The Genetics of Prehistory. 

@Graf von Losinj Bantu expansion went hard

I think I've heard that a possible explanation might be Jews involved in the Arab trade in East Africa, which went very far South in times long before Europeans got there, moving inland and interbreeding or converting people.

he mentioned it in the video about countries with obscure histories

@@Mr.Nichan its actually Yemeni traders who were arabs, in swahili sultanate of East Africa ruled by arabs, which is the only scientifically agreed vector for the small amount of semitic dna in the lemba tribe who are overwhelmingly of bantu extraction genetically, any Jewish practices among the latter is simply due to the Yemeni vector

They came from East Africa, Semetic Africans

also the present world, in a way

Be thankful we are living in the most peaceful time of humanity

Battlefield 2042 BCE

@@scholaroftheworldalternatehist I feel like it's not gonna last long, America doesn't want to be the global hegemon, and it can't be anymore : China is getting stronger, even though it has a massive demographic problem, I can't see it collaspe like the USSR. Russia is getting back from 1991, and they're already a big player, I'd let you imagine if they get their economy together. With a Global American withdrawal, I can't failed African states holding up much longer either. There's global warming to take in account, the world is getting dryer, water wars are becoming a more and more of possibility arroung the world. Something's gonna go wrong, wether it be in Africa, because of water wars, or a fail state collaspe spiraling out of control, because of a reformed Russia or China taking even more imperialists measures. Or because of all of them at the same time. I'm not saying WW3's gonna break out and we're all gonna die, I'm just saying that this century isn't going to be any more peaceful than previous ones.

@@thomasp.1828 Social Darwinism justifies liberalism through the belief that those who succeed do so because they are biologically superior. The ideology then got recuperated by the Nazis whom extended the concept to race. His commentary had nothing to do with Social Darwinism.

Whatifalthist has the same religious beliefs as Roy Moore That's why he hasn't denounced 1/6

It's almost a super power.

He's correct in this video though based on reports of anthropologists and osteologists.

He's always criticized both. Though he's increasingly moving further right. That being said he's general neutral unbiased libertarian with right wing leanings.

@@noahtylerpritchett2682 He's also misogynistic and Atheophobic He hasn't condemn 1/6 or Trump Also Racist. The horrible bias he has against brown people like Persians shows in 'What if Ancient Greece Industrialized'

Meth binges jk

Hes not awol, these videod probably take ages to make

No, Our ancient ancestors stories just passed on through us. Their stories, as well as everyone's stories are still happening.

Probably as long as each member counted on each other for jobs or survival then the tighter the connections is. Right now in much of the developed or developing world it’s shameful to ask for assistance from own relatives which might be a reason the society became more wealthy.

Many of them haven’t been forgotten, we just lost the context that we don’t truly know how ancient they really are

@Legends of the Ancients very interesting. u got any other legends that are present throughout the world?

That’s the advantage the Neolithic agriculturalists and their descendants had over the others [having been a highly literate people.] Steppe nomads-despite being the forefathers of great cultures and bearers of our common Indo-European cultural family-could not be said to have been a truly historic population until they were assimilated into the local Hellenic and Italic cultures. The parts of Eurasia where Steppe peoples were more demographically dominant and culturally homogenous (e.g. Scythia, Germania and Gaul), don’t even enter the historical record until their ancient Greek and Roman cousins decided to chronicle their existence for some purpose or another.

I imagine he works on multiple episodes at a time. The quality of the videos over such a short period is also impressive.

His writing is good because his typos are bad

@@lebleu8843 The typos give his videos added character

@@chico9805 Fair point. Rudyard is good naured. ; )

no wonder theres alot of mistake

How consciousness emerged is one of those things I’ve wondered about. Stoned Ape sounds like an interesting hypothesis.

The original form of edens theory is manu theory of sanskrit texts And that theory gives India or Bharat as origin of humankind.

The theory is from Terence McKenna and is over 30 years old. He didn't come up with it dude.

Yeah the Stoned Ape just has less and less support over the years for a reason. The research was very biased, and used of psilocybin related substances proved to have no important effect on evolution

Possible. But I think human "consciousness" probably popped in many places at once around the globe.

there is nothing about consciousness in that story it's all about betrayal of clan causing death being a traitor by eating from foreign tree that is trying to suck tits if two cows ending with none it's about keeping faith of clan forever as bound with ancestral inherited blood nakedness is shame and purity only after poisoning mind with foreign beliefs you start being ashamed about own origin of body of own culture and naturality of own roots

The virgin third age vs the chad hyborian age

I don't think this works as well but: "The Wheel of Time turns, and Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legend. Legand fades to myth, and even myth is long forgotten when the Age that gave it birth comes again. In one Age, called the third Age by some, an Age yet to come, and Age long past, a wind rose in the Mountains of Mist. The wind was not the beginning. There are neither beginnings nor endings to the turning of the wheel of Time. But it was *a* beginning.

Ah yes after the Thurian Age.

In the first age, in the first battle, when the shadows first lengthened...

@@i_am_squishy6230 One stood

Mr. Worldwide.

@@SHAHIDKC Apparently

Same, I was thrown off by the East Asian in my test

@@joshuamaldonado250 Yeah, I was surprised I was as mixed as I was given I just look white to most people.

Curious what my results would say. I'm Native Ryukyuan and some articles say they share genetics with the Ainu. I share some resemblance like a lot of facial and body hair, especially compared to most East Asians. I've also been mistaken as Hispanic a few times and even white, but I'd still say most people can tell I'm Asian.

if look at illegal migrants it more less is randomly selected 😂 letting in people from completely different climate is on extreme side of even negative selection people in military are already preselected if it's military from normal nations they don't mix... only these from mixed countries mix not caring about own roots and ethnic instincs nobody selects partner through IQ we aren't even sure how we inherit IQ to even think about replicating it biggest part in it is just uncovering more of inborn potential of it so by putting lots of resources on development of children what is northern strategy but opposite to tropical societies with historically high mortality where it makes no rational sense and creates randomness and general poverty and lack of thinking about accumulation of resources we oversimplify world so many ways usually by own culture filter generalising while there are many axes gradients so we loose real detailed picture focusing on own best known patterns obscuring others with them the more intelligent the more able to believe own bias lots of quotes about intellectuals were created to be aware of it 😂

What I really love about this is that he brings up supposedly “settled” topics (like the one about race) and gives a completely new take on it. Take this video for instance, he simultaneously refutes both the “race is a social construct” crowd and the “racial Darwinist supremacy”/“race and IQ” crowd simultaneously. His take on race is extremely unique, and it’s one I think needs further study (and wider acceptance).

"this place boring gonna dip 5000 miles away"

@@ultratheman ya know, with how much that seems to happen maybe they just thought it was epic and glorious or something.

​@@priestofronaldalt Imagine being the first human in modern America, where no one else has stepped before. Miles and miles of completely empty space, just for you and whoever came with you.

@@dasbubba841 Vinland Saga

@@dasbubba841 and 8 foot tall cave bears ready to launch your head like a football

I mean yeah ultimately it's not sustainable but he will probably get pumped by the algorithm in the short term. so here's to more people finding great content!

@@Lucius.Hercules yeah

Alternate viewpoint: Let's hope it doesn't. I'd rather one long, well-researched, detailed video than three videos like this - a whistle-stop tour over an enormously complex area of historic and scientific inquiry which makes any number of dubious assertions and proclaims them as 'fact'.

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

@@sanskar4539 ah yes let me conquer the entire world today! how do i get started?

Thats not how we do things here.

Ikr it’s frustrating.

Google works because his knowledge is just from a shit ton of books. A lot of his controversial or surprising remarks end up being mass oversimplifications, I find. So when in doubt, just google.

90% of what he says is bullshit anyway, the Genghis khan story has been debunked a long time ago, he is generally very Eurocentric and his knowledge regarding east Asia is lacking severely, about the whole guilt and shame structure, he has 0 credibility. These video’s are just for entertainment. Nothing more nothing less.

bump

Saying race isn't a social construct is the ability to separate biology from the culture(s) attached with that ethnicity. The video even alludes to the concept that equality amongst biological races isn't a straight equality but rather a relative equality, where the advantages and disadvantages of any given race averages out, so in our modern world its more socioeconomics and the merit of the individual and their upbringing.

Well, they say the ladies loved him for his hair which was quite fair.

@Kelvin That's only supposedly true for continental Europe, and it's fairly well-known that the first Christian royalty in Europe tried to legitimize their supposed divinity by insisting they were related to Charlemagne and the other Carolingians, who they (with some mental gymnastics and help from the Pope) could "trace" back to Mary Magdalene, who they implied had children with Jesus. Basically, we don't know how much of it is true and how much of it is propaganda. Remember that the Catholic Carolingians competed with the previous dynasty of the pagan Merovingians! Carolingians likely used every trick in the book to secure their authority.

@Kelvin this isn’t necessarily true, undoubtedly the vast majority of Europeans are, but some distant Icelanders and Irish who’s families never mixed with continental Europeans may not be

@@in4mal_baker270 lol nice

@Kelvin you're the idiot. Literally all humans are 16th cousins by definition of biological drift I'm not a Englishman who's inherited my y chromesone haplotype from Charlemagne. We share the same haplotype

It may have been kept due to selective pressure due to a lack of horses. Without it, societies would need to rely on it's people's will to travel just to stay in contact.

@Luis Muñoz That part of the world stayed in the stone age the longest (along with groups like the Maori). Hunting with stone age weapons tends to be pretty risky!

Yeah, it's very interesting, but I really wish Whatifalthist would add a detailed list of their sources for further reading. As it stands, this is just a worryingly 'race essentialist' claim dropped into the video, without further comment or explanation.

@@PantomimeHorse this guy never provides his sources. He probably takes his information from Wikipedia and unironic 4chan.

@@PantomimeHorse I'm mostly of native american descent but I must not have the 7R gene. I'm not at all impulsive, I'm actually very restrained, and I'm an introvert. I'm very detail-focused and can be very persistent when performing tasks. While race is definitely a real thing, I'm a bit more skeptical of claims that say things like race x is more inclined to behave this way, race y is more inclined to behave that way etc.

I think a more accurate way of saying this is that 20% of the men take 80% of the women, and I haven’t personally looked into it but I’m sure Hunter gatherers have a social hierarchy, not rigid but still there

Never understood chariot hype. Like, isn't that just horseback archer with extra steps?

@@acarroll6842 Horses back then were not strong or large enough to mount someone on their back for long periods of time. When horses were first domesticated they could only be used to pull carts.

@@acarroll6842 yes, exactly, and it absolutely crushed ancient battlefields. 50 well trained chariots wouldn't even break a sweat defeating 1000 battle hardened veterans on foot

@@scotbush4338 witch i find bizarre can you not just throw a few stone's and the horse just falls ore something ?

@Legends of the Ancients And also warriors that were mounted on an actual horses, not some clanky cart ;)

Probably more true than the assumption of outright slaughter. Farming, even as inefficient as it was back then, could support far more people reliably on a smaller amount of land than it could hunter-gatherers. People probably did both a lot of hunting-gathering and farming too, for a while.

Even recent history would lend credence to slaughter. Only in the past century have we been barely dealing with the idea that genocide might be morally reprehensible.

Or the hunter group might have avoided the farming group by moving farther, either live in mountains or remote islands

@@dasbubba841 Farming also means new epidemies etc, they slaughtered hunter-gathers directly or indirectly, just as Europeans vs native Americans.

Genocide is definitely the wrong term, the only thing I dislike about this video. As you put it, they were simply swamped, overwhelmed, outbred etc...

Dravidian Aryan bullshit

Actually they were Albanian

@@HammerHeadzzzbro just made that up with no elaboration for free 💀

Yeah, it was a good video

I appreciate the WOT reference, but I don't see how it connects to the video.

@@malexosh Ah, okay. Thanks for clearing that up.

@@JG_Enigma maybe about abraham

i think it was master oogway tho

The wheel weaves as the wheel wills.

Considering that majority of our information is either on electronic devices or on some very perishable carriers (paper) the forecast is quite grim. If history ever taught us anything it's that we must do stone carving more ))

If we colapse then we are non-writing humans considering that most of our information is writen on paper or electronics(easier to write and produce) instead of rock or clay or something that has a longer lifespan and resistance.

@@alexandrub8786 Maybe archaeologists of tomorrow will be able to read CDs and SSDs (or even take reading from HDDs) but good luck for them decrypting MS Word file formatting :)

Ask anyone who can play VHS tape.

The sobering reality is that absolutely everything that anyone ever does will eventually be forgotten.

That's always a trippy thought I have. Especially since I'm native Ryukyuan and we're a bit of an anthropological mystery like the Ainu. Turns out, we even share genetics with the Ainu.

A wacky fact I heard when I was watching videos about paleogenetics is that you have ancestors that you have no genes from. (It's easy to see that you must have ancestors that you have no chromosomes from, since you only have 46 gentically distinct chromosomes, but "crossing over" during meiosis means you have some DNA from people you don't have full chromosomes from, and I'm not sure how far back you would have to go before it becomes probable that there are some people you have absolutely NO genetics from due to any crossed over bits on other chromosomes being lost, but I can see two ways that this would eventually happen.)

From what I understand you take a survey of people that offer to do genetic testing. You check records that are often partial or have massive gaps. Most of this is really just sophisticated guess work. It will be admended throughout my lifetime and my child's. One day it may even seem quaint the emphasis we put on it. Remember environment matters and it can effect genetics.

To me it's interesting but beyond 5 to 6 generations back it has no bearing on you in modern day. I hate those commercials where the people find out they have a "majority" genetic material from another group than their family heritage and change their entire lives. I say enjoy looking into your past but remember you should respect the past but not obsess on the bad that may have/not happened. You are who you are :)

@@urphakeandgey6308 what??? No way! From that island chain south of Japan? That's so cool!

It's a pretty good concept

Hey mate, could you link that video? Sounds interesting. Thanks.

The Garden of Eden is believed to be the ancient Saharan grassland of North Africa that disappeared due to natural climate change. Humans were forced to leave and search for a new home elsewhere. The Great Flood, meanwhile, is likely about a civilization that lived in the modern Black Sea basin that was permanently flooded after the melting of ice age era glaciers. There’s a surprising amount of ruins from that time period on the Black Sea floor that corroborate this theory.

@@luke_cohen1 it's also crazy when you realize human beings developed such uniquely keen eyesight to detect predators and locate ripe fruit... We literally can see because of snakes and fruit it's a little too correct.

interesting, i think this is where astrology once came from, gicing the stars names and chatichatistics to follow and regocnize threw the year, they each get some charicaristics suitible for that time of year, etc, and more and more conplex over time

I tried digging into it a while back. This video is pretty accurate. He mentioned in the video that all humans are very closely related, and that is is even more true for Indians. The difference b/w dravidians and aryans is minuscule evident from some of the graphs in the video

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

There's a lot stuff in this video that he's just pulling from thin air, claims without any reasonable proof, for example the entire indus valley part, is based purely on speculation.

@@gustavkirchoff4633 Yup Indus valley never depicted any racial hierarchy like he said But we can guess that the middle eastern farmers were the elite class from genetics

The migrations to India you need to know about are 1 Out of Africa migrants - The first people. They make up the tribals now 2 Iranian farmers - Came and mixed with the natives to form Indus valley people This IVC people moved south and mixed with the natives again to create Dravidians called ancestral south Indian (ASI) 3 Indo Aryans - Central Asians who came and mixed with the already mixed IVC people forming Ancestral North Indian (ANI) Then the ANI and ASI mixed again to create modern day Indians The individual components may vary according to caste and region (for example A Brahmin will have more Indo Aryan DNA Northerners a bit higher than south. While a lower caste from North India will be more related to ASI people)

Read the book. It has far more details about this. The Bene Gesserit, or "The Club of the Super Women" (as I friend of mine calls), has this plan of mixing genetic lines of the big houses for centuries. Believing that one day, a "superman" will born and lead humanity to greatness. But they dont know exactly what he will do. Neither I. I had just read the first book

The Bene Geserit breeding lineages for a hidden purpose is the Rothschilds and the globalist banker conspiracy

@@JBGARINGAN BINGO

The Bene Gesserit need to make me a sandwich!

@@JBGARINGAN The global banking families are more like the spacing guild tbh

I think that would be true if he was talking about linguistics

@@Holding0-6 no because he said “Bantu” and west Africans are not genetically Bantu nor are we culturally Bantu, we do however share a common origin but that’s about it. It like labelling all of Western Europe “Germanic” encompassing Celtic regions just because. That would be stupid wouldn’t it? Well same applies here if he is going to lump us together then use the correct term “Niger-Congo” or split the two into “Bantu” and “west African”

@@makeytgreatagain6256 Got ya

He completely skipped the back-migration of farmers into Africa but mentioned all other migrations shown on the map and went on to mention the relatively insignificant Southern Arabian migration into the Ethiopian highlands, as if that was what's responsible for modern Horner genetics, which is very misleading. It almost feels like it was done on purpose, tbh.

@@Kermatrix most horn Africans haven’t gotten much MENA ancestry the back to Africa migration prettymuch only effected Northern Africa. East African admixture with the Middle East is new only the Habesha (northenr Ethiopians) are mixed with ancient Middle Easterners apart from them all other horn Africans are 90-100% SSA

Thats true

Namely encompassing Iranians and North Indians but excluding modern Europeans.

@@TheSwordofStorms Iranians and Indians are Aryans but the others aren't.

@@offthemountains that’s just not true. Indo-Iranian is a subgroup of Indo-European. You’re right the term was changed from aryan, but it was Iranian, which is, funnily, a derivative of aryan.

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

It is possible to mix them but no one has tried hard enough

Birds and dogs are different species, not races. Races is like a German Shepherd vs. a Chihuahua; they're very different within the same specie, they can still breed. With humans, we have different groups, but these groups cannot be defined as races because the differences aren't significant enough.

@@nagichampa9866 A lot of words just to say breed and race are interchangeable.

Wolves, Coyotes and German Sheppards can mix. They all behave differently on a genetic level, with wolvez being bigger and more intelligent.

it's quite infuriating because some weak race managed to survive. Because the conquerors wanted to be merciful.

@@alexanderi1183 Weak race? Where are you going with this exactly... I kind of want to know but at the same time I'm scared

@@cdemr any civilization that couldn't adapt.

@@alexanderi1183 Who are you to say like that? God or Nature??

@Art Man how am I a nazi? I never specified on what race should be eradicated, just the weak ones.

He did

>brazil

Nice try Gambian leaders

How about talking about real countries that had a low chance of becoming superpowers but did. Theres enough alternate history stuff on RU-vid, and history is more interesting than people can come up with anyways

Eg: Australia can not even win a war against emus, even by using automatic riffles, or other invasive species like, checks notes... Rabbits!

There is more biodiversity I'm Africa, even among the same country's. Than the rest of humanity. I call that successful because bodies with more human diversity, and even diversity from other hominid species, will lead to large successful genetic diversity. Which means more successful birthrate fertility and are less likely to be sick to any disease. With the exception of diabetes. I'll never understand the African subseptability to diabetes compared to other populations. That oddity aside I basically mean what I say. It's a good impression.

@@noahtylerpritchett2682 maybe in ancient africa, the genetic mutation and competition that results in more insulin are just lost since for most of human history there are an abundance of sweet fruits in the vast African forest so survival doesn't really need to require super efficient processing of glucose

Yes they original hunter and gatherers got replaced by Neolithic farmers and indo-European pastoralists latter we are a mix of these 3 groups genetically in Europe while West Africa remanded far from Neolithic civilization meaning Africa maintained a hunter and gatherer society and thus was untouched by massive modern civilizations and trade with neighbors for about thousands of years.

really, your surprised....? 👀 isnt it obvious? when u like... look at humans? not trying to be rude but isnt this obvious from appearance, and also kind of, considerd very evil for a white person to say even tho entirely true.... becasue yk, white people been saying this.................. What do you call that, intuition? Selfawareness? Rationality?

@@audhumbla6927 not really if you hadn't know what to look for.

Well most if Latin America is quite inaccurate too, but I don't think the genetic component there can be really illustrated using only solid colors.

@@jackyex latin america is an spectrum

@@EPK123 exactly, as I said solid colors can't really capture Latin america's genetic diversity.

@@jackyex solid point, even looking at South Africa in the Cape; that mixed designation only applies to about 50% of the population of that area, with 25% of the remainder being entirely white and the other half black. Though the only way to ever wholly be accurate I suppose is statistics and percentages rather than map distributions.

@@JL-ti3us well Afrikaans people are white but they have around the range of 13~25 khoisan dna, but they still look very white so there's that.

I agree, starting to think this guy is some ANTIFA. Talk everything bad about the west and hold mass murderers from other cultures in high regard.

Yes thank you he kinda butchered parts of the indoeuropean migrations and it makes me wonder about the rest of it.

Most europeans orginated from the middle east. There is a specific genome that links back all the way to middle east. Its also why you see much of southern europe have a mix of arabian looks and then blue eyes from mixing with northern eurasians

@@flash4901 this could only be said to be true for the people in the very sputh of europe. Anatolian farmer admixture is at the most less than a third in most aread above the alps, and thats Mediterranean farmer admixture, which is already 20% WHG.

Thanks for writing this comment. Some people swing the pendulum way too far.

race was developed as a marketing tool by slavers in Virginia and is therefore a social construct

I think we just need to upgrade our vocabulary from what we using today which mostly came from European trying to make themselves superior somehow. So we can use the word "ancestry" or "bloodline" to describe ourselves biologically and use the word "ethnicity" to describe ourselves culturally. And don't use the word "Race" at all.

@@alhasanalradhi6953 One hundred percent agree.

@@alhasanalradhi6953 About the word "ancestry", I think there might be a jargon issue here I learned about when looking into paleogenetics. It would seem logical to say that your "ancestry" includes all of your ancestors, and maybe even to say that you have 50% "ancestry" from each parent, 25% from each grandparent, 12.5% from each great grandparent, and so on, but that's not how actual genetics works. People often think of a child as a 50-50 mixture of their parents genes, a 25-25-25-25 mixture if their grandparents genes, etc., but genes mostly travel as whole chromosomes at a time, and you only have 46 of those, whereas you can have as many as 64 great great great great grandparents (you might have less due to cousins mating), and some of them probably gave you more than 1 chromosome. You still have some genes from ancestors you don't have whole chromosomes from, due to "crossing over" where DNA is passed between paired chromosomes during meiosis, but this doesn't provide as much, and there are ways that ALL the genetics from an ancestor, including those preserved due to "crossing over", could be lost. (An interesting side-note is that everyone has mitochondrial DNA passed down asexually through their mothers direct female line and all males have Y-chromosomes from their male lines which never "cross over" with X-chromosomes and so are also passed on asexually.) Thus, you can see that you do not have the same amount of genetic information from ancestors you are equally removed from (even if you only care about which ancestor of a certain distance the gene actually came from rather than counting different identical genes as the same. These identical genes happen mostly because your ancestors share some more remote ancestors, meaning there are some people you are multiply descended from, but that would increase the fraction of your mathematical "ancestry" that person represents as well as the genetics you get from them.) Moreover, you must have some ancestors that you have NO genetics from. Another issue is the difference between genotype and phenotype. Most genes DNA doesn't do very much. (People often make a big deal about how DNA that doesn't code for proteins is not "junk DNA" and how it has all these super important purposes, and may use exaggerating language to get you excited about their reseach, as scientists and science reporters usually do, but that doesn't mean every piece of DNA is equally important.) There isn't an obviously good way to mathematically measure phenotype contributions as a whole, because the relatative importance of each gene is subjective and not fully understood anyway, but it's clearly not the same as genetics, and phenotype is what actually matters and elements of it are what are noticeable without genetic testing.

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

The link between the Garden of Eden and the Stoned Ape history enthrals me. Because it touches the very core of our humanity. However, to be honest, I don't believe. At the time people started creating culture like habits, music and clothes, I suppose they hadn't got a language able to preserve such memories. Whatifalthist videos are the absolute best content on YT. Based on solid reasoning and necessary theories. They spread knowledge and encourage thinking.

@@sanskar4539 ok boomer

@@Halera- "Whatifalthist videos ... based on solid reasoning" This is actually my main problem with whatifalthist. His focus is on alternate history, which implies that history can be predicted based on large-scale features and trends and important events. This is fun, but I don't think it's very true (and I don't think he does either), since history seems very much like a chaotic system to me, and to the extent that it is true, I think you would need to be a lot more rigorous to find the actual answers. Anyway, this focus requires him to use theories of what the relatively simple explanations for various things in history are. These explanations tend to strike me as probably practically unverifyable, since there are so many possible competing explanations and history is such a small and uncontrolled dataset where large-scale events are concerned. Basically, he has a particular, fairly complex and mostly very credible-sounding, worldview he's constructed, which he can use to reach conclusions consistent with that worldview, but I wouldn't say his reasoning is actually convincing. (It's better than a lot of other people's explanations of why things happen in history, though.)

Or maybe it’s a metaphors for childhood? Children do have to learn and loose ignorance on what is and isn’t allowed and they grow and loose their easy, safe life.

7R probably isn't the only gene that influences risk-taking and impulse

From what Kings & Generals said Genghis Khan wasnet even that big of a... lets call him a seducer, although this is youtube so anything and everything can be bullshit

@@ivanpetkovic2130 Yeah saw that video also…looks like the folklore got spread around too well.

Genghis Khan dramastically change the genetics of world more than europeans

@@inominado1774 the way Social Justice types give the Mongols a pass because they aren't white is really frustrating.

*Rust belt, I live in the sun belt. Got my words mixed up!

lol and then you cover just that.

@@thomaswomack9162 would you happen to be from the American south?

@Kelvin then how else did people arrive in the Americas? Did they sprout from the spring grass?

Yes they’ll still fight and call each other colonizers

@Graf von Losinj Oy vey! That's antisemitic stop noticing obvious things like that. Reality is antisemitic

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

@@sanskar4539 ram is Raamah son of Cush Ben Ham Ben Noah, krishna is Cush who is the eponymous ancestor of the biblical powerful Land of Cush which stretched from the Kingdom of Kush in Sudan, to ancient Kish in Babylon (which the bible says was built by Nmrod son of Cush, first king and most powerful ruler in biblical history) Modern REAL descendants of Cush, Nimrod, are the Cushites of north east africa such as the Beja (known as the elite Medjay of ancient Egypt) in Egypt and Sudan as well as Somalis and Ethiopians eritreans, the father of Cush who is Ham also had Mizraim as a son (ancestor of Ancient, Coptic and Felahin Egyptians) as well as the other son of Ham called Phut, father of the Amazigh berbers of north africa (interestingly the oldest use of the name berber is found among Somalis, who have a recorded 2000 year old coastal city on the gulf of aden, called berbera, in fact, this gulf was until recently known to the entire world as the Gulf of Berbera) Its funny how Hindu worship my Cushite ancestors like Cush, and his sons like Raamah, these are historical patriarchs mentioned in the bible whose descendants like nimrod conquered the entire world and founded the first human empires in sumeria such as Babylon

@@sachemofboston3649 yep the irony. If Abraham was resurrected today he would be condemning both his descendants.

💯

There are similar creation myths in various cultures that have different settings and contexts. Garden of Eden is one of the stories that comes from Judea - Christian - Islamic mythology. Hindu mythology mentions the first living beings as being created by Brahma who was himself created by Vishnu (the closest equivalent to the supreme God in Hindu Mythology). Manu and his wife Shatrupa were the first Human beings and were created by Brahma to populate the earth and this is where the similarity ends (no garden of eden, no forbidden fruit, no banishment to earth etc.)

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

@Prat667 . ever heard of out of India theory? Which is written in our ancient books with a lot of proof of it. We fought Danabas i.e. people of the danube river( Russia) and Asurs and Daityas from Middle East and Mesopotamia (Iran) . So much similarities between pagan religions ,zorastanians of iran, religion of europe before judaism and Christianity . There’s a shiva ling in Ireland. People persecute nature worshippers and witches in Europe which actually shows similarity to hindu culture. In Africa too there are two nations sumali and mali named on Sri Lankan king Ravana’s Father Mali and Grandfather Sumali whom Lord Ram fought. There’s a tribe in Africa who call themselves Kushites because they were ruled by Ram’s son Kush and descended from him. People in Thailand follow Buddhism which also originated in India but there Kings have Ram in there name because they were once ruled by Hindus . Same goes with Indonesia a muslim country. They still practice Ramayan. There’s so much overlapsing of cultures. If you do research you’ll find so many aspect of Hindu cultures around the regions of the world and there culture. Because we ruled almost the whole world at a point of time in history.

@Prat667 . you don’t know your history and you believe western propoganda. Let’s awake the nation and our civilisation

Interesting. What are some examples of relations between phenotype and geographic features?

Source?

Remind me

@@gabrielbap1 Tibetan changes to lung capacity, and there are some kind of Philippine group that can hold their breath way longer. Idk, just spit balling

@@abiku2923 Tribes in the arctic can survive on an almost exclusive diet of meat and fish (not plants to eat most of the time). Most other people would sicken and die on such a diet.

Source on that I will love to see that

@@melvinskdkj8536 also keep in mind there is no archaeological evidence to back this at all. This conclusion came from some test done in 2020 on a sample group of west Africans. So to say all west Africans have 20% non human dna is idiotic

Thats how it goes. A small sample size of black people suddenly represents all of us. Media and science is against us

An awful lot of ideas in this video being presented as 'facts'.

@@PantomimeHorse ya.. Most of this is speculation

That's cool. What have they named it?

@@ManiacMayhem7256 Its about 12 000 years old and still unnamed I know its odd

A genocide may not have occurred in all, or maybe even most, of these cases, but it's the simplest answer.

@@terrantabula9847 The problem is in assuming it is the answer, when it may not be the answer in the majority of the cases brought up in this video.

@@flyingeagle3898 Death represents the removal of a person or people as a factor in future events, whereas letting them live would significantly complicate something which we already have very, very little information about with more speculation. Also, I don't know if we could break ourselves of this habit in assuming something like this. The concept arose back during times where such an occurrence would have not been totally out of the ordinary and when we think back to ancient history its always as a 'more violent, savage time' compared to our 'modern, more civilized' own.

Apparently there was a coexistence in what is now the Persian Gulf between people with modern well-developed frontal lobes, and people who lacked self awareness. The savage and the civilized would recall it differently.

It is actually pretty uncommon to find fair lower caste people and darker upper caste ones. But I do agree that you can't determine caste based on looks which in my opinion isn't because caste system was loosely structured (in fact, the opposite) but because there are too many subgroups within castes which makes the big 4 divisions less relevant and blurs their boundaries.

@@nakshatra1402 Please read about caste system from reliable sources. The entire thing is so politicized and propagandized that its almost impossible to find reliable unbiased information about caste sytem.

@@nakshatra1402 The very fact that you cant identify caste from appearance discardes any racial basis. Physical appearance is the only attribute of race.

@@nakshatra1402 The birth based caste system emerged about 1500 years ago and solidified only during the late Mughal - Early Colonial era. Caste system was somewhat fluid and flexible until 1500s. No system can remain the same for 3000 years. The Varna system, was based on one's attributes. The Vedas and Bhagwat Gita clearly state that one's Gunas or attributes determines one's Varna. The Varna system slowly decayed into lineage based Jati or caste as we know it today. Source: Bayly, Susan (2001), Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age, Cambridge University Press.

Europe was evolving a caste system during Middle Ages, but the Turkic invasions (conquering almost all of southeastern Europe), the Black Death (killed 30% of Europeans, affected disproportionately the upper classes) and then the discovery of Americas (giving poor Europeans hope of a better life overseas and pressuring kings to abolish serfdom to have more settlers) ended the complications and simplified the system.

Then watch Survive with Jive. This guy has no idea about pre-history topics.

@@alexanderi1183 Ok

Yeah things are advancing faster and faster probably because less religious control of society, surplus food/materials, more segments of society allowed to advance….Hopefully though the richest tech people today (Elon, Bezos…) around my age hurry up and learn how to advance the human body/brain.

@@johnl.7754 yeah advancement will only get faster if all goes well. but as this video shows, not everything goes how we think it will. either way, learning more about our ancestors will be cool.

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

@@sanskar4539 intersting how your records from that time survived when most others didn’t. But I’m sure there were some things missed, as there always is with everyone. I’m excited to see all the gaps filled.

1 genes don't lie, language and culture mutates much more (at least since homogenic cultures were replaced by hybridisation) 2 data doesn't lie only interpretation can lie you are still ability to learn from many angles and find objective truth as it's one thing and not relativist you just decide if you look for truth or you want to listen to one subjective interpretation if you will think still this way you will learn nothing as everything around wil be seen as lie to you that's in a way nihilistic and all liers will love it

@@szymonbaranowski8184 1) genes don't lie but it can be bought from across the border and provide it as evidence. We can only hope the countries "scientists" are fully independent and truthful. People will do it for whatever reasons they think is important for them i,e. build friendships with other countries, create unity within the country, continue a legend or a myth, or even to legitimize their tradition that they've been following. I personally don't think the dna makeup legitimizes anything but i do care if the person is following the customs, tradition, culture, and social personality more so of the ocuntry. Who doesn't like a little spice when they visit another country. The looks can be anything, even within a group there can be people with different looks, a little bit more melanin or flatter nose wont change how the traditions are followed or the progress or survival of the country if the intention of the person is for the good of the country. 2) data doesn't lie but who are the people in the data sets. Everything needs to be transparent and debated and needs to cover all the people of the region to come to an objective truth, but we still won't truly know the timeline or from which side the people came from or they moved back and forth. We again haven't accounted for genocide or refugees fleeing a region after another group takes over of the land or many other ancient dna has been retrieved. If we only go by the population size or diversity in genetic make up then india would be the father of european people. There needs to be a spoken story or a myth or a legitimate written record to build a narrative on or we can't surmise a conclusion to make history. Even with these we can maybe be 98% sure but not 100% because it can be ancient propaganda, or like gypsies in the uk, origin unknown.

Google the most common surname in the world. Who knows how many wives the original had

surnames like smith, taylor, miller aren't patrilineal. they're occupational and was assigned or given to them as means to identify them during some time in the middle ages

@M G yes but a lot of people were smiths. but it doesnt make them related or family. a lot of people also adopted this surname because of its commonness like the native americans and black slaves

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

@@user-op4mc1cu3o This ^

That is a very interesting topic.

Billionaires shouldn't exist and there should be a Wealth Cap for Millionaires

@@christiandauz3742 who asked?

@@MeatGoblin88 The people that suffer because of insane wealth concentration Unless the Billionaires finance 10 Million as Space Colonists they to cut down on their wealth

There's this idea of a Land Value Tax by Henry George who wanted it to replace every tax in existence. To put it simply, Henry George thought that land should be treated as the oxygen in the air and shouldn't be owned as it is immoral to him to deprive land off someone as much as it is immoral to depriving air from someone. George thought of a system where people pay for a rental fee based on the value of the land(determined via bidding rent rates) and the size of the land. This makes sure everyone in an economy uses land productively as it would be a financial burden to the tenant if it creates less value than the rent fee on it. This prevents people from buying land and not using it productively or profiting off increases in land value that they did not contribute in. The main drawbacks of the system is the potential of societal divide/inequality since as wealth grows, less financially productive people have to settle on land with cheap rent they could afford which will divide settlements/cities socio-economically by land value. However one of the popular upside is the vision that this tax system will put capitalism into overdrive due to 0 taxes on everything else and people incentiviced to be as efficient as possible with land usage which in addition systematically puts the best individuals/organizations control over the most important plots of land. Might not answer all of your questions but it's food for thought

The Indo-Aryans story of conquering the whole world is told in Hinduism, i.e. Sanatan Dharma during Treta Yug(Treta Age). Ram(7000years ago)and Krishna(5000 years ago)are our ancestors . So many Indian names have Ram and Krishna in them. But west think it’s all mythology 🤦🏻‍♂️We have a whole Mahabharat(A great war fought in India). We’ve Kshatriyas conquering the whole world i.e ig are Aryans. We’ve a great flood period during which People survived on a boat and sailed through it. We’ve the story of Manu and Mani the first humans. Hinduism and India have so many pre-history stories which West think is mythology how stupid🤦🏻‍♂️(no offence but if you analyse this is our history).

Well, its impossible to isolate the variables. When you control for education, age, gender, mental health, and a myriad of other factors to isolate for something as ambigous as race, then I'd imagine that the disparity would diminish.