The History of Mongolia: Every Year (-215~2023) 

Correction/오류사항: 1. Laoshang chanyu ruled Xiongnu from 174-161 BCE 라오상* 선우는 흉노를 기원전 174~61년까지 다스렸습니다. 2. Kalmyk Khanate borders are incorrect 칼미크 칸국의 국경이 명확치 않습니다. 3. 일리그 카간 -> 일테리시 카간

Very ambitious and hard work. Well done!

Thnx anwooo for making this video downloable on my device!!!

In the last part, it is possible to show not only Inner Mongolia but also Buryatia

You're so hardworking🎉

Finally!! Really a qualified work 19 min video... Thank you for your dedication

Oh, now I know this will be incredible. Thank youuuuuuuuuuuu!

8:04 that Turkic leader smile

수고하셨습니다

very well done..now I will have to rewatch it multiple times to read the side notes

This a great video

The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.

영상 잘 봤습니다. 이런 멋진 영상은 어던 프로그램 이용해서 제작하는건가요?

요나라의 실질적 영토가 작았나요? 연한 색은 간접지배인가요?

Anwoo you created a eye opening video on the history of qatar. Can you please make a video on yemen/ethiopia/ Eritrea region pretty please!

Shimunek, Andrew. "Early Serbi-Mongolic-Tungusic lexical contact: Jurchen numerals from the 室韦 Shirwi (Shih-wei) in North China". Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, Edited by Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky et al. (Leiden: Brill). Retrieved 22 September 2019. quote: "Asdemonstrated by Ratchnevsky (1966: 231), the Shirwi confederation was a multiethnic, multilingual confederation of Tungusic-speaking Mo-ho 靺鞨 people (i.e. ancestors of the Jurchen), the Meng-wa 蒙瓦 ~ Meng-wu 蒙兀, whom Pelliot (1928) and others have shown were Proto-Mongolic speakers, and other groups. The dominant group among the Shirwi undoubtedly were ethnolinguistic descendants of the Serbi (鮮卑 Hsien-pei), and spoke a language closely related to Kitan and more distantly related to Mongolic."

14:26 티무르 제국 간접지배영역까지 포함하니까 교과서에서 봤던 것보다 2배 이상 크네요 ㄷㄷ

14:30 finally someone show's Timur's Peak Empire at it's true thiccness

👍👍👍👍

Brilliant video but I have to point out mistakes, you forgot to make Kazakhstan no longer a socialist republic and let Uzbekistan gain some land after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, but overall, I like the video :D

You can help me make video of Казанкое хатсново

Well done

Pannonian Avars weren't Mongols but Turks. The Buyla inscription which is the only attested epigraph in their native language was also identified as Oghuric making their Turkic origin a reality in the academic world

4:46 what makes you think the rouran had anything to do with the Huns?

Kazakh khanate was 3,5 million km

와 첫 몽골 배경음악 진짜 최애 노래 중 하나인데 혹시 진짜 이름좀 알려주실 수 있을까요? 외국 원본 영상에선 걍 몽골 히스토리 송이라고 밖이 안나와서..

❤

혹시 역사학자신가요 ? 전체적인 세계사 흐름을 다 아시는것 같네요 ...

Title should be History of Eurasian Nomads 😅

Still waiting for sikh misls, you can find sources regarding them in kushwant singh history of sikhs and hari ram gupta history of sikhs

알탄칸은 어딨죠?

16:09 카자흐칸국 그외

A good history of map development ! but there are still some mistakes. The Mongolian system is more similar to the European feudal dynasty system. Each khanate has a high degree of autonomy, and the same is true for the enfeoffment khanates within their khanate; and, the fact In fact, the Mongolian Empire was united for a period of time after the death of Kublai Qa'an. Strictly speaking, it was not until the disintegration of the Il-khanate in 1335 that the Mongolian Khanates began to gradually abandon the unity of the empire: 13:30-13:48 (1303-1334) Let me start with the place where the autonomy is strong: In reality, within the Mongol empire there existed a number of regional powers at various levels. It is in fact difficult to clearly distinguish which of these powers was a ‘state’ or a ‘regime.’ They formed one system in its entirety. Traditionally, the Mongol empire has been regarded to have ‘dissolved’ into ‘four khanates,’including Dai Yuan Ulus, under the great qa’an. However, in fact, all we can say is, at best,that it was divided into four loose groups. If someone claims that it was ‘dissolved,’one should also count orda Ulus, Ariq Böke Ulus and otchigin Ulus among them. The idea of the ‘division into the four khanates’ seems to be a reflection of a [preconceived] image. 【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.20】 Unity of the empire: Kaidu’s sons and a number of other princes of the houses of Ugedey and Jagatay agreed to recognize Timur’s suzerainty and to settle all future interprincely conflicts by negotia-tion instead of war (1303). This important agreement was supple-mented by making the il-khan of Persia a party to it. Upon the death of the Il-Khan Gazan in 1304 Timur dispatched a grand embassy to Persia to install Gazan’s brother Oljaitu as the new il-khan and to inform him of the pacification of Central Asia. The khan of the Golden Horde, Tokhta, also supported the new agreement. Charac-teristically enough, he in his turn summoned his vassals, the Russian princes, to an assembly in Pereiaslavl, Suzdalia, where his envoy announced the decisions taken by.the leading Mongol rulers.The success of Timur's policy was indeed impressive and the Mongol Empire may be said to have reached the apogee of its power during his reign. All this amounted to a restoration of the unity of the empire in the new form of a pan-Mongol federation presided over by the great khan in Peking. 【Vernadsky, George (1953). The Mongols and Russia, p.82.】 In the Jaghatu valley according to Vaşşâf,that he received the ambassadors of the Great Khan Temür,the grandson and successor (1294-1307) of Qubilai, accompanied by those of Chabar, the son of Qaidu, and Du'a, the son of Baraq: the object of this composite mission was to apprise the Il-Khan of a pact that had put an end to the longstanding quarrels between these branches of the House of Chingiz-Khân. From Marâgheh, where he installed Aşil al-Din, the son of Naşir al-Din Tusi, in the observatory founded by his father, Öljeitü made his way to winter-quarters in Müghân, halting en route at Tabriz to pay a second visit to the Gunbad-i'Âli.In Müghân, on 9 December,he received the ambassadors of Toqta, the ruler of the Golden Horde, who presumably made some allusion to the reconciliation of the princes of Central and Eastern Asia,of which Toqta also had been informed. T o this development, ap­ parently betokening the restoration of the Mongol world empire as it had existed under Mongke, Oljeitu refers in a letter addressed to Philippe le Bel, which has been preserved in the French national archives. He begins this letter, written at Ativan (Barzand) in Mughan on 5 April 1305, by affirming this desire to maintain the traditional ties of friendship between the Il-Khans and the "sultans of the Frankish people". He then proceeds: " . . . We , Temur Qa'an, Toqta, Chabar,Du'a and others, the descendants of Chingiz-Khan, after recriminating one another for forty-five years down to these recent times, have now,protected by Heaven, all of us, elder and younger brothers, reached a mutual agreement, and from the land of the Chinese, where the sun rises, to the sea of Talu [the Caspian, or perhaps the Mediterranean],our states joining with one another [i.e. re-establishing communi­ cations],we have caused our post stations to be linked together." 【J.A.Boyle (1968). The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 5: The Saljuq and Mongol Periods, p.399】 The collapse of the unity of the empire: A holistic approach is necessary for several reasons. first of all, the Mongols themselves did not give up the notion of imperial unity until the 1330s and 1340s when regional uluses began to crumble down. for example,up to that time in the entire Mongol world there was only one qa’an or qaghan, and other rulers used the title of khan or qan. They were all well aware that one was the title of supreme sovereignty over the empire and the other was of a subordinate ruler under his authority.This practice was basically unchallenged till 1364, when the empire ended with the collapse of Mongol power in China.so it was not just a symbolic gesture but an institution that continued to exist for more than one and a half century. It was a reflection of the Mongol world order. 【Hodong Kim(2009).The Unity of the Mongol Empire and Continental Exchanges over Eurasia,pp.19】 😄😄🥰

xiongnu是蒙古人的祖先？不应该是donghu吗？

Sanki Moğol değilde Türk Tarihi'ni izledim....

Taimur empier 🔥🔥💪💪

언젠간 내몽골도 또한 '진정한' 몽골인들이 지배하기를 바랍니다.

한몽 통일이 해답!!!~ㅅ.ㅅ~

Xiongnu, Göktürks, Avars, Uyghurs, Kyrgyz Khaganate, Timurids and Gurkanid("Mughal") Empire out. Not Mongol. Nice video without that.

Xıongnu Confederation was Turkic, not Mongol

The history of Mongolia was shaped by the Turks 🇲🇳

Xiongu not mongol

Xiougnu were Turks, not Mongols.