Тёмный

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: Proof/Explanation! 

Faculty of Khan
Подписаться 91 тыс.
Просмотров 37 тыс.
50% 1

In this video, I derive and discuss the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, perhaps one of the most famous relationships in Quantum Mechanics. I start by using the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (derived here: • The Generalized Uncert... ) to determine the commutator of the position and momentum operators whose expressions I found in the previous video (link: • Position and Momentum ... ).
Once I derive the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, I devote much of the video to explaining what it means - *that it's a statement on the fundamental nature of quantum mechanical particles which arises from certain mathematical principles (e.g. Fourier Transforms) describing those particles*. In the video, I state that the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 'is a consequence of mathematics', but keep in mind that this mathematics is used to model quantum mechanical particles. Thus, in the context of Quantum Mechanics, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a physical fact that can be derived mathematically (that's what I mean when I say 'consequence of mathematics').
Towards the end of the video, I emphasize that the Uncertainty Principle is NOT a statement about observer-induced limitations on measurements; that's the Observer Effect. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is rather difficult to wrap one's head around, at least at first, so I encourage you to ask questions and comment down below!
Prerequisites: All the previous videos in this playlist (Playlist 1: ru-vid.com?list..., and all the videos in this playlist: • Quantum Mechanics: Mat... .
Lecture Notes: drive.google.com/open?id=1S7B...
Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=4354534
Twitter: / facultyofkhan
Special thanks to my Patrons for supporting me at the $5 level or higher:
- Jose Lockhart
- Yuan Gao
- Justin Hill
- Marcin Maciejewski
- Jacob Soares
- Yenyo Pal
- Chi
- Lisa Bouchard
EDIT: The deBroglie formula at 6:40 should have hbar instead of h.

Опубликовано:

 

11 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 39   
@JoshuaAalampour
@JoshuaAalampour 5 лет назад
Your videos are so underrated! Thank you so so so so so so so much!
@ostensiblyquerulous
@ostensiblyquerulous 6 лет назад
Christ dude you’re production value and teaching skills are unmatched. Pretty much every topic you have covered/cover is super useful and helpful. Can’t say thank you enough - you are helping me succeed in my QM class.
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan 6 лет назад
I'm happy to hear that my videos have been useful for you! Thank you for the kind feedback!
@duckymomo7935
@duckymomo7935 6 лет назад
Faculty of Khan are you related to khan academy?
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan 6 лет назад
No
@Ananta9817
@Ananta9817 6 лет назад
Bamboozled. I just checked your about section. Thank you for uploading university level videos. They're all really interesting.
@steveymcginins7761
@steveymcginins7761 6 лет назад
Your videos are simply incredible
@jamesmonteroso824
@jamesmonteroso824 3 года назад
this makes sense a lot thank you so mucccccccccccccccccchhhhh
@joshuakyanaalampour
@joshuakyanaalampour 5 лет назад
Thank you !
@maxunknowngamer2286
@maxunknowngamer2286 Год назад
Nice 👍
@Ihsan_khan00
@Ihsan_khan00 Год назад
Great, thanks
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@freekiddionsmodestmenugta9759
@freekiddionsmodestmenugta9759 4 года назад
how can u say that fourier transform of postion space is momentum space ?
@srishtikdutta8946
@srishtikdutta8946 6 лет назад
Yes it's lit😁
@sanjuansteve
@sanjuansteve 6 лет назад
Since everything from gluons to solar systems are in orbit with something and moving as polarizable axial or helical apparent waves as they travel thru our expanding universe, it seems like the natural first assumption to explain particles behaving like polarizable axial or helical waves would be that they are orbiting undetectable dark matter particles, no? Wouldn't that explain the double slit, uncertainty, etc? Does anyone know of any specific experiments, calculations, theories, etc that have disproved this possibility? Thx
@Fearabbit
@Fearabbit 4 года назад
Just the fact that you CAN measure dark matter by their mass. You would know that there is something there. But we know where all of the mass of particles comes from, there is no dark matter involved. Plus I'm not sure how them orbiting dark matter would explain any wave phenomena.
@simranak960
@simranak960 Год назад
Sir in 8:50, in the momentum space after Fourier transform of position space ,Sigma p supposed to be less and Sigma x supposed to be large isn't it?? If it's so then why the mistake in the video?
@JRabba1995
@JRabba1995 4 года назад
I think there's a mistake where you took the Fourier transnform of a delta function, the result should be a constant in momentum space. Great Channel, I enjoy all your videos.
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan 4 года назад
Thank you for the kind words! The Fourier Transform of a delta function is actually a sinusoidal wave as I mentioned (see: mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransformDeltaFunction.html). The imaginary power on the e denotes the fact that it's sinusoidal (Euler's formula).
@venkat4167
@venkat4167 7 месяцев назад
You are wrong. You need to take magnitude i.e. absolute value of exp(-2pikx0) which is 1 throughout. The momentum however is still spread out.
@jamesmonteroso824
@jamesmonteroso824 3 года назад
FINALLY !
@charansri503
@charansri503 8 месяцев назад
And this is the actual proof!
@atharvas4399
@atharvas4399 6 лет назад
ist the de broglie formula at 6.40 wrong? lambda = h/p , why the 2 pi?
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan 6 лет назад
Yea I meant to write hbar instead of h; thanks for the correction!
@Pudin788
@Pudin788 5 лет назад
thanks a lot
@1060michaelg
@1060michaelg 3 года назад
I would totally get this if it weren't for the math part...
@shubhammandot6547
@shubhammandot6547 4 года назад
Theoretically speaking, if we can find the instantaneous velocity of the particle in a purely "particle wavefunction system" then we should be able to find atleast the instantaneous momentum of the particle with good accuracy, isn't that right?
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan 4 года назад
I believe so, yes!
@shubhammandot6547
@shubhammandot6547 4 года назад
@@FacultyofKhan Then wouldn't that violate the uncertainty principle? I'm just curious to know how accurate this line of reasoning is.
@FacultyofKhan
@FacultyofKhan 4 года назад
@@shubhammandot6547 Why would it? A more certain velocity doesn't translate into a more certain position; it translates into a more certain momentum since momentum and velocity are closely related.
@simranak960
@simranak960 Год назад
But in Quantum mechanics p is not equal to mv but p= h/lamda.
@pekertimulia125
@pekertimulia125 3 года назад
Jadi jika diambil limit mendekati nol bukan adalah salah
@pekertimulia125
@pekertimulia125 3 года назад
Artinya itu resolusi terendah yg bisa dicapai satu terhadap yang lain
@pekertimulia125
@pekertimulia125 3 года назад
Artinya penggunaan derivative dalam persamaan Schrodinger adalah cukup adanya
@pekertimulia125
@pekertimulia125 3 года назад
Ini turun kalau bukan dua Delta x eq. p/m
@pekertimulia125
@pekertimulia125 3 года назад
Secara limit bukan nol /h
@prasenjit7699
@prasenjit7699 Год назад
Too hard
Далее
Despicable Me Fart Blaster
00:51
Просмотров 7 млн
Дарю Самокат Скейтеру !
00:42
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Position and Momentum Operators in Quantum Mechanics
26:05
The Uncertainty Principle and Waves - Sixty Symbols
15:46
What is the Ultraviolet Catastrophe?
40:29
Просмотров 2 млн