The fate of Villedor (ALL Endings Survivors/Peacekeeprs/Renegades/Destroyed) - Dying Light 2 

The only problem I have with this game is how they treat the peacekeepers they act like their the worst and are a tyrannical government even though they acknowledge things like low water supply and kill zombies instead of avoiding them

i litterally got the worse ending on my first run. i fucking destoryed the city and i left alone

The Survivors felt more like people who just didn’t like how restrictions (protective or otherwise) to their lives were put in place and went against The Peacekeepers, while the peacekeepers feel a bit too totalitarian and bureaucratic to be trusted with owning the entirety of Villedor. In the end I chose The Renegades, under the leadership of Juan Rainer, as they seemed to be the most neutral faction that knew what most was necessary for Villedor’s survival, even if they were the most morally ambiguous.

I support as a survivor. Live together and save together -Speech of Pelaro

I would’ve gotten the renegade ending if I didn’t save lawan

So the survivors ending seems to be the best ending. No one dies, and everyone is surviving. The peacekeeper is ending seems to be more neutral ending people may have died, but yeah, but the renegades ending seems to be the bad ending two people died and there’s a bunch of protest and destroying all I’m gonna say is it’s the worst ending

I support the survivors. city this better.

What ending will I get if I give the tower to Matt, save Mia and there is no one left to take over villedor? If Matt is dead there is no peace keeper ending, if frank is dead there is no survivor ending and if Juan is dead there is no renegade ending but if I let Lawan detonate the bombs what ending do I get?

Survivors: Peacekeepers: “Six people died last night” Renegades: “Forty people died last night” Destroyed: Most people died because of the missiles

The survivor's first instinct was to lynch me and backstab me multiple times whilst all the PKs I met were actually friendly so of course I chose the PKs

Man, it feels so obvious who they want you to side with.

I like the peacekeepers better they might not be perfect but the survivors ending just feels to perfect and good hoping the dlcs will fix that to make the survivors more grey

They make the peacekeepers seem way too evil especially with the “death of their entire family remark” they really make them be like evil tyrants in this game for no reason when every pk I even met was actually friendly and trustable in this game but the survivors literally backstab and do us dirty so many times it really makes no sense💀

Kinda hate how they make the other 2 faction endings that arent the survivors "bad"

I want them to expand on the Renegades letting you take territories for them actually being on their side and the other factions hating you and fighting you for them

Note in PK ending the streets are cleared (albeit ruled by an iron fist). In Juan ending, there's a party/nightclub for the elites (while the common folk starve). Survivor ending is anarchy, reliant on charity. I don't give the tower to Matt, because I don't like the idea of propaganda spam replacing genuine warnings to the common folk of the missiles. But I still hold that PK is the "good" faction in all this. Survivors come across as literal communists, anarchists and other ne'er-do-wells who resort to terrorism from the get go. Almost every quest they give has lies and double-crossers (poisoned water, lying family members, dog hunters, plaster in the flour... it's endless)

I actually, genuinely hated the PK ending of the game; I preferred the PK faction all throughout my first (full) playthrough. In old Villedor, Aitor and the PKs not only seemed genuinely interested in my wellbeing, but they were damn near civilised most of the time. But the Bazaar? They try to hang you when you first meet, their initial leader is a pious moron and their second leader, should you side with them, is too aggressive, hotheaded and overall too angry for the position. A good leader sits in the middle of the two extremes presented by Carl and Sophie, and that's where I always saw Aitor. And when you break into their compound, an action that can reasonably be seen as a threat, Anderson tries to coerce information out of you, but they never actually harm you. Whereas, putting aside the fact that Sophie's brother is an absolute psychopath regardless of what side you choose, if you do try and help them, they attack you simply for suspecting you of being a PK spy... with little to no evidence. The PKs only truely show themselves to be bad in the same circumstances that the survivors show themselves to be bad; when you screw them over, or when they succumb to desperation. All throughout my time after leaving Old Villador, I sided with the PKs out of principle: I give them the first substation because that's what Aiden agreed to do when he meets the PKs there. I give them the VNC radio because so many genuinely good soldiers, who Aiden counted amongst his friends, died to help get him there. How could I let them die in vain? And for what? So some drunk asshole living in a dive bar can get his own personal radio station? In return for... suggesting that there may be a grappling hook nearby? Assuming you don't have the foresight of having already played the game - ergo, if you were in Aiden's position - it always seems like the most reasonable decisions are to side with the PKs, at least from my standpoint. Don't get me wrong, I would align myself with socialist ideals... in a world in which I am safe! But if it's between rooftop huts or military outposts in a world otherwise run by infected freaks and Renegades, it's a no brainer to me. The PKs also create food, they also provide education - I'd wager a much high education - and they also house people. Sure, your lot is much better if you actually join the PKs, but it's not like the survivors are freely providing for people outside their communities either. I feel no obligation to help the 'free people' over the PKs; if you work with the PKs you quickly see that they are not much fewer in number than the survivors themselves. And I'd rather the PKs have control than... 'the people'? The people meaning either psycho Sophie and drunk Frankie or nobody at all; anarchy. Provided that you side with the PKs, the faction is in the moral blue at the best of times and in the dark grey at worst. But then, after all that, once Jack Matt dies and Meyers takes over, all that ambiguity is thrown away to make them basic tyrants. I mean, I'd rather law with harsh punishments over lawlessness, but Meyers never seemed so unreasonable when we knew her in game. Though in saying that, when the Bazaar was tough on water they dropped a windmill on top of a PK outpost and left potentially hundreds of soldiers to die in the main base at Old Villedor. Now, granted, I haven't got far enough yet in my (second attempt at a) Survivor faction playthrough to really experience the PKs as a potentially antagonistic faction, so I may well come back one day having seen the other side of the coin and revoke some statements, but at the moment I'm fairly certain that I won't. Edit: So I just finished my Survivor playthrough and my opinions haven't changed all that much. It was nice to see Frank get back on his feet and - having spared Hakon - I got to see the Survivor cast get their happy endings... but honestly, I still don't see what kind of a chance this new world has. Seeing Jack Matt lose his shit at the end of the story didn't surprise me; the man was dying of cancer and watching all his hopes, dreams and aspirations go down the drain because of Aiden and Frank; if anything, it's a testament to the PK soldiers present that they saw what he'd become and relieved him of command. Still, what remains of the PK under Juan's leadership isn't really the PK anymore. With all that in mind, I still believe that the Peacekeepers offer a safer and overall better Villedor than the Survivor factions do; especially in a world with rapidly mutating infected. And for reasons I can't really articulate, running around Villedor feels a fair bit safer with towering blue outposts all over the place and Peacekeeper soldier all around to battle infected, as opposed to ramshackle farms and roaming scavengers. And even as far as practical rewards go, I think the PKs offer a better deal. Survivor rewards offer parkor shortcuts which become obsolete as you upgrade your nightrunner parkor tools and get all your parkor skills, whereas PK rewards offer fun traps on the ground that have genuinely helped me in a pinch at night, and are fun to play around with during the day. Not to mention, of course, the blessed PK crossbow.

Peacekeepers are the only good "government" (you know what I want to say) faction in recent games. In most cases they are tyrants, corrupted or incompetent but in DL2 they are good which is refreshing

I always feel compelled to side with those who align with order like the peacekeepers. I prefer the idea of returning to the way society used to be than accepting the new world we’re forced to live in. Even if some people have to die for that to happen.

I support PK tho!! cause they maintain the laws nd they have the potential to govern or rule the entire city with safer hands than..the renegades or survivours etc..

I found the survivors or the free folks good, bazaar people I found insane alittle and is too pacifist… so I went for straight PK just to fall under Juan’s trap…

Survivors : natural good Peacekeeprs : lawful evil Renegades : chaotic evil Destroyed : natural evil

Most favorite peacekeaper ending 🤝

Their are deadly monsters and Renegades everywhere in Villedor, The "Survivors" outright ignore them and do their best to avoid an conflict with them. The Peacekeepers fight back against all the Monsters and the Renegades in Villedor. Remember the attack on the canteen? The Peacekeepers had to come save everyone cause they could barely defend themselves and even let themselves be attack in the first place.

I like the vibes the survivor ending gives

None of this endings feels satisfying, even the survivor ones is as bland as tap water.

I did the survivors ending first, now in ng+ I'll do the peacekeepers

Renegate ending is definitivly the best ending, because I PARTY ON THE ROOFS with Juan 🚦🥳🥳🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 🚦

I went full pks and got survivor ending somehow

Destroying the city changes the map a lot ?? I have not seen videos of it

Kinda seems like the peacekeepers should have a better ending, since, aside from Juan, they were reasonable folk, while the survivors seemed like a bunch of petulant children. While Frank does get his shit together eventually if you side with him, and you can give Lawan and Hakon peace in their conflict, the survivors faction as a whole seems whack

I choosed Peacekeepers, because they are the only one who can basically build old world. And survivors were so annoying. And PK would clear the city from infected and care about city structures. Survivors wouldn't care about city structures, so those buildings would collapse and their windmill utopia would collapse too.

I support Peacekeepers

How’d you side with renegades?

Pk are the good guys I mean Sophie literally tried to kill you

I thought I was doing survivor ending and got renegade ending lol

Why is the survivors acting like North Korea with that execute the whole family BS

surivors: somewhat good ending true but they life in fear of zombies and just don't wipe out the zombies witch means more deaths peacekeeprs: i say they more of a nautral ending true some people died but they died bc they did something bad like water trieff and other stuff the innocent are safe and PK wipes out the zombies in the city effectivly saveing more people from zombies renegades: we can all say it's a bad ending they treat people like trash berly gives any water and are bad destroyed: worst ending nothing to say more if u like it u are a sadist (i kinda like it bc i am one to) in my opinion PK are the best ending true they somewhat are tyrans and set stirct rules but they eventually make city the last city standing safer by killing all zombies in it also strict rules are needed when apocalypse happens i mean survivors are also one way but people are still dying they life in shadows and wait for god knows if u help PK they set a lot of traps for zombies that are we can say effective while survivors help is giveing u new ways of transport and not going to ground so i stay with PK

When will they actually change how the city looks I want the city to actually look like one of these endings and which fraction room is the area more often That be interesting

I support Renegades it is one of the most anarchy moments to the city of Villedor

Honestly, I chose Bright Peacekeepers (it isn't the Renegade ending, its the Bright Peacekeepers ending). Just because they have the same flag doesn't mean they're the same. My reason? Purely a RP perspective. Juan is the route youd go if you're playing as an Aiden that only cares about finding Mia, and doesn't care about the city. He is the best option for finding Mia, from an RP perspective.

The whole soup kitchens stuff is nonsense

It seems that most people support Peacekeepers... Great job! I am proud for people not falling into that sunshine happy ending and empty phrases about making better society while watching people die by hunger and bandits like in Bazaar. Peacekeepers are the best!

i wish there was another outcome cause i didnt side with the survivors and I betrayed Jack Matt but got the Survivor ending

As person who chooses the nightrunner ending every time, i just want to say that i support the Bazaarians and the PKs.

Crazy how people wanna support the pk when it’s being ruled by a terrible person. Like as if the pk wouldn’t of done worse to Aiden if he showed up to them mid turning plus who would support a man who let the best character (his own men) go on a suicide mission just to blow up minutes in and not give a crap about them. If someone else was in charge I would be pk all the way but when the head of the organization is corrupt the rest of it will be as well

PK is an example of Fascism because of their leader

Pk to moim najlepszy ending, oni chcą się pozbyć wszystkich zarażonych z miasta i je oczyścić a inne frakcje poprostu to ignorują że największym problemem są zombie, a pk chce je wszystkie wybić i nawet chyba im sie udało w tym zakończeniu

I'm not buying this game's propaganda, the Pecekeepers are actually maintaining steady rationing, eliminating zombies and enforcing order the medieval way. This isn't our society anymore, it's a new Dark Age.

I got the destroyed city ending. UGH lol

The reason I side with PK because of Aitor, Rowe, The Razor Cannon & of course The Crossbow, the only A-hole thing is Jack Matts

PK ending is the best for the future. Only bad thing is the rule of killing the whole famaly and frank dies coz aiden dont ask Jack to warn people of missle attacks but call Frank to ask him

I like the city being destroyed 🥰 The perfect ending 😁 there shant be any city standing 💖

From Good to Horrible

Devs:noooo you have to side with the survivors, they’re the good people!!

I wish the survivors took a more active approach with the zombies, but there's definitely something people forget. The PK's are objectively bad, its not like they were ever supposed to be saviors. They are military men for the most part, and even try to sabotage every faction. On the other hand, the survivors enlist a more democratic approach. I imagine that, because they have more of the everyday people AND the nightrunners, they are able to clean out small and important areas. I imagine this could lead to water treatment plants and solar energy farms after years. Theres also rain and well water that they could have! Its kinda funny to assume that the survivors dont have these very important everyday workers, which is more important that just pure force and military.

I fucking got the renegades my first try.

Ok ok...but hold on...now there are protest...on the middle of stress...at freaking NIGHT? Did the renegados killed all the zombies? Because so then they are THE only right choice

For as amazing of an experience this was playing thru 3 times, i have never played a more BROKEN game from high end developers......... (I had to play thru 3 times because of glitched trophies and bugged missions or side quests) and currently in 2024 its still just as BROKEN... Still a great experience that i would definitely recommend but man how much better could it have been without all the issues...

Survivors are also a bad ending IMO. Sophie's leadership won't help bazaar "thrive" when zombies aren't being killed. How many "loved ones" actually died under Survivors? W PK's!

I kinda like that no matter who takes control theres still major flaws in each.

I wish that instead of Jack Matt, Aitor took the position of commander

I WISH THAT THE CITY WOULD CHANGE IT'S APPEREANCE BASED ON ENDING YOU GET, SADLY IT'S GOT SCRATCHED BACK IN 2020😢

Are little kids really debating which factions is better? Many of you wouldn't even survive with the PK.

I really can't understand why the Peacekeepers are seen as a bad ending while the Survivor's as a good ending. 🤦‍♂️

I would have gotten the renegades ending first play through if I didn’t decide to save lawan lmao-

Pretty terrible writing in terms of the ending: 1. The Survivors faction was awful right from the get go but their ending supposedly shows a good outcome? That whole things makes no sense. I didn't see anything indicating that for example they'd build soup kitchens (also making people reliable on handouts...) 2. The Peacekeepers were reasonable from the start and had only a few idiots in it (Jack Matt). How you get from that to "we kill your family as well if you break the law" is beyond me. Also punishing confirmed thieves is good. The ending shown here is not consistent with what is experiences while playing the game... 3. The pure idea that siding with Juan is siding with the Renegades also makes no sense. I would never hand over the keys to the city to a bunch of thugs that run around with masks constantly attacking and killing people. Up to the point where you meet Williams there wasn't a single Renegade that you could even properly talk to and that wasn't a generic crazy a-hole. There were two side quests with supposedly "new" renegade members but what they said made no sense and was not consistent with the behavior of the generic renegade enemies seen.

I support the Survivors from beginning to end. They believe in community and freedom. Freedom from oppression, totalitarianism, manipulation, neglect, abuse, and greed. They believed in human rights. They also believed in rules and retribution, but not through control, dominance, or hierarchy. Concerning what Aitor said about being an equal and a leader is false, he had it wrong. A true leader is one who upholds and teaches those values to be an example without asking anything more in return. Unlike a ruler or a boss. The PK call themselves “righteous protectors.” But if they were, why did they leave the Bazzar suffering at the hands of Jack and Joe? Why didn’t they extend a helping hand to convince the Bazzarians they were the good guys? Why did they take too much from the people while leaving them with too little? Why did they judge the Bazzarians as a whole at the beginning over the actions of one man (Hakon)? Also, the audio tapes from the GRE, VNC News, and the Renegades confirm that like the Army before them, the PKs (and Renegades) are collectively a bunch of grunts who follow orders no matter what. This led to events like Black Monday. And lastly, they are controlled by someone who is power hungry or with agendas that can change for the worse if they wanted to. I hope some can see this too after they played this game many times. Also, the Survivors’ rewards are much more helpful when avoiding the Volatiles during a chase in Hard Mode, navigating the city, and avoiding crowds of infected and Special Infected when low on health.

The survivor and renegade ending feel far too fragile. Survivor obviously everything is just great but it feels like a sudden gust of wind could top it all. The renegades are obviously falling apart at the seams. Only the peacekeeper really look like they have order and laws. They are harsh, but in a world like dying light harshness is required

thanks god i supported the Survivors and i saved the city i think i got the best ending

these factions ending seem like a remnant to the original factions of the 2018-19 version, the endings do not represent at all how these factions behaved in the storyline.

I somehow got the renegade ending despite giving the entire city to the peace keepers, I hated Juan and only sided with him once because frank was pissing me off and jack could not be trusted and somehow he took the entire city by one single decision I made half way into the game…

Lol, imma kill off the bazaar, kill hakon, help lawan furfill her hit list, give the tower to jack only to kill him later, then blow the city up leaving with the most devious grin

Bruh peacekeepers founded north Korea v2

Holy shit, I've never seen the survivors nor did I think u could support renegades

In my opinion Peacekeepers ending is the best.

Kinda the peacekeepers ending is the Dying light 2019 i was hoping for

How did they even climb the tower with that big banner?

I supported the renegades lol

Tf that night runner grappling onto?

how is there a renegade ending wtf?

Well, those 6 dead were thieves and Renegades. I feel sorry for some of the thieves out of those 6 because they're not total thieves, they're just surviving, they haven't really adapted to having PK rule the entire city. Basically PK is like North Korea, self-sufficient, but I think a dictatorship like PK will be better than Survivor when PK helps to keep the society peaceful and orderly. especially in the chaotic post-apocalyptic period, Survivor helps people to be free, but because of that, it will make it even harder for us to return to the society before the zombie outbreak. Of course, it will not be as dictatorial and sick as Renegades, Renegades is like the dark Middle Ages, the people are poor, but the nobles still have fun. Choose PK, although people are not very free, but basically they still have human rights, as long as they don't steal or do anything that affects society. PK will distribute food and water to people, make sure they work and keep society in order, they can even provide good education. PK soldiers are very good at killing Zom, they can free the whole city and rebuild. Remember that guns still exist in the DL2 universe, it's just that the army has taken all the weapons out of the city. If there are still Pilgrims like Aiden visiting the city, then surely PK will get the guns back, they can even build it.

The endings are a lot like Fallout: New Vegas' endings. Survivors is the independent ending, PKs are the NCR route, Juan/renegades are the Legion/Mr. House route (because he is playing the PKs like Mr. House did with the NCR, and Legion because the city is in control of raiders).

I just got the PK ending and I’m pissed off

Who was the guy that grappled away can't be adin

Why doesn't the map look like this! missed opertunity

Anarchocapitalism is the best.

Destroy everyone is the only good ending

I still don't regret choosing the PKs.

The hanging scene looks like it came from the E3 version

Got the best ending first try!

So I got the destroyed ending now do it again

0:55 is that a kid hanging ?

How is the Fish Eye still standing in the worst ending? Both Old Villedor and Central Loop got completely destroyed, they were nuclear missiles.

my first run was true ending and i didnt know what i was choosing.

Is it a bout facilities and factions

What's with all the Peacekeeper apologia here? It's ok if you prefer them but they were written too obviously evil and corrupt, there's not excusing them

For fuck sake I wasted so many fucking hours just to get this shitty ending

I actually got the best ending first try, even though I expected it to be the neutral route. The Survivors in the Canteen are all ranging from neutral to awesome, while those in Old Villedor range from good to "please god let me choke the life out of this fucker and feed his body to the volatiles". The Peacekeepers, on the other hand, are from start to finish the bad faction. They can't do anything by themselves, are closed to any outside opinion, and can't even enforce the laws that they want to enforce. Nothing can strive from such a weak faction. I'm not saying anarchy is better, but in this case, a loose strong leadership from the survivors (and the Nightrunners), is better than a tight weak leadership from the PKs.

I don't even know what faction is better. All of them have their own downslides. Peacekeepers are too merciless and aggressive which isn't really bad in that chaotic world but they are also honorable. Survivors are kinda more primitive and kinda more peacefull at the same time. I went with PKs the first try and had to fight Jack Matt at the ending because he thought I was the traitor just because I let the colonel live.