"The Intimate Connection Between Cancer, Aging, Protein, and TOR" Ron Rosedale, MD 

Brilliant comment, Jay! Especially regarding the danger of accurate information on how people can eat to support and improve their health being detrimental to Big Pharma. And also the processed food industry. Isn't the Medical Industry the largest currently in the USA? A few decades ago, investors were informed that the number of people in the USA with Type 2 diabetes was rising rapidly, providing a rosy future for those who put their investment money into the insulin production facilities, for instance. After all, since Type 2 diabetes is considered to be 'incurable and progressive' (and diabetics are told to consume non-fiber carbohydrates) but they live for years and years taking insulin daily... this increase in incidence of the disease was seen as a jackpot! Just to give one example... It seems that we are all being 'pharmed' for profit.

Apparently magnesium is 40% depleted from soil compared to 1950s

I also thought that the "cancer loves ketones" argument around minute 38 was suspicious . It contradicts the Warberg hypothesis of Glucose & Glutamine being preferred foods.

Ditto for fat levels. Unprocessed milk, on average, is also much higher than the 3.25% butterfat content of so-called 'whole' milk in supermarkets. Even the American industrial Holstein cow averages a higher butterfat (cream) content in their milk than that! Heritage breed cows, managed traditionally on pasture and stored forages, like hay, alone will often produce milk from nearly 5% to as much as 8% butterfat milk. Those who have never had unprocessed milk (aka 'raw') from these traditional breeds (Jersey is one of our favorites) on a pasture-based or 100% 'grassfed' diet - creamy and light golden in color - they are in for a treat!

Human breast milk percentage by weight: 3.8% fat; 1% protein; 7% lactose This is not about dilutions, clearly by design, calorie wise, human breast milk is mostly fat and very low in protein.

The type of research Ron primarily references in this presentation is about the specific biochemical pathways that protein affects. This is very different from association studies, or clinical trials, which are often most reliable when subjected to meta-analyses. Keep in mind that the opinion he had already formed was based on knowledge and science, and not just plucked out of thin air, or personal bias - like Ancel Keys.

Actually that is not the main point, the main point is to be fat adapted; means you can burn more fat than glucose. Burning more fat than glucose had been shown again and again to improve longevity and health. To adapt fat burning, there are three knowns ways 1)fasting 2)eat more fibrous foods such as leafy green vegetables 3)get your calories more from fat than carbohydrates or proteins. DONE!!

Good point! In the case of humans, we are well into de-volution. Average human brain size is measurably smaller after humans began growing grains and legumes (beans, lentils, etc) than it was before - or in cultures that were still getting most of their food from animals, herding cultures as well as hunter-gatherers. Research published in 2008 in Neurology showed that, while aging human brains shrink slightly (and this is on the SAD diet!), vegan brains shrank an average of more than 5% over the 5 year study.

since life started, truth hurts (:. human mind tend to avoid harsh truth but hey you can live your own simulated artificial life but nature doesn't care) life operated this way for billions of years, again truth hurts.

@@realimagevanity2289 And it all came out of random chance right?🤣🤣🤣

@@TOMMYSURIA what is random chance? nature doesn't know order or chance. your brain just trying to make pattern and make sense of its existence.

@@realimagevanity2289 and you figured out all that in a chaotic mind?🤔 interesting.

Evolution is science - there are enormous evidence for evolution. Why would you say it is "belief system" ? It is as real as your legs.

It seems you don't even believe that you have eyes and fingers, otherwise you would not need to use banal language and could have clicked the link I gave you above and maybe, just maybe have learned something!

Learned what? A lot of religious nonsense? Have you ever read "selfish gene" for example? You know, things that people gave a lot of attention to. I just can't believe you Americans, there are almost no such thing in Europe as belief in creationism. You are really stuck in evolution of reason!

Robis9267 I am not an American nor is the link I gave an American Link, so here is an example of something you believed that is totally wrong, because you incorrectly assumed something! Europe does have many people who DO NOT believe in evolution and are staunchly Christian and believe in creation. Just because Richard Dawkins is from the UK, does not mean that all of Europe follows his improbable or biased ideas. Here is a critique on the book you mention plus his other books written by Jonathan D. Sarfati, Ph.D, F.M., who was born in Ararat, Australia, in 1964. He moved to New Zealand as a child, where he later studied mathematics, geology, physics, and chemistry at Victoria University in Wellington. He obtained honors level in physical and inorganic chemistry, as well as in condensed matter physics and nuclear physics. - creation.com/the-greatest-hoax-on-earth/introduction.php

Argumentum ad verecundiam. Such a great guy, did this and that. Studied this and that (not doing good job in any of those, obviously). Great job, i'm convinced already. There is no such thing as BELIEF in evolution, it is fact, as climate change, and there is just acceptance of facts, or ignorance. Funny thing how republican leaning people choose to ignore reality in both of these occasions. Dawkins is jus most vocal, in fact, if you want to be not taken seriously, talk with any scientist about creation. 99% of scientists do not question evolution, as they do not question e=mc2.