Тёмный

The Geneva Bible VS the King James Bible | Ephesians  

gclmedia
Подписаться 3,6 тыс.
Просмотров 7 тыс.
50% 1

The Geneva Bible 1560 vs 1611 KJV | Comparing Ephesians 6:12
Unravel the truth behind the supposed differences between the 1560 Geneva Bible and the 1611 King James Version (KJV) in today's eye-opening exploration of Scripture, specifically in the Epistle to the Ephesians! Join us as we settle the age-old debate once and for all and uncover the undeniable similarities between these two historic translations.
📜 Comparing Ephesians 6:12:
Discover the striking similarities between Ephesians 6:12 as translated in the Geneva Bible and the King James Version. Despite minor variations in wording, both translations accurately convey the Greek word "kosmokrator," shedding light on the spiritual battle against the forces of darkness.
🔍 Understanding the Nuances:
Dive deeper into the nuances of the Greek word "kosmokrator," which denotes the ruler of this world or "this world's ruler," but also so much more beyond this world. Explore how both translations effectively capture the essence of this term, emphasizing the spiritual warfare against Satan and his demonic forces.
💡 Contextual Interpretation:
Gain insight into the proper context of Ephesians 6:12 and the significance of Paul's preamble regarding the battle against "flesh and blood." Understand how both translations align with the broader biblical narrative and reinforce the spiritual nature of the conflict.
🤔 Dispelling Misconceptions:
Challenge misconceptions surrounding the supposed differences between the Geneva Bible 1560 and the KJV. Uncover the truth behind the narrative designed to question the credibility of these translations and the Bible as a whole.
🙏 Embracing Unity in Scripture:
Celebrate the unity found within the Word of God and the timeless truths it imparts to believers across generations. Recognize that despite variations in translation, the essence of scripture remains unchanged, emphasizing the spiritual warfare against the powers of darkness.
Join us as we unravel the truth behind the alleged discrepancies between the Geneva Bible and the King James Version, and reaffirm the unchanging message of spiritual warfare found within the pages of scripture. Let us delve into the richness of God's Word and embrace its profound truths together. Welcome to a journey of discovery-it's all in the Holy Book!
MY BOOKS
📘Elucidations: amzn.to/3RiZ3U0
📗God's Garden: amzn.to/3RiZihS
📔The Name Above All Names: Coming Soon
💻Visit my my Website 👉🏾 gclmedia.org
GEAR USED IN THIS VIDEO
My Favorite Camera: Sony A7iv amzn.to/4cbNg1J
My Favorite Lens: Sigma 24MM 1.4 Art Sony E-Mount amzn.to/3Vx8HVz
Video Monitor and Recorder: Atomos Ninja V amzn.to/3yU5tT8
Main Mic: amzn.to/3yU1GVW
LIGHTING
Keylight: Amaran 200x amzn.to/3yWk14L
Rimlight: Amaran T2c amzn.to/3x5STQj
Practical lights: Aputure MCs amzn.to/3VybUnD
Bulbs: Aputure B7c amzn.to/3Xyi2xZ
Content Creation Amazon Store Front: amzn.to/47p7ulT
In-Depth Bible Study Resources: www.amazon.com/shop/geraldc.l....
Follow Me:
/ g.lewis.sr
/ gclmediainc
/ gclmediallc
#Geneva #Ephesians612 #PastorG

Опубликовано:

 

28 фев 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 142   
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 9 дней назад
Check out did King James Change the Words of the Bible? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5huF3cRCyuE.htmlsi=ToKlIDOg3sYwEH3j
@luisgabrielortiz2008
@luisgabrielortiz2008 Месяц назад
King James changed it because he was a “world ruler”. 🚩🚩🚩🚩
@luisgabrielortiz2008
@luisgabrielortiz2008 Месяц назад
Also, King James was an obvious high ranking Scottish Rite mason. Why wouldn’t he change parts of the Bible to benefit himself and who he really served.
@donnyteel6627
@donnyteel6627 Месяц назад
So it says something different but it means the exact same. Like ordering a pizza but getting served a cheeseburger because it is technically food. Got it
@robertadam3841
@robertadam3841 3 дня назад
A pizza and a cheeseburger are two different things entirely. There is no context in which a pizza and a cheeseburger are synonymous, although you can order a cheeseburger pizza in some restaurants. There are contexts where a ruler and a worldly governor can be synonymous. That’s the difference. In this context they are synonymous.
@SweeetWater420
@SweeetWater420 4 месяца назад
Although they are nearly identical, there's one thing you missed that I expected you to mention. Comparing "And against the worldie gouernours, the princes of darkness of this world" and "against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world" you can see that the worldie gouernours are the princes of darkness of this world while the KJV separates the powers or governors of this world from the princes of darkness of this world as if they are separate entities when the GNV clearly says they are one in the same. Not surprising that a King would want to omit that in his version of the bible because he is a worldly governor or prince of darkness in this world. With that said, I'll be studying the GNV more.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 4 месяца назад
Wasn’t worth mentioning. Watch the video again and pause it on the Geneva. Look at the exact words you mentioned and tell me what you see?! 🤗
@MikaElstandup
@MikaElstandup 4 месяца назад
True
@yonasermias8645
@yonasermias8645 3 месяца назад
In the video he clearly addresses this exact conception. That the original Hebrew text says Kosmokratos, which translates to worldly governors. We do not wrestle against flesh and blood. "Flesh and Blood" in Hebrew is Basar Dam. It literally means we do not wrestle against human beings but against the powers that govern the spiritual world. I was on the fence but just gained clarity from the Holy Spirit!
@ralphgreenwood2469
@ralphgreenwood2469 2 месяца назад
King James didn't translate or change anything. An elite erudite committee of language experts did the translating not King James.
@aleshadhaniram-qg9yu
@aleshadhaniram-qg9yu Месяц назад
YAHAUAH IS THE HEAVENLY FATHER NAME not yeshua , yeshua is a word not a name so them wasnt commaned to use yeshua but YAHAUAH IS A NAME NOT A WORD, SO YAHAUSHA IS THE MESSIAH not jesus.
@DaleJollySoulWarriorCristian
@DaleJollySoulWarriorCristian Месяц назад
WHY DID THE MONARCHY BANNED THE GENEVA BIBLE ?!
@detroitandclevelandfan5503
@detroitandclevelandfan5503 3 дня назад
King James didn't like how the Geneva Bible reads. Especially, the study notes. The note saying how the Hebrew midwives were right in disobeying pharaoh. He saw this as promoting rebellion against kings. Also, he wanted to be popular among the people, of his day. So he ordered a new Bible to be made. The King James version. Eventually, after the KJV was out for a while, King James banned the Geneva Bible from being printed, sold, or having the possession of. I hope this helped.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 3 дня назад
The Truth Behind the King James Bible: History & Facts ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5huF3cRCyuE.html
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 3 дня назад
Blessings! I responded but I don’t know what happened to it. Let me try again: There was never an outright or formal ban on the Geneva Bible. King James simply strongly endorsed a new translation, which we know as the King James Version (KJV). His support effectively sidelined the Geneva Bible, especially in official and ecclesiastical use. Over time, the KJV became the preferred version in England, and the printing and distribution of the Geneva Bible diminished. King James’ disapproval of the Geneva Bible’s notes, coupled with his support for a new unified translation, led to the gradual decline of the Geneva Bible’s popularity and use. This situation is often seen and interpreted as a de facto ban, although there was never an explicit royal decree forbidding its use.
@godlink6743
@godlink6743 2 месяца назад
Thank you for pointing that out and pointing out the true intent behind the motivation on the subject.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia Месяц назад
Check out Geneva VS KJV | Genesis 3:5 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-D_46LZ5Epls.htmlsi=kbStQtN1IXLcnq07
@natalieable8463
@natalieable8463 3 месяца назад
This is dishonest. That verse in the two versions are vastly different. Stop lying.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 3 месяца назад
Thank you for watching and engaging. It’s unfortunate that you feel that way. If you have a moment let me if you still feel that way after you watch this Italics in the Bible ru-vid.comjmkRi3Z8rSA?feature=share
@maxonmendel5757
@maxonmendel5757 19 дней назад
​@@gclmediawhatever you can say to settle the argument can be said here
@USA-MikeWallace
@USA-MikeWallace Месяц назад
Thanks for the correction, I didn’t read it carefully before. Based on the context, it does refer to the spiritual world indeed , because at the beginning of both two versions from EPHESIANS 6:12 write that for we not against flesh and bloody, SO either the words "rules" or "worldly gouernours" after the first verse all should be explained by being controlled by evil spirits behind.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia Месяц назад
Not a problem my friend. I am here to give a spark that I pray is just enough to ignite a fire in the viewer. I appreciate you.
@marymiettinen9821
@marymiettinen9821 4 месяца назад
Thank you so much for this video.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 4 месяца назад
You are most welcome! Thank you for taking the time to watch. I appreciate you!
@Dirkkkkk
@Dirkkkkk 2 месяца назад
orthotomeo! thank you for “cutting it straight - the Word of truth” (*subscribed)
@FredHenry1850
@FredHenry1850 2 месяца назад
I wish more Bible companies printed the 1560 Geneva Bible. I'd buy one tomorrow if Allen, Schuyler or Cambridge printed one.
@yonasermias8645
@yonasermias8645 3 месяца назад
Thank you for teaching with the authority of the Holy Spirit to clear this up. The enemy can even come as if he is telling you the Word of God when truly he brings confusion in the form of wisdom or knowledge.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 2 месяца назад
Thank you more for taking the time to watch and engage. You have truly blessed me.
@stevenw354
@stevenw354 2 месяца назад
Thank you for sharing
@gclmedia
@gclmedia Месяц назад
My pleasure. Thank you for taking the time to watch and engage. I appreciate you.
@johnhall1614
@johnhall1614 3 месяца назад
great explanation, thanks!!!
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 2 месяца назад
You are most welcome! Thank you more!!!
@miguelpasamano4995
@miguelpasamano4995 Месяц назад
I highly recommend James MurDock's translation of the New TestaMent.
@USA-MikeWallace
@USA-MikeWallace Месяц назад
感谢指正,我没认真读,结合上下文,确实是值得灵界,因为两个版本的EPHESIANS 6:12都有说 for we not against flesh and bloody,后面即使世俗层面的rules 或 worldly gouernours 都应该意指受到背后邪灵操控的。
@kennethjames7277
@kennethjames7277 2 месяца назад
Any ...yes any translation reoves some description content. There is no denying it. Fight it and be reduced to emotional whimpering instead of logicality.
@wesgrand6380
@wesgrand6380 4 месяца назад
Right on time
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 4 месяца назад
Well I appreciate you! Thank you so much!
@DaleJollySoulWarriorCristian
@DaleJollySoulWarriorCristian Месяц назад
The KJV changed, they hit Jesus with Rods To hands. And changed from, they hit each other with Rods to their hands. No weapon to defend yourself.
@louisvega-oe2sc
@louisvega-oe2sc Месяц назад
If one is in the spirit, the spirit is the one that discerns,: 2corinthians 3:6.......
@hirakisk1973
@hirakisk1973 2 месяца назад
Geneva Bible: "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly governors, the princes of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness, which are in the high places". KJV: "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places". NASB: "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places". Here is the issue with the Geneva Bible's translation as "worldly governors". When looking at how the word was used outside of the Bible in that time, it meant "world ruling deities". It wasn't a reference to humans, but to the "gods". This is why St. Paul uses it, he is referring to the demons who controlled the world and was NOT talking about human authorities. The Geneva Bible mistranslated the word to reflect their political beliefs about anti-government, which is why there is a huge resurgence in this translation's popularity among conservative American Christians.
@thelightbulbguys
@thelightbulbguys 3 месяца назад
Read 1st Corinthians 13 in both and get back to me.
@Sauveguy
@Sauveguy Месяц назад
The Geneva Bible was the first complete English Bible😊😊
@aidaemail94
@aidaemail94 3 месяца назад
The meaning is changed. Geneva verse is much clearer.
@davewhitehead135
@davewhitehead135 Месяц назад
Christian's Should Read The Geneva Bible.
@gmac6503
@gmac6503 19 дней назад
yeah they had better manuscripts lol
@Darth_Raider_
@Darth_Raider_ 22 часа назад
If its the same then they remade the kjv 51 yrs later for no reason at all. That makes no sence.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 13 часов назад
Thank you for watching and engaging. The reason makes a lot of sense. Check out this video 👉🏾 The Truth Behind the King James Bible: History & Facts ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5huF3cRCyuE.html
@peggyntsala6739
@peggyntsala6739 2 месяца назад
Some of these human rulers today are shape shifting
@juanvaladez5703
@juanvaladez5703 2 месяца назад
100%
@mastmec
@mastmec 3 месяца назад
I guess if you think government is good, then keep studying your KJV
@Kinetic.44
@Kinetic.44 3 месяца назад
The Textus Receptus, the original Greek and Hebrew, is THE ONLY inspired word of God. Any pastor worth his salt reads from an Interlinear Greek/Hebrew/English Bible, numbered to the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance. I use the 1599 Geneva Bible for my own personal reading and quoting of scripture, aside from when I want to point out the mistakes and corruption in the king james, as the Geneva translations are unfrowarded by anglo saxon roman catholic influence. The KJV is translated from the Greek however it has a lot of mistakes and some intentional corruption (there is no easter in the Textus Receptus or Geneva Bibles, for example) roman catholicism is a hybrid pagan abomination to God created by constantine. All other more modern translations are just plain corrupt text.
@claytonsmith6148
@claytonsmith6148 2 месяца назад
This is a gross misrepresentation that you have mentioned. There no mistake’s/misrepresentations/ errors/contradictions etc in the KJB, only misunderstandings! Every so called issue in the KJB that people have brought up has been squashed, and shone that the KJB translators were spot on. The predecessors of the KJB(Geneva, Matthew’s, Great Bible, Tyndale’s etc) were either produced by an individual, or a small group with less proofreaders. With the KJB we have 47 of the most brilliant scholars ever assembled, superior in every way! That never happened before, and will never again. Because most scholars today have been trained for 8 or so years, and maybe know one ancient language somewhat? But the scholars of the KJB era started between 4-5 years of age with language, and literary studies. Being fluent in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin at 6 years of age. They make modern scholars look like infants in comparison, so even if you gathered 47 scholars it couldn’t happen again like then! You mentioned Easter, I’m guessing that you think it’s a pagan term, and they seemed to have messed up? But no they did not, Easter was put in the KJB on purpose for a legitimate reason. Though there is some obscure evidence of a pagan use of the word Easter, the true entomology from the ancient Roman/Greco world was: east rising, or sun rising, or a new day/dawn of a new day! So knowing this the KJB translators used it to describe the “Resurrection of Jesus Christ”, since Passover was completed on Saturday night! This also refers to Jesus Christ being the last, and finale Passover once, and for all, for all mankind. So this is what you, and many others have often misunderstood. This is nothing new in the English language, there are many words that we use, or have used that have multiple meanings. This is a nonissue when things are understood in proper context. With our downgraded, dumbed down society, it’s no wonder people get confused so easily. There was absolutely no, none, zero influence whatsoever from the Catholic Church on the KJB. Though they tried to kill the King of England, and others. I’ll post more later.
@Thedolirionn
@Thedolirionn 2 месяца назад
You speak shit like crazy!
@ralphgreenwood2469
@ralphgreenwood2469 Месяц назад
@@Kinetic.44 Nothing you said concerning the King James Bible can you prove
@miguelpasamano4995
@miguelpasamano4995 Месяц назад
@@ralphgreenwood2469because it ain't true and I highly recommend James MurDock's translation of the New TestaMent.
@noutheticcounseling5447
@noutheticcounseling5447 2 месяца назад
It amazes me that the Geneva Bible 1599 has been basically omitted among all the other English translations. The KJV 1611 is not even readable today and those that read the KJV and KJV onlyists are reading the 1769 version. Among the English translations debates it's always the KJV against all the others; except for the Geneva 1599. I use the NKJV, NASB, ESV, and the Geneva. They are all good translations. I used the KJV for many years but upon learning many things about King James himself I would state that the KJV is the government Bible; however believe that is a good translation as well. Research the rules and conditions King James gave to his translators. First and foremost, the reason for the update was the people need an update in language from Geneva language of 1560. So they desired to replace with KJV 1611 which was still old English. But we all know the Geneva Bible was updated with that cultures linguistics in 1599, 12 years before the KJV was printed. But the Geneva Bible was replaced anyway with many people who fought against it. But make no mistake about it, it was primarily the notes in the GB by the reformers that King James hated.
@ralphgreenwood2469
@ralphgreenwood2469 Месяц назад
I will ask you a simple question.Which Bible ,which translation has prevailed over all others?
@noutheticcounseling5447
@noutheticcounseling5447 Месяц назад
@@ralphgreenwood2469 if you are speaking about longevity, then it would be the Latin Vulgate which was in use for 1100 years. I realize the King James has been in existence for 400+ years, but like I stated, the Geneva Bible is older and still in use today.
@loribeth6995
@loribeth6995 Месяц назад
Don’t believe this. Genesis 3:6 is a prime early example. KJV literally changes what the weekend tells Eve. Geneva Bible says deeper told Eve they “shall be gods.” KJV uses the annotation in the Geneva Bible to change the verse to “shall be like God.” He didn’t say that.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia Месяц назад
Blessing! When you have an opportunity check out this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-D_46LZ5Epls.html
@maxonmendel5757
@maxonmendel5757 19 дней назад
to say they didn't change anything is to say they had nothing to do.
@justinamusyoka4986
@justinamusyoka4986 9 дней назад
That's true,he wants to imply they simply copied the Geneva Bible yet they banned it.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 9 дней назад
@justinamusyoka4986 Actually, I am not trying to imply that he copied the Geneva at all. Thats not how the “New Translation” came to be. Check out did King James Change the Words of the Bible? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5huF3cRCyuE.htmlsi=ToKlIDOg3sYwEH3j
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 9 дней назад
Blessings! Have you ever done any research on the 1604 Hampton Court Conference? If not, I think you will be completely amazed by the reason for the commissioning of a “New Translation.”
@maxonmendel5757
@maxonmendel5757 9 дней назад
@@gclmedia believe it or not, this is all one big racket to keep English readers from coming back to the One True Faith.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 9 дней назад
@maxonmendel5757 how so?
@jesuschristcoming8952
@jesuschristcoming8952 17 дней назад
Don't do that . Cause that bibles different. KJV is from Rome Catholic but Geneva1560 is free for Rome Catholic
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 17 дней назад
How so? If that be the case then what would be the point in the Catholic Church edition called the Douay-Rheims (New Testament in 1582, Old Testament in 1609-1610), that’s 1 year prior to the 1611 Protestant “New Translation.” The Douay-Rheims Bible was produced to provide English-speaking Catholics with a translation of the Bible that reflected Catholic doctrine and teachings, in efforts to counter the influence of “Protestant translations” like the Geneva Bible and the Bishops’ Bible during the Reformation era. 🤷🏿‍♂️
@DaleJollySoulWarriorCristian
@DaleJollySoulWarriorCristian Месяц назад
Why was The KJV made ?!
@detroitandclevelandfan5503
@detroitandclevelandfan5503 3 дня назад
King James didn't like how the Geneva Bible reads. Especially, the study notes. The note saying how the Hebrew midwives were right in disobeying pharaoh. He saw this as promoting rebellion against kings. Also, he wanted to be popular among the people, of his day. So he ordered a new Bible to be made. The King James version. Eventually, after the KJV was out for a while, King James banned the Geneva Bible from being printed, sold, or having the possession of. I hope this helped.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 3 дня назад
@detroitandclevelandfan5503 great response!!! Just a little more nuanced. There was NEVER an outright formal ban on the Geneva Bible, King James just strongly endorsed the new King James Version. His support for of the “Nee Translation” effectively sidelined the Geneva Bible, especially in official and ecclesiastical use. Over time, the KJV became the preferred version in England, and the printing and distribution of the Geneva Bible diminished. And as you stated eloquently and correctly, King James’ disapproval was of the Geneva Bible’s notes! His disapproval of that aspect, coupled with his support for a new unified translation, led to the gradual decline of the Geneva Bible’s popularity and use. This is often interpreted and seen as a de facto ban, even though there was no explicit royal decree forbidding its use.
@loribeth6995
@loribeth6995 Месяц назад
Nope. He’s it did change many words. Research how the KJV translators did not have a strong understanding of Hebrew and Aramaic.
@T.Y.B.T.G
@T.Y.B.T.G Месяц назад
Grab Hallelujah Scriptures and the Cephr the others if you want to compare. I wonder how people are doing in the pit and lake of fire for trying to change Yahuah's words to suit their tyrannical needs? 😂King James took the original phrasing out his version in Eph 6:12 because it was talking about him or the current forms of government and wicked rulers at that time. The changing was because of the lack of education or "being taught," as they would say back then. Don't be religious just follow Yah.
@unknown_amazing_chap4480
@unknown_amazing_chap4480 2 месяца назад
According to satanists, the rankings and titles of satan's army are named exactly as it is named in Ephesians 6. Therefore the King James (the word of God) is correct because only God Himself could reveal this secret to us.
@tedtan6449
@tedtan6449 Месяц назад
I beg to disagree, WORDLY rulers is not the same as World Rulers. You can be a world ruler but not WORDLY, an affinity to material things.
@AwgustRushOfficial
@AwgustRushOfficial 2 месяца назад
If it was no changes there would be no need to call it a new version 🥱 man stop ✋ with all that miseducation! You looking real SUS right now my brother 👀
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 2 месяца назад
I appreciate you! Thank you so much.
@AgainstThisWorld
@AgainstThisWorld 4 месяца назад
in this life everything is on the details brother...
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 4 месяца назад
Down to even the very minute of them.
@AgainstThisWorld
@AgainstThisWorld 4 месяца назад
@@gclmediayes so changing it even the slightest WILL have an impact. The grammatical understanding is that in Geneva it implies that any politician is evil. And by studies we know that, because most of them are psychopaths
@lonecar144
@lonecar144 Месяц назад
Deut 4:2 (KJV) and Rev 22:18-19 (KJV) tell us there can be only one preserved Word of God. And yet version after version is spewed out to deceive. There is not a power that is not given by God. Through providence God raised up the most powerful nation there ever was or will be, the U.S.A., and in its infancy it was given the preserved word of God; “Robert Aitken, a Philadelphia printer, was the first to publish the first American edition of the K.J.V. New Testament in 1781 and the K.J.V. Old Testament in 1782, omitting the Apocrypha. On completion, he petitioned and received from the Congress of the Confederation, an official endorsement that Aitken added to the binding of his Bibles, to assure colonists that they were buying a non-royalist edition: “Resolved, that the United States in Congress assembled… recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States and hereby authorize him to publish this recommendation.” As a result, the Aitken Bible (KJV) is often referred to as “The Bible (KJV) of the Revolution.” The nation was given the KJV, not the dead sea scrolls, not the book of Enoch, not Hebrew books etc. but only the KJV. If God wanted us to understand his word in Hebrew he would have raised this nation up speaking Hebrew. Back in the 1600’s God saw to it that the certain scriptures were translated into English “KJ Bible” and was put into print so that all could read for themselves the truth that in in the scriptures. God did this because he knew that he would bring about this powerful nation [U.S.A. and the English language] of ours to lead the world. The scriptures were written by apostles and prophets inspired by God through the Holy Ghost. The compilation and translation to English was also done by the direction of God through the Holy Ghost and he did not make any mistakes, i.e., the fourth horse being “pale” was no mistake, the horse is not green. In Greek mythology, the name Chloris (Khloris Χλωρίς, from khloros χλωρός, meaning “greenish-yellow,” “pale green,” “pale,” “pallid” or “fresh”) appears… Pallid 1. pale; faint or deficient in color; wan: a pallid countenance. People say that they believe that scripture was written by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost, which is true. But what you people don’t seem to realize is that the compilation and translation of the bible (KJV) was also done by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost. If the bible (KJV) was written and compiled by men of opinion and perspective and translated by incompetent translators then you might as well throw it in the trash. The prophets were told what to write and how to write it, 2 Peter 1:20-21 (KJV) The nation was given the symbol of the Eagle, 37 … Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together. Luke 17:37 (KJV), the body being the Church, the body of Christ. The nation has the motto and preamble “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”. This greatest and most powerful nation the U.S.A., has been given the last and best chance to lead the world to heaven on earth or destruction. But like all other nations of power before it (symbolic Israels, Rev 11:8 (KJV)) the U.S. has chosen destruction and is now the great “liar” saying “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”, it is now the conglomerate of the dragon, beast, false prophet, and harlot, it is Satan loosed from the pit, 7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth Rev 20:7-8 (KJV). And yet no one seems to know of or speak of a very clear fulfillment of prophecy in our recent history. We (U.S.A.) are the ones who brought down fire from heaven in Aug. of 1945 and we are the ones that gave life to the image of the beast in May of 1948. Rev.13:13-15 (KJV). All glory to God. Amen
@gmac6503
@gmac6503 19 дней назад
Yeah, and buy a modern translation and commentary on Ephesians and you can catch up to scholarship of the 21st century. Andrew T Lincoln (Word Biblical Commentary), the EGGNT and BHGNT, and _The SBL Study Bible_ by Society of Biblical Literature. Plus only 36% of British Evangelicals believe Paul was the author of Ephesians
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 19 дней назад
Yes, you are right! Whether or not Paul is the author of Ephesians is a great subject of debate.
@gmac6503
@gmac6503 19 дней назад
@@gclmedia the scholarly consensus is Paul wrote seven letters but I just received a book this week and she makes a good case about Philemon not being written by Paul either. The pastoral epistles only about 25% of British evangelicals believe Paul wrote them.
@juansute8550
@juansute8550 6 дней назад
How can people trust you people when you just came to lie to us?
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 5 дней назад
Thank you for watching and engaging! What have you found to be a lie? What other evidences would you like for me to provide?
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 5 дней назад
ru-vid.comjmkRi3Z8rSA?si=y-Xzc7uQxEnxdSXe
@mr.commenter395
@mr.commenter395 4 месяца назад
Nice video! Context matters! People are deceived into believing the KJV is not reliable over Geneva. As this video shows that both translations are pretty much the same.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 4 месяца назад
Practically identical! It's like asking two people how they're doing, and one says 'great' while the other says 'fantastic'! What's the real difference here? 🤔
@mastmec
@mastmec 3 месяца назад
@@gclmediadepends on the context of how they respond, replying “great” or “fantastic” can mean different things.
@kennethjames7277
@kennethjames7277 2 месяца назад
Read it and compare it yourself with comprehension and without emotional overpowering . Inject some cognitive thinking.
@Kinetic.44
@Kinetic.44 3 месяца назад
The Textus Receptus, the original Greek and Hebrew, is THE ONLY inspired word of God. Any pastor worth his salt reads from an Interlinear Greek/Hebrew/English Bible, numbered to the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance. I use the 1599 Geneva Bible for my own personal reading and quoting of scripture, aside from when I want to point out the mistakes and corruption in the king james, as the Geneva translations are unfrowarded by anglo saxon roman catholic influence. The KJV is translated from the Greek however it has a lot of mistakes and some intentional corruption (there is no easter in the Textus Receptus or Geneva Bibles, for example) roman catholicism is a hybrid pagan abomination to God created by constantine. All other more modern translations are just plain corrupt text.
@user-zd5rm9xv3e
@user-zd5rm9xv3e 2 месяца назад
God bless you brother..
@somewhatreallycoolguy7439
@somewhatreallycoolguy7439 2 месяца назад
any pastor worth his salt would acknowledge the blatant 'corruptions' to the textus receptus. why would you consider erasmus, a catholic, capable of divine inspiration if catholicism itself is an abomination? look at the lord's prayer in matthew, for instance. "for thine is the kingdom" is a corruption to the text coming from the byzantine era. it's not found in the vulgate, nor in codex sinaiticus, nor in codex vaticanus. its a clear and obvious addition to the text, that's not found in any classical manuscripts or papyri.
@kenowens9021
@kenowens9021 Месяц назад
As long as Jude 7 says that the fall occurred due to fornication, it's okay.
@wondery6693
@wondery6693 3 месяца назад
As I watch this video I see other videos to watch titled "Why Geneva Bible is Superior to King James Bible" and "The KJV is Corrupt" Who gets paid to do there videos about different Bibles? None can even use the correct name of our creator and Savior.
@maxonmendel5757
@maxonmendel5757 19 дней назад
the KJV is a revision of the Bishops Bible.
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 19 дней назад
Yes, Technically it is…I actually have a video coming on that this week!
@maxonmendel5757
@maxonmendel5757 18 дней назад
@@gclmedia will it be as big of a waste of time as this video?
@maxonmendel5757
@maxonmendel5757 18 дней назад
@@gclmedia are you a KJV-Only guy, or what? I dont even see the point in this video
@gclmedia
@gclmedia 18 дней назад
It’s unfortunate that you feel that way! I have no intent of wasting anyone’s time! My point was to show the consistency between translations. No, if you frequent my channel, you will see that I am not King James only! Although I am a fan of it and it is my preferred translation, I also frequent the JPS, GWT, ESV, and RSV!
@normmcinnis4102
@normmcinnis4102 3 месяца назад
Just avoid any "translation" After 1611.
@kenowens9021
@kenowens9021 27 дней назад
BOTH version say in Jude 7 that fornication caused the fall and that strange lust is homosexuality.
@heythere6983
@heythere6983 24 дня назад
The fall? I don’t see that
@jonathanglabman
@jonathanglabman День назад
The Hebrew Bible is the original. G-d created the world from it, the Prophets prophecies were in it. Anything else is a watered down translation
@gclmedia
@gclmedia День назад
Thank you for watching and engaging!
@aleshadhaniram-qg9yu
@aleshadhaniram-qg9yu Месяц назад
Kjv change the YAHAUAH and put lord and god
@megawhitesox0574
@megawhitesox0574 4 месяца назад
dont agree the its the same.
@Kinetic.44
@Kinetic.44 3 месяца назад
The Textus Receptus, the original Greek and Hebrew, is THE ONLY inspired word of God. Any pastor worth his salt reads from an Interlinear Greek/Hebrew/English Bible, numbered to the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance. I use the 1599 Geneva Bible for my own personal reading and quoting of scripture, aside from when I want to point out the mistakes and corruption in the king james, as the Geneva translations are unfrowarded by anglo saxon roman catholic influence. The KJV is translated from the Greek however it has a lot of mistakes and some intentional corruption (there is no easter in the Textus Receptus or Geneva Bibles, for example) roman catholicism is a hybrid pagan abomination to God created by constantine. All other more modern translations are just plain corrupt text.
@johnnyvans_77
@johnnyvans_77 Месяц назад
kjv is the pure word of God!!✝️🔥
@LanaSmith-fx5ux
@LanaSmith-fx5ux 27 дней назад
King James had it removed because it made it seem like people would rise against the monarchy. He literally had it changed. So no the KJV is not pure also because God gave the word to the Israelites and they didn’t speak English. You want pure it won’t be English and it won’t be KJV.
@johnnyvans_77
@johnnyvans_77 27 дней назад
@@LanaSmith-fx5ux what english bible do you use?
@LanaSmith-fx5ux
@LanaSmith-fx5ux 26 дней назад
@@johnnyvans_77 is that supposed to be a gotcha? I’m not a KJV onlyist cultist person. You’re the one that is saying it’s pure. It’s not pure. King James changed words so that people wouldn’t rise against or believe against the monarchy. God did not speak in English or Middle English.
@johnnyvans_77
@johnnyvans_77 25 дней назад
@@LanaSmith-fx5ux hahaha you don answer my question.. again im gonna question you what bible do you use in english??
@juanblackwell8801
@juanblackwell8801 3 месяца назад
Yes it did
Далее
The Truth Behind the King James Bible: History & Facts
13:40
The Geneva Bible
12:03
Просмотров 30 тыс.
Новые iPhone 16 и 16 Pro Max
00:42
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Every Church Father explained in 10 minutes
10:24
Просмотров 151 тыс.
Pawn Stars: 1583 Geneva Bible (Season 15) | History
4:56
Have we Translated Genesis 1 Wrong All this Time?!
10:00
Three Myths about King James Bible
16:47
Просмотров 449 тыс.
All Bible translations explained in 7 minutes
6:39
Просмотров 622 тыс.