The History of Europe: Every Year In Game Style 

Imagine if you counted the "third Rome", Russia aswell

@@FederationMappingExcept literally no one considers Russia as the actual successor to rome. The empire died with the Eastern a Roman Empire, or if we wanna take it further we could count the last rump state which was the Despotate of Epirus which fell in 1479 I believe

Roman lasted the same as ottoman empire

@@FederationMapping "Third Rome" is a self-claimed title. By that same standard you might as well count the Ottoman Empire as just a continuation of Rome, even though it conquered them.

@@Argacyan Yeah. Nobody's the third rome lol. All of them were different states than the actual Roman Empire.

That's world tension in a nutshell. Builds up and then snaps.

I think ever since the digital revolution were in a new classical era, or perhaps ever since WW1, and we're gonna see this pattern for an era

It is also due to small explosions not surviving in the historical records, only large movements.

​@@neckreththat's the opposite of their point. Further in the past = small frequent changes, recently = rare, big changes

That's what happens when you concentrate so much power in one place. Everything is far more interconnected, resilient and safe today, so when someone starts a war, it doesn't just shake the region; the entire world can feel its tremors as the bombs drop and the guns fire. Economies tank, supplies suffer, and reports come flooding in. In this age, war is an oddity for the weapons we have now are so advanced that they shake the foundations of the earth, and our machines make so much that taking land does more harm than good. That was why war was common back then; The bloodshed was in small amounts and had a regional effect, and taking land was guaranteed to make your kingdom stronger. Today, every conflict results in so many deaths that they are tenfold that of the battles we had in ages past. Back in time, we were but men. But now? Now, we may as well be living Gods. Forget hitting someone with lightning or a flood when we can eviscerate an entire city with the power of a thousand suns. Forget about all the power God had in the Bible, for we could destroy heavens entire army with the press of a button. If God were real, he would be held captive by us today, and we would have the devil's head on a pike for the amusement of the powerful

I see the sad face

Every man cried

*Istanbul*

Yeah... @ 8:47. :'(

not for long, soon it will be Constantinople again, crusaiders are raising. Ther is no place for followers of false prophets in Europe @@Sigma_Male_Anti_Female

8:07 Mistake , Novgorod was never part of the "Golden Horde"

@@fyurerysyeah this video is very very innacurate, but it gets the basics

@@henrycrystal9740details matter

Well, imagine moustache man

tysm!

​@@AGLMapping What are you using to make the video may I ask

i think it maybe something like mapchart or just photoshop@@East_.-Sussex_Mapping

@@East_.-Sussex_MappingI think he’s using MapChart

@@East_.-Sussex_Mapping Mapchart probably

Rome still exists)

@@user-xx4qo3ru5t kind of

@@user-xx4qo3ru5t ok nerd

@@user-xx4qo3ru5tRoman Empire not the city: edit I changed Roman’s to Roman Empire so no confusion happens.

@@user-xx4qo3ru5tlike Roman republic and Roman Empire

No way you're the first person to notice the face

Saw it too

Me too

I saw it too. Later history of the Roman Empire is a pet love of mine.

The English kings during that time were French, its the Plantagenets they came from Anjou wich is why historians are calling their holdings as "the Angevin empire". They are also the reason why the English language is composed of roughly 60% French/Latin vocabulary. So yeah there is almost nothing british about them, the "British/Anglo-Saxon" kings were beaten by William the Conqueror a Norman/French duc who conquered England you can see that on the map in 1066. Your kings starting to embrace the English language was with the Tudors a Welsh dynasty that came to power in the 16th century, And like i said its not the same English culture that you've had before William's conquest.

@@ForeskinWillisyea, what forskin said ☝🏽

@@ForeskinWillis the english language is only 30% french lol

@@LockOn7016 No it is 28% French and 28% Latin. So im right.

@@LockOn7016 A computerized survey of about 80,000 words in the third edition of the Shorter Oxford Dictionary, published by Finkenstaedt and Wolff in 1973 estimated the origin of English words to be as follows: French: 28.30%; Latin, including modern scientific and technical Latin: 28.24%; Germanic languages, as inherited from Old English, from Proto-Germanic, or a more recent borrowing from a Germanic language such as Old Norse, excluding Germanic words borrowed from a Romance language: 25%; Greek: 5.32%; no etymology given: 4.04%; derived from proper names: 3.28%; and all other languages: less than 1%.

Никаких независимых княжеств на той территории уже не было после монгольского нашествия. Они были разделены между ВКЛ, Московским царством и осколками золотой орды. А после между Речью Посполитой, Российской и Османской империями

@@user-wc6qi6yy6c Московское государство начало свое освобождение во времена золотой орды Княжества южнее и севернее Москвы благодаря ей же стали независимыми - например Тверь. Да и Москва потом захватила все русские княжества. Раньше, чем это отмечено на карте

Plenty of small errors and/or (over)simplifications made here. Most recent events in Yugoslavia and the ensuring conflicts happened ~10years earlier than they do in this map-animation. I think its to be expected given the scale and complexity that is being attempted here.

And even moreover, the Mongol troops did not even reach Moscow, let alone to the north. There was no need to paint everything in the colors of Mongolia, and the Golden Horde was later and much smaller.

expected you to be here lol

Where do you guys get the map

Days*

thanks!

Welcome back!

ضش

@@brahimhaddad-om4dsyour mom just in case

Oh alr

Still very good job

Exactly as every other country in Europe... it didn´t exist France but Frank Reich or Francorum Rex (King of the Franks).

Catalufo intentando creer que España la fundó Felipe V o Franco. Catalonia si que nunca existió

History is all opinion and interpretation though. Obviously there are better and worse interpretations, but if there was always a correct answer on history historians would all be out of a job!

Even insane is an understatement, this is Egyptian amount of work! I wonder how much did it take to review for errors

Mate how tf is there gonna be a part II

@@ozzyman1464 wdym??

@@ozzyman1464 Asia and the middle east!

san marino

Hellas

@@BobInGreek i think they mean in English because I can think of like 6 countries that use older endonyms then Bulgaria in euros

The problem here is that Novgorod de facto depended from Vladimir and after Moskowz which depended from the Horde

Any reason why one is more correct than the other? In my history textbooks we always called it Byzantium.

@@EGeorgev It's a historical term. They just didn't call their nation "Byzantium Empire".

The borders of the world were most likely as fluid as today its just lack of good records

It’s not a game, they drew it all

i drew it in an app called flipaclip

@@AGLMapping oh ok thanks