The Gray Lady Winked

Подписаться 141 тыс.

Просмотров 8 тыс.

50% 1

In this podcast, Ashley Rindsberg talks about his book The Gray Lady Winked. New York Times has been nothing less than an institution for the last century. But how has it behaved during key events of global history? What has been its reportage like? Ashley takes us through a journey in this book where he narrates how the New York Times reported and narrated these events.
Annotations:
00:00 Intro
00:49 Ashley's background
02:12 Why does the truth matter?
05:48 Project 1619 and postmodernism
10:43 New York Times and its role in shaping the truth
14:04 Fake News and New York Times
18:43 Questions on the credibility
22:35 The Lack of Transparency
23:25 Neutrality of Left Wing Politics
29:28 Delusions of grandeur
31:57 Folk Journalism and the New York Times
37:57 Israel - Palestine conflict and the similarity of reportage on India
42:48 What it is to be a Jew?
46:37 Jews, Indian Americans and politics
50:48 Breaking the shackles of propaganda factories
56:11 Scope for redemption for the NYT
01:00:51 Saving the tenure for journalism
01:05:07 Are we being coaxed with too much information?
01:08:42 Future projects Ashley is working on
01:10:23 Closing Comments
Follow Ashley:
Twitter: @AshleyRindsberg
You can check out all of Ashley's work here: ashleyrindsberg.com/
Buy his book here: www.amazon.in/Gray-Lady-Winke...
#NewYorkTimes #FakeNews
----------------------------------------------------
Listen to the podcasts on:
SoundCloud: / kushal-mehra-99891819
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1rVcDV3...
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/show/the-car...
------------------------------------------------------------
Support The Cārvāka Podcast:
Become a Member on RU-vid: / the cārvāka podcast
Become a Member on Patreon: / carvaka
UPI: kushalmehra@icici
To buy The Carvaka Podcast Exclusive Merch please visit: kushalmehra.com/shop
------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Kushal:
Twitter: kushal_mehra?ref_...
Facebook: / kushalmehraofficial
Instagram: thecarvakap...
Koo: www.kooapp.com/profile/kushal...
Inquiries: kushalmehra.com/
Feedback: kushalmehra81@gmail.com

Опубликовано:

8 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 29

@Krishna_gaming_98 3 года назад

Never once have I regretted my decision to subscribe to your channel! Great episode as always 🙏🤗

@smoky3302 3 года назад

Please show your love and support to suraj yengde, Akash,Dhruv ,kumar sham and paurash Sharma too. Lefty channels matters too. 😁

@pramod_p5 3 года назад

@@smoky3302 Kumar Shyam is that guy who said that he likes Owaisi because after Ram Mandir jusdgement, he didn't change and he is so brave, that was laughable at best, I mean it's like Owaisi takinga U-turn angering his own vote bank to support Ram Mandir, lol it would never happen and yea it didn't happen too. Owaisi knows his core base and why would he go against it, that's when I realized Kumar Shyam was either particularly ignorant to common sense, or completely delusional against BJP.

@shreyahttps 3 года назад

@@smoky3302 it's spelled brain ded not Lefty dear, actual leftists are way better with their methodologies and argumentations than these great souls.

@neon-astronaut 3 года назад

Thank you Kushal for this great podcast as always He was a wonderful guest Looking forward to read his book

@mohitkumbhat 3 года назад

Beautiful discussion !! What a great host Kushal ji is, and thanks to Asley ji for caring about the truth !

@jirik2435 3 года назад

28:00 You could market your book as NOT being in the NYT bestseller list.

@JaihindDosto 3 года назад

Jai Hind Kushal bhai, Great episode 👌

@TheKbthakur 3 года назад

Wonderful guest & extremely important topic

@akshay-iq3qn2jp2c 3 года назад

Good conversation with ashley rindesberg

@sns_creativity 3 года назад

Great Conversation...

@pramod_p5 3 года назад

Mr.Jones movie was something that just eroded my respect for the journalist awards, it was literally bullshit, for the amount of information that Walter Durranty hid, which could have changed the minds of several, thus helping Ukrainians in the Stalin-imposed famine, Holodomor. And the way NYT defended Durranty saying since USSR was an iron curtain, he couldn't speak about it while Gareth Jones brought the information to the picture, it just made me lose my respect to awards in journalism.

@rajatbhargav3938 3 года назад

love ur work kushal

@kunalseth6437 3 года назад

👍

@pkmkb_0 3 года назад

NDTV ka bhi likho koi

@anonymouslyopinionated656 3 года назад

Kushal comment pardhta hai

@aresmars2003 2 года назад

I had a spat with a pastor back in 2012, finally left the church after Trevon Martin was killed. He didn't preach some things directly in sermons but he'd have small study groups where he'd include language of "White Supremacy" and "Empire" and taking the perspective that "whiteness" became an American quality that enabled some ethnic groups to be included while excluding others, and so Jews were once not white, but now they are, and some Asians, including his ancestry, Korean were also light skinned, so could be included as white. It seemed interesting to consider what "whiteness" means, but overall confusing. When I argued privately, it was funny, how he himself, couldn't clearly articulate I think, so he'd just defer to books he read, AS IF one person writing a book, ever for a PhD instantly makes something true, and makes your understanding of their argument as true, etc. I don't even think I was arguing what WAS true, but just preferring to be agnostic against over-arching conclusions and singular frameworks of see the world. One blogger I liked once wrote "Knowing many stories is wisdom. Knowing no stories is ignorance. Knowing one story is death." The clear meaning, having a singular narrative (ideoalogy) for explaining the world gives an undue confidence that the world can be reduced to your models of the world, and all players in the world then can be reduced to roles that you assign them, and ultimately determining some people as perpetrators and other people as victims, without allowing both of them their full humanity, and as individuals with strengths and weaknesses and vulnerabilities, who sometimes don't make the best choices, as judged by hindsight. So I see that's what the "Left" does with their social justice, which includes parts of reality, but because it can only sympathize with one side (victims), it creates a false story about how reform can be made.