaining how he said "proceed" at the end of the monarchs resolution passes priority to their opponent, and since theres nothing that activates after that and they passed priority they have missed the activation window of their floo card

The constant use of a comma instead of an apostrophe is actually making me sick.

"bruv"

Just before this he took my call lol. He had branded fusion, I chain ash, he chain called by, (off the top btw) and then chain snow banishing called by, fusion, and mercouriour in grave. He then said resolve all effects except snow. He then proceeded with his turn until I'm almost dead at end of BP, then said forgor merc. Then it escalated to the judge call lol

"I did not miss DB for stuff like that" but We did!

YES or NO... iconic