When Roger Federer Took Djokovic to Tennis Church! 

Cope. Tennis coaches teach young kids the Novak way. RF was one of a kind. OHBH is dead in the water.

@@prempititantipool3075 novak fans love Federer videos. they're always here, instead of watching novak 💪💪🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@prempititantipool3075 liar. It's funny, if you want to meet a Novak fan, click on Federer videos 💪💪😘😘😘😘

​@@prempititantipool3075Dope-voic drooler shut up and watch it Don't cry like a whimp 😂😂😂

50 years from now people will still be wondering wth went on at 40-15 and blaming God.😅🎉

like everyone else

LOL. You are currently missing from ~elsewhere~ on the internets. Banned?

@@prempititantipool3075 #2 at worst. nadal is too clay heavy

​@@prempititantipool3075Lol. He will always be the top until somebody comes around with the game that really Wows people. It's just a fact regardless of whether he has the most GSs or not. He changed the game and made the other 2 to get better, or get left behind. His technique and what he brought to the game was just more of a natural to where the other players had to practice many hours.

@@prempititantipool3075 It's tons more than that lol. Read what I wrote again and let it sink in. If not, read it again

Yes, despite 40-15 shambles.😮

Didn’t Nalbandian beat Fed, Nadal and Djoker in Paris 2007?

@@RazOls Madrid

Medvedev atp finals 2020 defeated 1, 2, 3, 5, 8

@@brokeboy4559 was he nr. 4 himself?

@@John-lr4hp yup

novak fans love Federer videos. they're always here, instead of watching novak 💪💪🤣🤣🤣🤣

I heard some Roger fans became atheists.😢😭

LOL. I see you've been having the same discussion with Novak fans that I have. Them and their "Roger dominated in a weak era" argument never fails to amuse me because what do they call the period Novak as dominated? If 9 of the last 10 years haven't been "weak" then I'm clearly missing something.

This is 2010 Federer wasn't even 30 then and Novak started dominating a year later in 2011.

novak fans love Federer videos. they're always here, instead of watching novak 💪💪🤣🤣🤣🤣

24 and still people call an other one the goat, i love how it makes you mad

@@schlimmeFinke if you want to find a novak fan, they'll be watching Federer highlights 😘😘

40-15😂

@@schlimmeFinke Fed fans making their own happiness.😂

@@TvRF2.0 Djokovic's Peak Era 2011-2016 (part falsely called Big3 or 4 Era by very blind ocultist followers 👺) For better understandings let me present you an Djokovic's Peak Era: 40 Big titles Djokovic 15 Big titles Nadal 14 Big titles Murray 9 Big titles Federer (cry out loud there ) 4 Big titles Wawrinka 2 Big titles Cilic 1 Big title Tsonga 1 Big title Ferrer And that is all Folks! Look closely inthere, Djokovic got 40 Big titles, which is more than the next 3 combined (is that Big3 or 4 and who is 2., 3. or 4. ?) Not to mention else, but difference is so huge that even next 3 of these were realistically just taking leftovers of Djokovic

@@TvRF2.0 Djo fans' explanation for 2012-2014 is that Djo was not at his grass peak; competition was too tough to dominate year after year; Djo didn't have Becker yet, etc. Yet they argue he has been dominating *since* 2011.

@@TvRF2.0 I dont mix nor excluding anything, everything Big is inside and i could exactly equalise and separate peaks Djokovic;s Peak was 2011-2016 and 40 Big titles Federer's Peak was 2004-2009 and 32 Big titles Nadal's Peak was 2008-2013 and 28 Big titles 6year consectuive peak and at each of their own, so for every single one of them it shows peak each at their own the best age (so no excuses)... Federer peaked earler as he is oldest, then Nadal as younger and finaly Djokovic as youngest. It is all expected, as age difference, that they will peak at different times too... and that goes same to similar way for any other player who takes this sport seriosly... what wrong do you see there ❓

Not comparable because both Federer and Roger won masters by competing in bo5 not bo3 till 2009 when the rules changed. You have to also remember that after djokovics wimby win and domination till 2016 RG only Roger was in good form and Nadal in the worst form of his life and Murray being injured until 2016. Sure Novak was a level above others in 2014-16 but he lost to Wawrinka 3 times in this period and twice on finals. I'd say djokovics 2011 year was amazing because he faced prime fedal and murray

@@milankostic5401 novak fans love Federer videos. they're always here, instead of watching novak 💪💪🤣🤣🤣🤣

Because Djokovic can win, but can't play this way. Simple as that

@@alessandrobacchetta5368 Nole cannot play the way Fedex does and Fedex cannot play the way Nole does, each person has their own style, that's natural. The most important thing is to win, you play beautifully but if you lose the result is 0. Sports is about winning, you imagine Fedex plays well but without the GS title, does anyone know him?

Because this is a fedex channel 🤡

@@ahmedcristiano5546 Novak wins mostly because of his athleticism and mental strength, but he's still a boring baseline robot so no one really wants to watch him; instead they prefer to watch the maestro. 🤡