THE GREAT WALL OF STALINGRAD 

Can i get decals on Xbox, Aswell?

Can u do a vid on the action x centurion

Can you do a video on the otomatic in the Italy tech tree

please play the T80 and T28e in the USSR 2.3br, they're great fun and you have never done a video on both tanks (53th try)

Odd please do a full line up of 6.7 America feel the pain recently the players are terrible finishing first is fun when you win the match not when loosing

unless you're in an spaa. the phlydaily curse

Yeah which is essentially an up armoured is-3 hull. He was comparing it to the is-3

So its a T10 chassis with a giant gun on top?? Not an unarmoured IS-3 chassis with a gian gun

@@just_me1232 no im saying he was comparing it to the is3 so he was saying what it is in comparison

@@just_me1232 The Obj.704/ISU 152 (1945) was based on the IS 3 Chassis

@@WarThunderNuke ahhhhh IS-3 with giant gun, not T10

cOMPLETLY AGREED

balanced

That's the thing, most of these tanks were supposed to be ambush predators, but the format of War Thunder as a game makes that not very practical. So, you have this strange situation where heavy TDs brawl need heavy armor for its tier, ok-ish maneuverability, workable gun-handling, and a potent gun; in short, you need a TD to play the role of a MBT, which by the virtue of WT's semi-realistic modelling and balancing, is nigh impossible to get right. Hence the whole lot of them simply suck ass!

The biggest issue to tank destroyers with frontal armour is that most of them cannot utilize that armour anymore due to the introduction of shells that cut through conventional armour like butter and unfavourable battle ratings. Back in (2015-2018) heavy tanks and tank destroyers with a lot of armour were the meta and everyone played them. But as more and more light tanks were added with Heat-FS and APDS/APFSDS they became slow moving easy targets instead. The T95 is a perfect example of this, it is practically useless these days, as the one thing it relies on which is armour, is useless. There is no reason at all to play it these days unless you want to put yourself at a disadvantage. It's honestly sad to see.

So then how would you kill them? They could also add a more safisticated system where the places where it’s been hit becomes weaker so of you repeatedly shoot at the same spot it can pen

And a NVD

i think he plays at 1440p, which really helps. But i might be wrong

@@_invencible_ why exactly 1440?

@@WatchMysh that's 2K

@@_invencible_ I know. But where's the advantage? I play in 4k and I can spot stuff very reliably even at long range.

@@WatchMysh i don't know... i'm not even sure he actually plays in 2k. I just remember when he showed his alienware laptop and it had a 2k screen

Wym cost more they already cost like 2-3 kills to spawn possibly more

You haven't rushed a cap and spotted one person have you

@@kv2931 Planes are cancer.

Just like with tanks, planes takes experience in how the game works. And of course how the game gives an advantage to players with better crew skills and fully "modified" vehicles.

As someone who regularly takes out planes, the amount of times i die right away makes up for any easy kills I get.

Heavy armor chad 🗿

Yeah plus Russians aren't as well equiped in terms of effective heavy armor as the Germans so this tank is a weird one in the Soviet tree

@@princessapplestrach6327 Oh, But I have to disagree. Soviets prove quite a challenge when facing them. They may not have the absolutely best frontal facing armor, but their overall armor score would be high. No easy trap-shots, high probability of fucked-up shot near werid angled casted turrets, and usually strong lower frontal plate is something that can't be ignored. Tanks build to take a lot not only from the front, but also from the other angles.

@@lyagushkha8490 i was talking about TDs their heavies are quite good and trolly indeed

@@lyagushkha8490 This was actually a key part of Soviet heavy armor design; overall armor profile>overall armor thickness. Keeps the weight down which makes it transportable/maneuverable while still offering good protection

but the obj 268 can stop british 105mm APDS to its cheeks, and since british mains think they cna pen anything with their gun, theyll be suprised it doesnt pen... and i had a match with the 268 where i was being shot at by multiple centurions mk10s and none of them thought that the 268 had this much armor... (i was hulldown and at 1km)

Ye because those are ani aircraft guns it what they were made for

I think the front plate is visible if you zoom in

well dont angle then. the armor can actually stop the APDS to the cheeks if you arent angled.

use the ISU-152 or SU-152 , it uses the same ammo but its 2 BR's lower than the obj 268

@@petrkdn8224 and KV2 is even lower, u just need to take the big reload I have plenty of 5+ kills games and one 10kill game, and another with 9 kills, but the last one I didn't get 10 or more cuz there was a 10v10, small Batle, and alot of 1 leavers

its 200mm at an impact angle of 55°. Tiger 2 has 237mm pen at 0° and about 70mm at 60° ... tiger isnt going through that... same with the T34.. it cant go through

This guy: “fine, I’ll do it myself”

WT started with only planes; tanks were added later. I agree with planes being removed from tank BR