The Fourth Cup - Dr. Scott Hahn 

How awesome!!! ❤

Welcome home!!! Dios te bendiga! God bless you!!!

Welcome Home.

Joan Laws Praying for you, sister, and thank you for your beautiful testimony :)

+Joan Laws Hi Joan, I share the same feeling of confidence with you. I completely have faith that at the end of our lives, my parents will be able to present their 15 children with all their own families each. For now, like you, I am studying theology, to be able to answer my siblings questions,when they are ready to learn the truth about the Catholic Faith. God bless you and all your family.

+Joan Laws If you need help I would be happy to help. Catholicism is easy to defend.

+Anna Pennrose Thank you so much Anna. I will keep you in my thoughts and reach out to you when in need. God bless you! Joan

Catholicism is roman paganism. It is not Christianity but the whore of babylon

We just completed this one. It includes the Fourth Cup. Excellent series ready made for bible studies stpaulcenter.com/promise-and-fulfillment/the-eucharist-in-scripture/

Hey! Can you tell me more? I’d like to write to you or get in touch via social media or email please? :)

Mar Eduave bq

Grace And Peace, Mar. I "studied" *God's WORD Of Truth, Rightly Divided,* and found *That "The Body Of CHRIST, Seated In The **_HEAVENLIES_* Is "the *Only True Church!" Chris Endrizzi *Rightly Divided* "studies" here for your Encouragement! IF you wish… *ALL THIRTEEN Bible* baptismS “study” *{# 7}...* *+ 17-Part Great GRACE Departure! {# 11}* "study": ru-vid.com/show-UCyxdRMbcLVBWY1HV2Fv8ALQdiscussion www.bereanbiblesociety.org/berean-searchlight-may-2020 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PS: What think ye?: *"Solves* _ALL "religious" Confusion"?_ = *NO "Other" Doctrine Than "Right Division!"* {Perchance Disobedience to *THIS **_"Sound_** Doctrine" Of God!* is _The Cause_ Of ALL Of The "Controversial/Contradictory/Confusing/DIVIDING" Issues? }: www.bereanbiblesociety.org/no-other-doctrine-but-right-division/?Berean+Bible+Society&SEARCHLIGHT&

I don`t know what books you are studying from , but there is only one that will give you the Truth . The inspired word of God . There is no place in the scriptures where you find that the apostate Catholic Church is the true Church Catholic use Matt. 16 : 18 and to say that Christ Built his Church on Peter is Blasphemous . Christ Call Peter a stone or small rock Petros in Greek and it is unstable never could Christ build his Church on an unstable foundation Christ new his Heart he rebuked him many timed and Paul did too . and Christ says and on this Rock meaning Petra a giant rock I will build my Church , Christ is Called the rock all through the Bible His body is the Church and it is made up of saved believers Acts 2 : 47 ; He is still building it today as sinners get saved they are Baptized by the one Spirit into the one body of Christ the Church and he is the Head of the Church Eph.1 : 22 - 23 There is no earthly visible Church that is Holy , that include the apostate Catholic Church which is full of sin . You keep believing the catholic Church is the true Church and the way of salvation and you will open your eyes in hell when you die . You need to get saved and read and study the word of God The KJV and become a member of the True Truth Church made with out hands It is a spiritual assembly with spiritually save sinners .

Mar Eduave wow

May God lead you to his Church the Catholic Church

Roelie . There is no 4th Cup in the New Covenant . Dr Hahn like all Catholic need to use the Old Testament to back up the false teachings of the Catholic Church , They do this with Mary ,The New Covenant Consist Of Christ being the Mediator of the New Covenant , Christ who is the last High Priest sacrificed Him self as the Lamb with out Blemish . He shed his blood for the sins of the world one time . there Can be no more sacrifices , Hebrews 10 : 12 - 18 ; the mass and eucharist sacrifice Christ over and over again which is unscriptural and part of the Catholic dogmas . and The Communion which we take the bread and wine is symbolic remembering his Death . there is no forgiveness of sin or or salvation in the rituals , Read and study the word of God

@@consuelomarianamendieta1133 I have news for you, the apostate Catholic Church is not the true Church which is the Body of Christ . Get saved and read and study the scriptures and you will know the truth

@@donaldcooley897 If you are sooooo sure how come you are in this beautiful Catholic teaching? ; -) Maybe you are NOT sure about your religion!

@@Lezith456 I am sure about my salvation and being a member of the Church the body of Christ the true Church a spiritual Church The reason I am commenting on here is to tell people the biblical truth there is nothing beautiful about Catholic teaching most of it is unscriptural and fabricated . Catholics need to get saved and read he inspired word of God instead of the false unbiblical teaching of the Catholic Church by the way I am in the visible earthly Baptist Church where saved believers worship God in spirit and truth .

That’s so exciting! Keep it up. God bless you.

Patricia, actually the Church teaches very specifically that for the laity, Communion under the species of bread only is a full Communion---the Host is not Jesus' Body but His LIVING Body, and a living body contains blood, so receiving just the Host is both eating Jesus' Body and drinking His Blood. One of the Councils defined this as dogma---not sure which. The priest at Mass is required to receive under both species.

This is very touching thanks Dr Scott Hahn.

Each species, under the appearance of either wine or bread, is substantially the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus, so receiving under either is sufficient for the communicant. Perhaps your confusion is over the necessity that at Mass, the priest must consecrate both bread and wine, and the priest (and only the priest) must consume under both species. Members of the congregation receive fully the entire Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity no matter whether they receive either one or both.

how the heck did you change? what triggered such poison in the present from you as opposed to 2015 ?

Why "Tim Spangler", are you in danger of becoming a Catholic revert?

Wow Tim when did you have a change of heart. Welcome home 2 weeks ago did you go back to your old self when you asked why the disciples did not nibble at their Masters' ears & nose at the Last Supper. I'm confused......

Denise Braganza kom

Tim Spangler Are you pulling our legs? I sincerely hope not 😂

Man....my goal is to become learned enough to teach apologetics at my parish

Sophia Nguyen amen x

Yes I'm now learning about divine mercy Sunday and sister faustina and what Jesus revealed to her I'm so in love with Jesus and what he has done and what he still is doing I've been meditating on Jesus passion for 10 years now and I still am humbled by what God did for me and us

Very informative and in depth study of the institution of the Holy Eucharist. So the Holy Eucharist is the sacrament of the sacraments. A priceless grace from our Heavenly Father to humanity.

DR SCOTT HAHN, THANK YOU FOR THE GREAT TEACHING. GOD BLESS.

There are over a HUNDRED MIRACLES OF THE EUCHARIST ON THE INTERNET. In Lanciano Italy, in a small church around the corner from a council sign "Miracolo Eucharistico", there inside a gall tabernacle is a miracle of the Eucharist. It is clearly cardiac muscle, and globules of blood, which has lasted for decades. Many of these miracles are still there when ordinary wafers would simply deteriorate in a few years, becoming powdery, these consecrated hosts are literally centuries old. One special fact is the blood group AB which is common to these miracles; common enough in Palestine, is relatively rare in the places where many of these miracles are found, and indeed in Buenos Aires where a miracle of the Eucharist was found, leading the former Jorge Bergoglio to seek scientific proof of this miracle, which identified through the cells that the person whose blood it was, in fact, had been suffering violence.

madknee it’s me grace!!

@@grass201 :33 heyaa!

I LIKE FOOD

I hope what you wrote is good

@@lonelyberg1808 lol ya it was! i think i got an A or smth

Not quite. Yes, Jesus in His divine nature exists outside of time. But in humbling Himself to take on a human nature, He entered the world and existed in time in His human nature. As Scripture says, Jesus sacrificed Himself once and for all. Heb. 10:10-14, 1 Peter 3:18, Heb. 7:27, Heb. 9:12, Heb. 9:26-28. That one sacrifice that took place some 2000 years ago is re-presented and re-offered at each Mass. When Jesus said, "It is finished," and handed over His spirit, His sacrifice ended in time and place.

@@cajundomer False. We do not re-offer, but offer. It is the same sacrifice then as it is now, eternally and forever, outside of time. There is only one sacrifice, and we share in the mystery at mass as if we ourselves are at the foot of the Cross. The past becomes future and the future past.

Rob Marshall I'm half way through that book. Every page blows my mind. Is Dr Hahn offering anything new or does 'how Christ...' say it all?

The Catholic Church has always regarded the Eastern Orthodox priesthood to be valid and their Eucharist to be valid.

+Monterrey0304 you can try Apolgeticasiloe.com or here in RU-vid try Frank morera la eucaristia is a spanish version of the same topic(not a translation).

Go look at Lighthouse Catholic Media. They are the ones that produced this.

Yes he do and he say he love.

Holy Communion is a participation in the merits and fruits of the cross..the shed blood of Jesus...

Jesse Seva it’s a book by the same name

The book is out.

K. Smith In love, yes one need be a Christian Catholic to enjoy the beauty of the Eucharist.

The Protestant Anglican Church does not enjoy the Eucharist - without validly ordained priests, the Eucharist cannot be consecrated into the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ. One must be a member of the Catholic Church to receive the fruits of Christ's sacrifice - outside of Her, there is no salvation.

I'm so glad you appreciate these wonderful reflections. I hope you continue to follow in Scott Hahns path.

If you can come home and participate in this Eukaristic feast then why appreciate it from the distance

Howard Merken I thank you for your response sir. How can they still be God's chosen people when they deny Christ?

Look up Roy Shoeman. He's a Jewish convert. You might even be able to speak to him directly if you email him. There's a lot to cover with your questions. Way too much to cover in a comment.

mike bustamante Thank you for directing me to better resources

Adam F Continue to flow with the RCIA I pray Jesus can guide you to all truth. Remember just take it one day at a time. People dislike the Church so much, they'll rebuke you, just learn the scriptures and offer a great rebuttal. I love you sibling. At the end of your life pray that you can say 2nd Timothy 4:7 not in vain. Blessings.

Catholic Renewed Thank you for your prayers, truly.

Thanks David

AlegreViajero44 Back in 1998 I had a series of cassette tapes by Dr.Hahn that I would listen to in the tape deck of my old car. This series dealt specifically the Passover and the fourth cup.

AlegreViajero44 I was listening to Scott Hahn back in 1988 as I prepare to be baptized in 1989. this presentation of Scott Hahn is simply an exegesis of what has been taught in the church since Jesus Christ himself established the sacrament during the Last Supper. Jesus Christ owns it

Jean-Pierre, I clicked on your link, but it says that web page does not exist.

Hey David Clayton, Speaking with The Love of The HolyBible GOD, why don't u just read yr bible let JESUS CHRIST reveal GOD's Truth to u? Simple right???

@@billy1132 Great suggestion, just finished reading today’s liturgy. 🙏🏻

@@davidclayton3099 Hey David Clayton, Just read yr bible from John chapter 3 Verses 1 to 10. Apart from any theology Or whatever "gy"

@@billy1132 I have, and I’m born/ re-born of water and spirit. God so loved the world he gave us his only son. John 3 is a loving scripture of truth.

@@davidclayton3099 Wonderful👍 Dear David Clayton! Let us go into the world n share CHRIST JESUS with all, esp unbiblical folks who call themselves 'christians'!!!

I agree. It is His blood that saves us, not eating the meat of the lamb. It i His shed blood that saves us!

But the entire lamb must be eaten that night. Reread Exodus

I agree with Nancy, it is very clear what was mandatory for the sacrifice to save those in the household. The blood was one part, but eating it was another. Both needed to be done.

@@nancyjanzen5676 and blood was in the meat too at least a little bit

So what are you saying, Miles? Are you saying that you have done more studying and research on this topic than Scott Hahn, who has devoted his life to studying and teaching scripture, and has studied numerous ancient writings and can speak numerous languages?

miles erb, you raised a little contention. Don't give up. Don't just claim, "I've studied." If you want to win a debate, state your sources. make sure they're not biased. Don't pick anti Catholic sources, pick historically accurate sources and document your sources. I'm afraid you'll find that the evidence is against Protestantism but you need to follow this argument to its end. I'm sorry but its my belief the truth leads to God and the Holy Catholic Church. "To truly study history is to cease being protestant." Also, don't miss the point of this talk by Dr. Scott Hahn. Christ died and was resurrected to unite all men and bring them to God free from sin.

Correction, "To be deep in history is to cease to be protestant." Cardinal John Henry Newman.

My question is why not celebrate the entire life of Christ from birth to death. When did Jesus become man? When he was born or when he was conceived? Do you know we also his conception?

@@nancyjanzen5676You celebrate the life and death of Jesus everyday through the rosary. It is also the most powerful weapon against evil.

Desmon. When Jesus was concieved is when God became man and the whole process of salvation began. If the Christian world celebrated that no Christian could say I am pro life but...... The Catholics that have picked up the Protestant understanding are the ones who dont stand stong against abortion. Jesus was conceived, he was carried in Mary's womb for 9 months, he was born. He did not appear at the Jordan river as if by magic, though he could have. Maybe he was trying to tell you something those first 30 years.

Desmon, when the Lord handed down the last supper, He did so after the teaching in John 6. In John chapter 6, starting at verse 32, Jesus teaches on the real meaning of eating His body and drinking His blood and it's significance. All the Apostles say it is a hard teaching and they did not understand. Jesus did not say this is symbolic. He did not say I am speaking figuratively. He meant what he said in John 6:54. Thousands of people left that day because it was a hard teaching. I wonder if the Apostles finally started to understand at the Last Supper that Jesus was instituting the Eucharistic celebration that would last forever. Like the bread that fed the 5,000 people at the beginning of John Chapter 6. We read at the beginning of chapter 6 how the bread multiplies itself and the little wafer called the manna was the bread from heaven that fed them for 40 years, towards the middle of the chapter how Jesus is the bread from heaven, and at the end, how we must eat (in one case he actually used the word gnaw, like you are eating the pascal lamb at Passover) His flesh. If you are just doing something in memorial, are you really eating Jesus body and drinking His blood? Only in a supernatural setting where the Apostles would call upon Jesus to enter the bread and wine and turn it into His body and blood, could this be done. The early church did this and there is reference in the early writings by the church fathers that they were accused of cannibalism. And one more thing that might shock a lot of people is that Martin Luther, the fallen away monk, believed in the true presence in the Eucharist. Calvin tried to side step the issue and say it was only the true presence at the moment it entered a person's body. Both Luther and Calvin both believed Jesus was present at some point in the Eucharist. Ponder John 6:51 "if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh." and in 53-58 "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever.” Jesus never backs down. He never says I was kidding. He meant what He said and He said what He meant. He wants us to believe we are eating His body and drinking His blood. I believe....

Desmon why do you quote Paul on the Eucharist but ignore the words of Jesus on the Eucharist?

John Raymond New Mass or the Novus Ordo is considered Valid, but I myself only attend the Extraordinary Mass or the TLM. The New Mass isn’t sacred enough for me in my view and opinion.

You're awfully stupid.

The Pasdover Seder has four cups of wine. The last one is the one Dr Hahn is speaking of. There are no other cups.

You protest in vain

@@argelbargel7680 Oh dear, the simple mark of losing an arguement is to abuse people!!

@@lonelyberg1316 Surely there are many who will see n come to know The Holy Bible Truth n like me, turn my back to the church of rome n Come Home to JESUS n CHRIST Alone in Protestant christian churches!!

There’s a huge huge huge difference

Jesus says you must eat His Body and drink His Blood or you have no life in you. But, no other christian denomination even claims to be providing His Body and Blood fully except the Catholic Church (there are some claiming something similar, but not the real deal from the very beginning of the Church). So, I'm not sure how you think you can achieve what Jesus says you must do if you are not receiving His Real Presence in the Eucharist. Clearly, those that heard Him first hand understood He wasn't talking about a symbol or spiritual "eating". Because they balked at it and left Him because it was too hard a teaching. Jesus didnt back down from what He said either. Christian denominations disconnected them from the holy lineage of the priesthood, established by Jesus Himself (Mtt16) whose ordination sacramentally enables the consecration: changing of the bread and wine into the substance of Jesus. When Luther left the Church, the communion by protestants and christians could only ever be symbolic. And, they dont even think any sort of liturgical sacrifice is necessary any more anyway (which is not true). So, no. There is absolutely a significant difference between doing what Jesus emphatically and repeatedly said was necessary for life and resurrection and not doing it for whatever reasons.

Amen, amen!! When He said "It is finished", He meant the sacrifices and the law were finished, to be done away with.

Nikolay, is that your opinion based on what you read? If it is your opinion, can it be considered a fallible teaching of the scriptures? When Christ was crucified, He was crucified for ALL mankind!! That doesn't mean that ALL mankind is saved and everyone goes to heaven. There are still things we need to do. If you don't believe in the saving acts of Jesus ("For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." John 3:16), you might not be given eternal life. If you don't eat His body and drink His blood you may not have eternal life (""Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day." John 6:53). People who say they believe in Jesus but do not show it by their works may not have the saving faith needed for entry ("Do you want to be shown, you foolish fellow, that faith apart from works is barren? Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar? You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by works", James 2:20-22). St. Paul even says to a group of Christians "Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling;" Phil 2:12 Why would Paul tell believers in the Crucified Jesus to work out their own salvation with fear and trembling if it was already guaranteed. I don't think St. Paul believed it was guaranteed and neither should we. I used the word might quite a bit because from the way I read scripture, God always can show mercy on whomever He pleases and save them just because He wants to save them. I don't want to be like Job and have God say “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell me, if you have understanding." Job 38:4.

Well said brother. For many years people have been trying to add to the finished work of Christ. The resurrection wasn’t the finishing of His work, it was an after effect , Jesus never sinned, He paved the way for our resurrection. I don’t understand everything about Christianity, I’ve been studying the Bible for 32 years and am still growing in my faith. Paul talks about another gospel in Galatians chap 1. Any religion that adds to His finished work on the cross is a false gospel. We cannot do anything to earn our salvation, Ephesians 2 tells us that by grace we are saved, it is a gift of God lest any man should boast. God. Less you

@@ketidaco Resurrection is also part of our redemption...in it Christ destroyed our death itself....

Jesus was Jewish... and protestantism didn't exist until the late 1500s

I agree Jesus was Jewish - the roots of Protestantism are prior to 15th century. God bless you.

Do you realize that Martin Luther was a German monk in the Catholic church? Do you realize that both Martin Luther and John Calvin agreed that Jesus' Body and Blood are truly present in the Eucharist. They just didn't agree as to when the transubstantiation actually happened.

​@@gracepilgrim7765 Jesus said His Kingdom (singular) is like a mustard seed that becomes a great tree. If you cut a branch off (in the 1500's) it is disconnected from the roots. In what sense do you say _"the roots of Protestantism are prior to 15th century"_ ? The abuses around indulgences in Germany (which is what Luther "protested" against) were corrected by The Cathoilic Church. But too late; protest proliferated under its own momentum as the slogan "Sola Scriptura" generated thousands of opinions as to Biblical interpretation.....because scripture is _not_ self-interpreting. The seeds of this Protestant-Babel were planted in setting up the individual ego as the highest authority of Truth. This was not Reform but Rebellion. And rebellion was the sin of Lucifer ("I will not serve"), He incited this same sin in Eve & Adam, ("I will not obey") And it is the sin of Protestantism, & of modern, American "democratic individualism". ("I will have no Pope or Bishop over me"). "I am my own Pope/Church/Bible." "I am NOT a humble sheep in need of a Shepherd" PRIDE is the first(& deadliest) of the 7 deadly sins, for a reason. It is, & was, the "gateway-sin" that through disobedIence makes all other sin possible. Thus Humility is the first & most important virtue. Read the lives of the Catholic Saints & you will see this. Study the "Reformers" & you will find self-appointed-prophets full of pride. They claim to have "rediscovered" the true Church that had been lost for 1500 years....yet they worked no signs or wonders (So they said that the age of miracles is past). And, although Jesus said His Church (The Messiah's Kingdom) will NEVER fail (Matt 16:18), the Protestant narrative requires that Jesus's effort flunked & had to be restarted by Luther, then Calvin, then Zwingli, Melancthon, Fox, Smyth etc etc etc etc..... This narrative defies all the prophecies (That the Messiah is God's LAST Word to Man) and it is faintly blasphemous (That Luther will succeed where Jesus failed). This narrative also requires The Holy Spirit to go to sleep & desert His Church for at least 1500 years (or 1900 years if you are a Pentecostal). Then He wakes up & goes berserk creating thousands of Churches!

@@wilts43 well said

Nope. He was crucified on the day of preparation. Which was every Friday...even during Passover week. For centuries upon centuries, the Friday during Passover week was called the preparation of passover...no matter where in fell during Passover week. If preparation day fell on the day after (or any day after) Passover it was called the preparation of Passover. I suggest you study historical Judaism on the college level before making a statement such as you have. Many Jews here see poor understanding in your comment. Best of luck in better understanding of very simple things.

LOL John you truly are full of yourself. Jesus was crucified on the 14 Nisan 30CE which was a Wednesday. Either way the Last Supper was not a Passover Seder.

@@SolaChristo I had heard it was a Wednesday as well so that Jesus could be in the ground for three days to fulfill Matt 12:40, 16:4; and Luke 11:30 in the Bible. But I also agree with John that it was on the day of preparation, John 19:31 "Since it was the day of Preparation, in order to prevent the bodies from remaining on the cross on the sabbath (for that sabbath was a high day)" So Jesus was crucified on the day of preparation as the Bible states. There is the sabbath and there are the major feasts: Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles. Which sabbaths are also referred to as "high days?" The first day of the feast - The High Day (Yom tov) -- the 15th day of Nisan (Our Wednesday sunset to Thursday sunset), night 1 and day 1 in the tomb The second day of the feast - the 16th day of Nisan (Our Thursday sunset to Friday sunset), night 2 and day 2 in the tomb The third day of the feast - The Weekly Sabbath - the 17th day of Nisan (Our Friday sunset to Saturday sunset), night 3 and day three in the tomb. The first day of the week - the 18th day of Nisan (Our Saturday sunset completes the 3 days, Jesus is raised from the dead sometime between Saturday sunset (the beginning of Sunday for the first century Jew) and Sunday morning. "From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised." MATT 16:21 When we chose to remember those moments is not as necessary as when the events actually happen and show the Bible is the inerrant Word of God.

"Easter" is an English word, not a Latin one. You will not find the word "Easter" anywhere in the authentic Latin books of the Roman liturgy. I don't think it would matter either way, as such a hang up over a word strikes me as slightly superstitious. But to whatever degree it might matter to you, "Easter" is strictly an anglophone usage.

It is only called Easter in English. All other cultures and languages of Catholicism use a form of Passover or Pasch, Pasqua, Pascua, Paques. Blame it on the English language not the religion.

@@matthewaislabie7354 really you need an intervention

@@nancyjanzen5676 Yeah we probably all do.

@@matthewaislabie7354 it is called Easter only because it falls mostly in that month. Kind of like the fourth of July which is actually Independence Day.

HQ Life read John6: 52-71.

PLEASE READ JOHN 6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't think with the word "symbolic " simply because we don't symbolically burn in hell . The true presence of God is in the Tabernacle of God .

If you are symbolically saved do you symbolically burn in hell or do you literally burn in hell ? If your baptism is symbolic is your salvation symbolic? If the body is symbolic is life symbolic ? The concept of symbolic is literally dangerous .

remembrance of the Passover is not like just remembering. It is a making present of ourselves at that first Eucharist.

When the Lord handed down the last supper, He did so after the teaching in John 6. In John chapter 6, starting at verse 32, Jesus teaches on the real meaning of eating His body and drinking His blood and it's significance. All the Apostles say it is a hard teaching and they did not understand. Jesus did not say this is symbolic. He did not say I am speaking figuratively. He meant what he said in John 6:54. Thousands of people left that day because it was a hard teaching. I wonder if the Apostles finally started to understand at the Last Supper that Jesus was instituting the Eucharistic celebration that would last forever. Like the bread that fed the 5,000 people at the beginning of John Chapter 6. We read at the beginning of chapter 6 how the bread multiplies itself and the little wafer called the manna was the bread from heaven that fed them for 40 years, towards the middle of the chapter how Jesus is the bread from heaven, and at the end, how we must eat (in one case he actually used the word gnaw, like you are eating the pascal lamb at Passover) His flesh. If you are just doing something in memorial, are you really eating Jesus body and drinking His blood? Only in a supernatural setting where the Apostles would call upon Jesus to enter the bread and wine and turn it into His body and blood, could this be done. The early church did this and there is reference in the early writings by the church fathers that they were accused of cannibalism. And one more thing that might shock a lot of people is that Martin Luther, the fallen away monk, believed in the true presence in the Eucharist. Calvin tried to side step the issue and say it was only the true presence at the moment it entered a person's body. Both Luther and Calvin both believed Jesus was present at some point in the Eucharist. Ponder John 6:51 "if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh." and in 53-58 "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever.” Jesus never backs down. He never says I was kidding. He meant what He said and He said what He meant. He wants us to believe we are eating His body and drinking His blood. I believe....

www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNSa69O8nB817rqGdBZPOrBFmafJXQ%3A1579554837370&source=hp&ei=FRgmXo2hFKnJ0PEPrYe66Ak&q=eucharist+miracle&oq=e&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.0.35i39l3j0i131l2j0j0i131j0.4333.4333..6071...1.0..0.123.123.0j1......0....1.......8..35i362i39.qGbEZaYYayA

It's both ..Protestants miss out on the family idea of communion...and part of the instruction for the Passover lamb in Exodus was to eat the lamb and sprinkle his blood on the doorposts with a hysop branch

Daisy, Jesus is both divine and human, God and man. His spirit can be anywhere while His body remains in Heaven. All things are possible for Him, He can be anywhere He wants!. Haven't we taught our little ones that Jesus lives in their hearts? If His Spirit lives within us, as it should, we can better understand Dr. Hahn's message. I will pray for you!

You mean acts from the bible? The one that was canonized by the Catholic Church? The very book you read from called the bible didn't fall from the sky. It was canonized (arranged) by the Catholic Church. Daisy if you go into history you cease to be protestant. Read the bible, are you one of those who in John 6:66 who left Jesus when he said my flesh is flesh indeed to eat? Are you accusing Jesus of being a crazy by offering his flesh for us to "knaw" on ?

john o.....did you actually read the acts.?....Jesus is not coming down to earth until He comes again to set all things right....what is it you don't understand about that ?

marcia. thanks for your prayers...but the church is saying that His body and blood, soul and divinity is in that host....think about it...if that were true really and you are ingesting Him, wouldn't you think you would at least FEEL something ?...the idea is preposterous and not biblical..it's what the church teaches and it's wrong, dead wrong.

john o......i have never been so sure of something in my life as far as the church is concerned......wolves have come into the true church from the beginning....paul mentioned this, he could see it happening...this is where the RCC started....always was wrong and always will be....there would have been a small number of people that kept to the gospel that Paul taught.