The Creator Of Commander | A Conversation With Sheldon Menery | Untitled Magic The Gathering Podcast

Подписаться 1 млн

Просмотров 198 тыс.

50% 1

Be sure to also watch "Dealing With Difficult Commander Players" here: • Dealing With Difficult...
Celebrate 30 years of Magic: The Gathering at MTG Summit! More information here: mtgsummit.com/
Join the RC Discord here: / discord
Check out the official RC website here: mtgcommander.net/
A reminder that my Discord has a 100% free "Looking For Game" section, with games of everything from Commander to Modern (and even Pauper) firing off. So if you want to get some webcam Magic, just check out / discord
#MagicTheGathering #MTG #commander
►This episode is brought to you thanks to our wonderful Patreon community. Join to support the show, or just Shuffle Up & Play with other awesome people on our Patron Discord by going to / tolariancommunitycollege
►This show is made in part due to Card Kingdom. You can help us out by visiting our affiliate link at www.CardKingdom.com/TCC

Игры

Опубликовано:

27 сен 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1,8 тыс.

@TolarianCommunityCollege Год назад

A reminder that my Discord has a 100% free "Looking For Game" section, with games of everything from Commander to Modern (and even Pauper) firing off. So if you want to get some webcam Magic, just check out discord.gg/tolariancommunitycollege

@lordeng1ish Год назад

I've seen this but the 100% free LFG section makes it sound like there aren't a plethora of chat channels to hang out in, also for free.

@WingofTech Год назад

Do you guys do Tabletop Sim? 🥺

@adarkimpurity Год назад

Subjective and differing formats wouldn't be a 'deviation' or an 'exception' if there wasn't a rule!

@pearcehubbart3767 Год назад

Only power level 7 right?

@hughjass5494 Год назад

@@WingofTech TTS is way better than webcam magic. Casting Praetor's Grasp over webcam is a nightmare.

@migsmigs2425 9 месяцев назад

Rewatching, in honor of this great man. Rest in power, Sheldon.

@zackpumpkinhead8882 5 месяцев назад

Oh my God. It's starting. The time when old magic players start to...

@davidlayton4310 3 месяца назад

I watching cause I haven't before but because of that mans memory he did alot for MTG

@MrAdamJoel Месяц назад

Same

@skyfe2306 9 месяцев назад

RIP Sheldon, thank you for your good work!

@connorpinzon 9 месяцев назад

Rest in peace Sheldon Menery, thank you for doing so much for so many

@zackaryfisher2883 Год назад

What a fantastic interview! I greatly appreciate that Prof was totally willing to kinda just gun it on important topics, rather than dance around the point (looking at you, Dockside!). At the same time, I feel like there was a great deal of respect between Prof and Sheldon, and even when Sheldon didn't give the most satisfying answer, Prof's comments on that were never harsh or clearly antagonistic. Like I said, fantastic interview

@DiabloTommaso Год назад

@@XCodes nah still the card is a mistake and always will be. 4 player 3 tresure and a are positive in mana

@charliewright2667 Год назад

@@XCodes imagine unironically comparing dockside and dark ritual lmaoo. Also saying it wouldn't be a problem if other cards were banned is like saying paradox engine wouldn't be a problem if mana rocks/dorks didn't exist lol. Technically true, but maybe, just maybe, the one card is the game-breaking problem, not the 10s-100s of format staples that it benefits from.

@markusaurelius83 Год назад

It was a good interview, with the exception of the "diversity-question". Can't people just stop injecting their ill-informed political beliefs into things we enjoy?

@DiabloTommaso Год назад

@@XCodes man are you kidding rigth? Do you really need me to explain why dockside is broken? If so let me help you.

@jianhaogao7608 Год назад

@@XCodes Being a creature already means better than instant, treasure better than single use mana, and dorkside can easily hit 5+treasure

@brockmckelvey7327 Год назад

The Professor: Why not have more people on the RC? Sheldon: ...Have you ever tried to run a weekly D&D night with your friends?

@AricHaldan0782 Год назад

@@Zookmottin multibillion dollar corporation pay their board of directors a lot of money to be present. I don't think we want to link the rules committee with that kind of financial incentives so the comparison is kinda dead in the water.

@fruhlingsbilder Год назад

@@AricHaldan0782 👀 true we want one that makes idiotic decisions to based on their extremely small sample size. But at least this dude is the only person that has "a philosophy". Maybe market manipulation is a small bonus too.

@xxhellspawnedxx Год назад

@@Zookmottin A board of directors is a majority rules operation, not one running on consensus. So the comparison is invalid. As for why they don't want to run a purely democratic system, I don't know, but that's where it's at.

@anthonyyates9003 Год назад

@@xxhellspawnedxx "because democracy is the worst system" (I may have left a bit out here)

@soren1803 Год назад

@@xxhellspawnedxx Sheldon has expressed anti-democratic sentiments on his discord before

@gmalanga Год назад

I think the only thing keeping Dockside Extortionist from creeping into every single deck is the absurd cost of the card, and for that matter Wizards of the Coast not reprinting it enough.

@krvys7226 Год назад

While I agree, I do argue many players don't mind people proxying. Either if they don't own the cards, or own only 1 copy of the card between multiple decks

@gmalanga Год назад

And Brian, what a great job as an interviewer! Congratulations!

@bluntx123 Год назад

Yup, if you can afford to run dockside in every single deck with red splash, you should be. The card is so much more broken than primeval titan unless your running a land matters theme.

@requenagames612 Год назад

you are right, is not in every single deck that use red just because of the price. That card is cancer. And sol ring and mana crypt too.

@justinhoudeshell4031 Год назад

The other part about dockside it over performs at higher power and is just ok at lower power level tables.

@TheJOVVA 9 месяцев назад

This video introduced me to Sheldon, the Godfather of Commander. I'm deeply saddened to read that he passed away today. Thank you Sheldon

@stryk55 Год назад

Commander brought me back to Magic...hadn't played in 16 years, Dominaria was coming out on my birthday so I stopped in my LGS...everyone was playing Commander, and I learned that all my old cards from 1994-2002 were actually useful in a format and got hooked! Thanks, Sheldon!

@MrAlfredSaxon Год назад

Same here! Commander rocks, and I don't agree with everyone that thinks it should just be considered a casual format.

@cdude665 Год назад

This is why we love the professor. He genuinely has the community's best interests at heart and asks the good questions and doesn't cater to the guest while simultaneously being respectful. Love it!

@captaindaddd6055 Год назад

I'm generally all for representation, but I really don't think we need more people in a rules committee that just say "yeah just rule 0 your playgroups lol". What I get from him talking about the philosophy of commander is that, at heart, it is a "casual" format, and that the banlist is just a guide for playgroups. I don't feel that there needs to be a huge governing body just for them to say "hey you probably shouldn't play golos but it's up to you guys anyways". Afaik, the commander advisory group is pretty well diverse too and they do speak with the rules committee enough, I'd hope

@roberthancock6870 Год назад

The reason dockside isn't played as much as hullbreacher was is that way more copies of hullbreacher were printed

@Ambyli Год назад

Ikr, when hull was legal it was i think $11-19 while dockside is only now $50-70. So of course it started appearing everywhere! Could have the price ranges wrong but I definitely remember buying a hull and not thinking about it as much as a dockside.

@Zafocaine Год назад

Bingo. The logical fallacies betting used are sort out astounding. It's no wonder that transparency has been so sparse. You know Rachel Weeks chatted with dude about Sisay after she got shut down by shrines on I Hate Your Deck.

@theelectricant98 Год назад

Yeah I was surprised the cost/scarcity element didn't come up

@theelectricant98 Год назад

If anything it's even more reason to ban since it's inaccessible

@jonarvaez8232 Год назад

@@theelectricant98 how bout we unban primetime first. He's suffered enough

@jeffwren7815 Год назад

Professor is out here gunning for Dockside...

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

As he should be. That card should have never been printed.

@RafaelPanazzo Год назад

@@casteanpreswyn7528 Dockside is great. leave it alone

@ThiefSakon Год назад

Because red usually cares about enchantments. It's a trash design AND way overtuned.

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

@@RafaelPanazzo its one of the worst cards ever printed. There is no justification for it other than, "it'll be expensive on the secondary market". Next you're gonna say Ancestral Recall and Time Walk are perfectly fine and balanced cards.

@jianhaogao7608 Год назад

@@RafaelPanazzo Are you kidding me?

@claytonchandler6657 Год назад

Can we please have more of these interviews? It was really amazing to see you two talk, I would really love to see more videos of you talking to the higher ups of magic the gathering.

@DylanHunter64 Год назад

Sheldon: The first thing is, we don't do 'Why this, not that,' Prof: You do here! I literally spit out my coffee in laughter 😅

@Zafocaine Год назад

The fact that he thinks that line of reasoning would get more cards banned rather than unbanning unreasonable bans should disturb the community playing under him.

@DylanHunter64 Год назад

@@Zafocaine I can see both ways of thinking. There are a lot of cards that could be lifted from the banned list but there are also a lot of people who'd rather see a card like Dockside banned rather than see Prime Time unbanned.

@UVAFoozle Год назад

@@DylanHunter64 as far as banning for power level, I think there are only a few cards that get talked about enough to possibly (and popularly) deserve a ban (Dockside, Thoracle, Ad Naus, Fierce Guardianship, perhaps a few more). About as many or maybe a few more than the number of cards that get talked about enough to warrant an unban (Prophet of Kruphix, Prime Time, Coalition Victory, Biorhythm). I don't think the banned list would immediately spike to 100+ cards as Sheldon suggests, but a progressive banned list like that, with a new ban-for-power mentality, would certainly grow much faster as Wizards continues to push commander design. Perhaps they keep it this way so they don't have to change things regularly.

@Srynan Год назад

@@UVAFoozle already got to disagree, play a game or 2 with Prime Time and/or Prophet of Kruphix. Those cards are very reasonable bans and will warp the format of many groups if unbanned.

@josephpayton7522 Год назад

@@Srynan Neither of those cards are nearly as good as dockside let alone as good as thoracle and ad nauseam. It's a joke to leave Prime Time banned especially.

@dcshw2 9 месяцев назад

Rest in peace, Sheldon. You remain alive in the lives you've touched.

@MrSamuelStreamer Год назад

Well there goes my next hour

@zackarieneifert7014 Год назад

Now I know what to blame when the next episode is late.

@melkiah 9 месяцев назад

Thank you for letting the rest of us get a peak and a small chance to be familiar with this magical being. I hope all the shuffle up and plays and this conversation get revisited so we can all appreciate what a gift Sheldon truly was to our gathering not as the father of edh but as an amazing person he truly had a gift to make you feel apart of something even through a screen. RIP legend

@345tom Год назад

That final question is such a hard question, with Sheldon being open about his current condition. It's hard not to think about that question in the context of Sheldons ongoing health issues. Kudos for Sheldon for answering and such, but man is that, contextually, a rough question to be asked

@UnexpectedDanger Год назад

This was very interesting, Sheldon seems like a pretty good guy but I still think the rules committee is very behind with the format. I'm glad prof took him to task a bit for that. They have a lot of catching up to do.

@markscruggs8346 Год назад

Right, he was talking about how powerful Prime Time was...a decade ago

@atle853 Год назад

Yeah, for all intents and purposes cEDH is the default format and casual commander is the variant. cEDH is a board game consisting of around 300 staple cards (plus commander specific extras), reverse engineered from the most consistent version of all the rules. Casual is somewhere between a failed attempt to utilize trade binders and cEDH. Format warping things are problems for casual when they invalidate thousands of cards, but they are advantageous for developing cornerstones of a competitive format.

@DimT670 Год назад

@@atle853 if you think cedh is played more than non cedh you are full on delusional. Cedh is the aberration that goes against what the format is, ergo the problems. There is a fixed cedh format, its called highlander

@A12C4 Год назад

@@DimT670 I think you completely misunderstood his comment. What he is saying is cEDH is the resulting format of such a small amount of rules and bans with an eternal card list, EDH is an aberration that shouldn't exist (not that we don't WANT it to exist, but it SHOULDN'T exist with this set of rules).

@KingdomsTV Год назад

We are excited to have you both at the Magic Summit! Also, unban Coalition Victory! 😂

@ebontatro9631 Год назад

Especially since Painbow is such a badass! I need that win con in there! I'll live with Teferi's Protection and Worldfire but Coalition Victory would be so much more on par with Painbow!

@mightyone3737 Год назад

It never ceases to amaze me that Coalition Victory is verboten while Liliana's Contract and other stuff is totally fine. I get the 'wait until your upkeep' is a gargantuan ask in a powerful meta, but it's so much easier to pull of Contract's condition, and it's not a dead card when you draw into it like Victory is. Also Victory uses a ton of mana, so it's really hard to hold up counter magic. I haven't decided if I'd run it in Reaper King, but it's a solid-ish spell in that deck in particular, but again, with so many changelings and Maskwood Nexus, Contract is still so much better.

@BelieMyBurial Год назад

@@mightyone3737 having to wait an entire turn rotation makes all the difference in the world, especially when the condition required is the easiest to remove card type. Coalition Victory has to be answered while on the stack or the game ends then and there. and it's conditions are laughably easy nowadays and can be met with three cards most of the time, one of which is in the Command zone and at least one of which is a land. also, never mind the fact that five-color decks are already getting too strong and generally tend to be goodstuff piles, they do not need an instant win card on top of everything else.

@aarononeal201 Год назад

You do realize that Commander isn't a DCI sanctioned format nor is it controlled by or ran by WoTc a subsidiary of Hasbro. So technically speaking Commander has no actual banned list right? Sheldon and his cohorts literally have zero power or authority for that matter to anything remotely close to "Banning" literally anything.

@breadgehog 9 месяцев назад

@@mightyone3737 The problem is that it's a relic from a time when full WUBRG was a novelty as decks go, and basic land "types" didn't exist, just basic lands. Two triomes and an actual WUBRG commander win you the game the same turn, when other wincons either resolve on upkeep or lose you the game if someone has a counter. Coalition Victory would actually be completely fine in Reaper King imo, as you'd have to actually have more than one creature. I'd be fine with Rule 0ing it into that deck.

@samanthamccormick1436 Год назад

This was fantastic Prof. You are an absolutely slick interviewer. The right balance of respect and inquisitiveness, the exact right amount of edge. Love to see you interview others in the game.

@CRIMS0N_KING Год назад

Everything Sheldon was saying about Primeval Titan applies to Dockside. As soon as it hits the battlefield it becomes a race to copy, reanimate, etc. it. It's had less reprints and is significantly more expensive than Prime Time and that's the only reason it's not showing up more.

@bluesight_ Год назад

EXACTLY We are living in the Treasure Token meta, and it seems the RC likes it that way.

@xChikyx Год назад

When i was in their discord, some people on the RC told me that they feel thassa's oracle is as hard as interact with as recurring nightmare, as problematic as that one too, yet they don't want to ban it because they use rule zero as an excuse for everything. the RC is a joke

@8nykspree Год назад

You're comparing apples to hershey bars when you compare Dockside in this era of edh to Prime Time back when it was legal and subsequently banned. You had to be playing around that era to really understand how broken Prime Time was at that time of MTG where it was a literal arms race to who could abuse it in whichever way possible. Dockside is nowhere close to the level of busted that PT was a decade ago by virtue of where the landscape of the rest of the format sits today.

@jonf2009 Год назад

The problem with prime titan was utility lands. Treasure tokens almost universally just tap for mana, primeval could get valakut, field of the dead, a cradle, strip mine, etc.

@B1gLupu 5 месяцев назад

@@8nykspree Dockside is much, much more impactful card than Primetime ever was. Commander a format where cards like Mox Diamond, Sol Ring, Mana Crypt, Carpet of Flowers are stables, so Dockside is just an explosion of mana. It regularly makes 8 mana on etb, in a format where 5 mana pays for Ad Nauseam.

@fidwell Год назад

Sheldon: "We have no stance on proxies." Prof: "Ah, so you're for proxies!" Sheldon: "Are you even listening?"

@pizzapm Год назад

theyre probably for proxies, but cant say so because they work closely with WOTC

@tttyyy949 Год назад

@@pizzapm WOTC is not against proxies unless its sanctioned tournament. So that's not an argument.

@rustlingclock0234 Год назад

@@pizzapm 30 year celebration would say otherwise 😂

@turtlekappa7141 Год назад

Cause WotC totally didn't issue a cease and desist order over proxies

@Surixurient 6 месяцев назад

in the game were Sheldon played with prof and prof asked to use a proxy Sheldon seemed personally against proxies@@pizzapm

@obadijahparks Год назад

The death trigger for Elenda, the dusk rose was what made me learn about that rule change.

@22781dave Год назад

Same. I bought a copy of her to build as my second EDH commander when she was around 4-5 bucks thinking she was busted. After finding out she would have to stay in the yard until I could recur her I scrapped that idea and she ended up in a bulk box. Fast forward a few years and she is now one of my favorite EDH decks to play!

@cylonsteve2511 Год назад

I went with the more humble Gerrard post rule change 🙂 Elenda is very potent.

@nateszigeti3653 Год назад

imagine my mind as somebody who had built Elenda with intent to let her go to grave before that change. Didn't take recursion out, i just get to use it on other targets.

@thebasedone2621 Год назад

Prof coming in with some heavy hitting questions. Never realized how fierce of an interviewer he was.

@JohnWVarner Год назад

I kinda like it. Very direct, not antagonizing or confrontational but not dancing around the crux of the question.

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

He was actually a lot more tame and reserved than usual, and it was a bit disappointing.

@treetheoak8313 Год назад

Honestly I feel like wizards is weary whenever they okay a rep to do an interview with him. Because I would not okay some of these questions at all if I where them! 😂

@Xoulrath_ Год назад

@@casteanpreswyn7528 yeah, this was just an hour of Shedlon stroking his ego.

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

@@Xoulrath_ 100% and it was insulting as fuck. Usually Proff is better than this, makes me think he had to agree to a WotC interview contract before.

@BlazingSpirit190 Год назад

It really is nice to see an interview where the interviewer and interviewee obviously have some differing views, but are perfectly respectful the entire time, even when going through some of the touchier questions. Kudos to you both!

@TimmyTurner421 Год назад

Yes that's very rare these days and awesome to watch

@flipevent 9 месяцев назад

Given today's recent news, I think there can be no more poignant of an answer to the legacy Sheldon has built than the one he gave on 49:26. Thank you for everything, Sheldon Menery. Even though as you said, it's a bit sad that you will no longer be doing the work, the whole MTG community will keep your memory and legacy alive from here.

@alexparsons3295 Год назад

The random frame at 21:39 of Sheldon sitting by himself had me remembering certain scenes from fight club.

@Kakerate2 Год назад

LMAO

@williambrown983 Год назад

The Prof phased out, but then untap happened and he came back.

@krazykilper Год назад

I met Sheldon at Commandfest Orlando 2022 and let him know I was upset about the Golos banning. He was a good sport to my rather annoying criticism and later I even had him sign a Golos. Best event I've been to yet!

@kingfede1985 Год назад

This is one of the best pieces of content I've seen in years, absolutely. Thanks prof for all your work, and thanks to Sheldon for the special gift he gave all of us with Commander! :)

@Srynan Год назад

What a grace to be a part of this community. I am so honored that you have managed to produce such an open, honest and heartfelt interview. Kudos to the Professor, to Sheldon and all of the people behind the scenes who have made this possible. Thanks for continuing to be reasonable, hard working and welcoming people.

@Neg319 Год назад

Sheldon's a great guy. I met him at command fest Orlando earlier this year and when he came to our table, he spoke with us as if we were his friends. I really enjoyed the interview.

@ZakanaHachihaCBC Год назад

Eh, my experience is less positive. He made a post in a commander Facebook group linking to how MDFC work as the commander, and the link originally said “if either face of an MDFC is a legendary creature” and was at some point in under 24 hours changed to say “if the front face.” All he had to say when I had directly asked him about this was “it was changed after I posted the link” and then never replied when I asked why he couldn’t have just edited his post to say there was an error or correction. Because there were a lot of arguments between people who read it just now with people who read it when first shared and had literally no reason to go back and read it again.

@Neg319 Год назад

@@ZakanaHachihaCBC That seems like a very small mistake to judge a person by.

@ZakanaHachihaCBC Год назад

@@Neg319 It was getting pretty heated in the comments. Yeah it was a small interaction, but it’s also not something I judge him as a person off of, even if it’s really stupid that he didn’t make the edit.

@TimmyTurner421 Год назад

@@ZakanaHachihaCBC You seem to be a very petty person. Sounds like a "you" problem to be honest

@dddgaming885 Год назад

Yeah, the dude who called people "braying asses" for rightfully pointing out that initiative is too strong in 1v1 formats is super great. Lmao.

@junkred9466 Год назад

Three years ago I wanted to enter the world of Magic, but my girlfriend told me about the rotations, it stopped me right away. But recently I finally learned about the commander format, and today, I’m waiting impatiently for the arrival of my first deck (from a local game store no worries!), thank you so much for making this game accessible for casual players!

@chrismaxwell3001 Год назад

I feel like the Rules committee are individuals that wotc have grown to connect with and trust their assets with for consultation. CAG has been developed to fill the missing connection those few people have with the wider community outside judge circles and pro tours. From the outside it looks like an apprentice step for those wanting to be on the Rules committee, as its a platform from which the individuals opinions and decision making structure are becoming more visable to Wotc, to be able to see if they can be trusted to have a partnership with in the future. Like Sheldon said, providing for a future rules committee.

@mikeholler3251 8 месяцев назад

Wow, you're a great interviewer. Continuous respect, and you provided pressure in a way that wasn't "calling him out" but gave him an opportunity to clarify what he was saying.

@daviskendrick6214 Год назад

Much respect to both of these gentlemen. Extremely professional interview while still asking very touchy questions.

@keernalc5423 Год назад

I loved this podcast but it’s left me feeling uneasy. I think prof brought up great questions and was given half answers. Would love to see more conversations like this.

@stickofbutter4144 Год назад

Agreed, one of the first things that annoyed me is saying that the reason prime time is banned because it warps games around it. And that it’s been banned for so long that most players have not played with/against that. Formats change, decks change, cards that have been banned for a while should be re evaluated not just left on the banned list because at some point it was good.

@moxcardboardtv8797 Год назад

Enter Sheldon Menery and the RC. They give vague half answers because they don't have actual good reasons for their decisions besides the fact that they don't want to lose their control over the format and they want to force the format to be what they think it should be instead of what millions of players have evolved it into.

@juts89 Год назад

@@moxcardboardtv8797 You also have to consider that many times, players do not understand the game well enough to know exactly what they want. Players will almost always optimize the fun out of a game if given the opportunity to easily do so. They have the clout to say they designed the format that is so popular, and you have to weigh any suggestions as a what if vs a certainty. That being said I think the one thing they need to do if they want a leg to stand on is obliterate rule zero from space and actually take hard stances on the rules of the format. Its not a format for a small group anymore. My personal asks? Ban the reserve list. I think a huge portion of the community would shit on them if they did that though, so whos right?

@abentevent Год назад

@@stickofbutter4144 have you played with it in commander?

@lakingpaul Год назад

@@juts89 Just wanted to say I agree with your first paragraph. As someone who has founded a thing myself, people often don't understand the full implications of the suggestions they put forth. Being open to collaboration and input when you become popular is important, but wanting to maintain some control of the direction of the thing you came up with is understandable to me.

@fishinfrenzy3503 9 месяцев назад

May God Bless his Soul!!! 💖 I never knew Sheldon personally however, it Felt like, Every time I "Shuffled Up" to play... He was Right there with us, Every Mistake of the Way!!! The Commander format Helped me through some Misery and Pain... Nigh! Sheldon helped me through! If it were not for HE, Commander and a Close Friend... I Might Not be here right now... I wish his Family and Close Friends, Strength... For I have Yet to find mine! 💝 🍻

@TimmyTurner421 9 месяцев назад

Beautifully written. So much passion, gratitude, and respect. Big heart

@resolvegaming2263 9 месяцев назад

Great interview, rip Sheldon

@thygevandassen5725 Год назад

Chiming in from Denmark here - absolute fantastic interview! Never knew I actually cared about this stuff and knowledge. So great to get insights into all of this. G R E A T work, Professor. You are awesome!

@Mozokuni Год назад

Great video! I'm building my first commander deck while watching this video and it's good to get to see behind the curtain.

@Revanaver91 Год назад

We’re really lucky as a community to have folks like the Professor and Sheldon as advocates for us. I can’t imagine where magic would be without them, and I’m so glad they’re both such firm believers in creating a more welcoming, accessible, and equitable community. Thanks to you both!

@cmkmusicislife1571 Год назад

I played a game of EDH with Sheldon and called him out for not shuffling the top card of his deck. I don’t know if he did it intentionally or by mistake, but he wrote an article about it lol

@jordanwoosley1861 Год назад

Got a link to the article?

@jessesandburg Год назад

Link?

@RaunienTheFirst Год назад

It's entirely possible OP is trying to post a link, YT likes to delete comments that contain links or things that look like links.

@stuartmiller4363 Год назад

Link?

@guftders Год назад

Whats the name of the article at least, and where was it posted? We can just google it

@lokiwiFruit Год назад

Prof you are not afraid to ask the hard questions or call out what players are thinking. I really appreciate your content and product reviews. This looked like a semi-tense interview and it was a great look behind the curtain so thank you for doing this.

@Andregea 9 месяцев назад

Sheldon's passion for the game and his dedication to creating a fun and inclusive environment for players to enjoy Magic will be remembered and celebrated by many. His contributions to the Commander format have left a lasting impact on the Magic community, and his legacy will continue to influence the way players enjoy the game for generations to come.

@HadesSyntax5049 Год назад

As someone returning to magic, but new to commander, I have to say you’re interview was very well done and much appreciated!

@dakotawiegand1462 Год назад

This was a great interview! It’s super interesting listening to this conversation and good for the prof for throwing a combination of soft and hard questions!

@Sakurina Год назад

That Magic Summit promo is the funniest promo Prof has done in a while

@KingdomsTV Год назад

7’s only in the Commander Arena 😂

@GraemeGunn Год назад

lol "And Vince!"

@Phe0nix1986 Год назад

That was such an interesting interview… thanks for it!!!

@TolarianCommunityCollege Год назад

Glad you enjoyed it!

@Shane16784 Год назад

As someone that generally disagrees with the RC, I find this interview quite an interesting listen. Sheldon is quite an interesting person to listen to talk about magic, very articulate. I have watched the discord a bit of late and find it something that is quite a good bridge of communication for the RC and general base (which I have mostly been critical of not existing). Still will disagree (in respectful manner) but nice to want to hear more of the RC instead of less. I would love to see an extended interview (Also love the Prof asking about Leovold and reaction to the “No” lol)

@CQCnotBLT Год назад

Good to see another Untitled podcast!

@carsonkoehnen Год назад

lmao

@TheBigDirty716 Год назад

The conversation about dockside is difficult to listen to. The situation he described is definitely not what is going on at my LGS. The only reason not everyone is running it is because not everyone is willing to spend 80 bucks on a card. If it was 20 like hullbreacher it'd be as ubiquitous as sol ring

@isaacsmith3998 Год назад

Yeah I want to call bullshit on Sheldon here. There are tons of docksides running around at lower power tables at my LGS. It is in pretty much every deck that has red in it, and the only limiting factor is its absurd price. Very frustrating to see it acknowledge in this way by the format rule makers. I was really disappointed with the way the prof just changed the subject after because the answer was just not satisfactory.

@TheBigDirty716 Год назад

@@isaacsmith3998 agree. It's frustrating when someone with so much power over the format seems so disconnected from the game I experience

@stolstice2071 Год назад

100% this!! It's more about accessibility than pure power level

@ZakanaHachihaCBC Год назад

Hearing him talk about Dockside is really a long winded way of admitting he has a disconnect with the majority of players and how the game is played

@ZachtheUnbowed Год назад

Never related with a comment so much in my life

@YaoBao1 Год назад

What a profound and meaningful interview this was! Thank you very much for facilitating it Prof!

@ieatmygarden Год назад

Absolutely lovely - only upgrade would have been a solid hug at the end! Please do another interview with Sheldon and have him on an episode of shuffle up and play!

@JustABrokenToy Год назад

Sheldon seems fairly pragmatic, and I appreciate that. I think the RC has become more transparent over the past few years, but part of the point the Prof was making is that there's still gaps even with some of the CAG's input. a diverse range of voices in the CAG (budget vs big spenders, casual vs cEDH, Johnny/Jenny vs Spike vs Timmy/Tammy, new players vs rules lawyers) should provide enough useful input to accomplish the intended goal, but not all those players should have a final say on the commander format. as Sheldon points out, the useful takeaway from some piece of data is when it's filtered through someone like Shivam to see how Shivam's experience is impacted. also I want to say dockside has a low floor but a high ceiling. the issue is exacerbated by the prevalence of mana rocks.

@simplistic_1 Год назад

Excellent interview, despite an appalling lack of discussion about the finer points of EDH Merfolk strategy and deck construction.

@OGDanteZero Год назад

This is so cool! What a great interview. Thank you sir for creating the main format that I love to play!!

@Alex-xk5xt Год назад

he really said "we're the only format with a conscience" in the first five minutes lmao. this is gonna be good.

@xddddddddddddd Год назад

if the conscience means "i don't want to play / proxy good interaction" yes i agree commander players do have that 😂

@aidansherwin3872 Год назад

@@xddddddddddddd what do you mean you dont wanna sit across from me as we both solitare towards a very eventual victory?? TRYHARD

@Xoulrath_ Год назад

If you aren't winning on turn 1, ignoring all interaction, then you're doing it wrong.

@mintspears6714 Год назад

Loved hearing form Sheldon, loved that Prof didn't only ask easy questions either. Thank you Sheldon for creating such an amazing way to play an already amazing game

@demonbear55 Год назад

At one point I thought the Prof would ask to treat the witness as hostile. What a great interview. Great job Prof.

@aloehart3374 Год назад

The ban list isn't about restricting your local group. The ban list is about events and travel. If i play with friends consistently, we'll play whatever we want. But if you sit down with random people, you can have a pre-game conversation but you can, at minimum, expect legal decks.

@OmNommSnom Год назад

Yeah, Sheldon doesn't seem to understand that Commander isn't anything like D&D. Commander is a card game that needs rules and restrictions not imgination and a, "philosophy" that he mentions every 10 seconds.

@direkitsune Год назад

@Hono Shirayuki except, it's WAS once upon a time. And to a decent extent it still is because regular playgroups have their own house rules, gameshops can have their own house rules, etc. It wasn't meant to be an overly serious format, meant to be something to do while bsing with friends, something also in common with d&d.

@OmNommSnom Год назад

@@direkitsune I see the point you are trying to make but I still wouldn't compare a competitive card game to D&D. The comparison just doesn't make any sense.

@direkitsune Год назад

@@OmNommSnom I think your making a logical mistake. Commander is not a competitive card game, it's a casual one

@OmNommSnom Год назад

@@direkitsune Commander for the most part is casual, however, Magic at its core will forever be competitive considering everyone is playing to win.

@zachariahhenzel3518 Год назад

I just really appreciate that this conversation was captured for me to eavesdrop in on... thank you!

@strawhat4lif316 Год назад

Does wizards pay you money "Meh that's between us" Answer: yes

@bloodblade487 Год назад

I'm really glad this conversation happened. Some good questions were asked.

@gigawarman12 Год назад

If only any them were actually answered

@Caio22011 Год назад

@@gigawarman12 THIS

@Arcdemon44 Год назад

Sheldon dodged around anything resembling a good answer. His defense for Primeval Titan still being banned was hilariously weak and pathetic.

@gigawarman12 Год назад

@@Arcdemon44 it was basically a non-answer

@m1gr3nA Год назад

@@gigawarman12 he is not wrong about how the games look like when titan is involved. but i still don't understand why dockside is not in the same place as titan.

@PeterNXavier Год назад

Such a great interview. I have not seen an interview like this in any topic for a long time. Hard hitting questions, educational, informative, etc.

@1KamaronConClase Год назад

Great video as always! Really like this inside to one of my favourite games. And spicy questions too, very well done!

@halfbloodv Год назад

This interview was a great service to this community and was entirely needed 👏 excellent job Prof. I think this will benefit us all greatly in our opinions of the RC and their methodology.

@ferventalchemist Год назад

Great talk between two great minds! ❤ I love these long form discussion videos. Now that I know there’s a format philosophy channel, I may be active in the discord.

@thewanderingmind3327 9 месяцев назад

Here to pay my respects. Thank you for bringing joy to so many of us nerds. Rest easy, good sir.

@davidgunsberg2475 9 месяцев назад

Vale Sheldon. Thank you for everything you did for us.

@Arochius Год назад

Sheldon’s responses here feel very carefully pre-crafted/studied. He seems extremely reticent to speak more candidly on things, and I get the impression that the RC (or just him) feel that they are above the public opinion/perception. He says he doesn’t WANT to say Commander is “theirs”, but my impression is he certainly feels that way.

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

That, combined with his admission of a "working relationship" with WotC, something we could only really speculate on before, proves to me that the RC and Sheldon himself are too wrapped up in their own bs to actually pay attention to the format on the ground level.

@thatepicwizardguy Год назад

@@casteanpreswyn7528 not being transparent about if they're paid by WotC or not instantly made me not trust him.

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

@@thatepicwizardguy yeah...that shit was concerning, especially since we already know that, while they don't acknowledge the secondary market, we know WotC has investments in said market. At this point, I'm treating the RC as WotC employees, so they cannot be trusted to make decisions healthy for the format.

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

@@tomprince8223 "its a good thing that WotC pays the people who are supposed to be separate from them as they are the ruling body of a fan created format" is a take I legit didn't expect.

@damonlouis6536 Год назад

@@thatepicwizardguy i guess you don't understand many jokes

@kylegonewild Год назад

I appreciate being willing to come on and chat with a large figure in the community such as the Professor. While I don't feel like too much was elaborated on I didn't already hear from just bouncing around the MTG creator space, what I did realize from subtle cues is that how I view commander is *NOT* how Sheldon views commander by a long stretch. He's very much got this "it's our baby" mentality about something that decidedly is no longer their baby.

@Xoulrath_ Год назад

Right?! He's complaining about Primeval Titan in a world where turn 1 Thoracle/Consultation is a thing. Makes sense.

@Zafocaine Год назад

It's entitlement, and nothing more. He thinks that a select few should be able to Gatekeep the format while still calling it a "community driven format" (a phrase which he said so quickly that it sounded like one word because he wanted to get all his rehearsed PR phrasing in). It's not community driven if Darth Menery is in the driver seat and the rest of the bus is filled to the gills with RC/ CAG members.

@TrackMouse34 Год назад

Well said!

@Xoulrath_ Год назад

@@Zafocaine the most common thing that I've heard since WotC started designing directly for the format is that most people hate it. The draw to Commander for a lot of people before, was using cards that just didn't work in any other format, and finally having a place to play them. Now it's just a situation where you buy the latest sets, or at least singles from those sets, or your deck is unplayable.

@charliewright2667 Год назад

@@Xoulrath_ I mean this is just blatantly false lol. Powercreep is a definite problem, but I pulled a slightly upgraded precon out after stopping playing from HoD-KamigawaND and literally won a pod the first week I was there, and ended up as archenemy in a pod with a slivers player the next week lol. Maybe you're just not very good at deckbuilding and rely too much on strong cards instead of powerful synergies?

@MatthewMaiorana 9 месяцев назад

Very glad this was recorded - thanks Professor. RIP to a MTG legend.

@tisseurdereves6414 Год назад

Very interesting interview, straight to the point and no restraint. I would have liked to have Sheldon's take on Universes Beyond, but aside from that, it was very informative. Thanks Prof.

@JohnWVarner Год назад

The current setup of a smaller governing body and larger advising body is actually really clever. As he said, getting 6 people with equal voices to agree is hard enough, expanding that number (for whatever reason) would ultimately degrade its ability to set appropriate guidelines.

@portaltoanotherdimension5312 Год назад

Yeah! Even better, What if we only had one führer? Then the disicions are made only by 1 person, there for eleminating the need for disscussion or governing?

@casteanpreswyn7528 Год назад

No. So, if it is gonna be a smaller body, it needs to be an odd number of people and decisions should be voted on by majority not uniformity.

@LinkMEP Год назад

@@portaltoanotherdimension5312 You can't be serious.

@fromadhdtodndtomtg Год назад

This was great! Thanks Sheldon to sharing your thoughts!

@jaidenblom6668 Год назад

SO STOKED FOR THE SUMMIT! Definitely gonna go

@jasons3734 Год назад

SO EXCITED TO SEE EVERYONE AT THE MAGIC SUMMIT!!

@punintendedd Год назад

I think one thing to consider when expanding the RC is you can have 18-20 people asynchronously provide their input, but having 18-20 people across the world all needed to sit down at the same time to reach a decision, when each of those people have other full time commitments, you will be waiting for a very long time

@Hakokoro Год назад

The idea the commite needs to all sit down at the same time for a long time is very archaic. It's the moder world , we found always the organize and make decisions ,send messages without needing that.

@Godfreyjp Год назад

You can do it the same way most parlements or other govermental agencies do. Have a minimum amount of people that need to be present for a meeting.

@zachhogan7865 Год назад

@@XCodes if you don't have time for a monthly meeting with 15-20 other people, then don't be on the committee

@zachhogan7865 Год назад

@@XCodes yeah but a ruling committee doesn't need to last 3 hours and isn't a game. It also isn't a full time job which is probably the most important than to balance. It's most certainly possible and I think the big thing is that their current way of representing the voices of the community is flawed and could be better.

@Caio22011 Год назад

@@XCodes running a RPG table is an activity you do for fun, those are easy to throw to the side, since they aren't actually important things The RC is a responsibility, not a side activity, if you are not able/willing to attend most meetings you should step down

@jamesmoore1476 Год назад

Dockside hasn't warped all levels of play because the damn thing costs $70.

@wierdo884 Год назад

hey Prof, Thank you for this type of format of video. I'm not the best video watcher but i am a commander player and it does warm my heart seeing this kind of video.

@nim411 Год назад

Loved the interview! Was a real treat to hear from Lord Commander Menery.

@raedien Год назад

Prof: Do they give you any money? Sheldon: That's between me and them. Uh.....

@EwMatias Год назад

Yeah, that's the one point where I think that's not really an acceptable answer to let slide. Whether Sheldon likes it or not, he is an influencer and disclosure of any financial ties is an important ethical issue, even if he is not legally compelled to do so.

@floofiestmuffin6945 Год назад

@@EwMatias I agree that he shouldn't have let that slide, I also think that if he pressed on that the interview would have been more tense and shorter

@s.dalner7245 Год назад

Yeah, if the answer to that question was "no" he would've just said that and that would be it. But the fact that he feels a need to keep it confidential at all basically guarantees that the funds he has gotten from WOTC is larger than 0$.

@OmNommSnom Год назад

He was given 60 docksides as payment

@jagerblitzen4017 Год назад

@@EwMatias It's none of our business what you make for your time and its none of our business what Sheldon makes for his time. NOT paying Sheldon would be the classic "love for the game" excuse that hugely profitable corporations use to get free work from interns or other unpaid council/committees and its all a form of exploitation. If Sheldon's successfully secured compensation for both his time and the value he's brought to Hasbro, good for him.

@ghostpizzaproduction Год назад

The Leovold question encapsulates my personal issues with the RC as an entity. In that, until they play it, they don't seem to see it as an issue, and from previous statements and articles, it seems like their personal play groups are fairly static. So if they don't see the problem cards they don't discuss them. Hopefully adding new blood as they have done lately will accelerate the problem cards being brought to the group.

@Kakerate2 Год назад

yeah if you aren't playing with a plethora of players on the regular, or have access to data on the matter, then you are frankly not qualified to make very many decisions. a DAO would be the best way to handle this.

@ZrinNZ 2 месяца назад

I'm a baby Magic player (started mid-2023 right after March of the Machine Dropped) and if it weren't for Phyrexia - but more importantly the Commander format - existing, I wouldn't be playing. I'm still new to the Magic world but it's really nice to see the level of respect given to people like Sheldon. I love "interview Professor", you ask REALLY good questions that lead into interesting answers. Loved this interview. Bless you Sheldon!

@Pathoslogical Год назад

Excited to listen to this after work!

@manuelito1233 9 месяцев назад

RIP my guy, RIP

@powerhelm8966 Год назад

I feel like Rule Zero convos are "How are we gonna play tonight". I'm glad he said "There's a ton of format warping cards" clearly there's also an aspect of working with WotC. If they banned say Dockside a week before it was announced in Double Masters....whoops. I think it IS very appropriate to compare bans though.

@commongentleman529 Год назад

It's great to see such rich content and definitely gives more depth to the format. Love to see important questions being asked and could be taken further with figureheads of the community rather than purely 'entertaining' content creators saying they simply don't like card x and y.

@TheMaskedHero Год назад

As someone who has played the format for over a decade, I loved this. It's incredible to look back at how far everything has come.

@rkk667 Год назад

Discussion about primeval titan exactly describes dockside except dockside is 80 bucks so we don't all have one... it warps every time it shows up

@jurgnobs1308 Год назад

i feel like dockside is a worse offender because you can throw it into almost any deck and as long as the opponents plqy a certain way, it wrecks them every time. for primeval titan, you need to craft a deck around it a bit more because you need to recast it or copy it.

@larsfinlay7325 Год назад

I went to school with Sheldon! He's the best, so great to see him on here! 2 legends!

@FirewalllDivision Год назад

so sad to see someone with such low schooling to be failing a format and be a thorn in the side of proper banlists... wouldn't want such a cancerous friend....

@itsmebk7 Год назад

Great interview, thanks for being a hardass with him 🤟

@joshuashaffer4556 Год назад

Thank you for this. It’s very informative and you both are super professional and honest. Which drives the conversation. I’d say this is good media!! Bravo man!!

@karolkurzawa3246 Год назад

Big respect for Sheldon. Keep up great work Sir. Best what happen to EDH is that rules are not in the hands of WoTc. It keeps the game fun and healthy as it is.

@bluntx123 Год назад

Very interesting to hear his take on the ban list. I agree that a few bans do provide a structure for the format (power 9), yet some cards seem very randomly banned because they were considered "the worst offender" and they didnt like playing against it.

@xChikyx Год назад

meanwhile some cards thst really need a ban are unbanned because sheldon plays them in his decks...

@bluntx123 Год назад

@@jfuzzz Yeah I just provided a general example. Thanks for clearing it up for anyone else reading though!

@hdofo36 Год назад

An absolute banging video, thoroughly enjoyed it prof.

@esemekoge693 Год назад

I really like the frankness for the prof and respect to Shelden for coming up with honest answers, great video.

@bobbydarwin2202 Год назад

I nominate The Professor be on the RC. He really is here for love of the game! He has the player's interest at heart. Thank you Professor for the awesome interview! Thank you Sheldon for the game that is such a big part of our lives!