The Case of David Dooley 

Crap we are in a cult....

It’s a cult I’d gladly join tbf...

But in my opinion, this secret club about murder isn't as psychologically damaging as guides/scouts etc

We are...🤫🤫

Yes!

Roses are red, violets are blue, some rhymes rhyme, but this one doesn't.

@@XpRnz poems don't have to rhyme..

STOLEN!

Roses are red Violets are blue I'm watching this video While taking a poo

Roses are red Violets are blue I was feeling down Then Mike said "hey you" ❤

And Fridays, when I have to work the weekend!

Agreed!

This is exactly what I was about to post.

It's one of the few things reminding me of what day it is.

In a way its odd that Mike's videos do this for most people, but on reality the stories are horrific. But I think its the way Mike presents them. He's a great story teller and narrator. He would probably be entertaining to watch if he told ghost stories too.

Agreed. Emotions should not supersede evidence. It’s far more important to make sure the *right* person is convicted. I’d rather have 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man go to prison.

@@Obsessed_With_Corgis even if one of those 10 tortured, raped, or killed your loved one?

@@rebeccav9969 If there was no real forensic evidence, I wouldn’t be convinced that the person accused is actually the one who harmed my loved one. If they’re innocent; that means the real perpetrator would still be out there, likely harming other people. I would never want a conviction just for the sake of “moving on”. I’d want to *know* that the *right* person is behind bars.

Was later accused of having and making child porn. He was a pedo so yeah let him rot in prison

@@drthik1 Oof. He'd probably be in for a while then, anyway. It certainly doesn't help his case here, either. Prison will not be fun for him.

The boots are what makes it very hard for me to believe, I can't drop a paintbrush without it splattering all over my boots. If you caved someone's head in, there would definitely be blood on your shoes, and you wouldn't be able to clean them well enough to scrub any DNA evidence

My thoughts exactly. I feel like he was guilty BUT thats is NOT enough to put a man behind bars for life. Beyond reasonable doubt doesnt seem to exist

Maybe he took off the boots to sneak around.

@@TheWonkster he could’ve just changed his boots when he left

@@fulcrum7455 Well no that’s not what she’s saying. She’s saying that she doesn’t want innocent people to go to jail based on shaky “evidence”

they don't

How long is their training in this tradition Jon of to

Jon of to?

Which is why the death penalty is questionable at best.

I think you are the one who actually doesnt understand what it means. At what point did anyone ever have a explanation for the murder that wasnt the prosecution? None. The jurors make their decision based on the evidence presented to them. There was no other plausible explanation that could explain what happened beyond a REASONBLE DOUBT. Lets put it this way. You go outside, the ground is wet, you hear thunder, you smell rain. You didnt see it rain but you can safely assumed it rained. Its also possible that a fire rescue helicopter flew overhead and dumped its water out over your house. Sure that could have happened, but what is more REASONABLE to you based on the evidence, in this example, the wet ground, thunder, smell of rain. Also, it is not at the trial that you get your actual sentence, that is another process where a judge can either agree with the jurys recommendation or not.

You're right. Big hotshot sciency tech lab but no cameras inside?!

Yeah, doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

it's not quite as odd as you think those types of buildings tend to have security installed whenever the building is built but are too damned cheap to maintain/update systems as frequently as they would need it to actually be functionally useful. Retailers are often more aggressive about their camera systems than warehouses and even then it's usually in very specific placements like staring directly at where a till point opens etc.. In those buildings as long as the parking lot cameras still working its not worth paying for the maintenance (and even then its to avoid liabilities are employee parked vehicles)

people dont like being watched while they work i ,work somewhere similar and we only have a few internal cameras.. theres an interesting article about it that i read a few years ago

Maybe there were... After all, the detective was found to have suppressed one piece of CCTV evidence that we know of. Maybe there is some more out there, somewhere? Something else that was inconvenient to the prosecution case? Not trying to be all conspiracy theory, but there was already shown to be iffy goings on between the detective and the prosecutor, sooo...

Riiight you know you have to put your seat belt on do all the turns and twist

Riiight you know you have to put your seat belt on do you all the turns and twist

you get me? :')

I know. Love him

I'm literally at that point and I thought the exact same thing just before I read your comment 🤣

Holding out for the 10 hour long cut of the life insurance dance.

When the question is about doing the life insurance dance, the answer is ALWAYS yes.

Forever.

😬

@@ntnrocket1 In fact, can we get it in gif format so we can just play our own music and have it going? I promise it won't be used for evil purposes.

😂😂😂

All Dave's are killers!!!

Literally only business that judges has and he is asking is that any of her business hahaha

Lmao I laughed so hard at that! What an idiot.

*you're*

​@@bentramer4281 Except they used the right spelling lol

@@LokiPii the second "your" lol

True..if he's this boorish and arrogant imagine what he's like to anyone he's investigating

Too true.

ronan devarey... Not as many cops as you're trying to indicate.

@@alanab9674 'So many' refers to a large, but indeterminate amount. So you don't know how many cops I'm 'trying' to indicate. So I'll clarify it. 40% of cops admit to committing domestic abuse (and that's just the ones who admit it.). They shouldn't be cops. There are over 30,000 officers who have been decertified for wrongdoing in the last ten years. They shouldn't have been cops in the first place. 85,000 officers were investigated or disciplined for misconduct, perjury, evidence planting and garden variety corruption in the last ten years. The ones whose investigations weren't frivolous or malicious, they shouldn't be cops. So many cops, like I said.

@@ronandevarey4809 Just bc "admit" is used doesn't mean it's true or factual. Stars use dubious terminogy to compile their numbers. And their sources are often biased & questionable.

😂

Hahaha 🤣

😂😂😂

🤣

Hahhaha

😂😂😂

Your right! In a criminal trial, the person must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Whether he did this or not is not the case. It's up to the prosecution to prove he did it. I don't think they did. It is a sham.

Nice

@@mr.pitjoey2910 that's supposed to be the standard but what's obviously always happened was emotional manipulation and conjecture. It's kind of embarrassing that even these days, with all of the information available, emotional manipulation is still more important than evidence.

You say it's a thin case, after watching a 20 minute video - but two separate juries who considered ALL the evidence, were both convinced of Dooley's guilt! The circumstantial evidence in the case was powerful and pointed to Dooley, he had motive, means and opportunity. No one need lose any sleep over this conviction!

It really is scary! 😳 I spent 6mo in county for something I didn't do.. it happens quite frequently.

This is only a 23 minute video. There was much more evidence presented during the trial.

@@sandrab2589 did you go?!

@@stephanieann8115 read court documents

@@stephanieann8115 His case was also profiled on Dateline. In addition to tampering with time cards, he has pled guilty to child pornography charges. A model citizen.

Where I work, the cleaner has keys. How else would they clean? There are also keys hidden for staff to use.

Good point, why would he need to break in, unless it's an electronic key and it was timed, but then it works the other way, if you were trying not to be caught, don't use the key. I still don't think there was enough matching evidence, but this thought has confused the issue slightly

Good point...no screw driver needed...unless to was thinkin...hey, they won't suspect me if I make it look like it wasn't me. But, no DNA...and Random Guy....thats something.

I worked in an office building for 25 years and the cleaning staff had keys to every room so they could do their job.

I've seen a couple of those. Where the person just ran away from everything and everyone out of nowhere. And they didn't even know why they did it.

Yeah, there was a mom who thought she was ruining her families lives so she left just to be found later.

Look up the story of *Lawrence Joseph Bader* . It was _wild_ !

There are bizzarre interesting ones like that of Natasha Ryan who went missing in 1998. A dude (who might've already been a serial killer) admitted to her murder and was put on trial. In 2003 Natasha attended her own murder trial. She may have had a vitamin D deficiency from hiding inside her boyfriend's house for the past 5 years but she was alive and well enough.

That actually happened where I live years ago. Local news channels start reporting about a missing man. He was healthy and in his early 30s. Honestly not the type you would see very often as missing person. About a week later he returned home. He just left on a road trip out of state and just never told anyone.

Same

I'm still not sure if he did the murder but yeah I've lost all sympathy.

If he is innocent of 'that' crime though, justice still hasn't been served and a murderer is out there.

I had seen this story elsewhere, but not the guilty plea. Certainly gave me a sense of confidence in the verdicts.

@@AM2K2 Thats true we forget about the victim to often

Here is dinner time. 😁

Glad I am not the only one who eats lunch to Mike!

Here in italy is dinner time to ..

@@hereaioan3379 Bon appetit!

Me. Right now.

It would have been a Brady violation if the prosecutors withheld something that could exonerate the defendant. I didn't hear Mike mention that they got one BUT maybe that's the actual reason he got a new trial.

He’s not innocent dw

*withhold

Yea just stick to facts instead of throwing out the old spouse angle with no evidence at all.None of his dna on her and none of hers(or blood)on him/in his car would be enough for me to say not guilty

I agree. You would need OJ Simpsons jury to find him not guilty using that defence. There’s certainly enough doubt in this case on its own. His big mistake, if innocent, was not about leaving but not declaring he had left the site. Once his wife couldn’t corroborate it he was on a very sticky wicket. Circumstantial evidence put him as the number one suspect but with room for doubt. He got a second chance and his defence team threw him under a bus by pointing the finger like some TV courtroom drama plot. The defence could be proved to be right but that was not the time to bring it up.

BNBG nice wire reference

Exactly!

@@Gos1234567 I think it kind of makes sense in terms of pointing out suspicious behaviour and measuring that against the defendant's. the husband's behaviour was as suspicious as Dooley's - that is to say only mildly suspicious, and certainly not enough to convict someone. so if you wouldn't point the finger at the husband, who had a very common motivation for murder, then why would you do so with the defendant?

Yeah, I really find it suspicious that he would leave and his timing didn't help at all, but idk seems like there is smth hidden \_^^_/

Everyone blames the lowly janitor. Easy trash can.

@@ElanaVital83 no. it has nothing to do with his status. he was hella sus

well said.

@@aspirindamage5152 He definitely deserved to be a suspect, but the prosecution shouldn't have brought forth charges until they investigated further. They were way too eager to close the case without putting the proper amount of effort in.

I would have said there’s fucking blood 🩸

Yeah husband definitely guilty

@@GardenGuy1942 he may be guilty, but it's possible she got lippy with him.. we should reserve judgment. It's very possible he had to put up with her mouth every day. ...j.k. of course. Lol

The guy making the 911 call sounded almost like he had been expecting her to get murdered sooner or later.

Because she could have killed her self

You can be guilty of one thing without being guilty of another

Two different juries who saw all the evidence against David Dooley at two separate trials, ie not just a 20 minute RU-vid video, were both convinced of his guilt. It wasn't just 'possible' he did it - there was compelling evidence of his guilt, and he had motive, means and opportunity. I wouldn't lose any sleep over this one if I were you! Dooley was obviously forensically aware, and this was clearly a pre-planned crime. Michelle Mockbee was ambushed at her office door by someone who knew her and her routine. Dooley and his wife's serious, long-term clocking in scam against the company was strong motive. And that motive was supported by the screwdriver marks on her door, and the fact both the Dooley's clocking in cards mysteriously vanished after the crime. The CCTV evidence Dooley went home for 30 minutes right after her murder was damning, and explained the lack of DNA evidence. He'd prepared a change of clothes and footwear right after the murder (hence no blood in his car), and no doubt after showering at home changed into fresh work wear and the clean, blood-free boots, then returned to the office and feigned shock on 'discovering' her body. What are the chances he was the only one of 13 staff, whose movements couldn't be accounted for during the murder? He did it alright, and I bet his wife knows it - and the reason why. Michelle was very unlucky to find herself at the centre of a staff theft, and to be sacrificed, to cover it up.

Happens all the time. It's called "Circumstantial Evidence". They can't always prove someone did something, they just have to convince the Jury that they are the most likely candidate.

@@williammueller6639 People sometimes forget circumstantial evidence IS evidence - and considered in context, it can be every bit as strong and indicative of guilt as DNA evidence. No prosecutor in the world can ever 100% prove a person committed a murder. Even with the strongest, most convincing evidence there has to be an element of doubt because the jury was not there, does not know the people involved personally, and didn't witness the crime with their own eyes. That's why the phrase 'beyond a reasonable doubt' is inevitably part of every guilty verdict, and is the best that can be realistically asked of any jury. However, the legal standard 'beyond a reasonable doubt' is a high level of proof - it certainly doesn't just mean 'it's possible the defendant did it'. That would not be enough to convict! This is a quick, 20 minute video, providing a summary of the case - two different juries who considered all the evidence at two separate trials both convicted Dooley of Murder. People shouldn't glibly dismiss that fact like it's nothing! The guy got two fair trials by jury, had good legal representation both times, and was twice judged to be Michelle Mockbee's killer. David Dooley had motive, means and opportunity, and the evidence against him was compelling. I don't think anyone need start any campaigns to free him!

@@glamdolly30 thats why they say a good prosecutor can indite a damn ham sand which and they will win the case every time.

I really don't understand how they found him guilty. No DNA, no blood and no witnesses. Very strange.

This scares the living shit out of me as well. Makes me want to have a body camera on me 24/7 sometimes

@@11co5955 wear a Fitbit or Apple Watch. It’ll record your heart rate and prove you couldn’t have been violently bludgeoning someone to death while you’re sleeping. It actually worked as a defense in a recent case.

I felt sorry for him at first, but after hearing of this child pornography thing I'm glad he is where he is.

@@EditLivy agreed, he deserves the sentence after I heard that

Yes, I've noticed that he's become much more relaxed and confident. Less "reading from a script", much more natural "chat".

Me too. Mike makes it sound so good.

Me too. I just posted that. That was excellent made me laugh

I literally live for the Life Insurance dance 🙈

YEAH , I’LL SUPPORT THAT . . . SUPER CREEP WITHOUT THE MURDER CHARGE !

The cameras only caught his car leaving, and unfortunately, not his clothes (person). That is clever you brought it up, however!

Yeah and the shoes not having any blood is huge unless he had a different pair to throw on. Thing that gets me is if this was a spur of moment killing and not premeditated then how could there be essentially no DNA of his anywhere.

@@Irob0t2113 I thought that as well, I doubt it was someone random. He likely planned this out, had gloves and got rid of his shoes. He had enough time to do it too. Not saying he's 100% guilty, but he definitely could have pulled it off. Since he's the one who reported the body.

@@Irob0t2113 he might have been wearing those slip on shoe covers that janitors and contractors wear before stepping into your house or somewhere clean

@@handsanitizer2457 Yeah really interesting case. So much stuff like trying to break in her office and leaving just screams guilty yet the lack of DNA makes you question it. If he planned it then yeah he got the whole don't leave evidence part right but everything else was just a total mess.

It’s the murder of a child’s spirit

Where did that happen?

@UCuOJSKGG17YocfFzreQXEVA given that his second trial didn’t take place until 2019, I wouldn’t be surprised if the charges about the pornography were just deprioritised until the murder charges were sorted. Why bother going back to court over it when you’re already there for life? So he just took the plea deal.

Yeah and the killer is still free, is that okay with you?

@@onraj9mm obviously not, the point of the comment is that the man should be in jail regardless. If he didn’t kill her, then justice needs to be served in that respect too.

Shame!

Mason may dude!! I thought it was A-Mason

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Bye 😂

See that you doo.

Why are you doing here

What Otamatone is that you :o

The original investigation of child abuse was back in 2005, was based on family allegations, and was closed. When the victim turned 14 (in 2014), the charges resurfaced and apparently included abuse that continued into 2007. So they reopened it and decided to charge and prosecute when there was a chance he could be acquitted of the murder.

@@Yes-iu3kr damn. So this does prove that he's a total pos and not above murdering someone to hide his timecard scam.

@@nikkivens9812 I would.say this is a very comvulated case and Mike's video is only the tip of the iceberg. Some testimony suggested that the crime scene had been changed before being photographed. The forensic investigator changed his testimony, which originally said that it was Dooleys DNA on the bag...instead saying he couldn't say it was or it wasn't because there wasn't enough DNA. (The bloodier part of the bag had been tossed in error.) And the vic's husband gave his friend (who also worked at this place) $10,000 the day before the murder. (Even though the husband and the vic were $70,000 in debt.) Its an interesting case to read about.

She only did that because she realised she was coming off as a douche talking like she was. She didn't give a sh.t about the victim or her family. She and he were stealing together, so no doubt she and he planned that he would go there and get those records so they could get away with stealing. I wonder how many other businesses they were defrauding by pushing up hours they didn't work.

@@Odette321 There's nothing on google as to whether or not Janet and David Dooley were charged in connection with the time clock fraud. It makes me wonder if the two of them planned to kill Michelle Mockbee, or if it was a spur-of-the-moment thing that happened, like she discovered David in her office trying to take the evidence or something.

@@Odette321 this is a weird comparison you're making. Someone being capable of theft does not automatically make them capable of murder.

I couldn't give a ####. They're both garbage

She said in statement after mentioning victim BUT so that means disregard everything said prior to BUT so she didn't care about victim imo.

I would've considered OJ...but he was locked up in Nevada. Plus, he preferred butchery.

This is why our justice system terrifies me

But that means that they could prove that he did it.

Try other justice systems

@@b.a.m.5078 Oh yeah? Try living in China? Or Somalia? Or 150 other places worse than our legal system.

Same here. 😊

Me too

Or did he?

😂😂💯

Soo funny 😆🤣😂

That's not that hard to say, try saying this 4X fast Sally sells sea shells with Susan Sally sander supposed sister Saturdays secretly sleeping soundly lol

@@Dantectez 😂😂😂 I couldn’t even read it let alone say it 😂

especially in small communities there are jurors who just want "closure" and maybe even some like, anywhere after a certain amount of time of deliberation care more about themselves getting home than holding out on their belief and - the complete existence of another human. not saying it applies in this case..just in general. kind regards, Cruz.

@Tazer Face the trunk of the car that the cadavers dog hit, the tape used to bound the baby girl, the google searches she did the lies about xanii the nanny, the job she lied about having, the bed cover that matches the sheets she was found rapped in, and there’s more I can’t recall at these moment do you need more?

@Tazer Face oooh Lord,,,well grammar police, that was possibly because I have my keyboard in Spanish and sometimes it tent to autocorrect the words if I don’t switch the keyboard to English

Well she's not a homely looking dude so...

Tazer Face who gives a shit? I bet their English is way better than your Spanish.

I always show up early I am in finance so it makes a huge difference. There is a whole police academy 5 min down the road though. My company is actually a customer of Thermo-Fisher too.

Yeah, it's that unlucky Tirteen!

I never show up early because my employer puts me to work without pay until my actual shift starts. If I try to add the minutes to my timecard the boss just changes them and I get a threat of a write-up. Isn't work wonderful?

@@-._.-KRiS-._.- : You can sue the company for that with proof that he changes you time card and make you work without pay. I did.

Crooked cops.

That's exactly what I thought.

@@WeeniePablo that's the convenient cover story to convict Dooley. I think it was a hired hit by Michelle's husband.

@UCxHH6_tlywTEaflYWF4dCfQ it could've been anyone's screwdriver and explain the other persons DNA found but NONE of Dooleys DNA was anywhere near there? Cleaning products only do so much, blood would most likely be found in his car, strange he had literally no wounds, himself, from her defending herself or anything. There's literally nothing that proves he WAS in that office, but thee IS proof of a strange man on the property after the alarm for the place was tripped 3 days prior

he has a guilty face

yep, they were leading her to answer that how they wanted

Exactly

It was a weirdly worded question. Confused me!

Good catch

I caught that too. It was a badly worded question and then he made it worse by saying said "that afternoon" . Then in the next interview he said he had reviewed all the interviews and he deliberately misstated the question he had asked with an equally clumsy rendition of the question,

The DNA was inconclusive... so there wasn't enough to determine who it belongs to.

or time how long it takes dooley to get home. swab the shower and sinks in his home and see if any blood is in them. so much the detectives dropped the ball

@@TheHikeChoseMe They did check his home. No forensic evidence related to the murder.

@@TheHikeChoseMe They did. There was no blood found in his house or car

I’m no lawyer but I feel like that would be illegal (if it’s not, it should be)

I noticed that too. Yup, no leading the witnesses here...

Just herd that part totally agree

@@doctorshell7118 And a Hard Of Hearing witness at that...who was probably struggling to understand him clearly.

absolutely! was thinking that the whole time. leading question for sure

@@Yes-iu3kr I wonder if there was any actual evidence she was hard of hearing? Hmmm...

The husband is guilty tho

@@GardenGuy1942 Physically impossible for him to have been there.

@@toomanymarys7355 it is possible he hired a hitman..then he wouldn't need to be there.

@@toomanymarys7355 200k in cash withdraws inside of a year sounds like kinda alot to me.

@@johnv6806 they definitely should’ve gone through those payments for their alibi. Lets say he claims to have paid off their mortgage- that’s an extremely traceable offence. Did he have hidden gambling debt? Motive right there! Very sloppy “we know who the attacker needs to be before we start the case.”

It pretty much made me okay with the outcome too.

That was likely just planted or even fabricated just to make him look bad...

Yup

@@michaelhelgeland4588 na he took a plea cause he knew he was a POS

@@michaelhelgeland4588 Why would he plead guilty to that?

i dont think you know what reasonable doubt means. There was somebody killed. Thats a fact. Now whats more reasonable to you, that someone with motive, inconsistencies in their stories, was SEEN leaving moments before the murder and coming back was responsible, or some random person snuck in wasnt detected and just decided to savagely beat and kill a random woman for no reason, THEN nobody sees or hears them leave?? You need to provide a different plausible scenario that could give you REASONABLE DOUBT as to the prosecutions case.

​@@austintruly You don't understand what reasonable doubt is. Is it reasonable to think that someone other than Dooley could have killed her? It certainly is given the evidence in this video. It doesn't mean that it is "more reasonable", just reasonable. It's not about picking the most reasonable possible explanation out of the ones you can come up with. There are always infinite possible explanations. It is about proving that it would be unreasonable to think that the given explanation could possibly be wrong. If you can't understand the difference I hope you are never on a jury.

@@Matt-hs5jm “It is about proving that it would be unreasonable to think the given explanation could possibly be wrong.” Just to clarify that’s from the perspective of someone trying to disprove the reasonable doubt, as in this quote would be the prosecutions goal.

@@austintruly someone else's dna was found at the scene they didn't bother to check that avenue out?

Most cases before DNA were circumstantial (unless there was a witness to the crime or the person confessed). A case mostly having circumstantial evidence does not mean the case is invalid. I mean don't get me wrong, this case was not a solid case. I don't know if I could have voted to convict if I had been on the jury. I'm just saying there is a difference between circumstantial case and an invalid one.

He didn’t! C mon

@@ladyboywonder9139 oh well he not only had child pornography but he made it so he can be innocent of the murder for all i care, still deserves the sentence, i hope no one is working to free him or overturn his conviction

Seems way too convenient. Kinda like when a Boeing employee was being investigated for selling company secrets to China, absolutely no evidence, the investigators where made a joke of, they found the actual criminal, and then all of a sudden, CP was "found" on the original guys work computer.

That's how I feel too. If he did it, he deserves the time. If he didn't do it, he still deserves the time. To be honest, all child abusers should get murder time anyway, so good!

@@ladyboywonder9139 😆🤘

I agree. I actually kind of think maybe the husband did play a role in this. Now here me out; he worked there and knew the schedule for the cleaners. He also would have likely known they were double dipping in hours, plus he would know all the camera angles. I propose it's possible that he set the guy up knowing the cops would immediately look at him due to these factors. Maybe the janitor guy was leaving to go smoke or something. Got in, clocked in thought he'd dip out before anyone gets there to get a quick Jay in. I think it's possible the husband hired someone. I'm not saying he absolutely did, but it is possible and set this guy up knowing his patterns and behavior.

I only use the example of smoking bc it would make sense why he wouldn't tell the cops he left, and where he really went. Who knows what previous records he had, and fear of losing job. I think it was most likely something he left to do under the radar.

@@kristentaylor9222 What made me really suspicious was the broken doorlock. Every janitor has a master key. Unless of course he didn’t use his key on purpose to exclude himself from the poole of suspects.

@@cats1970 that could easily be true. It could have been a staged robbery, or someone came at her and she ran into her office they bust the door and drug her out. He might not have wanted to waste the time using keys in that event. However, I think it's too convenient that all this was going on with the cleaning couple stealing money, then she ends up brutally murdered, as if it was a passionate crime, vs just wanting to get away with the money fraud. This crime says to me that whoever killed her truly disliked her. It was motivated for more than covering up a money scheme. Not to say the janitor might not have really disliked her. But did they even follow up on where the transactions went after the husband withdrew that kind of money? I get paying off debts, but in cash?? And scrubbing clean his computer? It seems fishy to me. Furthermore, the guy lingering could have gotten the wrong day. It is eerily like the west Memphis three case. The police wanted it to be solved so bad they used any shred of evidence to convict.

So much of our legal system is based on emotion which is horrifying

🤣🤣🤣

gooo

👍😁

Let's goooooo... 👀🌲🌲🌲🌲

first day of a new job and first day being subscribed to this channel i feel lucky

I bet the unkown DNA found on her will turn out to be the actual killer like it has happened many times before.

Honestly, he probably did it but you're right, there's not enough evidence.

You must be from California

@@daryldeweese 1. no, I'm not and 2. I don't get it. Is this a joke? Is it an insult? A compliment? Was the case in California and I wasn't paying enough attention?

I vote to have "hella doubt" to be used as a legit form of legal jargon. 😂👩🏾‍⚖️

Which means that guy should definitely not be in jail. I hope his appeal works

Well, are you really suprised, it’s just 23:41 lasting video! ”Maybe” all aspects aren’t presented.

@@oldtimer7635 all Mike's videos are roughly 20-30 mins long. He just covers the case and the info at hand, doesnt do deep dives. If you want deep dives go watch Stephanie Harlowe, John Lordan, or Danelle Hallan.

@@Curious_KJ did you watch till 23:12??? 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️

@@Shazam1991 Just because he had "cheese pizza" on his computer doesn't mean he murdered her. In fact most people who are into that shit are skittish and too cowardly for murder. "The original investigation of child abuse was back in 2005, was based on family allegations, and was closed. When the victim turned 14 (in 2014), the charges resurfaced and apparently included abuse that continued into 2007. So they reopened it and decided to charge and prosecute when there was a chance he could be acquitted of the murder." We don't need idiots like you on jury duty. Whether he should be in jail for the murder, is still questionable.

It's the American way.

@@CAHSR2020 90 IQ post

he was pulling beyond his weight. she is attractive

Butthurt over a cop joke, so we pull the ole’ IQ insult, eh? Sounds about white. 🙄

Yes, makes you wonder what else was covered up.

Serious, glitter is super hard to get rid of.

Edited and still a Shiite sentence. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Scooby Doo suspect Number 1! The mild mannered janitor!

Course *

Stop 🤣

well.. there is a dead woman on the floor and no one else with a motive to kill her. So there is that 😂

You just watched the system conduct "justice" by hiding evidence and convicting an innocent man and then went "I have NO doubt the pedo charge is substantiated with evidence", because their track record is impeccable

I think about this every time he posts

I mean, there are extreme holes in the case. He should’ve gotten manslaughter IMO. But a definite 30min window is very persuasive, and he was the only one of the 14 who couldn’t account for what he was doing in the building while she would’ve died. Not to mention all the cleaning stuff he had at his disposal. His reasons for being caught leaving are sketchy if the wife in question isn’t sure she even saw him.

@@msmiami212 Who the heck can clean up a crime scene - including showering, cleaning a truck, and disposing of evidence - so perfectly that crime scene techs don't find his DNA - in just 30 minutes? They would have swabbed EVERYTHING (The whole truck interior and exterior, the door handles and shower drains of his house, etc...) No one mentioned any smell of bleach or chemicals. He perfectly removed all of his DNA from her and the bag after moving her body, he didn't leave a single strand of his hair... All in just 30 minutes minus driving time? And he was THAT thorough, but managed to leave someone ELSE's DNA behind? The 30 minute window doesn't really mean anything to me other than he dipped out to watch gross vids on his phone: He pleads guilty to being a pedo with no fight, but still fights the murder conviction? He's a horrible human being, but I don't think he killed her.

@@EvylFairy yeah I agree. I'm obviously no expert, but I don't think he did it either

@@EvylFairy "They would have swabbed EVERYTHING" Not necessarily; depends on time and resources. All this stuff costs money, and most murder investigations don't do much in the way of scene processing - all the DNA testing is usually done later, using evidence from the evidence files and in the lab. Budget permitting.

@@EvylFairy No need for the aggression, tf? We don’t know how prepared he was to kill in terms of having physical disposable covers. We also know he changed clothes. He WORKS there and doesn’t need to worry about strands of his hair at the office. And he ‘dipped out’ to watch gross vids... that he could do from the parking lot? Sure, ok. There’s also no point fighting smaller charges when you’re already serving life for murder.

Right. The det. Excuse me you are being questioned about your inappropriate relationship with the prosecutor. Come on ya clown

Cops have a habit of going tunnel vision on a suspect without doing their due diligence.

It seems to me they had plenty of evidence, enough to to be found guilty at two different trials.

@@austintruly Juries often convict without sufficient evidence. This is nothing new. Here's what didn't add up to me in this case: 1. Where was the blood in Dooley's car and in his house? There was blood everywhere at the murder scene as the woman died from blunt force trauma. If he went home to change his clothes it would be almost impossible for there not to be even a drop of blood in his car or house. 2. Dooley's DNA wasn't even confirmed to be at the murder scene. 3. As the OP said, who did the DNA at the scene belong to? Why wasn't this investigated? 4. Dooley coming into work and then leaving again seems suspicious until you consider why he may have done so if he was innocent. What if he was the first one to find the body, but knowing that the finger would be pointed at him, decided to come back at a time when other employees would also be in the office? His wife then tried to cover for him by changing her story. This is a perfectly reasonable explanation for his behavior. 5. Just because he overbilled the company he worked for doesn't make him a murderer. What percentage of employees/contractors who overbill end up killing the head of accounting? I don't know either, but it sure as heck isn't high. Motive was pretty weak here. 6. There's no way we can know that Dooley was the only person with opportunity. All it rules out are the people who were seen working in the warehouse. It doesn't rule out the other 7.5 billion people on earth. TLDR: The jury did not have proof of Dooley's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

@@allanshpeley4284 bruh your argument is even weaker lol.

@@PR-xm5zc Nah, you're just too slow to comprehend it (lol).

The reason he was found guilty is because he had no explanation as to why he left. His wife said he didn’t come and later said he did. Plus why did he hide the fact that he left from the detectives during his first questioning. Believe me when I say this, He did that sh*t

Honestly, I assumed he left cause he pooped in his pants after finding the body. Would explain his wife hearing "pants".

Agreed

@@vadothagreat2693 For what motive? Some double-punched time cards? With nothing left behind in the process? This guy doesn't come across like any sort of forensic genius. All I see is low effort reasoning masquerading as critical analysis.

@@vadothagreat2693 The signs point to him, but the initial lying could have been little more than him and his wife trying to hide their payroll scam. No DNA in his vehicle is perplexing. While I understand that DNA isn’t a necessary component for a guilty verdict, I just wouldn’t have been able to vote guilty. We have a high bar in this country to find someone guilty, and I think the prosecution fell well short.

Yeah, it's total BS. He very well could have done it, but the evidence certainly didn't prove it was him beyond reasonable doubt.

I agree, he’s definitely not a good person if he’s involved in child pornography and should definitely serve prison time for that but I’ve been on a jury for serious cases and there was reasonable doubt that he killed this woman. I think it was more likely the husband but they didn’t bother investing him apparently.

I agree, I feel like time card fraud isn't a reason to kill anyone over

It's not beyond *any* doubt. It should be reasonable.

@@MegaTinni That's exactly what Matt said, 'reasonable doubt'

@@clearcomm yea the motive is ridiculous,none of her dna/blood on him in his car.Seems pretty violent so maybe a crime of passion,she couldve been having an affair with a co-worker

She ran a fraudscheme stealing money she's no saint.

@@somniumisdreaming "Ran a fraud scheme"?! You're referring to her husband and her clocking in for overtime pay for each other? The ways poor people are villainized for finding ways to come up... but not the businesses cutting corners and paying less than a living wage to staff despite being able to afford it blows my mind.

@@TahtahmesDiary stealing is wrong. Why are you defending these pos people? I am poor but you know it never occurred to me to go and add hours to my time sheet. If you ever run a business you’ll understand that they were committing fraud and the best way to get more hours is usually to talk to the manager or find a job that pays better. I know for a fact that if this was going on in your business you’d stop them and call the police.

I don't think anyone feels bad for the company, but you can't really think poor folks should steal money if they can. Btw, how do you know they weren't being paid fairly? Do you know how much they were being paid? I can't remember hearing it in the video.

@@TahtahmesDiary This is the funniest comment I've ever read. Most people live paycheck to paycheck, but don't find ways to commit fraud 😂😂😂

This store I used to work at would interrupt the radio every 20 minutes with a store promotional add and it stats by going "Hey you! Yeah you!"

@@collinhaas6137 Interesting store you worked at.

What about Roger Waters?

Comments in this channel are weird

As someone who had a lot of anxiety trigged by the entirety of 2020 I agree.

It's actually understandable if you stop and think about it from this angle: lot's of buildings like that tend to be older with either outdated security or sparse security in terms of camera/surveillance systems. Even if the building isn't older, it's costly to not only invest in an entire surveillance system, but also costly to maintain and update. I think the companies that own those buildings don't really want to bother with that expense and probably consider it an acceptable sacrifice as these places aren't exactly broken into or stolen from all that often (at least not enough to justify the surveillance system/maintenance cost). It's stubbornly stingy, I know, but when you're talking about a company/corporation, they're trying to cut their headroom as much as possible for maximum profit and sustainability. I'm just trying to go with an Occam's Razor approach on this though, so obviously it's just a somewhat educated guess on my part.

@@donnydogpiss4533 Installing a camera system that would cover all areas would cost less than a $1000.00 and it cost nothing to maintain, just a dvr and a few cameras. In fact you can buy an entire system that could do that for around $500.00 the other $500.00 is the cost to install.

Goo crew member reporting for gooty!

@@katc6880 👏🏼👏🏼 hahah I salute you! Gooty 😅

Me too

Same!

Same.. he’s amazing!

I know right! He's the best since the old Forensic Files!

I saw him too on Netflix Cecil Hotel documentary

Wait whats he doing in the show?

Moike 🤣

LOVE it 😊😊

@@piercenealy7490 it was a documentary on the cecil hotel which has a ton of crazy history. He was one of the people they had on there explaining different stories like he does on this channel

A jury of my peers? I’m going to need people to take a damn aptitude test. Do these people know what reasonable doubt means?

Right what an unlucky dude if he really did just rip his pant 😐

He was found guilty of unreasonable doubt

We didn't exactly get to experience the entire court proceedings and what the prosecution brought to the table. We see snippets in this video that seem like lack of evidence though.

There was other DNA that didn't match either of them. I also don't really see a motive here. They were both doing illegal shit together - why increase the heat on you by literally murdering them in the workplace?

@JewTube What else are you supposed to do with your eyes? Keep them closed whenever you don't immediately need them?

It's been 4 days straight for me lol

Wtf don’t u sleep or work or have a life? Shit, bingeing to me is a few hours. Not all day and night . That’s what an idiot kid with no life or friends does. Or a loser grown up. Which are u?

@@ChildofGodforevr probably someone who has more time than you do. Maybe they dont have to work like you do?

@@ChildofGodforevr due to surgery I am on bed rest so not much else to do for a bit ... always has to be one b to ruin a situation

🤣🤣🤣🤣 the way he said it bahaha

I absolutely LOVE that he's a big it's always sunny fan. He's always throwing in little things from the show that make me giggle

Chardee MacDennis.

Bout to crack one open myself, cheers!

Mike has a way with words, and delivery!!

You've been charmed into ignoring his charm.

As soon as youtubers start asking for subs I unsub.

Well, he does ask for likes and subscribes, but he's subtle about it, and it's not on every video.

@@eloycneto he does ? I have never seen that.

And he’s just plain cute ❤️

Cops tryina twist her words for a conviction probably

The first time he asked, he definitely said "after he left". The second time its hard to hear it, but I think he said the same thing. Despite the captions saying "afternoon". Edit: Also pretty sure the question was about after he left for work in the morning.

@@joshuadowdle9691 I reviewed this section a few times. One cannot make assumptions about what we csnt actually make out in the bad recordings. But we do know she clarified "When's the first time I seen him yesterday?" And the officer said, "Yeah. Yesterday afternoon." Clear as day.

Leading questions

@@Yes-iu3kr It's certainly not clear as day. If it were, it wouldn't be contentious.

Wow that was fast lol

He truly gasped in disbelief, I’m not the only one who saw it?

Me too

Did no one watch the last 30 seconds where he pled guilty to making child pornography?!

Gasping when you get a lifetime in prison isn't reserved for innocent people

@@leluschka11 Oddly enough you can be guilty of one thing and innocent of another. Weird, right?!

It was the police detective's fault. The prosecutor was doing their job to try to convict. It was the juries that failed here, not the prosecutors.

@Jon jurors are made up of people just like you and I. 😂

They should get some sort of award for this one. They got a juror to convict with zero evidence and a shit ton of reasonable guilt. That’s pretty amazing.

@Jon I guess that's why it was good enough for Andrea.

C A P the idea of it is that jurors aren’t actually in the employ of the state. If they were, they could be incentivized to do what the state wants. A jury of citizens allows for a pool of people whose lives aren’t affected by giving a verdict.

@C A P i see your point but it's because the jury is supposed to be their "peers" aka free members of the community not paid officials

@C A P that's a horrible idea

Jurors will throw anyone under the bus just to go home.

Idk how it is everywhere else but louisiana you get paid for jury duty, not much but you do

Hell NO! Get the kids out of the room!!

Same! Then I was like ohhh ok rot in jail

Well it’s not like they proved he was guilty. A lot of people are put behind bars for crimes they didn’t commit. Somehow a lot of police in the US still rely on the polygraph despite the fact that it is very easy to beat if you know what you’re doing. Not saying Dooley didn’t do it, but based on this video they definitely didn’t have any hard proof

@@notsocooldude7720 They mean the cp stuff at the end

Lol same

@@notsocooldude7720 Polygraphs are useful because people freak out when they know they did something so when you ask a question and the person tenses up or starts sweating or breathing heavy (hard to control when you know you did it and feel guilty from it). It gives investigators something to go after, I've had officers out shit they did on the job that got them criminal charges because they freaked out during the poly. Also how many times have you taken a polygraph? I assume a lot since you know how easy they are to beat.

No you do not get keys to the office like that.

The "detectives" could have easily determined whether janitorial staff had regular authorized access to offices. Something is weird here.

As someone who worked in maintenance, that's a fucking lie looooooool. Offices with payroll or server rooms are off limits to cleaners, we do NOT get keys to them. The only people with the keys to literally every room in the building are the security guards.

@@onehellofanopinion2313 So who cleans those rooms? Surely not the security guards.

@@maryvallettakeith6146 they clean in the presence of security or staff. C'mon now.

same lol

And Fridays

Wednesday where I am

Yep!! 🙂👍

Me too! Almost got me! Rot in jail that effing p word!

Maybe he plead out knowing he was screwed after two trials, for benefits offered to him.

@Toby Thompson ?

@Toby Thompson The guy plead guilty to the child pornography. Are you defending that?

Cause we’re on “That Chapter” I’ll see myself out.

Bit like life ATM!!

@@Jaggededge112 🙄

I definitely couldn't/wouldn't.

Thank God you weren't - the guy was clearly guilty, as two different juries both concluded!

@@glamdolly30 What evidence did you hear that was beyond a reasonable doubt?

@@loveforeignaccents You watched the video, presumably? Firstly, David Dooley had motive, means and opportunity. He and his wife were ripping off their employer with a clocking-in scam, pocketing thousands in stolen cash. Michelle Mockbee had the power to expose that scam, and Dooley and his wife stood to lose their jobs and possibly face prosecution and have to pay back the ill gotten gains. The screwdriver marks on the victim's office door, and the fact that the Dooleys' clocking-in cards both mysteriously vanished after the murder, are smoking guns to the motive. Michelle's killer lay in wait outside her office door and ambushed her as she arrived for work. That shows he knew her and her normal routine. It also suggests he was an employee who could easily access the private premises. Dooley was the only one of 13 employees whose movements could not be accounted for during the murder. And immediately after it, CCTV caught him driving home, returning after 30 minutes (he never gave a plausible reason for that trip home). This gave him opportunity to dump evidence, shower and change into a fresh set of work wear and clean, blood-free boots. I believe he first changed into clean clothes at the crime scene, immediately after killing Michelle, and put the bloody clothes into a plastic bag. He may also have pre-prepared his car by covering the seats with plastic, and throwing it away after. That's why no blood was found in his car. I think he's forensically aware and wore gloves during the attack, to prevent fingerprints. Though of course the fact he worked there meant his DNA was throughout the building - as janitor, he had access all areas. I think when Dooley got home he showered, and dumped the bag with the incriminating, bloody clothes and shoes (to dispose of properly later), then put on a fresh set of work clothes and boots. The reason his boots were clean is surely that he wasn't wearing them when he committed the murder! He got back to work in his clean gear ASAP, and looked suitably shocked and innocent when the body was discovered. Two different juries considered all the evidence, at two separate trials, and both found him guilty of murder. That does not suggest a weak Prosecution case against David Dooley, but a strong one!

@@glamdolly30 Well, you certainly do have a lot of persuasive, incriminating evidence there, but I'm still on the fence; after what Mike said they ended up finding at the end of the video though, unrelated to this case of course, I'm glad he is locked up and serving time (for that) anyhow. But thanks for enlightening me on your point of view; it was rather interesting and detailed! Have a good evening.