The Day Roger Federer Took Novak Djokovic to School! 

You are not Djokovic fan! Lmao no self-respecting Djoko fan would react to the video title like you did without being triggered...this doesn't make any sense...

@@Summon256 It should make a lot of sense to any sensible individual.

​@@Summon256How did being triggered suddenly become a sign of self-respect? I think there are Novak fans cool enough to ignore the title and just watch the tennis here.

@@Summon256 not all djokovic fans are disrespectful bastard ok? i mean at least 0.0001% of them are respectful

But not that many will watch the other players. There's nothing as unique as federers playstyle

I think when he beat Djokovic in the Cincinnati final, he stopped him from winning all the ATP Masters(shields) tournaments.

​@@precessionoftheequinoxes3224he only slowed down the process, Nole has a triple golden master

Ronnie is is not as exciting and not as beautiful.

@@NamTran-xc2ip Not quite, he still has to win Monte Carlo once more to achieve that.

@@ashleythomas4112 You sir are right. Hopefully he gets it eventually, still quite a few years ahead. I'm just worried about his motivation for these masters, especially since he already had a double and none even got 1. If he gets it he will win all big titles in the ATP tour thrice, quite an achievement, and he stands alone.

Wrong Fed is both.

@@Jonathan-mp3juWrong, Nole is the GOAT!

well said. Best all around résumé of the situation

24 > 20 sorry

Well said Charlie .

😄

LMAO 😂🤣😂

I've been watching the big 3 since all began their respective journeys as greats. Roger will always stand alone as the greatest. As his career proved, it's about the impeccable and unmatched talents that only Roger possessed. I'll never witness another player like him in my lifetime. He stands alone ❤

@@Maverick50-gy9vjwasn’t even a hate comment. You Nole fans take everything so personal

@@pawshands9706 u can like him for his talent, but consider he is the best is not correct. Tennis is a game, there are champions and losers. And nole has the most titles ( gs and master titles ), making him the best. Yeah sure that fed has the most beautiful style and play, but that doesnt make you become the greatest.

@@sonbui7063 Sorry but quantity here dies nit guarantee greatest. Roger was all-round and joker has the best defense but not all-round and he just defends.

@@pawshands9706 yeah so what ? Better skill can make you become the greatest ? Absolutely not. What about mindset and mental strengh ? Does roger did it better than nole ?

Very true.

​@@jonathanrexactually it's better now 😂

@@moer20078 the old Serbia is still able to beat all the youngsters. How could it be better compared to big3's era?

​@@moer20078 Totally. You're too funny! 😄

Yes…it will be better without the Choker Butt pickin Ball scratchin Beta Boy Baldal Beaten Badly By Badass Balkan peRFect? No! RFederer RFloundered RFolded RFailed RFour times RForty RFifteen

He is a man of steel nerves. Federer did not have that mental edge Nadal & Djokovic have, though he certainly has had moments of resiliency throughout his career. Federer is undoubtedly the greatest tennis player I have ever seen play, but to be the most accomplished you have to have a Jordan like mental edge. Djokovic has that.

Which courts are fast? Grass? He lost to Djokovic in 3 Wimbledon finals 2014, 2015, 2019. Hard court in AO? Federer only beat Djokovic in 2007, ok because he was at peak and Djokovic was too young. But then Djokovic beat him 4 times 2008,2011,2016,2020. Please don’t tell me that in 2008 Federer was too old and past his peak already. The records speak for themselves. Federer is NOT unstoppable on fast courts. Djokovic is AT LEAST equal to him but I don’t want to say BETTER.

The difference between Roger and Novak is mental strength. Novak meditates… Roger didn’t know what that was, and it made all the difference under pressure.

@@tehatte Dubai and Cincinatti are fast courts. Wimbledon are a medium court!

@@juniorcorrado7868 Do you have facts to back up your claim?

​@@tehattewe call slow courts

Well, no, but thanks for playing. Doesn't have near as many titles as Federer - no way to ignore that unless you're just hating. Let the excuses and desperate justifications commence.

Godfather!

The GOD of tennis!

@@RazOls the fukin grandfather of tennis 🤣🤣🤣

You didn’t include results from an arguably faster surface; grass.

@@marklerfaldWimbledon grass hasn’t been faster than these courts since the early 2000s

of course and because majority of atp tournaments is on medium hard speed with clay courts almost 80% of tour no wonder djoker and nadal have more gs.without saying that real score is 22-22-22 because only luck make djoker take 2 gs from federer.

@@prempititantipool3075 no need we all know the slowing of tennis courts started 15 years ago.

Oh so in other words Federer couldn't adapt his game to the changing surface? You're just making Djokovic look better 😂. Federer never beat Nadal at Roland Garros, Djokovic beat Nadal twice at Roland Garros just shows Djokovic is better at adapting. Hence he has more slams than Federer 😊

33 years old is not consider a grandpa anymore,both Rafa and Novak played amazing at that stage of their careers, but Novak had the answers to all the questione marks that Federer had.

@@gurammanjavidze6150 But it was then for players 6 years older than Djokovic.

@@lanapearce9968 Yes but that doesn't change the fact that Roger was playing very high level of tennis and threw everything against djokovic and still got outplayed 5-2 h2h and 2-0 in slam finals in 2015 vs Djokovic.

@@gurammanjavidze6150 a 27 year old Djokovic. It's a huge difference. The fact that he won some matches and that the GS matches were close is a huge testament to his skills

@@mvarela1992 he was dominating the rivalry in those years, Roger won some matches amd GS matches weren't that close 3-1 both, especially the wimbledon final. That was due to Rogers age i comepletly agree but he was like 80% of his prime self. his elo rating in 2015 is higher than in 2004 and 2005. Nearly as good as in 2009, i mean his elo rating.

I agreed about Roger having a easy ride until Nadal and Djokovic came but 😎 ...............best era you say !! Let`s take look at Sampras , Agassi`s era ; 1990-2002 Most people would agree that its easier to win a GS than to become number one , and too stay there is a hole other ball game ! In Sampras period these people hit the number one spot ; Edberg,Boris,Jim, Pete, Andre, Muster; Marcelo( only runner up in GS) , Carlos , Kafelnikov, Rafter , Marat, Gustavo, Hewitt......and they won together 42 Slams , THATS hard competition ! This is NOT one hit Slams wonder , they are the real deal ! To win slams AND to take the number one Ranking ! There was hard competition though the years to end as number one ! And right here Sampras took 6 year in a row , a record still standing ! Besides those tough guys there were ALSO GS winners who could beat anybody on a good day ; Michael Stich, Richard Krajicek, Goran Ivanisevic , Petr Korda ! So lets go to Federer`s , Nadal`s and Djokovic's era ; 2004- 2021 In this period these people hit the number one ranking ; Federer, Nadal, Novak , ...........and Murray .................that`s it ! This is 17 years we are talking about ! Where is the next young gun ? And where were they 10 years ago ? The big 3 was great of course , but the next 2-4 generation of players was not ! Very weak field in 17 years ! First in 2022 Medvedev (26) and Carlos(20) took the number one ranking for a short while ! Which era strikes you as the hardest ?

hi

Butt pickin Ball scratchin Beta Boy Baldal Beaten Badly By Badass Balkan peRFect? No! RFederer RFloundered RFolded RFailed RFour times RForty RFifteen

Thanks man, happy you like them!! I just wish more were watching =/

@@RazOls Keep it up Raz!

@@RazOls Engagement is fairly low on the official channels, too. Think quite a lot of Fed fans are still in 'GOAT' lamentation mode. Could also be that there is nothing new to come from Fed now, and a lot of the same footage is being recycled. Tour has only just resumed post-USO, too.

Always good also to read the comments of Djoko's baby fanboys, who coudn't face the frustration of seeing prime versions of their idol being ass-kicked this way, couldn't admit that on good days Federer had just a superior game, even despite being 6 full years older. Just imagine 2023 Nole how badly would be beaten by this Federer.

Prime Novak is better lol. You have to come to terms with that…

@@SergioWoods 2006 Federer destroys 2011/2015 Djokovic, probably 2004/5/7 Federer too.

@@lanapearce9968 No he doesn’t dummy. Djokovic played tougher opponents in his top seasons and tougher tournaments. Frauderer played easier opponents and padded his record in easier tournaments…

@@SergioWoods You're just showing you're not a tennis fan, you're a child and you're a glory hunter. Can't respect a player that beat your 'goat' 23 times? How did a "fraud" win so many times against such a godlike player?

😂

@jasonpeng4214 😉​💪💪💪

This was peak Djokovic (a consistence player) against clearly-out-of-his-peak Federer (a brilliance player). They have to be considered two players in just the same league, the best league ever... It's quite normal that the "prime" one has an advantage over the "much post prime" one, and it's even more normal that best of five matches are the exact situation that greatly favors the prime player between the two, and even more being a consistence player. It's not like we have to extract particular revelations from this statistique. They're two monsters, and they're very very hardly going to lose a big match best of 5 in which age is giving them a big advantage. Federer lost only one slam match vs young Djoko just because he was notoriously infected by mononucleosis, Nole instead was extremely close to lose only in their last Wimbledon final (but the urge to finish the match the soonest possible, fearing the raising fatigue, somewhat slowed Roger's arm)... their 2015 final was certainly close, but without such desperate situations like "Federer serving 2 consecutive match points". That's completely normal, period.

That's what I thought, the silence after Djokovic played some brilliant balls was deafening 😂

To you and fans in denial really

8 years since prime Roger vs prime robotic. The chump that couldn't dominate until Roger was past it and Rafa was broken down, beating Anderson and Berrettini for slams😂

Seriously. If 2003-2009 was weak what does that make this era? There ain’t even nadal to challenge Novak right now

@@commondirtbagz7130 The weak era was 2001-2007

They claim slam winners like Hewitt, Roddick and Safin were 'weak era', while claiming Tsitsipas, Ruud and Anderson are all time greats. Of Djokovic's last 12 slam wins, only 3 were against slam winners and one of those was Delpo! So the weak era seems to belong to Djokovic.

​@@lanapearce9968and what about bhagaditis and some random players that he defeated. Novak has played the most matches against nadal, federer, murray and stan if you consider if you consider matches against each other

​@@suchitapage4725weak era was not from 2008-16 , it was from 2017- now, but between 2001-07 and 2017- now which is weaker is really debatable

2011 Djokovic clears lol

A rookie Novak Djokovic by the age of 21 had 6 wins over so called prime Federer who was busy beating Baghdatis, Philippoussis, Nalbandian, Gonzalez, Ferrero who never won a single ATP Masters tournament let alone a grandslam and player like one time GS winner like Safin, Roddick. That was the competition. Now, look at the Era of Novak Djokovic: Federer himself, Nadal, ( against Nadal and Federer 110 matches combined), Murray, Wawrinka, Delpotro ( all slam winners), next Gen pop in ( Medvedev, Theim, Zverev, Tsitsipas; again slam winners and ATP Masters winners), the next gen Pop in ( Alcaraz, Sinner, Rune, Rude; Slam winner and ATP Masters winner). Djokovic's Era has seen some of the highest level of competition. It's not even debatable.

Fabio Fognini

Valid answers so far

Lord Gulbis

Bernard Tomic

Nalby, of course. The only time he was somewhat fit, he beat the Big 3 altogether.

Just look at the current top 10 and players who participated at the Laver cup 🤢 weakest era of tennis🤢

​@@prempititantipool3075what are you smoking? Are you 12 years old? Nalbandian has destroyed Djokovic in earlier years. The weak era is such a pathetic argument, I can bring up examples for Djokovic that claim that this era is incredibly weak compared to his standards. Djokovic has been at the right place at the right time and by far has worked super hard to come up at the elite level, he should be admired and respected for that. But fans like you putting other legends down, it's disgraceful taste for his kind, don't be a shameful fan because that doesn't represent Djokovic's greatness. Federer is the maestro and best shot maker of all time

@@prempititantipool307506 nadal beats any djokovic on clay. 06 nadal would also give djokovic majorrrr problems on grass. When nadal could move on grass he was at his best.

@@prempititantipool3075 Djokovic last 12 slams he won has faced slam winners in 4 finals. So who is the weak era champ? Beating Anderson, Berrettini, Tsitsipas, headcase Kyrgios who never trains and Ruud?

@@prempititantipool3075 disrespecting Gonzalez like that really shows how you didn’t actually watch the matches from that time and you didn’t grasp how fast the courts were and how insane the level was

Federer also broke rackets and disrespected other players. He can never be goat according to your own rules.

@@SPZ909 I'm not going to compare numbers. No matter how you look at it, Novak is the epitome of that act. To those who don't know tennis, Novak is just a runaway locomotive. And Novak's deceptive dancing deserves more attention.

theres a reason why your comment went a month without anyone liking it or agreeeing

@lf_necronshandle it's OK... it's tough , I know. Novak just won 7th Atp Finals which broke a tie with Federer. All you have is these pathetic 500' wins from Dubai and Basel

@@vultur311 still dosent give you the right to crap over other players because your idol is #1 **statistically**

@@lf_necronshandle no, his game was best ever seen, even Nadal admited... 24 slams are only for stats. Federer is still a great player, tho... better server than Novak for example👍