The Chase UK: 38 Correct Answers Across All Cashbuilders 

Ikr and Gareth had a spectacular CashBuilder, was one of the best contestant’s in chase history and possibly could have beaten the chaser on his own.

@@qasimhussain1678 Well, it depends. If Gareth answered the same number of questions correctly as the team did collectively, then on his own, he would’ve been caught with 3 or 4 seconds remaining because of the way head-starts work in the final chase. This is why I’m not slamming any of the other 3 for going low - tactically, it makes perfect sense.

@@T6448_P2 Ok fair enough, I see your logic, how do you think Gareth would have done against the other chaser’s (either on his own or with a team)?

​@@T6448_P2but going alone has the advantage of not having to buzz and wait for names to be read out, so it's not that simple

yeah same

I wish they could keep the cash they’ve made like in Tipping Point. They hardly ever beat the Chaser 😢

High scores were much more common in the first five series.

Its now that he’s not impressed by high scores by players.

Sorry 🤣

Its the old click bait the tubers use to try get extra views 👍

@@Tom.Jackson. it wasn’t meant to be click bait, I promise you. I think I just worded the title awkwardly.

@@Tom.Jackson.go back to school mate, your reading comprehension is ass. “Across ALL cashbuilders” - the phrasing couldn’t have been clearer

@@markn.7914 lol, the title was recently changed, the original title was something along the lines of 'The Chase UK: Highest Cashbuilder Total - 38 Correct Answers'

The current record is probably in one of the recent episodes. More and more teams recently are so immovable in not going high the show has been making higher high offers than ever to try to tempt them. In the old days the standard cap for a team pot was £60,000, but nowadays it's common for the 4th player to get a six figure offer!

Ikr

Interesting to see how different the game is played in others countries. Germany also adopted this format but they only get 500 Euro per answer and you almost never see someone go down as they give so little money. Only giving them a reasonable amount if most of the team lost already. And in the final you usually see well below 10k total which they almost never win. Pretty cheap show for the channel xD

Gareth wasn’t a very nice contestant to be honest, the other three were actually making smart decisions because it’s all about getting as many players back in the final chase as possible. I mean, yes it could’ve been a £38,000 win, but £19,000 is still a lot of money, but I feel like Gareth could’ve been more supportive about their decisions.

⁠@@gameshowclipsI think you’ve hit the nail right on the head. Any money-whether it’s £1 or £200,000-is zero money until the final chase is won, if it’s even won in the first place. £19,000 would actually be considered an average team cashbuilder total by modern standards, so none of them really had anything to worry about as £4,750 each is still a good payout for an hour’s worth of work. Still, it’s always interesting seeing different teams play _The Chase_ in different ways; whether that’d be all going low just to play the final chase, or all going high to maximise the pot. Every episode may be different, but at its core, it’s still a team game.

@@gameshowclips GARETH had every right to complain to his team when they kept chickening out This was Series 2 after all & it wasn't until the Celebrity Specials started being aired when they realized they needed the team more than the money I stand by what I originally said when I first saw this episode in 2010, everyone except GARETH was A COWARD

@@gameshowclips I understand where you're coming from but in my opinion, even though it's about getting as many people into the final chase, you'd also want to be playing for a decent amount too. Thankfully this was only season 2 cause what if it was the later seasons, it would have been less than 19k cause lower offers for seats 3 and 4 could be minus offers. I don't know how comparable this is but this situation was a less severe earlier clone of Darragh's episode because there weren't any minus offers.

Projecting?

@@TheShadowMan. Projecting what?

@@Messier45_Pleiades Projecting the lack of respect you have on yourself lol There is NOTHING wrong with whatever offer THEY take, its called choice idiot

​@artscafe9371 he isnt wrong people are working hard they are taking the coward way out especially if u are working as a team

@@benjamindada638if you’re working as a team then taking lower off is advisable if you’re a weaker player. Even if you don’t answer anything (which is rare) in the final chase, you still add value.

Did "across ALL cash builders..." not give it away lol idiot

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-R34ZeTL1bgw.html

£14,000 which was scored by contestant Les (Series 2 Episode 1)

Seat 4 went low too!

​@@gameshowclipsHuh, looks like I (and some media outlets reporting it at the time) were wrong in saying Darraugh's team was the only one to have 3 players go for the lower offer. Darraugh's team was WAY worse though, as seats 3 and 4 took minus offers, leeching on Darraugh's 9k and reducing the pot to just £1,575 per person.

@@bencalebrod Yeah, this is exactly what I though too. Certainly for the time. Darragh's team was the only one to have three players go low in the same episode/show?

The first player got £9,000, not £8,000

@@gameshowclipsYes, but why was the total on the display on the panel screen only GBP18K before adding the last player's total?

@@revealingreflections9338 Player 1 took her lower offer of £4000, Player 2 went for his £12,000, Player 3 took her lower offer of £2000 and from other comments Player 4 apparently took his lower offer of £1000. They all got to the final and did not get caught by the chaser, winning £4750 each.

​@@PureExileWhat are you talking about??

​@@grahamjones7070 Go back to bed mate 😂😂

Because three of the four contestants went low.

I can’t because of the risk of getting a copyright strike, but you can watch it for free here: archive.org/details/s-02_202301/S02E04.mp4

Seat 1: £4,000 and £16,000 (took low offer) Seat 2: £4,000 and £28,000 (took middle offer) Seat 3: £2,000 and £20,000 (took low offer) Seat 4: £1,000 and £22,000 (took low offer)

Yep, they won £19,000 (£4,750 each)

@@gameshowclips obviously at least 2 people took a low offer. They really should've won more

@@gameshowclips do you have the full episode? Would like to see it

@@XaviRonaldo0the full episode is on the website Archive.org Here’s the link to the final: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-R34ZeTL1bgw.htmlfeature=shared

Only because some of the contestants went low.

The first contestant got 9k, and I don't see where anyone went low.@@gameshowclips

@@Alan-io2ewhave you ever watched the show, after the cash builder they then go against the chaser and can either go high stay at their amount or take the lower offer 😂😂

@@Alan-io2ew TWO went low including, surprisingly, the first contestant! She won £9K but check 1:29 and you clearly see only £4k on the board. I believe the 3rd went low as well but you only see the updates once the next one starts.

You're absolutely right. The numbers do not add up. That was not 38 correct answers. It was 27.

£9,000 + £12,000 + £8,000 + £9,000 = £38,000. The prize fund is only less because some of the players went low.

I think you need to go back to school and learn to count.

should probably learn to count before commenting

In Australia its 2000 aud for each correct answer, equates to 1000 pounds though.

In the US, it’s 10 grand!