The Complete History of The German Nuclear Program 

Which topics will be covered in the near future beside the Life of Mussolini?

@@ZoomerHistorian no one cares

Thanks brother❤ Deus vult!

I honestly CANNOT WAIT for the Mussolini video(s)! Thank you.

This was an amazing video

Its not historically accurate at all

@@user-iz1qw7og4q prove it

@@user-iz1qw7og4qThank you Dr. Fauci

Nice try​@@user-iz1qw7og4q

@@user-iz1qw7og4qhow would you know have you seen it? List things that are incorrect from that documentary

You've been reported to the ADL

Why use dual metal airtight doors, when a wooden door will do just fine

@@actuallyKriminell they banned me from using a calculator for anything from 1943-45 please don't dispense these reports so vigorously

@@ZEZlMA Calculating numbers yourself is actually illegal. Please use your official government approved reference paper, thank you

@@ZEZlMA Please refer to your government issued reference paper

👃

I wonder why Hitler hated them?🤔

👃

Betrayed by a ✡️

2 minutes in - RIP Hiroshima. How she get with the #1 guy on the program. WWII was such a disaster we still pay for

Yhea!!! science!!!

JESSE DON'T EAT THE URANIUM

Graphite, b*tch!

@@through-faith-aloneYOU CANT STOP THE BULK

100%

@@WalterWhite-uq3gv an in depth interview could also be done!

He'd get banned off youtube for sure

He was already famous since the early '20s, for work that led to the realization that nuclear fission was feasible. He really was as big a deal as Newton.

Because he was a major opponent of Germany in the first world war and was Jewish, not because of his pseudoscience

@@jeroenlouwerse7454 Stop being dumb.

​@@jeroenlouwerse7454 bruh, i get your feelings on the first half, but by God, nuclear physics, or metaphysics for that matter are not pseudoscience... They are the monument to ancient Greek view that science and religion go hand in hand and that one gives examples in real life that clearly show the working of some higher force behind it all... The jew can have a lot of things said about him, but their religious mysticism is not unlike the other true religions which ushered the basic understanding of that same metaphysics long before mankind even started nearing the counting of time as we use it today... Just compare the maxims of God and maxims of energy by physics, and ask either a priest or a scientist to tell you more on God or energy correspondingly, and you will get the same answer - ``we don`t know more... We have observed and deduced what we can from signs and symbols and revelations/research, but the true nature of it all is beyond sophistry`` I have been told as much by all the physics professors that i had, and i need not talk to a priest for most of them are misguided anyway, and as far from true understanding of The All-Father as they get... But needless to say, if you consider that two atoms or two solid particles can actually not ever make true contact, that they are eternally separate, as Adam and Eve were when they were caught in the deep dream of suits of flesh(this world of matter), so too do material particles only truly have contact with phases of energy(as above so below manifestation of the Holy Spirit), as naught but fire, radiation and light may truly contact any bit of matter and are still not apart from the infinite field of energy which they are but a phase of... Think why fire was believed to have Cleansing properties... It is the one thing that can truly touch all of a sinner condmend, scientifically true on a subatomic level... No knife, no stake or breaking wheel can cleanse of ``sin``, not the cross nor an axe, but fire... And why does light have the same Cleansing properties... The radiation was just discovered too late to be viewed as such, but even so, pop culture artists were divinely inspired to make ``silly representations of zealous lunatics who worship at the church of atom`` and similar notions akin to that in fallout lore... Einstein just put into words of science the aspect of The Truth that all true religions preach... By True religions i mean those whose core was divinely revealed, regardless of the misguided state of the followers of that religion... Best regards dear brother! Ave!

​@@jeroenlouwerse7454 lol, pseudoscience you say? You sound exactly like the neo-communists that call everything they don't like or contradicts their narrative 'colonialist' and 'patriarcal'. I've heard those guys go as far to say that the scientific method is an instrument of oppression to 'invalidate' the superstition of the colonized countries. Far-right... Far-left... At the end of the day you're all the same...

This

Especially Operation Osoaviakhim considering Russians now love to call everyone a nazi when they themselves begged Nazis to work for them.

Operation paperclip still brothers me because those scientists were Germanys not the Nazis.

​@@salahdeanclemens2226actually they were both.

Indeed

​@@ZoomerHistorian I'm an aerospace engineer and would love a detailed video on the German rockets and how they translated to nasa and soviet success

@@ZoomerHistorianYes, please do an episode on rocket engineers like Wernher von Braun, who was a Sturmbannführer in the SS during the war (and was awarded the Iron Cross by moustache man) and later led the Saturn and Apollo rocket programs at NASA; or Kurt Debus, an SS Rottenführer that went on to become the first Director of the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

It's true and its very important now.

​@@reinotsurugibefore no one can

​@@ComradeOgilvy369 huh?

Last I checked Zoomer Historian only exists to go into the comment section and make fun of the idiotic German apologist simps.

​@@bewawolf19🥱

something the allies would never ever forever, pinky promise, not have done ☝️💀

@@publichearing8536 "Well they HAD to do it, to end the war sooner! It actually SAVED lives!"

@@charleschristianson2730 oh yeah that's absolutely right, how else would one -curb soviet influence in east asia- save _at least another 6 million billion_ civilians? also the people of southern Japan were avid puppy-kickers, they *kicked puppies and kitten* !

Many will never break away from the safety and comfort of their mainstream narrative security blanket.. they need it. It's part of their identity. Like a machine stamp or a cattle brand, it is forever in them.

​@@ravenodinson7483 Yes. "You have to understand. Most people are not ready to be unplugged. Many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, they will fight to protect it."

This guy doesn’t even post a bibliography. It’s a very basic expectation for a historian.

⁠@@ravenodinson7483The same logic can apply to you. You believe you know a truth that most of your society is blind to. But what if that truth isn’t quite so true as you currently believe? You aren’t comfortable with the idea that you’ve bought into something that in reality isn’t true. You can excuse yourself for having previously believed the “mainstream” view because it was taught to you, but you aren’t able to excuse yourself for your present views because you adopted those views on your own initiative.

@@firebird4491 Is it really that hard to believe that someone or some group in a position of control and power lied about the facts and events to suit their narrative and alter perception of people? I would argue it is absolutely inevitable. I start from a position of neutrality in that I do not immediately accept the narrative of those who came out victorious in the end in a historical event. For the simple fact that they have zero incentive to be truthful about their own crimes or the crimes of the group they conquered. It is illogical to accept any narrative on its face without doing a deep dive into both sides of the argument. Had it been the other way around, the exact same thing would have occurred. The winners write the history in wars. I will always approach a subject with curiosity and questions, regardless of whose feelings are hurt in the process or if it has inconvenient facts attached to it.

He is the man. Few people understand how hard Irving works. What other historian do you know who sites a source for every single assertion. The man is a god.

Fustel de Coulanges 'Ancient City' comes to mind. Unsurprisingly its also based

Wow...David Irving 💐💐💐

@@reinotsurugiThat is so strange. Why is he a god? He denies real historical events, is a historical revisionist, and litigious. He is a negationist, but you idolise him? I don’t get it.

@@flup1303 I'm sure if you stopped listening to his detractors and spent some time understanding the man himself based on his method and work, you'd admire him as well. But you have your view and don't want to challenge it, so continue in your ignorance.

Lol I noticed the very same thing. Lovely stuff isn't it

​@@james-fn3fnno, no it isn't. Flat earth version of history.

​@@senorpepper3405go eat bugs or something

@@ComradeOgilvy369 about what I would expect from someone who likes the zoomer historian. 👍

​@@senorpepper3405 How is this anything like flat earth? Irving writes using first hand evidence, not a Wikipedia page or worse - a hall of cost survivors incredible story of surviving the rollercoasters and Tom and Jerry ahhh shotgun executions (this was in an actual "memoir")

Me when I lie

Austrian*

my toddler came out as trans

@@techMan_25Me when I tell the trvth

From the first few sentences I doubt he touched on any of the real stuff.. He claimed the US made & tested the first nuke for goodness sake. Our nuclear artillery in the 1950s was designed off the German nukes which were launched from rail guns in Crimea and other parts of Russia. They also tested a larger bomb underground in France. Funny how they actually worried about stuff like fallout. We just blasted our own people..

Evil Heisenburg????

Only if we stop hiding behind our screens

@@Aluttuh lead the way big man

@@Aluttuh On the contrary. The name of the game is guerrilla warfare. We're in the spread awareness state anyways. And don't organize or you'll make yourself an easy target. Hide and prefer doing one-man operations.

​@@Aluttuh people need to wake up first. Unfortunately for some people, things have to deteriorate more before they wake up.

@@jalander8817 already ahead of you. I do this for you i hope you know.

Not even

Odd that he didn't mention that David died a couple months ago

@@LegendofNelda News of his passing was premature. He is very ill however.

@EJisArete He's alive??? No way the Irving foundation X said he died????? Is he in Argentina😏

This is correct.

"David Irving sponsor" is based on what? Either mean "biased" and you suck at English as much as it gets or I have no idea what you're trying to say.

It really is... Say what you will about his apparent sympathies - ZH produces top shelf content, and quickly. It's inspiring, actually.

I believe Hitler called it Jewish science and since he believed that Jews were trying to destroy the world and the Atomic bomb was designed to destroy the world he probably made that connection.

I think in "Manu: For the Man to Come."

Yeah but this guy isnt really credible.

​@@romanempire8370I talk to important ss officials, you also have a point

​@@romanempire8370Bots. Bots everywhere

oppenheimer is pretentious wank, the old film "fat man and little boy" is a much better depiction of the official narrative, for alternatives I recommend the books "reich of the black sun" and "wuwa - wunderwaffen"

Ask yourself where the "city of london" would be.

I think it would be too political as this channel is purely historical

What does "winning" look like to you? Because there really is no way Germany could have won the war the way it played out in reality once England refused to negotiate and the US joined in the fray. In my opinion a real "win" for Germany would have been to avoid total war, which was Hitler's intention. Germany would have had to broker some kind of negotiated settlement with England by '41. They would have either not attacked USSR at all or at least waited a year to strengthen their logistics. Without England and the US in the war, Germany would have had their western border free to commit nearly all reserves to the eastern front. In that scenario, they would have probably been able to get to Moscow as quick as the real Barbarossa, and would have eventually taken it. The USSR would have most likely surrendered at that point or kept pulling forces east til they were fully beaten or else negotiated some lopsided settlement.

They needed to reign in the Japanese and called for them to end the war with the Chinese nationalists, who were ostensibly friendly with Germany.​@@renardfox328

@@renardfox328 Pretty much how you explained it. I wonder what that post war world woulda looked like

Not a fan of althistory

Lebanon flag??? I dream of days of vengeful green.

@@againsttheleftandright4065 What the hell are you talking about?

@@WholeMilkisBetter Lebanon flag?

@@againsttheleftandright4065 Where?

@@WholeMilkisBetterhe’s talking about your pfp

Music from the thirties in general from the thirties is great

I too hate nuclear weapons

A historian. Old my beer. This Guy is just a punk head trying to defend the most discusting ideology of all Time.

​@@ZoomerHistorianyou hate nuclear weapon but you like the Nazi....

@@NameckSullyvann You labelling me that doesn’t dignify a response but I don’t think it’s Nazis who are known for using nuclear weapons on innocent civilians… that’s liberal democracies.

@@ZoomerHistorian no...the Nazi are known for having kill 2/3 of the european jews(children and women without distinction) start the worst War in human History,create a hierarchy among men,starve to death millions on the eastern front and destroy the german country like no one could have. And you dare defend them. The liberal democracies at their worst are a thousand Times better than the Nazis.

The trick to getting good recommendations is to really manage your watch history. Recommendations are based on your history and videos you engage with. If you end up watching something that's a bit trashy and you'd prefer not to have it influence your feed - make sure to go through your watch history and delete it. I'm a premium user and I get the sense that this sharpens and improves the recommendation algorithm as well, but I'm not sure about that. I never get recommended the sort of videos you're talking about anymore.

🗿🗿🗿🗿

Flat earthers

^circumcision alert.

@@senorpepper3405 reddit-esque personal-incredulity isn't an argument

@@henocksherlock3340 well, give me yours.

Are you also @WheelieYellow? Lol

12 hours of wehraboo cope

@@danielmolinar8669 you're the only one coping, this guy lives rent free in your tiny ✡️ head, cry

​@@danielmolinar8669Shalom Shmuel!

Yes

@@ZoomerHistorian goat bro🙏

How would you get rid of 6 million bodies ?

Well the easiest way to find someone being a complete idiot is them claiming the holocaust didn't happen as the overwhelming evidence shows it clearly has. The number of deaths is semantic as it is a question of how many millions the Germans deliberately killed and how many millions the Germans let starve because they couldn't feed them at the time, which then ignores the obvious issue the Germans were still planning on exterminating them...Just after the war.

He's not going to answer, dude. We want this channel up and running for a long time.