The Day Roger Federer Turned a Tennis Match into an Art Lesson (Even Ball Kids Had Fun!) 

🙂Have a good health kind stranger.

This is incredible! Glad you had that experience, sir.

Don’t cry his 38 ATP250 titles remains unbroken

@@fg92626 federer’s best will forever be better than Djokovic’s best. Good offense trounces good defense always.

Nole has won 24 GS in 3 different eras unlike this weak era player

​@@user-ex1iq3hq2zwell, Novak started winning more and more only when the oppositions were weak from 2011 onwards, no more prime Federer, no more prime Nadal. Murray peak was only good for 1 year. Who else gonna challenge Novak? The generation that came after the big 3 are very weak mentally!

@@user-ex1iq3hq2z looks like your intelect is weak so it produces this liquid commenting

That time has passed. 😉

@@mlrd2687 For me it's eternity! Roger in heart!

Sorry for your loss

Glad you enjoyed it ❤️

that backhand that he struggled with almost his whole career and is the major reason he has a losing record against djokovic and nadal?

@@miskodj17 The back hand that I always thought was a wonderful shot.

@@annewalden3795 gasquet had the most beautiful backhand ever, how many slams does he have?

@@miskodj17 Gasquet was a good player but he can't be compared to R F . As far as I know Gasquet has not won any Grand Slam events.

@@annewalden3795 that is the whole point, beautiful shot=/=good shot, federer backhand sucks and that is it

He is the GOAT.

Still for tennis what means jordan for basketball and Pelé for football

Agree 100%. He's the Michael Jordan of tennis❤

But stats do matter..🤣🤣🤣Being a GOAT is not about personality, it's about results.

​@@HMKHABIB1😅

@conartist I believe you are 100 % correct and I have seen magical shots from Roger for many years.

@@timothylee2772 It is about the whole package and Roger has everything required to be the G O A T in my opinion.

Thanks Luis, no worries my man!

Couldn't agree more! And thanks for the kind words ❤️

Roger Became Spoiled Later in His Career in My Opinion...He Became Too Big of a Celebrity

Tennis can be an interesting and beautiful game---like Fedrerer's game---or an boring baseline slugfest complete with caveman-like grunting: There are different audiences for each.

@@user-yd6ef1yo9d Agreed

@user-yd6ef1yo9d Maybe, but usually if you play the game, you tend to be audience for every way the game is played. Obviously, nearly everyone loves to watch a player like Federer except the very biased ones. But as an amateur player, I learned a lot from players like Murray, Wilander, Djokivic, etc... simply because I can never emulate anything from Federer. I play with one handed BH, but I can't learn anything from Federer's BH either. It's too hard to take the ball early, or flick like he did. It's better to watch how Wawrinka, Edberg do it.

@@tomsd8656 Prime Andy Murray Was Such a GREAT Player...His Defense Was a Pleasure to Watch...Wish He Stayed More Aggressive on Offense Like He Did When Younger...LOVED Watching Him Play

Race? All big 3 are same race.

Roger plays the game how most would like to be able to play. And from the spectator's point of view, it's a joy to watch. I wish he still held the records though because it would have inspired more to play like he did.

Take toilet breaks to another level😅😂

yeah i never really complain about anything since its a waste of time and people should be able to do what they want, but holy fuck is it annoying watching alcaraz fist pump and stare at jcf after every single point

@@bsrussian it's the same way with kids. My son played fairly high level tennis until he was 14, and the other kids were always looking at their parents.

You are 100 % right and I think Nadal summed it up perfectly ." Anyone who thinks I am a better tennis player than Roger Federer knows nothing about Tennis ".

Glad you enjoyed it, my man! ❤️

Unbelievable, the man is psychic! He certainly predicted that Nadal and Djokovic would have more Grand Slams than him. 😂

Nice catch! That's why I left it in

​@@WivoRNgood job and nice edit. I remember this match but it never made the highlights... some shots federer made in this tournament were insane..

​@marshaloga3047 Federer lost the final and then said some really stupid shit about Nadal though lool. He said something like "he only wins when I don't take the offensive and play bad". That's not word for word. But he said this about the king of clay 😂

@@kakashihatake1029 Yes Roger said the truth definitely. If I had been federer I would have said even worse about Nadal who won coz of cheap tricks. Taking a medical time out just when he is down 5-2 in the first set claiming he had injury and then breaking fed's rhythm winning first set and then for the whole match played like an animal. Roger might have won that day coz he was on fire since start. Nadal got scared coz Novak defeated him on all clay courts that year and Fed def Novak so he had to do something like this to lower fed's game. Nadal deserved every single word Roger said.

Djokos is Obviously GREAT But His Game Was a Complete BORE in My Opinion

It's in the video itself buddy, in the very first minute

Right, just asking to list it in the description - one more line. It's a big help when sifting through dozens of such videos (and some don't mention it at all even in the video itself). Thanks for listening. @@WivoRN

Nadal is the goat, Federer is art, Novak is the machine

​@@pencilcheckAnd you are delusional.

Yes I agree, it is about being a scripted media bot who is never gonna say anything outside of the script because of their sponsors and money, real class. One more example of off-the-court staff is them trying to get lower-ranked players paid more, oh wait that was novak the "bad guy". Stay a sheep, believe what western media serves you.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Closing out is often much harder than coming back, especially when you play against return and counterpunch specialists like Djoker. Federer is the greatest tennis tennis player of all time

Try being a gasquet fan

@@ismailedoomun8006Or Grigor 😂😂😂

Or maybe Rafa and Novak were just to tough sometimes for Fed to close out the match! Ever thought of that..

​@@Kidgloves1984No, because they live in delusional worlds

Artist of having a bad backhand? Imagine having such a bad backhand you have to hit slice more than 50% of the time

Federer Has Brutal Power as Well But The Way He Mixes His Game up Was Simply AMAZING to Watch

However, he is not efficient enough to win 24 Grand Slams.

Nole has won 24 GS in 3 different eras unlike this weak era player!! Anyone can look good when they are facing weak ass opponents

@@mlrd2687 Who cares?

Big respect for this comment and recognition. Fed will remain an icon of this sport.

Federer also played and beat the best players in the world by the time he allegedly had to be "retiring" or "in decline" and most importantly, Federer lost many opportunities due to injuries, just like Nadal. Djokovic should've won since he first arrived but couldn't. I like Djoko but numbers are mathematics, they're not art. A sport is a collection of many things, none of which are mathematical principles or logic. So by saying "well, said player has more titles therefore is better" is putting all other players on even ground and negate context. If we were all machines, then sure, by all means, the machine who achieves the most is the best one. However, we're not machines are we? Human beings are not on even grounds, therefore context is needed. As much as I like Djokovic or even Nadal, between them 3, Federer is by far the best I've seen. Pure art. And Federer is not the best I've seen either. In his 2-3 year prime, Kuerten was unbelievable. And I wish I had watched Connors and Borg. I'm sure I'd also be amazed by them. People not considering Connors or McEnroe just because they didn't watch them is absolutely crazy to me. It's like saying that WW2 wasn't as bad as your regular neighborhood crime because you weren't born yet. I mean... history exists for a reason and that reason is not to be automatically discarded from day one.

Djokovic getting bonus titles from playing weaker players these days. Fed played in an era against two other younger guys in peak form contending for GOAT status already. The players on tour now going against Djokovic aren't that kind of challenge. And Nadal is constantly plagued with injuries that limit his ability. But it's okay, narrow minded people only want to look at numbers and not context. If you look at each player in their peak objectively, Fed comes out on top - other than on clay, which I hand to Nadal.

Djokovic won his 2nd GS when he was 24 though, due to his breathing issues and diet/health issues at the beginning of his career. But I guess you chose to forget he was "plagued" with some problems as well.@@taipoxin

29-23

27-23@@redlightsky9729

There are always limitations. As far as tennis goes, Djokivic came really closed to having no limitation, but when faced with Nadal in his fit fighting form at RG, I think he would lose too, as he did on several occasions.

Do you speak English as your post is nor understand and full of errors

Well it got you watching ;)

@@Braselton21 There is no reason why I wouldn't watch a video about one of the best tennis players of all time. Djokovic is the greatest, but he is not the only one worthy of respect. The fact that the author of the video is biased will not stop me from hearing what he has to say and having a good laugh.

But Federer will always be relevant mate. He is the face of tennis. Doesn't matter how many slams Novak wins.

@@SHVideografie No he is not.But hey, don't let that stop you.

it's cute how insecure you are about the achievements of someone else, namely a very good Serbian